USPatent applicationPatented

Active-pixel image sensors

Granted 7 Aug 2007 · 2 office actions

Assignee: STMicroelectronics

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Jonathan Ephriam David Hurwitz, Robert Henderson · Examiner: David Ometz · AU 2622 · TC 2600

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An image sensor has an array of pixels read by column circuits to provide reset and read samples on a pair of sample capacitors. To alleviate the effects of parasitic capacitance in the region of the sample capacitors, a modified timing arrangement is used. Both sample switches are operated simultaneously to pre-charge both sample capacitors with a pixel signal value. One sample switch is operated after reset to apply a reset value to one of the pre-charged sample capacitors.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to active-pixel image sensors, and more particularly to CMOS image sensors.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

As is well known, active-pixel image sensors have the advantage that they can be made as single chips by conventional CMOS technology, in contrast to CCD image sensors which require special fabrication facilities and are typically implemented as multiple chips due to the range of power supplies required. However, the quality of images produced by active pixel CMOS sensors is poorer than that of CCD devices. One reason for this is the presence of fixed pattern noise (FPN), which includes pixel-to-pixel FPN and vertical FPN. FPN is particularly present when double sampling (sometimes referred to as correlated double sampling) is used to reduce other sources of noise.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One object of the present invention is to reduce FPN in active pixel double sampling image sensors.

An image sensor has an array of pixels read by column circuits to provide reset and read samples on a pair of sample capacitors. To alleviate the effects of parasitic capacitance in the region of the sample capacitors, a modified timing arrangement is used. Both sample switches are operated simultaneously to pre-charge both sample capacitors with a pixel signal value. One sample switch is operated after reset to apply a reset value to one of the pre-charged sample capacitors.

Preferred features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the claims and the following description.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating part of an image sensor;

FIG. 2 is a timing diagram illustrating a prior art operation of the circuit of FIG. 1 ; and

FIG. 3 is a similar diagram illustrating the operation of the circuit of FIG. 1 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 shows one pixel 10 of a known three transistor pixel array. Each pixel comprises a photosensitive divide 12 and transistors M 1 , M 2 , M 3 . A reset voltage is supplied on line VRT, in this embodiment per column but horizontal VRT lines may also be used. Each column has an output circuit 14 connected to the column by line Vx and including double sampling capacitors Cs. A current source draws a current Ibias through the pixel source follower buffer amplifier 16 .

FIG. 2 shows the timing required to operate this circuit in a typical rolling shutter exposure mode. The pixel 10 voltage Vpix is periodically reset to the reference voltage VRT by pulsing reset high. When the pixel 10 is released from reset, it begins to integrate photogenerated current on the capacitance of the photodiode 12 . The light signal is detected after a certain exposure time. The read signal goes high and the signal CDSSIG pulses, thus sampling the source follower output (Vpix−Vgsn) as Vsig, where Vgsn is the gate-source reset noise of transistor M 3 . The pixel 10 is reset by pulsing reset again and a second sample is taken by pulsing CDSBLK. The voltage (VRT−Vgsn) is sampled as Vblk. The differential signal Vdiff=(Vblk−Vsig)=(VRT−Vpix) is then processed by the remainder of the readout circuitry (not shown).

Vdiff removes the process variation of Vgsn between pixels which arises because of variation of Vtn in transistor M 3 . To maximize the photosensitive area of the sensor, the transistors used in the pixel are near to the minimum size allowed by the fabrication process. The Vtn variation is known to be inversely proportional to the square root of gate area. Standard deviations of tens of millivolts are typical. The layout of the column circuit elements is conventionally accomplished within a pitch matched to the pixel dimensions, typically about 5 μm in current semiconductor processes. The density of such a layout means that some parasitic capacitance between the top plates of the sampling capacities Cs is unavoidable. This parasitic capacitance is indicated as Cp in FIG. 1 . The effect of the parasitic capacitance Cp on the sampled voltages is now analyzed.

Assume that, at some time before the CDSSIG and CDSBLK pulses occur, Vsig and Vblk are pre-charged to a voltage Vprch. CDSSIG pulses, bringing Vsig to (Vpix−Vgsn). The voltage step applied to the capacitance Cp is (Vpix−Vgsn−Vprch) which causes the top plate of Vblk to change to voltage:

Vblk=Vprch+Cp/Cs(Vpix−Vgsn−Vprch)

During the CDSBLK phase, the Vblk voltage changes to (VRT−Vgsn). The voltage step on capacitance Cp is (VRT−Vgsn−Vprch−Cp/Cs(Vpix−Vgsn−Vprch)). This is transmitted to Vsig, which is no longer driven by the pixel. Neglecting terms in Cp 2 /Cs 2 , the resulting voltage on Vsig is

Vsig=(Vpix−Vgsn−Vprch)+Cp/Cs(VRT−Vgsn−Vprch)

The difference voltage Vdiff is then

The error term Cp/Cs Vgsn has a process-dependent distribution of up to several millivolts depending on layout and Vt spread. This contributes a pixel-to-pixel FPN which can be important. Also, if Vprch varies between columns then a vertical FPN may result from the term Cp/CsVprch.

The present invention alleviates this problem by altering the timing, as illustrated in one embodiment shown in FIG. 3 . CDSSIG and CDSBLK are pulsed together, which pre-charges both capacitors Cs to (Vpix−Vgsn). During the second cycle, CDSBLK pulses charging Vblk to (VRT−Vgsn). The voltage step across Cp is now

(VRT−Vgsn)−(Vpix−Vgsn)=VRT−Vpix

The error is transmitted to Vsig as

Vsig=Vpix−Vgsn+Cp/Cs(VRT−Vpix)

The voltage difference processed by the readout is

Vdiff=(Cs+Cp)/Cs(VRT−Vpix)

This represents a small gain error for the whole image, rather than an FPN source.

Similar timing can be applied to any active pixel array using double sampling or double read with storage or sampling capacitors. For example, in an image sensor using four transistors, pinned photodiode pixels, each transistor including a transfer gate, the same result can be achieved by:

(a) applying a pixel reset value to both capacitors;

(b) applying a transfer gate voltage to the pixel to obtain a pixel readout voltage; and

(c) applying the pixel readout voltage to one of the capacitors.

The readout circuit is unchanged from the above embodiment, only the sequence of signal then reset is reversed. This is equivalent to exchanging CDSSIG and CDSBLK in the timing diagram of FIG. 3 . The timing of the pixel reset signal would occur just before the first pulse of CDSSIG/CDSBLK and a transfer gate pulse would occur between the first and second CDSSIG pulses.

Thus, the invention alleviates fixed pattern noise caused by variances in circuit elements arising from available fabrication processes. Simulations suggest that the alleviation attainable would allow production of CMOS active pixel sensors giving the picture quality comparable to CCD devices.

Claims as granted

17 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N25/00
  • H04N5/21
  • H01L27/00
  • H04N3/14
USPC · US Patent Classification
348/241250/208.1348/308348/302

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.3 y
1,586 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
David Ometz
art unit 2622 · TC 2600
Citations: 4 back · 9 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock