USPatent applicationPatented

Valve seat for a control valve in a vehicle brake system

Granted 27 Feb 2007 · 5 office actions

Assignee: Kelsey-Hayes Company

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Eric R. Kaye, Joseph A. Starr · Examiner: Bradley King · AU 3683 · TC 3600

Life of the application

23 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A valve seat assembly for a control valve of a vehicle brake system includes a valve seat body. A valve passageway extends through a portion of the valve seat body. A groove is formed circumferentially in an outer surface of the valve seat body. The groove defines a groove surface substantially parallel to an axis of the valve body. A bore extends between the groove surface and the valve passageway to provide fluid communication between the groove surface and the valve passageway. A substantially resilient seal is disposed in the groove of the valve seat body.

Description

7 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/478,558 filed Jun. 13, 2003.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to vehicular brake systems, and more particularly to an improved valve seat for a control valve mounted in a hydraulic control unit of an electronically controlled brake system.

Electronically controlled brake systems for vehicles are well known. One type of electronically controlled brake system includes a hydraulic control unit (HCU) connected in fluid communication between a master cylinder and a plurality of wheel brakes. The HCU typically includes a housing containing control valves and other components for selectively controlling hydraulic brake pressure at the wheel brakes.

Control valves for HCU's are commonly formed as electronically actuated solenoid valves. A typical solenoid valve includes a cylindrical armature slidably received in a sleeve or flux tube for movement relative to a valve seat. A spring is used to bias the armature in an open or closed position, thereby permitting or blocking fluid flow through the valve, respectively. A coil assembly is provided about the sleeve. When the valve is energized, an electromagnetic field or flux generated by the coil assembly causes the armature to slide from the biased open or closed position to a closed or open position, respectively.

Control valves mounted in a HCU are actuated by an electronic control module to provide desired braking functions such as anti-lock braking, traction control, and vehicle stability control. To provide desired braking responses, fluid flow must be maintained from the wheel brakes to the master cylinder during all fluid pressure conditions during brake release.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a valve seat assembly for a control valve of a vehicle brake system. The valve seat includes a valve seat body. A valve passageway extends through a portion of the valve seat body. A groove is formed circumferentially in an outer surface of the valve seat body. The groove defines a groove surface substantially parallel to an axis of the valve body. A bore extends between the groove surface and the valve passageway to provide fluid communication between the groove surface and the valve passageway. A substantially resilient seal is disposed in the groove of the valve seat body.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a vehicular braking system according to the present invention illustrating a hydraulic control unit having a normally open control valve, a normally closed control valve, an accumulator, and a pump.

FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross sectional view of the normally open control valve illustrated in FIG. 1 , showing the valve seat according to the invention.

FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross sectional view of the valve seat illustrated in FIG. 2 .

FIG. 4 is an enlarged view, partially in cross section, of the valve seat illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 , showing the fluid flow path.

FIG. 5 is an enlarged cross sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the valve seat illustrated in FIG. 2 .

FIG. 6 is an enlarged cross sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the valve seat illustrated in FIG. 2 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3

An exemplary vehicular brake system having a valve according to this invention is indicated generally at 10 in FIG. 1 . The brake system 10 includes valves and other components described below to provide an anti-lock braking function. In other embodiments, brake system 10 can also include components to provide traction control and/or vehicle stability control functions. In yet other embodiments, brake system 10 can be formed as an electronic brake management system.

The exemplary brake system 10 includes a brake pedal 12 connected to a master cylinder 14 for providing pressurized brake fluid to a plurality of wheel brakes 16 , only one of which is shown. The wheel brake 16 is schematically illustrated as a disc brake. However, the wheel brake 16 may be any type of wheel brake found on vehicles, including a drum brake.

The brake system 10 also includes a hydraulic control unit (HCU) 18 connected in fluid communication between the master cylinder 14 and the wheel brake 16 . The HCU 18 includes a housing 19 having bores for receiving control valves and other components described below. Fluid conduits are provided between the bores to provide fluid communication between the valves and other components. For purposes of clarity of illustration, only one set of components is illustrated in FIG. 1 . Typically, however, the HCU 18 also houses corresponding components for other brake circuits and/or wheels of the vehicle.

The HCU 18 preferably includes a normally open control valve 20 , commonly known as an isolation valve, disposed between the master cylinder 14 and the wheel brake 16 , at least one low pressure accumulator 22 , a normally closed control valve 24 , commonly known as a dump valve, disposed between the wheel brake 16 and the low pressure accumulator 22 , and a hydraulic pump 26 having an inlet connected to the low pressure accumulator 22 , and a pump discharge connected to the fluid conduit between the master cylinder 14 and the control valve 20 . The HCU 18 may also include other fluid flow devices such as an attenuator, restricted orifices, and check valves (none of which are illustrated), depending upon the system design. The exemplary control valve illustrated at 20 is preferably formed as a solenoid valve switchable between two positions. The control valve 24 is also preferably formed as a solenoid valve switchable between an open and a closed position. The valves 20 and 24 , as well as the pump 26 , are electrically connected to an electronic control module (not illustrated) and operated to provide desired system braking in a well-known manner.

A sectional view of a portion of the control valve 20 is illustrated in FIG. 2 . The control valve 20 is received in a bore 28 formed in the housing 19 . The control valve 20 preferably includes a valve body 30 having a first body portion or sleeve 32 and a second body portion or valve seat 34 . The valve seat 34 includes a groove 36 formed circumferentially in an outer surface thereof.

The control valve 20 , being a normally open control valve, further includes an armature 38 slidably received in a passageway or bore 40 of the sleeve 32 , and biased away from the valve seat 34 when the control valve 20 is not energized. A coil assembly 42 is disposed about the sleeve 32 . When the coil assembly 42 is energized to produce an electromagnetic field, the armature 38 is pulled toward the valve seat 34 to prevent fluid flow through the valve 20 .

The armature 38 is disposed at an extreme of travel away from the valve seat 34 when the coil assembly 42 is deenergized such that the control valve 20 is in an open position, as shown in FIG. 2 . A spring 44 preferably engages the armature 38 to urge the armature 38 away from the valve seat 34 when the control valve 20 is in the open position. When the coil assembly 42 is energized, the armature 38 is disposed at an extreme of travel toward the valve seat 34 , such that the control valve 20 is in a closed position. When the control valve 20 is in the closed position, fluid flow through the control valve 20 is blocked. When the control valve 20 is in the open position, fluid flow through the control valve 20 is not blocked.

An annular portion 46 adjacent an open end of the sleeve 32 is crimped onto a radially outwardly extending flange 48 formed on the valve seat 34 . Preferably, the sleeve 32 is retained within the bore 28 by clinching, wherein material of the housing 19 is forced into a groove 50 formed in the outer surface of the sleeve 32 , as shown in FIG. 2 . The combined sleeve 32 and valve seat 34 can also be retained in the bore 28 by any desired mechanical or chemical means operative to retain the sleeve 32 within the bore 28 .

The valve seat 34 includes a longitudinal (preferably axial) fluid passageway 52 that terminates in a reduced diameter bore 54 . A seat 56 is formed on an outer surface of the valve seat 34 . If desired, the seat 56 can have an angle a 1 . Preferably, the seat 56 has an angle a 1 within the range of from about three degrees to about five degrees, as measured from a plane 58 perpendicular to an axis A of the valve seat 34 . More preferably, the seat 56 has an angle a 1 of about four degrees. An end surface 60 of the armature 38 acts as a valve sealing element and engages the seat 56 when the armature 38 moves downwardly. When the end surface 60 engages the seat 56 , the fluid passageway 52 is blocked.

A filter assembly 62 can be provided adjacent an inlet of the fluid passageway 52 , although such a filter assembly is not required. A substantially resilient lip seal 64 can be provided in the groove 36 of the valve seat 34 , for sealing between the valve seat 34 and the bore 28 of the housing 19 . The lip seal 64 includes a resilient annular body 66 having a first end 68 and a second end 70 . A resilient annular seal lip 72 flares outwardly from the body 66 in the general direction of the second end 70 . It will be appreciated that any other desired type of fluid sealing means can also be used.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3

As best shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 , at least one bore 74 is formed in the valve seat 34 and extends between the groove 36 and the passageway 52 . Preferably, the bore 74 has a diameter of about 0.25 mm, however, the bore 74 can have any desired diameter. If desired, an opening 75 of the bore 74 at the groove 36 can be of a diameter larger relative to the diameter of the bore 74 , thereby defining a tapered bore portion between the larger diameter opening and the bore 74 . Although the bore 74 is illustrated as extending substantially radially between the groove 36 and the passageway 52 , it will be understood that the bore 74 can be any bore which provides fluid communication between the groove 36 and the passageway 52 . It will be appreciated that although two bores 74 are illustrated in FIG. 3 , the valve seat 34 can include any desired number of bores 74 , such as one bore or three bores which extend between the groove 36 and the passageway 28 .

The groove 36 preferably includes a first groove surface 36 A substantially parallel to the axis A of the valve seat 34 . A second groove surface 36 B is disposed adjacent the first groove surface 36 A and extends downwardly and outwardly, as viewed in FIG. 3 , from the first groove surface 36 A. The second groove surface 36 B is preferably disposed at an acute angle a 2 , such as an angle a 2 within the range of from about 30 degrees to about 60 degrees relative to the first groove surface 36 A. More preferably, the second groove surface 36 B is disposed at an angle a 2 within the range of from about 40 degrees to about 50 degrees relative to the first groove surface 36 A. Most preferably, the second groove surface 36 B is disposed at an angle a 2 of about 45 degrees relative to the first groove surface 36 A. A third groove surface 36 C is disposed adjacent the second groove surface 36 B and defines a step portion of the groove 36 . The third groove surface 36 C extends outwardly, as viewed in FIG. 3 , from the first groove surface 36 B. Preferably, the third groove surface 36 C is disposed substantially perpendicular relative to the first groove surface 36 A.

Preferably, fluid flow from the brake 16 through a first conduit 76 , to the master cylinder 14 through a second conduit 78 , is maintained between the lip seal 64 and the bore 28 of the housing 19 during all fluid pressure conditions during brake release. However, it is known that lip seals in known control valves can deform when a substantially high pressure differential exists between the brake 16 and the master cylinder 14 , such as, for example, during brake release, thereby trapping pressure opposite the first end 68 of the lip seal 64 . When the fluid pressure is substantially higher at the first end 68 of the lip seal 64 relative to the second end 70 of the lip seal 64 , which would be the case when the differential pressure is increasing rapidly across the lip seal 64 , for example, within the range of from about 5000 bar per second to about 38,000 bar per second, such a high pressure differential exists. Such a pressure differential can be caused, for example, when the vehicle driver's foot slips off the brake pedal during an ABS brake application. During such an event, the control valve 20 is in the closed position, forcing fluid to flow over the lip seal 64 .

Such a pressure differential can cause the lip seal 64 to move downwardly, in the direction of an arrow 90 in FIG. 4 , thereby exposing the bore 74 . Further, such a pressure differential can force the flaring resilient annular seal lip 72 radially outwardly and against the bore 28 of the housing 19 , thereby preventing fluid flow between the lip seal 64 and the bore 28 . When fluid pressure behind (e.g. at the second end 70 of the lip seal 64 exceeds the fluid pressure at the first end 68 , the resilient annular seal lip 72 yields, allowing fluid to flow between the lip seal 64 and the bore 28 .

Advantageously, the second groove surface 36 B and the radially extending bore 74 provides economical features that substantially eliminate such restriction of fluid flow when such a high pressure differential exists. When a high pressure differential exists, the lip seal 64 moves downward, as shown by the arrow 90 in FIG. 4 , thereby exposing at least a portion of the bore 74 . The radially extending bore 74 thereby provides a flow path for fluid, as shown by the arrow 92 , even if the lip seal moves downward and outwardly, as best shown in FIG. 4 , and seals the fluid flow path between the lip seal 64 and the bore 28 . Specifically, fluid can continue to flow past an outer surface of the lip seal 64 and radially through the radially extending bore 74 to the bore 52 . A fluid flow path is thereby defined between the brake 16 and the master cylinder 14 , and fluid flow is maintained between the lip seal 64 and the bore 28 of the housing 19 during all fluid pressure conditions during brake release.

Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the second groove surface 36 B causes the resilient lip seal 64 to deform downwardly and outwardly, as shown in FIG. 4 , and into contact with the second groove surface 36 B. Advantageously, the second groove surface 36 B defines a ramp. When the high pressure differential between the brake 16 and the master cylinder 14 no longer exists, (e.g. when fluid pressure at the second end 70 of the lip seal 64 exceeds the fluid pressure at the first end 68 ) the ramp 36 B provides a surface against which the resilient lip seal 64 can slide upwardly and inwardly as the lip seal 64 returns to a static (non-deformed) position as shown in FIG. 3 . When the lipseal 64 returns to the static position as shown in FIG. 3 , lipseal 64 again covers the bore 74 , thereby preventing fluid flow through the bore 74 during normal braking operation. The step portion 36 C limits the travel of the lipseal 64 , further ensuring that the lipseal 64 can return to the static position and cover the bore 74 .

An alternate embodiment of the valve seat is illustrated generally at 134 in FIG. 5 . The valve seat 134 is similar to the valve seat 34 , but includes a first groove surface 136 and a second groove surface 138 . The second groove surface 138 extends from the first groove surface 136 to the outer surface 140 of the valve seat 134 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3

Another alternate embodiment of the valve seat is illustrated generally at 234 in FIG. 6 . The valve seat 234 is similar to the valve seat 34 , but includes a first groove surface 236 having an axial length b1 greater than an axial length b2 of the lip seal 64 , such that the lip seal 64 can move downwardly, in the direction of an arrow 94 , when a high pressure differential exists.

In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiments. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.

Claims as granted

21 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B60T8/36
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F16K31/06
  • F16J15/3204
  • F16J15/3232
  • F16J15/3236
USPC · US Patent Classification
303/119.2251/129.2

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalAdvisory action
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.6 y
1,302 days filing → grant
Office actions
4
after a restriction
Responses
5
1 RCE
Examiner
Bradley King
art unit 3683 · TC 3600
Citations: 7 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock