USPatent applicationPatented

Lubricating composition suitable for diesel engines

Granted 6 Oct 2009 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Exxon Mobil

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Evelyn Nobles Drake, Kevin John Kelly, Peter Calcavecchio, Kevin Louis Crouthamel +2 · Examiner: Walter D Griffin · AU 1797 · TC 1700

Life of the application

13 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An improved lubricating composition suitable for diesel engines comprising a major amount of at least one oil of lubricating viscosity and a minor amount of an alkylamine-alkylphosphate additive. The alkylamine-alkylphosphate additive comprises from at least 1.25 equivalents of alkylamine to 1.0 equivalents of alkylphosphate.

Description

7 parts
›This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser…

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/488,459 filed Jul. 18, 2003.

›FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to lubricating compositions. More particularly the invention relates to diesel engine lubricating compositions.

›BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Diesel engines may be classified broadly as slow speed, medium speed and high speed engines. Slow speed engines typically are two-stroke cycle engines operating in the range of about 57 to 250 rpm. Medium speed engines may be two-stroke or four-stroke cycle engines operating in the range of 250 to 110 rpm. High speed engines may be two stroke or four-stroke engines operating in the range of 1100 to 3000 rpm.

Slow-speed and medium-speed diesel engines usually run on residual fuels containing high levels of sulfur, for example, in the range of about 0.5 wt % to 5 wt % which can cause corrosive wear necessitating costly engine overhauls. High speed engines usually run on distillate fuels which also contain sulfur albeit somewhat lower levels than residual fuels. Lubricant formulators therefore use various additives to reduce such wear and enhance engine performance. Thus, metallic detergents are used in diesel oil lubricants to maintain engine cleanliness; and antioxidants are used to extend the lubricant's useful life. Various other additives may be employed in preparing a fully formulated oil. These include such things as anti-foamants, pour point depressants and the like.

The art of lubricating oil formulation, of course, has become increasingly complex not only because the performance requirements sought by engine manufacturers and users are becoming more stringent but because, as is known in the art, use of one type of additive in a lubricant composition can have a negative impact on the function of another type of additive in that composition. Consequently, there is always a need for improved lubricant compositions which need typically is met by extensive research.

The present invention has as an objective meeting the need for to improved diesel engine lubricating compositions.

Another object of the invention is to provide a lubricating composition that reduces corrosion and wear in diesel engines.

Yet another object of the invention is to provide lubricating compositions suitable for use in diesel engines operating on high sulfur fuels.

›SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention provides a lubricating composition comprising a major amount of at least one oil of lubricating viscosity and a minor amount of an alkylamine-alkyl phosphate additive. The alkylamine-alkyl phosphate comprises from at least 1.25 equivalents of alkyl amine to 1.0 equivalents of alkyl phosphate and an N/P wt ratio of at least 0.5.

In a preferred embodiment the alkyl phosphate is a mixture of mono and dialkyl phosphates represented by the general formulas I and II

where R 1 and R 2 are the same or different alkyl groups of from 4 to about 30 carbon atoms.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

The lubricating compositions of the present invention are useful in diesel engines and especially slow-speed, two stroke marine diesel engines. These compositions comprise a major amount of at least one oil of lubricating viscosity. Thus natural and synthetic oils or mixtures thereof may be used. Natural oils include mineral oils, vegetable oils, solvent treated mineral oils and the like. Synthetic oils include polyalpha olefins, polyol esters, poly internal olefins, polyethylenes, propylenes, polybutenes, polyethyleneglycols, polypropyleneglycols, polyalkyleneglycols, their mixtures and the like, other functional fluids, such as alkylated aromatics, perfluoroalkylpolyethers, polyphenyl ethers, cycloaliphatics, phosphate esters, dialkyl carbonates, silicones, silahydrocarbons, phosphazenes, etc. In general the viscosity of the oil of the composition herein is in the range of about 5 to about 30 cSt at 100° C.

The composition of the present invention also comprise a minor, but effect amount, of an alkyl amine-alkyl phosphate additive. This additive comprises from at least 1.25 equivalents of alkyl amine to 1.0 equivalent of alkyl phosphate. Thus the ratio, in equivalents, of alkylamine to alkylphosphate will range from 1.25:1 to 20:1 and preferably from 1:5:1 to 5:1. The corresponding N/P ratio will then be 0.5:1 to 8:1 and preferably 0.6:1 to 2:1.

Suitable alkyl amines of the additive of the invention are linear and branched mono and dialkyl amines and mixtures thereof, having alkyl groups of from about 6 to about 50 carbon atoms, preferably from about 9 to 19 carbon atoms, and most preferably from about 11 to 14 carbon atoms. Non-hydrocarbon atoms, such as oxygen, sulfur, boron, silicon and phosphorus can be present in the branched hydrocarbon side chains.

Suitable alkyl phosphates are mono and dialkyl phosphates and mixtures thereof represented by the formulas I and II:

where R 1 and R 2 are the same or different alkyl groups of from about 4 to about 30 carbon atoms and preferably from 6 to 11 carbon atoms. Particularly preferred is a mixture of mono and dialkyl phosphates.

The alkylamine-alkyl phosphate additive typically is used in amounts ranging from about 0.05 wt % to 2.5 wt % based on the total weight of the lubricant composition.

The compositions of the present invention will include effective amounts at least one of metal detergents, antioxidants, dispersants, pour point depressants, demulsifiers, defoamants, and aromatic rich solubilizers.

Useful dispersants include succinimides, succinic acid esters, amides borated succinimides and the like. These typically will be present in an amount between about 0.10 to about 5.0 wt % based on the total weight of the compositions.

Suitable metal detergents include calcium and magnesium phenates, sulfonates, salicylates and the like. Typically these will be present from about 0.50 wt % to about 30.0 wt % based on the total weight of the compositions.

Suitable antioxidants include hindered phenols, arylamines and mixtures thereof. The amount of antioxidants typically will be in the range of 0.50 wt % to 2.0 wt % based on the weight of the composition.

The aromatic rich solubilizers that are useful in the composition of the invention include alkylated aromatics such as alkylated benzenes, alkylated toluenes, alkylated naphthylenes, alkylated biphenyls and alkylated diphenyl methane. The solubilizer will constitute about 0.20 wt % to about 15.0 wt % of the total composition.

Other components that optionally are included in the compositions include anti-foamants, pour point depressants, demulsifiers, high temperature stabilizers-antioxidants, ash or ashless dispersants, anti-wear additives, extreme pressure additives, dyes and the like.

In one embodiment of the invention a fully formulated marine oil lubricant is improved by adding to the oil the alkylamine-alkylphosphate additive described hereinabove. The additive is added in an amount ranging from 0.05 wt % to 2.5 wt % based on the weight of the composition.

EXAMPLES 1 AND 2

A fully formulated, commercially available marine oil (Oil #1) was used to prepare two oil compositions (Examples 1 and 2) of the invention by adding to Oil #1 0.05 wt % and 0.5 wt % respectively of Mobilad C-423, a C 11 -C 14 monoalkylamine—C 8 mono- and dialkyl phosphate additive having 1.75 equivalents of amine per equivalent of phosphates. The commercially available oil included the components set forth in Table I.

The Example 1 and 2 oils were then subjected to a series of performance evaluation tests. For comparative purposes Oil #1 was subjected to the same tests. The tests and the results are given in Table II.

As illustrated in Table II, very good antioxidancy can be achieved with marine oils that utilize the amine-phosphate additive of the invention. As shown in Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry (PDSC), the onset temperatures of Examples 1 and 2 are 4-5 degrees higher than the result of Oil #1, the commercial oil.

The Four-ball wear test results indicate that Examples 1 and 2 have smaller wear scar diameters than Oil #1 under the severe test conditions (120 Kg load/600 rpm speed/60 minutes/200° F.) and almost equivalent wear scar diameter to Oil #1 under mild conditions (40 Kg/600 rpm). The K-factor is calculated from wear volumes and represents a better dimensionless measurement of relative wear protection. Clearly, under the severe conditions, both Examples 1 and 2 have much better protection than Oil #1 ([1.59−0.5]/0.5=218%, [1.59−0.62]/0.62=156%). The Four-ball EP test results are equivalent indicating that excellent load-carrying properties are maintained.

The Hot Tube Test is used to assess cleanliness features of engine oils under high temperature oxidation conditions. As exhibited, Examples 1 and 2 all have essentially equivalent cleanliness results of Oil #1.

›EXAMPLE 3 AND 4

Three samples of the commercially available marine oil, (Oil #1), having the composition set forth in Table I were each top treated with 0.2 wt % of different alkylamine-alkylphosphate additives.

In Example 3 the additive was Mobilad C423, previously described. In Comparative Example 3 the additive was Irgalube 349 an alkylamine-alkylphosphate having substantially 1 equivalent of amine per equivalent of phosphate. In Example 4 the additive was Elco 301 in which the equivalents of amine to phosphate is in the range of about 1.25:1 to about 1:30:1. The oils were then subjected to an acid emulsion corrosion test. For comparative purposes Oil #1 was subjected to the same test. The test was conducted as follows: A cast iron ring was cut from a cylinder liner material, polished to remove oxidation and corrosion and commercial in 600 ml of oil. Then the oil was mixed for 1 hour after which 40 ml of H 2 SO 4 was added at 1 ml/minute. Mixing was continued for 20 more minutes. The ring was removed, rinsed to a tared glass fiber filter with toluene, acetone and methanol. The filter and ring were dried and weighed. Also the corroded area of the polished face of the ring was determined using digital macro photographs. The results of the tests are given in Table III.

›EXAMPLE 5

A commercial marine test engine was operated for 1000 hrs using Oil #1 to which 0.5 wt % of Mobilad C-423 was added and the wear data for cylinder rings and liners was obtained. For comparative purposes the same data was obtained for Oil #1. The results are presented in Table IV.

›Tables in the description — 3
TABLE I
Base Oil74.4 wt % of a mixture of heavy neutral base oil and
a thickening component.
Additive package25.6 wt % of a mixture of performance additive
package including several overbased calcium
detergents, dispersants, antioxidants, EP/anti-wear
agents and defoamants.
TABLE II
Comparative 1Example 1Example 2
Commercial99.95% Marine Oil #199.5% Marine Oil #1
ExampleMarine Oil #10.05% Additive A0.5% Additive A
Solubility Appearanceclear & brightclear & brightclear & bright
4 Ball WearWSD (mm)0.3330.3330.333
40 Kg/600 rpm/30 min./200° F.K Factor0.570.570.57
4 Ball WearWSD (mm)0.450.433
80 Kg/1200 rpm/60 min./200° F.K Factor0.350.25
4 Ball WearWSD (mm)0.5670.5000.489
120 Kg/60 rpm/60 min./200° F.K Factor1.590.620.5
4 Ball EP (D2783)LNS (Kg)160160160
30° C./10 sec./1760 rpmWeld Ld (Kg)315315315
LWI65.36665.3
Cu Corrosion (D130-8)3 hrs/210° F./H 2 O1A1A1A
PDSC (Ramp 10° C./minute)Onset Temp (° C.)248.2252.3253.5
PDSC (Isothermal @ 210° C.)Time (minutes)2432.133.5
Hot Tube Test (288° C./16 hours)111
Hot Tube (312° C./24 hours)3.03.03.0
Hot Tube Test (317° C./24 hours)8.58.58.5
TABLE III
% CorrosionRing weightMetal on
(on polishedlossfilter
ExamplesDescriptionface)(centigrams)(milligrams)
Compara-Reference Oil A12.521.320.6
tive 2
Example 3Oil A plus 0.2%00.110
Additive A
Compara-Oil A plus 0.2%0.516.252.3
tive 3Additive B
Example 4Oil A plus 0.2%00.511.4
Additive C
Additive A = Mobilad C-423
Additive B = Irgalube 349
Additive C = Elco 301
1 of 7 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

9 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C10M163/00
  • C10M137/08
  • C10M139/00
  • C10M137/10
USPC · US Patent Classification
508/436

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
5.3 y
1,929 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Walter D Griffin
art unit 1797 · TC 1700
Citations: 10 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock