USPatent applicationPatented

Method and device for analyzing the CO2 contained in a drilling fluid

Granted 23 Feb 2010 · 2 office actions

Assignee: Institut Francais du Petrole

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Benjamin Herzhaft, Thierry Huard, Marcel Ropars, Laurent Neau · Examiner: Jennifer K Michener · AU 1795 · TC 1700

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method for estimating the quantity of CO 2 present in a geologic formation and a device for implementing the method include the steps of penetrating the formation by a well drilled from the surface contacting formation with a fluid that travels from the formation to the surface sampling a given quantity of return fluid at the surface and transferring it to a cell, ensuring the pH of the quantity of fluid, adding a given quantity of product acidifying the fluid to adjust the pH to a value of less than 4, and measuring the CO 2 level of the gas in the cell after the acidification step.

Description

3 parts
›The present invention relates to the field of…

The present invention relates to the field of geological surveillance of an underground reservoir, or of geological formations traversed by a borehole. The surveillance consists in particular of continuous or near-continuous analysis of the CO 2 level of the fluid in contact with the reservoir or formations, namely the drilling fluid or, more generally, a well fluid.

A precise, continuous analysis of the CO 2 present in the drilling mud or fluids is a considerable advantage for oil operators. This is because good detection of the amount of CO 2 in the reservoir during drilling is extremely important both for financial and for safety reasons. Too much CO 2 in the reservoir effluent can generate additional costs when the well is brought into production, or even cause well operation to be abandoned. At the present time, the steps taken after the fact on samples of reservoir rock taken from the well do not offer sufficient safety, and another technique providing the desired information quickly during drilling appears to be essential.

Gas analysis devices contained in the drilling fluid are known, but none of them enable the CO 2 to be precisely measured, as according to the present invention.

Thus, the present invention relates to a method for estimating the quantity of CO 2 present in a geologic formation comprising the following steps:

said formation is penetrated by a well drilled from the surface, said formation is contacted with a drilling fluid having a pH greater than 8 that travels from the formation to the surface, a given quantity of return fluid is sampled at the surface and transferred to a cell, the pH of said quantity of fluid in the cell is measured, a given quantity of acidifying product is added to said fluid to adjust the pH to a value of less than 4, the CO 2 level of the gas contained in the cell is measured after the acidification step, the quantity of CO 2 contained in the geologic formation is calculated from the previous CO 2 measurement.

According to the invention, the quantity of carbonate supplied by the geologic formation and/or by the additives in the formulation of said fluid can be taken into account.

The pH of the quantity of fluid can be adjusted to approximately 2.

The gas can be transferred by an inert gas scavenging the internal space of the cell.

The additives in the mud formulation can be taken account by running the CO 2 measurement method on a given volume of initial fluid, i.e. before contact with the formation.

The sampling rate can be determined according to the fluid travel rate.

The invention also relates to a device for estimating the quantity of CO 2 present in a geologic formation traversed by a well in which a fluid, for example a drilling fluid, travels between said formation and the wellhead at the surface. The device comprises means for sampling a given quantity of return fluid at the wellhead, a cell serving as a receptacle for said quantity of fluid, means for measuring the pH in said cell, means for inert-gas scavenging of the internal space of the cell, means for injecting an acidifying product into said cell, and means for measuring the quantity of CO 2 contained in the internal space of the cell.

Adjusting means can control the acid injection means according to the pH measurement.

The means for measuring the quantity of CO 2 can comprise an infrared cell or a thermal conductivity measuring cell.

Control means can carry out the following steps, at a rate determined by the fluid flowrate:

Sampling of a quantity of fluid; Measurement of pH; Injection of a quantity of acid; Scavenging the cell space; Measurement of CO 2 ; emptying the cell.

The device can include means for measuring the internal pressure of said cell.

The device can include means for regulating the temperature of said cell.

The present invention will be better understood and its advantages will emerge more clearly from reading the following description of non-limiting embodiment examples illustrated by the attached figures:

FIG. 1 shows the distribution of carbon-containing species as a function of pH;

FIG. 2 shows the interaction of a water-based drilling fluid and a gas composition containing CO 2 ;

FIG. 3 shows the interaction of an oil-based drilling fluid and a gaseous composition containing CO 2 ;

FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a device according to the invention.

The present invention provides access to measurements of the entire quantity of the CO 2 present in a geologic formation. These measurements are made on the carrier fluid between the geologic formation and the surface of the ground. The drilling fluid travels upward in the drilled well, entraining the CO 2 from the bottom to the surface. By degasifying the drilling fluid on its return to the surface, whether naturally or artificially, one can measure the degassed CO 2 , but the interaction of this fluid with the CO 2 considerably distorts estimates of the amount of the CO 2 in place in the geologic formation.

This is clearly seen by looking at the behavior of CO 2 gas mixtures in the presence of drilling muds.

Drilling muds (water-based or oil-based fluid) are made at the surface, with a pH greater than 8. The mud formulation almost invariably includes large amounts of salt (NaCl, CaCl 2 ) and possibly carbonates (CaCO 3 ) to adjust the density of the fluid. The following table shows an example of a typical oil-based drilling fluid formulation:

As shown in the table above, the formulation of an oil-based mud is a complex and highly saline aqueous emulsified mixture. This salinity has an effect on the solubility of the gases, particularly CO 2 .

A drilling mud in contact with gaseous CO 2 establishes a number of chemical equilibria.

First, the CO 2 becomes partially dissolved in the mud according to Henry's law, and an equilibrium is established between the gaseous CO 2 and the dissolved CO 2 according to the formula: [CO 2aqueous ]=KxPCO 2 , K being Henry's constant (depending on the mud formulation) and PCO 2 , the CO 2 partial pressure in the top gas phase that is in contact with the mud.

›Also, because of the pH of the mud…

Also, because of the pH of the mud, an equilibrium is established between the aqueous CO 2 , HCO 3 − , and CO 3 2− species according to the following formulae:

Aqueous CO 2 +H 2 O HCO 3 − +H + pKa=6.4

HCO 3 − CO 3 2− +H + pKa=10.3

FIG. 1 shows the percentages of the various CO 2 -based compounds as a function of pH. Curves 1, 2, and 3 represent the compounds CO 2 , HCO 3 − , and CO 3 2 , respectively.

In addition to the physical solubility properties of CO 2 , the chemical properties are conferred on the solution by the calcium carbonate according to the following reactions:

Solubility of carbonates: ↓CaCO 3 , Ca 2+ +CO 3 2− pKs=8.3 Reaction of carbonates with dissolved CO 2 according to:

CO 2aqueous +H 2 O+CaCO 3 Ca(HCO 3 ) 2

The latter reaction has a strong rightward displacement for high pH values and will continue as long as calcium carbonate is available in the formulation. Because of the high pH values of certain drilling muds and the present of Ca 2+ ions, the equilibrium tends to shift to formation of carbonates and hydrogen carbonates Ca(HCO 3 ) 2 .

Hence a drilling mud tends to function like a “CO 2 pump.”

FIG. 2 shows the change in composition of a top gas phase as a function of time T (in hours), initially at 13% CO 2 in air, when it contacts a water-base mud with pH=8.5, with the formulation given below:

It can be seen that an equilibrium is established very quickly (less than one hour) after conversion of CO 2 into HCO 3− .

In the case of an oil-base mud with pH=10.5 ( FIG. 3 ), under the same top gas phase conditions, all the CO 2 has been consumed by the mud. No solubility equilibrium appears, showing that CO 2 is present in the form of carbonates or hydrogen carbonates dissolved in the mud.

To measure the CO 2 carried by the drilling mud, one must thus determine the proportions of the carbonate and hydrogen carbonate species present in the mud, particularly by shifting the chemical equilibriums.

For this purpose, according to the invention, strong acidification of the medium enables the various species to be converted into gaseous CO 2 . The CO 2 release can be effected by strongly acidifying the solution by injecting concentrated acid until a pH of less than 4 and preferably approximately 2 is reached.

At a pH of 2, all the carbonate species will have been converted into gaseous CO 2 , the level of which can be measured with an infrared sensor or by thermal conductivity. The rise in pressure in the measuring cell can also be an indirect measurement of the amount of CO 2 released.

FIG. 4 shows schematically the principle of the measuring device. The device has a closed cell 5 connected to the wellhead 10 by sampling means 6 comprising a pipe 7 and distribution means 8 , for example a pump and/or valves. Cell 5 also has means 9 for evacuating the volume of material taken from the cell. The cell has means 11 for measuring the pH, preferably continuously, and possible means 12 for measuring the pressure inside the cell. Scavenging means employing a gas, preferably an inert gas, are comprised of a pipe 13 for introducing inert gas into the cell and a pipe 14 for evacuating the gas contained in the top of the cell, above the sampled mud. The outgoing pipe 14 sends this gas to a CO 2 analyzer 15 , for example an infrared sensor or another known measuring device. An acid pump 16 enables a strong acid to be injected into the cell at a speed and volume adjusted to the desired acidification rate and the changes in pH shown by sensor 11 . Temperature control and regulation means (not shown) of the cell may complete the device.

The drilling mud can be sampled directly at the wellhead either automatically or by an operator. The sampling may be sequential, at a rate depending in particular on the drilling fluid flowrate. All the controlled sensors, analyzers, and other means are connected to a computer (not shown) that controls all these elements: valves, motors, sensors, injectors, etc.

A membrane 17 for drying the gas is placed upstream of sensor 15 to eliminate any traces of water in this top gas phase.

FIG. 1 shows schematically a geologic formation 20 partially traversed by a borehole 18 with a string 19 . The drilling fluid injected at 21 raises drilling tool 22 from its position near formation 20 to the surface in the direction of the arrows.

The increased pressure in the cell can be correlated to CO 2 production.

›EXAMPLE OF OPERATING METHOD

Automatic sampling of a given sample volume of drilling mud, at the wellhead;

Triggering of the insert gas flow to the infrared sensor;

Injection of acid by means of the syringe pump and monitoring of pH;

Continuous CO 2 measurement using the infrared sensor or thermal conductivity;

Measurement stopped after acidification to pH=2.

The M infrared measurement thus performed gives a CO 2 equivalent of all the species, including carbonate and hydrogen carbonate species, present in the drilling mud. From this value must be subtracted the amount M density of the CO 2 corresponding to the amount of carbonate initially present in the drilling mud, particularly due to additives added to adjust its density. This value can be determined by measuring the original formation, on-site or in the laboratory.

In the event carbonate-containing geologic formations are being drilled, geologic knowledge of the terrain gives us the proportion of carbonate in drilled area C formation . The volume of waste contained in the drilling mud can be calculated from the volume of the hole, the mud flowrate, and the drilling rate; let V be this waste volume per liter of mud.

Hence we have the quantity of carbonate coming from the formation:

Ca formation =V mud ×V×C formation

Since M formation is the quantity of CO 2 corresponding to the quantity Ca formation , the quantity of CO 2 in the geologic formation carried by the mud from the hole bottom will be equal to:

M infrared −M density −M formation

Thus, the method and device according to the invention gives a more accurate estimate of the quantity of CO 2 in place in an underground deposit, taking into account the interaction of the fluid carrying this gas, the initial conditions of the nature of this fluid, and the drilling operations in this deposit.

›Tables in the description — 2
COMPONENTWEIGHT (g)
Oil470
Filtrate reducer6
Emulsifier18
Wetting agent2.9
Lime20
Clay15
Viscosifier4
Brine322
CaCO 3 (weighting material)260
COMPONENTWEIGHT (g)
Water1000
Clay30
Xanthane2.5
CMC3
Viscosifier5
NaCl30
Baryte (weighting material)210
2 of 3 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section E — Fixed constructions
  • E21B49/00
Section G — Physics
  • G01N33/24
USPC · US Patent Classification
436/32422/68.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom2004200520062007200820092010USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
6.0 y
2,175 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Appeals
1
notices of appeal
Examiner
Jennifer K Michener
art unit 1795 · TC 1700
Citations: 17 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock