USPatent applicationPatented

Electronic component value trimming systems

Granted 25 Jul 2006 · 3 office actions

Life of the application

13 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Described is a system for trimming the value of an electronic component. The system comprises: at least one trimming component, each trimming component having an associated switch for selectively connecting that trimming component to the electronic component in response to a corresponding bit in a control vector. A comparator is included for generating an output bit having a first value if a net value of the electronic component and any connected trimming components differs from a desired value. A controller connected to the switches and the comparator generates the control vector in dependence on the output of comparator, the controller comprising a shift register for sequentially receiving successive output bits from the comparator; wherein the control vector comprises the contents of the shift register and wherein a bit of said first value in control vector effects switching of the corresponding switch.

Description

6 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention generally relates to electronic component value trimming systems and particularly relates to a system for trimming the effective value of an electronic component such as a resistor in an integrated circuit (IC) to a desired value.

2. Description of the Related Art

Conventional techniques for trimming the effective value of an electronic component to a desired or target value comprise selectively connecting a main component to one or more trimming components via a network of switchable interconnections. Such systems can compensate for the tolerance of IC components such as resistors and provide a more accurate value than possible with an uncompensated component. There are applications where well controlled IC resistor networks are desirable. One such application, for example, is in the termination of transmission lines to optimise signal quality.

Many conventional systems have the disadvantage of static power consumption. This can be particularly problematical in low power applications. In addition, where such systems involve the distribution of an analogue voltage signal, there can be susceptibility to interference and error. Conventionally, these problems have been addressed by digital systems at the expense of increased complexity and increased silicon real estate.

An example of a conventional trimming system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,311. Here, the output impedance of a voltage driver is adjustable. Multiple parallel pull up and pull down transistors are located in the output of the driver. The output impedance of the driver is selected by activating a corresponding group of the transistors.

Another example of a conventional trimming system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,456. Here, a termination network for optimising a bus impedance is described. The network has a higher impedance than the bus impedance to be controlled.

Yet another example of a conventional trimming system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,652,538. Here, there is described a digital system in which parallel elemental conductances are switched in and out of circuit by a digital control signal to obtain a desired impedance. In this design, there is also significant overhead in the system control logic. This overhead is a disadvantage for applications in which there are multiple components to be trimmed on an IC. Either the control logic has to be replicated to trim individual or groups of components, or the control logic has to trim all components centrally. The latter may involve complex routing of a control bus across the IC. The control bus may have many bits, further complicating such routing.

It would therefore be desirable to provide a component value trimming system for IC applications in which the aforementioned problems associated with conventional systems are alleviated.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, there is now provided a system for trimming the value of an electronic component, the system comprising: a plurality of trimming components, each trimming component having an associated switch for selectively connecting that trimming component to the electronic component in dependence on a corresponding bit in a control vector; a comparator for generating an output bit having a first value if a net value of the electronic component and any connected trimming components differs from a desired value; and, a controller connected to the switches and the comparator for generating the control vector in dependence on the output of comparator, the controller comprising a shift register for sequentially receiving successive output bits from the comparator, wherein the control vector comprises the contents of the shift register and wherein a bit of said first value in control vector effects switching of the corresponding switch.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the switches are initially closed. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the switches are initially open.

The shift register preferably comprises a plurality of latches connected in series between first and last latches, the output of the comparator being connected to the first latch in the series. In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the controller comprises first logic for applying a clock signal to the latches until all latches in the series have received an output bit from the comparator. The first logic may comprise a counter for disabling the clock signal on detection of a predetermined number of cycles in the clock signal. In another embodiment of the present invention, the controller comprises second logic connected to the shift register for applying a clock signal to the latches until the contents of the last latch of the shift register periodically varies over at least three cycles.

The electronic component and trimming components may be resistors. Alternatively, the electronic component and trimming components may be capacitors or inductors.

The trimming components may be connectable in parallel with the electronic component via the switches. Alternatively, the trimming components may be connectable in series with the electronic component via the switches.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention to be described shortly, there is provided a component value trimming system comprising: a main component, a plurality of trimming components, and a controller for selectively connecting the trimming components in circuit with the main component. The trimming components are used to provide correction to the value of the main component. Specifically, the controller may comprise a shift register for selectively switching the trimming components into circuit with the main component.

The shift register greatly simplifies the controller because the trimming process is reduced to a fixed unit correction being made and convergence to the target value can be relatively easily detected. The system can be conveniently implemented. The system is also advantageously scalable, with the number of elements increasing with desired accuracy. The system can be activated simply by applying a gated clock. Additionally, the system is sufficiently compact for application to each of a plurality of components in an IC, making autonomous control practical. The shift register also provides local memory to the system, allowing the retention of the desired value following calibration and thereby minimizing power consumption.

The present invention advantageously compensates for the tolerance of integrated electronic components such as resistors and provides a more accurate value of such components than could be obtained with an uncompensated component. There are various applications in which well controlled on-chip component networks such as resistor networks are desirable. An example of such an application is the termination of transmission line systems to optimize signal quality. Other examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

A preferred embodiment of the present invention advantageously corrects tolerance in an integrated resistor by switching in parallel correcting elements. This technique minimizes the devices required because the system is compensating only the electronic component, thereby minimizing parasitic loading of the network. Reduced parasitics are important in high frequency applications providing improved device performance. The integrated resistor may be employed in a termination network. Such a network is often operated at relatively high frequencies. It is therefore important that, at the frequency of operation, the impedance of the network is close to its low frequency impedance or resistance.

The resistance value set by preferred embodiments of the present invention may be defined primarily by the value of a reference resistor. This value can be consequently independent to a first approximation of any other variables. The reference resistor can be a discrete component with tight control of value and tolerance. Moreover, the reference resistor may be operated at DC and need not then maintain accuracy at signal frequencies experienced by the network.

In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, many distributed networks are controlled via a common control vector. The vector allows cross talk and noise coupling between networks to be effectively eliminated.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified circuit diagram of a component network;

FIG. 1A is a simplified circuit diagram of another component network topology;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an electronic component value trimming system embodying the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of another electronic component value trimming system embodying the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of yet another electronic component value trimming system embodying the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3

Referring to FIG. 1 , in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a network comprising a main resistor Rm and plural parallel trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 each selectively connectable in parallel with the main resistor Rm via a corresponding one of a plurality of series switches S 0 –S 4 . The trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 are employed to compensate for the tolerance of the main resistor Rm. The trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 may be switched in or out of circuit by a digital control vector 10 . The control vector has 5 bits, Bit 0 –Bit 4 . Each bit is applied to a control electrode of a different one of the switches S 0 –S 4 . In other embodiments of the present invention, the control vector 10 may have more than or less than 5 bits. The switches S 0 –S 4 may be conveniently implemented by transistor switches. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the switches S 0 –S 4 are each implemented by a field effect transistor having a channel connected in series with the corresponding one of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 and a gate electrode connected to the corresponding bit of the control vector 10 .

In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 are substantially identical. The main resistor Rm is made higher by at least its maximum tolerance than a target value to be reached by the network. By switching into circuit an appropriate number of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 , the network can be set to a value close to the target. The accuracy of trimming is dependent on the resolution of the vector 10 and the value of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 . In other words, the accuracy of trimming depends on the number and value of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 . The value of trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 is preferably set such that their collective contribution to the network compensates for the extra resistance of the main resistor Rm at its maximum tolerance. Thus, the network can be configured to produce a net resistance value close to the target value. For example, the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 may be substantially higher in value than the main resistor Rm to provide incremental adjustment of the net resistance of the network when placed in parallel with the main resistor Rm.

The system effectively corrects for the tolerance on the main resistor Rm alone. This advantageously reduces the signal current carried by the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 . Also, this reduces parasitic loading of the network. It be appreciated that other network topologies are possible. FIG. 1A illustrates one embodiment, of the present invention in which the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 may be connected in series with the main resistor Rm. In such embodiments, the main resistor Rm would be set to a lower value than the target. The control vector 10 is generated by a controller.

Referring now to FIG. 2 , in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the controller comprises a shift register 20 for providing the control vector 10 . The shift register 20 comprises a plurality of D type latches L 0 –L 4 . In other embodiments of the present invention, different latches may be employed in the shift register 20 , such as J–K latches, for example. Each of the latches L 0 –L 4 corresponds to different bit of the control vector 10 . Each of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 is controlled by a different one of the latches L 0 –L 4 in the shift register 20 . Specifically, a logic ‘1’ on the output Q of one of the latches L 0 –L 4 in the shift register 20 turns the corresponding one of the switches S 0 –S 4 on and connects the corresponding one of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 in parallel with the main resistor Rm in the network.

The input to the shift register 20 is connected to and controlled by the output of a comparator 30 . In operation, the comparator 30 senses the net resistance of the network. The comparator 30 compares the sensed net resistance offered by the network to a preset, target value. If the net resistance is below the target then the voltage drop across the network will be less than Vr. Consequently the − input of the comparator 30 will be higher than the + input of the comparator 30 . Accordingly, the comparator output will be 0. If the net resistance is above the target, then the voltage drop across the network will be greater than Vr. Consequently, the − input of the comparator 30 will be below the + input of the comparator 30 . Accordingly, the comparator output will be 1. A logic ‘0’ on the output of the comparator 30 indicates that the net resistance 30 is below the target. A logic ‘1’ on the output of the comparator 30 indicates that the net resistance of the network is above the target.

The comparator 30 is implemented here by a voltage comparator and the target is in the form of a reference voltage Vr. In operation, the comparator 30 senses the error between the reference voltage Vr and the voltage developed across the network when biased by a reference current Ir. If the reference current Ir is set by Ir=Vr/Rref, where Rref is a resistor reference such as an external precision resistor, then the comparator 30 is effectively comparing the network resistance to the resistor reference. It will be appreciated that other techniques for implementing the comparator 30 are equally possible.

Shift operations in the shift register 20 are controlled by a clock pulse signal 40 produced by a clock signal generator 50 . As the shift register 20 is clocked by the clock signal 40 , the output of the comparator 30 is sequentially propagated through the latches L 0 –L 4 . If the output of the comparator 30 is logic ‘0’ state, indicating that the net resistance is low compared to the target value, then successive trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 are switched off as the logic ‘0’ is propagated through the latches L 0 –L 4 . When the target is reached, the output of the comparator 30 switches to logic ‘1’. The next clock pulse then propagates a logic ‘1’ into the latches L 0 –L 4 . The net resistance offered by the network then oscillates about the target with successive clock pulses. Specifically, the net resistance of the network is switched either side of the target with successive clock pulses.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3

Referring to FIG. 3 , in a first preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aforementioned oscillations about the target value are reduced by gating the clock signal 40 at the clock generator 50 . Specifically, the clock signal 40 is applied to the clock inputs C of the latches L 0 –L 4 in the shift register 20 for an interval which is at least sufficient to propagate the initial output of the comparator 30 through all of the latches L 0 –L 4 . The interval is determined by a counter 60 connected to the clock generator 60 . In operation, the counter 60 counts pulses in the clock signal 40 . When the count maintained by the counter 60 reaches the interval, the counter 60 inhibits the clock signal 40 at the clock generator 50 . The net resistance of the network thus converges to one of the two values either side of the target. If the number of trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 is sufficient then the net resistance converges to within acceptable tolerance of the target. When the clock signal 40 is gated off, the shift register 20 holds the appropriate states for the configuring the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 . This arrangement has the advantage that shift register need not be preconditioned. Initially, all bits in the control vector 10 can be set to logic ‘1’, so that all switches S 0 –S 4 are closed. Equally however, all bits in the control vector can be initially set to logic ‘0’, so that all switches S 0 –S 4 are open. Alternatively, the control vector 10 can equally comprise a random pattern of ‘1’s and ‘0’, leaving a correspondingly random pattern of switches S 0 –S 4 open and closed. It will also be appreciated that, in other embodiments of the present invention, a logic ‘0’ in the control vector 10 may close a corresponding switch S 0 –S 4 instead of a logic ‘1’.

In an especially preferred embodiment of the present invention the comparator 30 is gated off at the same time as the clock signal 40 , thus reducing power consumption in the system to a negligible level. The gated clock signal 40 can be thought of here as an open loop control signal. Specifically, the clock signal 40 is simply supplied for a limited number of cycles equal to the number of latches in the shift register 20 . A single control line may be used to control the system. It will be appreciated that gated clock systems as herein before described are advantageous in their simplicity.

Referring to FIG. 4 , in a second preferred embodiment of the present invention, the clock signal 40 is also gated. Now however, sensor logic 70 is connected to the output of the last latch L 4 in the shift register 20 . The output of the sensor logic 70 is connected to the clock generator 50 . In operation, the sensor logic 70 detects when an alternating bit pattern at the output of the last latch of the shift register 20 is periodic over three cycles. Such periodicity is indicative of the control vector 10 reaching steady state.

At this point, the net resistance is oscillating about the target. On detection of such an alternating bit pattern, the output the sensor logic 70 is set to disable the clock signal 40 at the clock generator 50 so that the net resistance of the network is set to one of the aforementioned values either side of the target. For example, if the net resistance is required to be lower than the target, to compensate for parasitic wiring resistance for example, then the shift register 20 can be disabled immediately after the next ‘1’ is propagated.

The aforementioned first embodiment may be useful in many different circuit applications. The error introduced in the first embodiment can be compensated by increasing the number of trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 and correspondingly reducing the weighting of each trimming resistor R 0 –R 4 to the net resistance. Depending on the application, this may more efficient in terms of circuit complexity and performance than including extra circuitry such as the sensor circuitry employed in the aforementioned second embodiment.

The embodiments of the present invention herein before described are advantageously scalable. Where greater accuracy is required, the number of trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 and the corresponding number of latches L 0 –L 4 in the shift register 20 can simply be increased.

In an IC layout design of an embodiment of the present invention, each corresponding switch S 0 –S 4 , resistor R 0 –R 4 , and latch L 0 –L 4 can be produced as a common cell. Such cells can be conveniently cascaded. Consequently, systems embodying the present invention can be produced on the same IC with different numbers of trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 and therefore different accuracy. This advantageously permits optimization of systems on a common IC in dependence on application. For example, a termination resistor for a driver may require less accuracy than a termination resistor for a receiver. Scalable systems embodying the present invention allow significant area savings.

In the preferred embodiments of the present invention herein before described, a resistor value is corrected by switching in parallel trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 each having the same value. This sequential technique is advantageous over techniques involving trimming resistors of different weights. This is because disturbance to the network is reduced. The disturbance is reduced because only one of the trimming resistors R 0 –R 4 is added or removed at a time. The simplicity of systems embodying of the present invention permits practical implementation for individual networks and simple convergence to the target.

Advantageously, systems embodying the present invention have low power consumption because power is only consumed during initial calibration. Thereafter, the required control vector 102 can be retained in the shift register 20 . The comparator 30 , together with sources for Vr and Ir, can be powered down.

Systems embodying the present invention are also advantageous in applications where power supply voltages are relatively low because the trimming can be conveniently controlled via the digital switches S 0 –S 4 . The comparator 30 can be implemented so as to minimize voltage headroom requirements. The minimum power supply voltage can be, for example, Vr plus the voltage compliance of the current source for Ir. As indicated earlier, the net resistance can be set primarily by the value of a reference resistor. The reference resistor can be in the form of an external precision resistor. Such an external resistor can be advantageously independent of and thus unaffected by other variables in the IC.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3

The vector 102 can be used to set plural networks of the forms herein before described. Thus, a single controller having a single shift register 20 can set multiple networks distributed across a chip via a common vector 102 . The accuracy of the net resistance of these ‘slave’ networks is determined by the accuracy of the controller in combination with the matching tolerance between the networks.

In summary, preferred embodiments of the present invention provide an adaptive network that uses individually connectable trimming components to compensate for the tolerance on a main component. Embodiments of the present invention have been herein before described with reference to trimming a resistance value. It will appreciated however that the present invention is equally applicable to trimming the value of other electrical components, such as capacitors and inductors, for example.

Claims as granted

27 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H01C17/22
  • H03M1/10
USPC · US Patent Classification
341/121326/82326/86326/90326/30

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005Jul 2005Oct 2005Jan 2006Apr 2006Jul 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.8 y
645 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
4
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Rexford Barnie
art unit 2819 · TC 2800
Citations: 11 back · 7 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock