Method for the removal and recovery of the oily component from drill cuttings with liquid CO2
Granted 31 Oct 2006 · 2 office actions
Current assignee: ENITECNOLOGIE S.P.A. · originally Eni S.p.A.
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Raffaele Tomaciello, Alberto Guarneri, Felicia Massetti, Alessandro Nardella · Examiner: George Suchfield · AU 3676 · TC 3600
Life of the application
10 dated eventsAbstract
Method for the removal and recovery of the oily component from cuttings coming from the drilling of oil wells by treatment of the cuttings with a solvent, which can be compressed to the liquid state, at a pressure value ranging from 45 to 80 bar and a temperature corresponding to the saturation value.
Description
4 parts›The present invention relates to a method for…
The present invention relates to a method for the treatment of oily drill cuttings from oil wells.
More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for the removal and recovery of the oily component from drill cuttings which allows the contemporaneous de-classification of the cutting from dangerous waste-products.
The term “drill cuttings”, as used in the present description and claims indicates the crushed material produced during the drilling mixed with drilling sludge. This is therefore a fluid with a rheology typical of aqueous suspensions with a high solid content such as sludge or slurry.
It is known that the function of drilling sludge is to consolidate the walls of the hole of an oil well, protect the metallic parts from corrosion, cool and lubricate the bit during drilling. Sludge, which can be water-based or oil-based, also supplies the pressure for keeping the geological formation integral and has the function of carrying the cuttings produced in the excavation by the action of the bit, to the surface. Oil sludge consists, for example, of mineral oil, barite, bentonite and other additives such as emulsifying agents and polymers.
In the past drill cuttings, mostly coming from off-shore platforms, were discharged into the sea creating an unacceptable environmental impact level. There are also considerable problems with respect to dispersion on the ground.
Various methods are used for removing oil sludge from cuttings: among these, washing systems with detergents, thermal and distillation systems. The main disadvantages of these methods are respectively linked to low efficiency, limited safety, especially when operating off-shore, high costs and plant construction complexity.
The use of a compressible solvent for the recovery of oil from drill cuttings, with acceptable residual concentration levels in the solid, was proposed with reference to “supercritical processes” i.e. bringing the fluid above its critical conditions during the treatment of the cutting. The application, described in S. Saintpère et al. (2000), “Supercritical CO 2 extraction applied to oily drilling cuttings”, SPE 63126, SPE International, using carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), is not competitive from an economical point of view.
It was also verified that the treatment process effected with CO 2 under supercritical conditions is strongly conditioned by the physico-chemical characteristics of the cutting which jeopardizes the removal efficacy, in terms of oil recovery and residual concentration in the solid.
The Applicant has now found that the oily part of cuttings coming from the drilling of oil wells can be removed with an extraction method which uses, as solvent, CO 2 in the liquid state, obtaining an oil with the same characteristics as the mud formulation product and which, when suitable additives are added, can be re-used in other drillings whereas the solid part (cuttings) can be re-admitted into the environment or sent for conventional disposal.
With respect to CO 2 brought to so-called “supercritical” conditions, or beyond the critical point, the use of CO 2 in liquid phase has the following advantages:
lower dehydration of the solid phase and consequently lower water production to be sent to the treatment; decrease in the plant costs, to be attributed to the limited operating pressures, in terms of equipment and piping.
In addition, the oily fraction removed with the use of the compressible fluid is completely recovered at the end of the process, without being contaminated by processing solvents and can be used again for subsequent processings, following refining processes and/or the addition of suitable additives.
The use as solvent of a fluid compatible with problems associated with pollution, such as CO 2 , is in line with the growing demand for environmental protection, as a result of the non-dangerous nature of the fluid and also because of the absolute lack of contaminating waste-products deriving from the process.
In accordance with this, the object of the present invention relates to a method for the decontamination of oily cuttings, coming from the drilling of oil wells, and the contemporaneous recovery of the oily component, comprising the following steps:
a) treatment of said cuttings with CO 2 in the liquid state at a pressure value ranging from 45 to 80 bar and a temperature corresponding to the saturation value; the operation takes place by continuously feeding the solvent, in liquid phase, to the vessel containing the cuttings, in a ratio from 2 to 20 times by weight with respect to the cuttings; b) separation of the liquid phase (solution) from the solid phase; the solid phase remains confined inside the treatment vessel; c) expansion of the solution leaving step (b), separation of the oily phase and recycling of the CO 2 in vapour phase; the oily phase is discharged and recovered from the expansion vessel; d) compression and cooling of the CO 2 vapour and its recycling to step (a), after optional under-cooling.
The above-discussed separation occurs at a pressure ranging from 30 to 60 bar.
More specifically, the present invention is illustrated in the enclosed claims.
The method according to the present invention has considerable advantages both from an economical and environmental point of view. The drill cuttings defined by the current regulations as being harmful waste-products have such characteristics as to make them, after treatment, compatible with the environment, whereas the oily part removed can be re-used as drilling sludge, with the addition of possible additives.
The solvent used is inert under the process and environmental conditions. The process operates with a closed cycle, with complete recycling of the CO 2 .
The method, object of the present invention, involves the use of small dimensional machines and consequently with the possibility of use also for off-shore applications. From an economical point of view, moreover, the present method seems to be of great interest with respect to alternative on-shore processes.
›An applicative example referring to the removal of…
An applicative example referring to the removal of the oily fraction from a conventional cutting, is provided hereunder for purely illustrative purposes.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The FIGURE is a schematic block diagram illustrating an apparatus for decontaminating oily cuttings.
›EXAMPLE
A typical embodiment of the method, object of the present invention, is schematized in the block scheme illustrated in the enclosed FIGURE.
The cutting to be treated is charged into the extractor ( 3 ), according to the known art.
The extractor is equipped with filtrating septa up- and down-stream, generally made of porous steel, for limiting the cutting.
After closing, the extractor is pressurized with the CO 2 in vapour phase, taken from the accumulation tank ( 1 ). The pressurization can be effected from the inlet situated at the bottom of the vessel or from the inlet situated at the head, generally from the bottom.
When a pressure value is reached, which is close to that of the accumulation tank, the vapour feeding is interrupted and the extractor is fed with the CO 2 in liquid phase, still from the accumulation tank.
The complete filling of the reactor is obtained by acting on the volumetric pump situated upstream of the extractor, by sucking the liquid CO 2 from the accumulation tank.
The liquid CO 2 is closely distributed in the cutting, dissolving the oily fraction.
The whole plant is pressurized following an analogous procedure, in all parts. The removal phase begins by continuously feeding the liquid CO 2 to the extractor using the pumping system, with the extractor situated in line with respect to the solvent flow.
The liquid solution leaving the extractor, consisting of the CO 2 solvent and the dissolved oily fraction, flows through the lamination valve ( 4 ) undergoing decompression at a lower pressure value. The oily fraction is thus continuously removed from the cutting.
The liquid-vapour mixture which is formed following lamination, is sent to a heat exchanger ( 5 ) which has the function of bringing the CO 2 solvent forming the mixture to vapour phase, whereas the oily fraction is separated from the stream as liquid phase.
The mixture of CO 2 vapour—liquid oily phase is passed through a separator with a cyclone effect ( 6 ), or a series of several separators with a gravimetric and cyclone effect, to obtain the complete separation of the liquid oily fraction from the CO 2 vapour stream.
An additional separation filter can complete the configuration of the separation section.
The liquid oily fraction is collected at the bottom of the separator or separators, from which it is removed by an intermittent vent through the valve situated at the bottom of each separator.
The CO 2 in aeriform vapour-gas phase leaving the separation section is cooled and condensed ( 8 ), and recovered in the accumulation tank ( 1 ), from where, after under-cooling ( 2 ), it is used for re-starting the extraction cycle.
With reference to the removal cycle, the moving of the solvent takes place by means of a volumetric pump ( 7 ) which sucks the liquid leaving the accumulation tank ( 1 ) and compresses it at the pressure value of the accumulation tank.
The removal phase is prolonged until the required recovery parameter is reached, referring to the percentage of oily fraction removed with respect to its initial content in the cutting (removal percentage), or the percentage of oily fraction removed referring to the quantity of raw cutting treated (yield percentage).
The time parameter of the removal process is provided by the ratio between the quantity of CO 2 used with respect to the weight unit of cutting treated. This weight ratio depends on the process parameters, the type of solvent used, and the type of cutting treated, and ranges from 4 to 30, generally 10.
When the removal phase has been interrupted by the stopping of the continuous flow of CO 2 , the extractor is isolated and the solvent contained therein is recovered using an auxiliary compressor, necessary in this phase for compressing the vapour at the pressure of the accumulation tank.
The recovery phase of the CO 2 is followed by the final depressurization phase to the atmospheric value and subsequently the recovery of the cutting treated, following the known procedures.
The data referring to a test carried out according to the procedure described above are as follows:
›Tables in the description — 1
| Solvent fluid | carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) |
| Type of cutting | conventional |
| Initial oil content | 9.5% |
| Extraction pressure | 68 bar |
| Extraction temperature | 20° C. |
| Ratio between CO 2 referring to the cutting | 9 kg/kg |
| Final oil content | 1.0% |
| Oil removal degree | >90% |
Claims as granted
10 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
8 codes- B01D11/02
- B08B7/00
- E21B21/06
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock