USPatent applicationPatented

EM-actuated liquid dispenser

Granted 15 Nov 2005 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: Techelan, Llc · originally TECHELAN, LLC

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Ilya Feygin · Examiner: Joseph A. Kaufman · AU 3754 · TC 3700

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A liquid dispenser that dispenses liquid via the action of a collapsing tube. The illustrative dispenser includes a liquid-carrying tube, a wire, and a magnet. The magnet is shaped to receive the tube and the wire between an elongated North pole and an elongated South pole. A pulse of current of controlled amperage and duration is sent through the wire, which causes it to deflect. This causes the tube to collapse with the result that a portion of the liquid that is contained in the tube is ejected.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to liquid dispensers for dispensing small quantities of liquid.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Sub-micro liter dispensing of liquid is a substantial challenge facing pharmaceutical, medical and other industries due to the strong proliferation of miniaturization technologies.

Among major obstacles of small-volume dispensing is the necessity to separate a known small volume from the bulk of a body of liquid. This separation is usually accomplished via a quick release of kinetic energy, which is transferred into motion of a small amount of liquid (i.e., the small volume that is separated from the bulk).

Enabling technologies include, for example, piezo-dispensation and heat-bubble dispensation, as used in the printing industry. The heat bubble is not applicable to bio- and medical-related applications. And the piezo technique is very restrictive and typically works well only with exceedingly small volumes of liquid (i.e., less than 5 nanoliters), with “well-behaved” liquid (i.e., ink) and under perfect conditions.

Consequently, there is a need for a broadly-applicable technique for small volume dispensing.

›SUMMARY

The illustrative embodiment of the present invention is a dispenser that avoids at least some of the drawbacks of the prior art. In the illustrative dispenser, which is actuated by electromagnetism, liquid is dispensed using “collapsing-wall dispensation,” which can be controlled for dispensations ranging from nano-liters to micro-liters with high accuracy.

The illustrative dispenser includes a liquid-carrying tube, a wire, and a magnet. The magnet is shaped to receive the tube and the wire between an elongated North pole and an elongated South pole.

A pulse of current of controlled amperage and duration is sent through the wire, which causes it to deflect. This causes the tube to collapse with the result that a portion of the liquid that is contained in the tube is ejected. The portion of liquid ejected is proportional to the speed and degree of deflection. In some embodiments, the shape of tube is restored by the intrinsic resilience of the tube.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts an EM-actuated dispenser in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2A depicts a cross-sectional end view of the EM-actuated dispenser of FIG. 1 , wherein the dispenser is not actuated.

FIG. 2B depicts a cross-sectional end view of the EM-actuated dispenser of FIG. 1 , wherein the dispenser is actuated.

FIG. 3 depicts an EM-actuated dispenser with multiple turns of wire to increase the strength of the dispensing pulse.

FIG. 4 depicts an EM-actuated dispenser with a dynamic valve to restrict the direction of flow of liquid.

FIG. 5 depicts an EM-actuated dispenser with a sponge to restrict the direction of flow of liquid.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 depicts EM-actuated liquid dispenser 100 in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention. Dispenser 100 includes liquid-carrying tube 102 , wire 104 , and magnet 106 .

Liquid-carrying tube 102 is advantageously a capillary, which holds liquid through the capillary action. Any one of a variety of resilient and relatively chemically-resistant plastics or rubber, such as Teflon™ tubing by Gore, silicone, Chemrez, Calrez tubing, and the like, can suitably be used to form tube 102 . In some embodiments, the internal diameter of tube 102 is one millimeter or less.

Wire 104 is disposed along tube 102 . In some embodiments, wire 104 is extruded with tubing 102 , whereas in some other embodiments, it is simply attached to tubing 102 . Wire 104 is advantageously capable of carrying current in the range of about 10 to 30 amperes (or more) without substantial heating.

Magnet 106 is shaped to receive tube 102 and wire 104 between elongated North pole 108 and elongated South pole 110 . In the illustrative embodiment, the gap between poles 108 and 110 is in a range of about 3 to 5 millimeters.

In the illustrative embodiment, wire 104 is attached along the top of tube 102 and returns “beneath” the magnet, forming a “loop” that is parallel to the long axis of the tubing. (See, e.g., FIGS. 2A and 2 b ).

A pulse of current of controlled amperage and duration is sent through wire 104 , which causes it to deflect. This causes tube 102 to collapse. As a consequence, liquid is ejected from the tube. The portion of liquid ejected is proportional to the speed and degree of deflection. The magnitude of the current pulse defines the deflection. The shape of the pulse can be adjusted as a function of liquid viscosity and other dispensing parameters. Increasing the number of turns or “loops” of wire 104 , as depicted in FIG. 3 , increases the force by which liquid is ejected from tube 102 .

In some embodiments, the shape of tube 102 is restored by virtue of the intrinsic resilience of the tube. In some other embodiments, restoration is generated or enhanced via a current pulse of opposite polarity. Capilllary forces will restore the original level of liquid inside tube 102 after its shape is restored.

During the collapse of tube 102 , liquid moves in both directions away from the collapse. Typically, movement in only one direction is desired. Motion in the undesired direction can be reduced in several ways.

One way to do so is to use a “dynamic” valve. A dynamic valve is a tapered orifice, which widens in the direction of desired liquid flow. Due to the fluid dynamics, liquid that is subjected to rapid movement, as in dispenser 100 , sees much higher resistance going into the taper than out of the taper. This creates, in essence a dynamic check valve, as is known in the art. FIG. 4 depicts dynamic valve 414 in tube 102 .

Another way to restrict the flow of liquid in dispenser 100 to a single desired direction is to use an open cell sponge. Properly located inside tube 102 , the sponge has a low static resistance to the flow of liquid and does not impede the filling or refilling of tube 102 . On the other hand, the sponge has a high dynamic resistance to faster moving fluid, such as is caused during the dispensing operation. FIG. 5 depicts sponge 518 in tube 102 .

It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims as granted

8 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B01L3/02
  • B67D7/62
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F04B43/09
  • F04B43/04
Section G — Physics
  • G01F11/08
USPC · US Patent Classification
222/504222/564

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003Jan 2004Apr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005Jul 2005Oct 2005Jan 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.5 y
909 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Joseph A. Kaufman
art unit 3754 · TC 3700
Citations: 7 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

No assignments have been recorded for this application yet.