USPatent applicationPatented

Method for treating waste-activated sludge using elecroporation

Granted 21 Feb 2006 · 3 office actions

Assignee: OPENCELL CORP.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Satya P. Chauhan, Jeffrey Held · Examiner: Peter A. Hruskoci · AU 1724 · TC 1700

Life of the application

17 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method of treating of municipal sludge, paper-pulp sludge, animal and plant waste, and the like, whereby the treatment thereof via electroporation causes the breakdown of waste activated sludge, which is then recycled back to a bioreactor, or to one or more additional bioreactors such as aerobic, facultative, anoxic, or strictly anaerobic.

Description

5 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/270,420, filed Oct. 15, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,709,594, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/107,614, filed Mar. 26, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,540,919, which is incorporated by reference herein, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/612,776 filed on Jul. 10, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,176, which is incorporated by reference herein, which is a continuation-in-part of application serial number Ser. No. 09/468,427, filed on Dec. 21, 1999, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/229,279, filed on Jan. 13, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,538, which is incorporated by reference herein, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/934,548, filed on Sep. 22, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,979, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/552,226, filed on Nov. 1, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,695,650, which is incorporated by reference herein.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,538, issued in Feb. 29, 2000 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Dewatering Previously-Dewatered Municipal Waste-Water Sludges Using High Electrical Voltages”, there is disclosed a system and method for dewatering and treating sludge emanating from municipal waste, or pulp-waste from a paper mill, as well as treating animal and plant waste. In that patent, the method for breaking down the sludge is to subject it to electroporation, which incorporates nonarcing, cyclical high voltages in the range of between 15 kv./cm and 100 kv./cm. which break down inter-cellular and intracellular molecular bonds of waste-activated sludge (WAS), to thus release inter-cellular and intracellular water, whereby the WAS is rendered inactive and greatly reduced in mass.

The viability and effectiveness of pulsed electric field (PEF) for disrupting the biomass in waste activated sludge (WAS) derived from municipal wastewater treatment has been proven in laboratory testing and on-site pilot projects. While there was no significant increase in the solids content of dewatered sludge, the quantity of WAS needing disposal was estimated to be significantly reduced. The pilot plant for testing at one or two wastewater treatment plants that generate WAS has been developed and deployed. A pulsed electric field (PEF) system that could handle 0.5 to 1.0 pgm WAS feed was designed. This requires an 8 kw power supply capable of generating 30 kV and pulse generator capable of handling 50 amp peak, current, bi-polar pulses, square wave, 10 μs pulse width, and 3000 pulses/second (pps).

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the primary objective of the present to provide a treatment of municipal sludge, paper-pulp sludge, animal and plant waste, and the like, whereby the treatment thereof via electroporation causes the breakdown of waste activated sludge, which is then cycled either back to a previous bioreactor, and/or to one or more additional bioreactors, such as aerobic, facultative, anoxic, or strictly anaerobic.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The invention will be more readily understood with reference to be accompanying drawing, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic showing the process for electroporating sludge in order to break up and destroy the waste-activated sludge for transport to one or more bioreactors.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1 , there is shown the schematic for using the PEF-electroporation system as a secondary treatment for previously-dewatered sludge. In FIG. 1 , the primary-treated wastewater is delivered to a bioreactor 10 , which may or may not be provided with air depending upon the type of bioreactor used, as described hereinbelow. The bioreactor 10 may be aerobic, facultative, anoxic, or strictly anaerobic for performing biological digestion. From there the sludge maybe sent to an optional secondary clarifier 12 , if necessary. From there, the sludge may be recycled directly back to the bioreactor 10 . The sludge may be optionally thickened at thickener 16 , with excess sludge being sent to a sludge dewatering unit 20 for further dewatering for forming a filter cake. From sludge dewatering unit 20 , the filtrate is recycled back to the bioreactor 10 . The filtrate exiting the bioreactor 10 , either directly or through secondary clarifier 12 and thickener 16 , is delivered to electroporating device 14 , which provides a pulsed electric field (PEF) with voltages between 15 kv./cm. and 100 kv./cm., as disclosed in detail in the above-mentioned patents and applications. The cellular units of the waste-activated sludge (WAS) treated by the electroporation device 14 are broken up and destroyed, releasing intracellular and inter-cellular water, and organic solids-contents. The PEF process is applicable to biomass contained in biological sludges from all the types of secondary wastewater treatment bioreactors. The PEF process is effective because it lyses cells, and the resulting cells become more readily available as food when those treated cells are fed to a bioreactor.

The PEF-treated sludge is then delivered to one or more bioreactors. It may be recycled back to the bioreactor 10 , to one or more optional bioreactors 22 , or to both the bioreactor 10 and optional bioreactor or bioreactors 22 . If delivered to optional bioreactor 22 , the filtrate therefrom is transported to the sludge dewatering device 20 .

The bioreactors, or biological cells, 10 , 22 may be either strictly aerobic (requiring oxygen), facultative (able to function with or without oxygen), anoxic (low or no dissolved oxygen conditions), or strictly anaerobic (no dissolved oxygen). The fundamental structure of the cells is the same in all of these regimes for the purpose of PEF treatment and application. Each type of these microorganisms' cells are subject to electroporation, the development of holes in the cell wall due to the PEF electropulsing, and those cells become a food source when fed to the bioreactor. The bioreactor that receives the cells does not have to be the same type from which the microorganism cells have originated, but may be in any of these regimes, i.e., aerobic, anoxic, facultative, or anaerobic, as they may be used as food by microorganisms in any of these regimes. In addition, the PEF-treated cells may be chemotrophs or autotrophs, either or both of which are found in the different biological treatment systems. In all cases, the different types of biomass from the various bioreactors used in wastewater treatment can be treated with the PEF process, with similar electroporation of cells resulting.

While a specific embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that numerous changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

13 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C02F11/12
  • C02F1/46
  • C02F1/461
  • C02F1/00
  • C02F3/12
  • C02F11/18
USPC · US Patent Classification
210/609210/610422/22210/624210/748205/751210/626

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005Jul 2005Oct 2005Jan 2006Apr 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examinationNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.0 y
715 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
4
1 RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Peter A. Hruskoci
art unit 1724 · TC 1700
Citations: 100 back · 15 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1Owner 2liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock