USPatent applicationPatented

Formulation for a metered dose inhaler using hydro-fluoro-alkanes as propellants

Granted 29 Mar 2011 · 6 office actions

Life of the application

21 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An improved suspension formulation for use in a metered-dose inhaler having a hydro-fluoro-alkane propellant is described, the improvement being the controlled addition of a small quantity of water.

Description

5 parts
›APPLICATION DATA

This application claims benefit to U.S. provisional application No. 60/456,113 filed Mar. 20, 2003.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The physical stability (particle size growth, flocculation rate, sedimentation/creaming behaviors) of a non-aqueous based suspension metered dose inhaler (MDI) formulation is a critical factor that affects the pharmaceutical performance characteristics of the drug product. For a suspension MDI, the key pharmaceutical performance characteristics of the formulation include reproducible dosing, ready dispersibility of the suspended medicament, and minimal particle size change over time.

Water has long been considered to have a negative impact on the physical stability of non-aqueous suspensions. In the literature, the following two aspects are well established:

a) too much water results in altered sedimentation characteristics leading to fast sedimentation and therefore to variability in dose of the suspended active ingredient, and b) too much water can alter the particle size distribution by contributing to the formation of flocculates and aggregates of the individual drug particles or can cause solubilizing and re-crystallizing of drug particles.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object to provide a formulation wherein the amount of water is about 0.13 to about 0.18 percent (w/w) of the product formulation.

It is another object of the invention to provide a meter dose inhaler containing the formulation according to the invention.

It is yet another object of the invention to provide a process of making a formulation according to the invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

The inventors have determined that a minimum amount of water is needed to ensure adequate re-dispersion of the suspended active ingredient. The term “product formulation” shall be understood to mean all components as described herein contained in the metered dose inhaler. It shall be appreciated by the skilled artisan that this amount of water (w/w) of the product formulation is the final volume, and that one or more of the components may already possess water. The amount of water to add to achieve the desired amount in the product formulation can be determined without undue experimentation by those of ordinary skill in the art from the teachings in this application and from methods known in the art. Preferably, the amount of water is 0.16% w/w of the product formulation. In this case, it has been found by the inventors of this application that adding about 0.13% or 0.14% of water to the other components as shown in the tables below achieves the preferred amount.

If the active ingredient is not readily re-dispersible, then, after a period of non-use by the patient, the amount of active ingredient per actuation will not be on target (either super-potent or sub-potent). The addition of specific amounts of water can aid in the ready re-dispersibility of the active ingredient in the metering chamber. This finding has been established for a suspension/solution formulation for use in a metered dose inhaler using an hydro-fluoro-alkane (HFA) as propellant. Specifically, a formulation comprising albuterol sulfate and ipratropium bromide, together with various other excipients and carriers, is described, using the HFA known in the industry as 134a.

Suitable excipients will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. These include, but are not limited to: organic acids such as citric acid, lubricants such as oleic acid, ethanol and carriers.

Suitable carriers will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. These include, but are not limited to: soy lecithin, polyvinylpyrollidones, organic polymers, phospholipids.

There are various MDI publications in the literature including US Publications 2003/0066525, 2003/0089368, US2001031244, US2003089369, US2003190287, US2003206870, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,225,183, 5,919,435, 6,306,368, 5,836,299, 6,092,696, 6,234,362, 6,036,942, 5,682,875, 6,305,371, and PCT publications WO 95/02651, WO 97/01611, WO 03/002169, WO 00/30607, WO 00/30608 and WO 98/56349 and EP 1 241 113, many deal with all aspects of HFA formulations. The inventors are not aware of any formulation patent publications for suspension MDIs that requires or recommends water to be added to the formulation to enhance performance.

Therefore, in one embodiment there is provided:

a formulation comprising water in an amount of about 0.13 to about 0.18 percent (w/w) of the product formulation, at least one HFA as a propellant, one or more active ingredients, and one or more excipients.

In another embodiment there is provided:

a formulation comprising water in an amount of about 0.13 to about 0.18 percent (w/w) of the product formulation, at least one HFA as a propellant, albuerol sulfate, ipratropium bromide, and one or more excipients.

Below are three tables showing formulations incorporating the invention, that is, the deliberate addition of water to a formulation to be used in an MDI using at least one HFA as a propellant. The first two tables provide specific details for such formulation having albuerol sulfate and ipratropium bromide as active ingredients. The first table provides the formulation with no canister overfill.

The second table provides the same albuterol sulfate and ipratropium bromide formulation with a projected canister overfill included.

The third table provides expected ranges for an albuterol sulfate/ipratropium bromide formulation according to the present invention.

This invention will provide a solution to the problem of actuation variability in formulations used in MDIs having at least one HFA as propellant where:

a) the formulation has a suspended, solid medicament and b) the valve is designed to include a metering chamber, that is an area for the formulation to be dosed or dispensed to reside between actuations or dosings.

Provided these two conditions are met, there is the potential that the addition of a small, controlled amount of water can improve the redispersibility of the formulation in the metering chamber. This possibility exists regardless of whether the formulation is a “pure” suspension, that is, no drug or active ingredient is dissolved in the formulation. This possibility is also independent of the solid medicament, the stabilizing agent (if one is used), the propellants used or the type of co-solvent, if any, used.

Therefore, in another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a metered dose inhaler comprising

a formulation as described herein above wherein the albuterol sulfate, and the ipratropium bromide of the formulation is suspended; a valve containing a metering chamber that is an area for the formulation to be dosed or dispensed to reside between actuations or dosings.

In yet another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a process of making a formulation as desribed herein above, comprising:

preparing a concentrate by adding: ethanol, citric acid, ipratropium bromide monohydrate, polyvinylpyrrolidone and albuterol sulfate; preparing a propellant, ethanol and water mixture, said mixture containing: propellant HFA 134a, a mixture of ethanol and water; adding the concentrate to the mixture of propellant-ethanol-water to provide the formulation.

A formulation according to the present invention can be made as follows:

1. Concentrate Preparation

Prepare Concentrate with:

Ethanol, Citric acid Ipratropium bromide monohydrate PVP Albuterol Sulfate

Do not add water.

2. Dispensing of Propellant, Ethanol and Water

Charge Formulation Vessel with:

Propellant HFA 134a Mixture of ethanol/water

Concentration of Formulation at this Process Step:

3. Final Product Formulation

Add concentrate (from Step 1) to the mixture of propellant-ethanol-water Concentration of Formulation at this Process Step:

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

All publications cited in this application are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

›Tables in the description — 4
TABLE 1
COMPONENTMASS PER CANPERCENT
Albuterol Sulphate0.0240 g0.208
(micronized)
Ipratropium Bromide0.0042 g0.036
(monohydrate)
Ethanol1.153 g10
(dehydrated, USP)
Water0.0150 g0.13
Polyvinylpyrrolidone0.0058 g0.050
(PVP, K-25)
Citric Acid0.0005 g0.004
(anhydrous)
HFA 134a10.3285 g89.542
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane)
TOTAL11.5310 g100
TABLE 2
COMPONENTMASS PER CANPERCENT
Albuterol Sulphate0.0309 g0.208
(micronized)
Ipratropium Bromide0.0054 g0.036
(monohydrate)
Ethanol1.482 g10
(dehydrated, USP)
Water0.0193 g0.13
Polyvinylpyrrolidone0.0074 g0.050
(PVP, K-25)
Citric Acid0.0006 g0.004
(anhydrous)
HFA 134a13.2744 g89.542
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane)
TOTAL14.82 g100
Propellant95.45%
Ethanol4.38%
Water0.17%
Propellant89.84%
Ethanol10.00%
Water0.16%
Activesnegligible
PVPnegligible
Citric acidnegligible

Claims as granted

11 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K9/12
  • A61K9/00
  • A61L9/04
  • A61K9/10
  • A61K9/72
USPC · US Patent Classification
424/45424/46

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom20042005200620072008200920102011USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionResponse after non-finalNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
7.0 y
2,566 days filing → grant
Office actions
6
non-final + final
Responses
4
3 RCE
Examiner
Mina Haghighatian
art unit 1616 · TC 1600
Citations: 31 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock