USPatent applicationPatented

System and method for an interspinous process implant as a supplement to a spine stabilization implant

Granted 28 Apr 2009 · 4 office actions

Assignee: KYPHON SARL

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Steve Mitchell, Charles J. Winslow · Examiner: Eduardo C Robert · AU 3733 · TC 3700

Life of the application

24 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An implant is used to distract and maintain the distraction of spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae of the spine. The implant can be secured to a spine stabilization system. The combination of the spine stabilization system with spine distraction provides an improved therapeutic benefit to the patient receiving such an implant.

Description

9 parts
›PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/565,971, entitled, “System and Method for an Interspinous Process Implant as a Supplement to a Spine Stabilization Implant,” by Mitchell, S. et al., filed Apr. 28, 2004.

›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/230,505, entitled, “Deflectable Spacer for Use as an Interspinous Process Implant and Method,” by Zucherman et al., filed Aug. 29, 2002.

This application is further related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/037,236, entitled, “Inter-spinous Process Implant and Method with Deformable Spacer,” by Zucherman et al., filed Nov. 9, 2001.

This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/694,103, entitled, “Interspinous Process Implant with Radiolucent Spacer and Lead-In Tissue Expander,” by Zucherman et al., filed Oct. 27, 2003.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to an interspinous process implant to supplement a spine stabilization implant or other spine implant, and method for implantation.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The spinal column is a biomechanical structure composed primarily of ligaments, muscles, vertebrae and intervertebral disks. The biomechanical functions of the spine include: (1) support of the body, which involves the transfer of the weight and the bending movements of the head, trunk and arms to the pelvis and legs; (2) complex physiological motion between these parts; and (3) protection of the spinal cord and nerve roots.

As the present society ages, it is anticipated that there will be an increase in adverse spinal conditions which are characteristic of older people. By way of example, with aging comes an increase in spinal stenosis (including, but not limited to, central canal and lateral stenosis), and facet arthropathy. Spinal stenosis typically results from the thickening of the bones that make up the spinal column and is characterized by a reduction in the available space for the passage of blood vessels and nerves.

Pain associated with such stenosis and other ailments can be relieved by medication and/or surgery. It is desirable to eliminate the need for major surgery for all individuals, and in particular, for the elderly.

Accordingly, a need exists to develop spine implants that alleviate pain caused by spinal stenosis and other such conditions caused by damage to, or degeneration of, the spine. Such implants would distract, or increase the space between, the vertebrae to increase the foraminal area and reduce pressure on the nerves and blood vessels of the spine.

Further, a need exists for an implant that accommodates the distinct anatomical structures of the spine, minimizes further trauma to the spine, and obviates the need for invasive methods of surgical implantation. Additionally, a need exists to address adverse spinal conditions that are exacerbated by spinal extension.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a posterior view of the distraction body, tethers, and spinal stabilization system of a disclosed embodiment of the invention, depicted as implanted in the spine.

FIG. 2 is a side view of an embodiment of the distraction body of the disclosed invention, without tethers for an embodiment of the spine stabilization system of the disclosed implant of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the embodiment of the distraction body of the implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 .

FIG. 4 is an exploded side view of the embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 1-3 , with tethers.

FIG. 5 is an exploded perspective view of the embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 1-4 , with tethers.

FIG. 6 is a further exploded side view of the embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 1-5 , with tethers.

FIG. 7 is an end view of an embodiment of a wing of the distraction body of the implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 1-6 , with a tether threaded through and anchored to the wing.

FIG. 8 is a side view of an alternative embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention.

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIG. 8 .

FIG. 10 is an end view of a wing of the embodiment of the distraction body of an implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 8 and 9 , with a first end of a first tether anchored to the wing and a second end of a second tether threaded through the wing.

FIG. 11 is a posterior view of the embodiment of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 8-10 , depicted here as implanted between spinous processes of adjacent affected vertebrae.

FIG. 12 is a side view of a further embodiment of the distraction body of the implant of the disclosed invention.

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of the embodiment of the implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIG. 12 .

FIG. 14 is a posterior view of the embodiment of the implant of the disclosed invention depicted in FIGS. 12-13 , depicted here as implanted between the spinous processes of adjacent affected vertebrae.

FIG. 15 is a posterior view of an embodiment of the spine stabilization system of the implant of the disclosed invention, without tethers.

FIG. 16 is a side view of the embodiment of the spine stabilization system of the implant of the disclosed invention, depicted in FIG. 15 .

FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the embodiment of the spine stabilization system of the implant of the disclosed invention, depicted in FIGS. 15-16 .

FIG. 18 is a perspective view of an embodiment of part of an insertion tool for implanting an embodiment of the implant of the disclosed invention.

FIG. 19 is a perspective view of an embodiment of an additional part of an insertion tool for implanting an embodiment of an implant of the disclosed invention, in combination with the part depicted in FIG. 18 .

FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a further part of an embodiment of an insertion tool for implanting an embodiment of an implant of the disclosed invention.

FIG. 21 is a perspective view of an additional part of an insertion tool for implanting an embodiment of an implant of the disclosed invention, in combination with the part depicted in FIG. 20 .

FIG. 22 is a perspective view of a fully-assembled insertion tool for implanting an embodiment of an implant of the disclosed invention.

FIG. 23 is a flow chart depicting an embodiment of the method of the invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 4

Embodiments of the present invention relate to an interspinous process implant that, together with a spine stabilization system, further stabilizes the spine while distracting or maintaining the distraction of the spinous processes of two affected adjacent vertebrae. Generally speaking, the implant is used to limit extension in order to reduce or eliminate pain in the spine that is due to extension. Preferably the implant is flexible so as to cushion the load when the spinous processes come in contact with the implant. The implant can be appropriately sized to maintain a desired amount of distraction. The implant does not limit flexion.

More specifically, the embodiments of the present invention concern a distraction body that is inserted between adjacent spinous processes. The distraction body is adapted to anchor a first end of a first tether and a first end of a second tether. The second ends of each of these tethers are then secured to a spine stabilization system. The spine stabilization system comprises two components, a first component on the left lateral side of the spinous processes and a second component on the right lateral side of the spinous processes. The tethers can be artificial ligaments, and the spine stabilization system can incorporate pedicle screws to secure hardware and secondary screws or other anchors that secure the rods to the pedicles of the lumbar spine. Alternatively, other compatible bone anchors can be used.

FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the disclosed implant 100 of the invention, as implanted in the spine to distract the spinous processes of two adjacent vertebrae and to stabilize the affected spine. The implant 100 comprises a distraction body 105 , which is implanted between the spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae. The distraction body 105 is comprised of a spacer 110 which fits between spinous processes 80 , 90 , and which includes a first open end 115 and a second open end 120 , a first wing 125 which fits into the first open end 115 and a second wing 130 which fits into the second open end 120 .

As can be seen in the figures and understood, the spacer 110 preferably is elliptical or oval in shape to better conform to the anatomy of the spine between spinous processes. Alternately, the spacer 110 can be round or have other cylindrical shapes. Preferably the spacer 110 has some flexibility in order to cushion the load with the spinous process come into contact with the spacer 110 .

Implant 100 can be made of a number of materials including, by way of example only, medical implantable stainless steel or titanium. The implant may also be made of polymers. In this embodiment, the spacer is made out of a polymer which is a thermoplastic. One such polymer is a polyketone known as polyetheretherketone (PEEK™). More specifically, the material can be PEEK 450G, which is an unfilled PEEK approved for medical implantation available from Victrex of Lancashire, Great Britain. (Victrex is located at www.matweb.com, or see Boedeker at www.boedeker.com). Other sources of this material include Gharda located in Panoli, India (www.ghardapolymers.com). The spacer 110 can be formed by extrusion, injection, compression molding and/or machining techniques. This material has appropriate physical and mechanical properties and is suitable for carrying and spreading the physical load between the spinous process. For example in this embodiment the PEEK has the following approximate properties:

It should be noted that the material selected also can be filled. For example, other grades of PEEK are also available and contemplated, such as 30% glass-filled or 30% carbon-filled, provided such materials are cleared for use in implantable devices by the FDA, or other regulatory body. Glass-filled PEEK reduces the expansion rate and increases the flexural modulus of PEEK relative to that which is unfilled. The resulting product is known to be ideal for improved strength, stiffness, or stability. Carbon-filled PEEK is known to enhance the compressive strength and stiffness of PEEK and lower its expansion rate. Carbon-filled PEEK offers wear resistance and load carrying capability.

In this embodiment, the spacer 110 is manufactured from polyetheretherketone (PEEK™), available from Victrex. As will be appreciated, other suitable similarly biocompatible thermoplastic or thermoplastic polycondensate materials that resist fatigue, have good memory, are flexible, and/or deflectable have very low moisture absorption, and good wear and/or abrasion resistance, can be used without departing from the scope of the invention. The spacer also can be comprised of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK).

Other material that can be used include polyetherketone (PEK), polyetherketoneetherketoneketone (PEKEKK), and polyetheretherketoneketone (PEEKK), and generally a polyaryletheretherketone. Other polyketones can be used, as well as other thermoplastics. The spacer also can be made of titanium.

Reference to appropriate polymers that can be used in the spacer can be made to the following documents, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. These documents include: U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 10/230,505; 10/037,236; and 10/694,103, which are incorporated herein by reference. The following cross-referenced applications are also incorporated by reference: PCT Publication WO 02/02158 A1, dated Jan. 10, 2002 and entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials; PCT Publication WO 02/00275 A1, dated Jan. 3, 2002 and entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials; and PCT Publication WO 02/00270 A1, dated Jan. 3, 2002 and entitled Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials.

Other materials such as Bionate®, polycarbonate urethane, available from the Polymer Technology Group, Berkeley, Calif., may also be appropriate because of the good oxidative stability, biocompatibility, mechanical strength and abrasion resistance. Other thermoplastic materials and other high molecular weight polymers can be used.

The threading of a first tether 140 and a second tether 165 is viewed in detail in FIGS. 1-7 . As depicted in FIGS. 2-7 , each wing can have two bores. An outer bore on each wing is used to anchor a first end of each tether. An inner bore on each wing, which passes through the segment of the wing that fits inside the spacer 110 , accommodates the unanchored second ends of two different tethers that pass each other through the spacer 110 in opposite directions.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 4

Thus, the first wing 125 has a first outer bore 135 that is situated outside of the first open end 115 of the spacer 110 . The first outerbore 135 anchors the first tether 140 . That is, a first end 145 of the first tether 140 is secured to the first outer bore 135 . A second end 150 of the first tether 140 is then passed through a first inner bore 155 of the first wing 125 , first wing 125 which fits inside the first open end 115 of the spacer 110 . The first tether 140 continues to be threaded through the spacer 110 , through a second inner bore 176 of second wing 130 , which second wing 130 fits inside the second open end 120 of the spacer 110 , and to an exterior of the distraction body 105 on the opposite (i.e., right lateral) side from where the first tether 140 is anchored (i.e., left lateral).

Similarly, the second wing 130 has a second outer bore 160 located outside the second open end 120 of the spacer 110 . A first end 170 of the second tether 165 is anchored to the second outer bore 160 . A second end 175 of the second tether 165 is then passed through the second inner bore 176 of the second wing 130 , which second wing 130 fits inside the second open end 120 of the spacer 110 . The second tether 165 then passes through the spacer 110 , and to the exterior of the distraction body 105 through the first inner bore 155 of the first wing 125 .

With the tethers threaded and anchored as described, the second ends 150 , 175 of the first and second tethers 140 , 165 respectively, pass each other in opposite directions when threaded through the first inner bore 115 , the spacer 110 , and the second inner bore 176 , while the first ends 145 , 170 of the first and second tethers 140 , 165 respectively, are anchored to the outer bores 135 , 160 .

The tethers 140 , 165 , can include artificial ligaments made from polyethylene tetraphthalate fibers or other appropriate biocompatible, flexible fibers. The tethers ensure that the distraction body 105 is not displaced from between the spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae.

As shown in FIGS. 1-7 , the first and second wings 125 , 130 depicted have first and second outer bores 135 , 160 . The outer bores 135 , 160 in this embodiment are substantially parallel to an elongated axis A-A of the spacer 110 . It is further within the scope of this disclosure of the invention to configure the first and second outer bores 135 , 160 bent to create an “L”-shape, i.e., they can be bent at an angle with respect to the elongated axis A-A. For example, the first and second outer bores 135 , 160 can be bent at an angle so that the axis of each outer bores 135 , 160 is substantially perpendicular to the elongated axis A-A of the spacer 110 , in this particular embodiment ( FIGS. 8-11 ).

As mentioned above, the second ends 150 , 175 of the first and second tethers 140 , 165 respectively anchor the tethers to a spine stabilization system as described below. The first and second tethers 140 , 165 can be secured to the spine stabilization system with a cuff or clip 178 made from a biocompatible material that is capable of grasping the tether material and preventing it from slipping. Alternatively, the tethers 140 , 165 can be sewn, pierced, pinned, or tied to secure the tethers under tension to the spine stabilization system. The configuration of the distraction body 105 tethered to the spine stabilization system prevents displacement of the distraction body 105 from position between adjacent spinous processes. The combination of the spine stabilization system with spine distraction provides an improved therapeutic benefit to the patient receiving such implant.

As can be seen in FIG. 1 , and as further depicted in FIGS. 16-18 , the spine stabilization system can be a system incorporating appropriate bone anchors to anchor stabilization implants to the left lateral and right lateral sides of the spine. By way of example only, the implant can secure a rod on both the left lateral and right lateral sides of the spine. These elements, and in particular, the left lateral and right lateral rods, can serve as a scaffold system for securing the tethers emerging from the distraction body 105 .

Pedicle screws 182 , 183 can be used as bone anchors to anchor hubs 179 which will secure the rods 180 , 181 with which the first tether 140 and second tether 165 respectively can connect to anchor the distraction body 105 . Two pedicle screws 182 , 183 anchor the hubs 179 , for example, to the left lateral pedicles of two adjacent vertebrae. An upper left lateral pedicle receives an upper left pedicle screw 182 , and a lower left lateral pedicle receives a lower left pedicle screw 183 .

Two pedicle screws also anchor the other hubs 179 to the right lateral pedicles of the same two adjacent vertebrae. An upper right lateral pedicle receives an upper right pedicle screw and a lower right lateral pedicle receives a lower right pedicle screw.

The hubs 179 secured by the pedicle screws can secure a rod on each lateral side of the sagittal plane of the spine, with each rod oriented, for example, substantially parallel to the sagittal plane of the spine. The first rod 180 can pass through bores 192 through the hubs 179 .

Each of the hubs 179 can receive a secondary screw 195 . The secondary screw secures the rod 180 and prevents displacement. Alternatively, the hubs 179 can receive a snapping member to secure the rod or other cap or mechanism that serves to secure the rod 180 or other cap or mechanism serves to secure the rod 180

Once in place, the left or first rod 180 and the right or second rod 181 can be used to anchor the first and second tethers, as disclosed above or in equivalent fashion. Again, other stabilization systems known in the art can be used to anchor the tethers of the implant 100 . It is also to be understood that other anchor mechanisms can be used that are not stabilization systems. For example, bone screws can be used to anchor the tethers of the implant 100 to appropriate structures of the spine.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 4

In an alternative embodiment, depicted in FIGS. 12-15 , the distraction body 205 of the implant 200 has a first wing 225 that is secured to or integral with the spacer 210 , and a second wing 230 that is secured to or integral with spacer 210 .

Moreover, in this embodiment, each wing 225 , 230 of the implant 200 has only a bore. That is, the first wing 225 has a first bore 235 , and the second wing 230 has a second bore 260 . As it will be appreciated, in this embodiment, the first tether 240 and the second tether 265 do not pass through the spacer 210 in opposite directions, as in the other embodiments described. In contrast, the first tether 240 is anchored at a first end 245 to the first bore 235 of the first wing 225 . The second end 250 of the first tether 240 is secured to the spine stabilization system on the same side on which the first end 245 is anchored to the first bore 235 .

In similar fashion, the first end 270 of the second tether 265 is anchored to the second bore 260 of the second wing 230 . The second end 275 is secured to the spine stabilization system on the same side on which the first end 270 is anchored to the second bore 260 .

As set forth above, the second ends 250 , 275 of the first and second tethers 240 , 265 respectively, anchor the tethers to the spine stabilization system. The second ends 250 , 275 can be wrapped around the rods 280 , 281 of the spine stabilization system. The first and second tethers 240 , 265 can be secured to the spine stabilization system with a cuff 278 made from a biocompatible material that is capable of grasping the tether material and preventing it from slipping. Alternatively, the tethers 240 , 265 can be sewn, pierced, pinned, or tied, to secure the tethers to the spine stabilization system. The configuration of the distraction body 205 tethered to the spine stabilization system prevents displacement of the distraction body 205 from the position between the adjacent spinous processes. The combination of the spine stabilization system with spine distraction provides an improved therapeutic benefit to the patient receiving such implant.

The disclosed invention further includes a method 400 for implanting the interspinous implant with stabilization system. The steps for implanting implant 100 will be described, but one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that implant 200 also can be implanted in a similar manner.

The spinous processes are preferably accessed from the sides, in order not to alter and to leave the spinal ligaments in place, including but not limited to the superspinous ligament. The spine is prepared (Steps 400 , 410 ) for implantation by making an incision and accessing the affected vertebrae. Pedicle screws, step 420 , or other appropriate bone anchors are installed, for example, in the pedicles of an upper and a lower affected vertebra, to anchor the hubs 179 needed for sustaining the left/first rod 180 and the right/second rod 181 . Secondary screws 195 are applied to secure the rods 180 , 181 in position.

The distraction body 105 then is inserted laterally, step 430 , and positioned, step 440 , between the spinous processes of the two adjacent affected vertebrae. The first tether 140 and the second tether 165 can then be configured to anchor the distraction body to the spine stabilization system, step 450 . The distraction body 105 of the implant 100 can already have the first tether 140 and the second tether 165 prepared to anchor the distraction body 105 to the left/first rod 180 and the right/second rod 181 , as disclosed above. The implant 100 can have the second end 175 of the second tether 165 exiting from the first inner bore 155 , ready to anchor to the left/first rod 180 , and the second end 150 of the first tether 140 exiting from the second inner bore 176 , ready to anchor to the right/second rod 181 .

Implant 200 , in contrast, will have the first tether 240 secured to the left/first rod 280 , and the second tether 265 secured to the right/second rod 281 (step 450 ).

An alternative implantation method can use the implantation tool depicted in FIGS. 18-22 . The implantation tool 500 can be used to assemble the implant 100 as it is being implanted. The implantation tool 500 can comprise a holding rod 505 that can have a mating end 510 that mates with a part of a tissue expander 506 of the implant and that holds the spacer 110 while it is being positioned between adjacent spinous processes. The mating end 510 can be in the shape of a fork with two prongs, by way of example.

The holding rod 505 can be housed inside a housing unit 520 which is slidable on the holding rod 505 in order to capture the tissue expander 506 . The housing unit 520 allows the mating end 510 of the holding rod 505 to retain the tissue expander 506 when a groove 508 in the shaft 507 of the tissue expander 506 is received by the forks of the mating end 510 .

As can be seen in the assembled view in FIG. 22 , the tool 500 is used to hold the spacer 110 and insert the spacer 110 laterally between the spinous processes. The tissue expander 506 can urge the tissue apart without severing the ligaments and also distract the adjacent spinous processes. Once the spacer 110 is positioned between the spinous processes, the tool 500 with the tissue expander 506 can be removed leaving the spacer 110 in place. With the spacer 110 in place, the implant 100 can be assembled in place. That is to say that the tethers which are preassembled onto the first and second wings are threaded through the spacer and the other respective wings much as seen in FIGS. 5 , 6 and 7 . The implant then is fitted together as seen in FIG. 1 . After that assembly, the tethers can be secured to the stabilization system also as seen in FIG. 1 . The implant 100 as seen in FIGS. 8 , 9 , 10 , and 11 can be assembled and implanted in a similar manner.

With respect to the implant 200 of FIGS. 12 , 13 , and 14 , the spacer 210 can be urged laterally between the spinous processes until the first wing emerges from the opposite side of the spinous processes. If desired, the tethers can be preassembled to the spacer 210 and thus the tether 240 can be used to help guide and urge the spacer 210 between the spinous processes. Once the spacer is positioned, the tethers can be secured to the stabilization system.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION · 4 of 4

The foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention and the various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and its equivalence.

›Tables in the description — 1
Density1.3g/cc
Rockwell M99
Rockwell R126
Tensile Strength97MPa
Modulus of Elasticity3.5GPa
Flexural Modulus4.1Gpa

Claims as granted

7 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61B17/70
  • A61B17/88
  • A61B17/58
USPC · US Patent Classification
606/248606/279606/246606/60

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionNotice of appeal filedNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.4 y
1,607 days filing → grant
Office actions
4
non-final + final
Responses
5
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Appeals
1
notices of appeal
Examiner
Eduardo C Robert
art unit 3733 · TC 3700
Citations: 330 back · 103 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1Owner 4liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock