Three dimensional back projection method and an X-ray CT apparatus
Granted 18 Jan 2005 · 1 office action
Current assignee: Ge Healthcare Limted · originally General Electric
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Sarah K. Patch, Akihiko Nishide · Examiner: Edward J. Glick · AU 2882 · TC 2800
Life of the application
10 dated eventsAbstract
To perform cone beam reconstruction by using projection data correctly corresponding to X-ray beam having passed through each pixel in the reconstruction area, data D 1 is obtained which is plane projected to a plane based on projection data D 0 . Then, plane projection data D 1 to the projection plane pp is projected to the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission to obtain back projection pixel data D 2 . Thereafter, back projection pixel data D 2 will be added for each corresponding pixel for all views to obtain back projection data D 3 . The present invention provides reconstruction by device of projection data correctly corresponding to the X-ray beam having passed through the reconstruction area. Through the plane projection to a plane the operation will become simplified and faster.
Description
11 parts›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a three dimensional back projection method and an X-ray computed tomography (CT) apparatus. More specifically, the present invention relates to a three dimensional back projection method and an X-ray CT apparatus, in the image reconstruction (referred to as cone beam reconstruction) based on the projection data that is gathered by axial scanning or helical scanning by means of a multidetector system, which allow reconstructions to be performed using the projection data precisely corresponding to the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area.
To date, the mainstream X-ray CT apparatus typically uses a filtered back projection technique, which reconstructs an image through processes including gathering data, preprocessing, filtering, back projecting and postprocessing.
FIG. 1 schematically shows projection data gathered at a view angle a “view=0°” by scanning with a multidetector 24 and the position of reconstruction area P.
In the back projection methods of the related art, the projection data gathered by the fifth array of detectors that corresponds to the z-coordinate of the reconstruction area P has been used for the projection data at the view angle “view=0°” for use in the image reconstruction.
FIG. 2 is a schematic enlarged view in z-axis of an X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area P as shown in FIG. 1 ( b ).
Part A of the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area P is incident into the fifth array of detectors d 5 . There may not be any problem in using the projection data collected by the fifth array of detectors d 5 as the projection data at a view angle “view=0°” for the reconstruction.
However, part B of the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area P is incident into the sixth array of detectors d 6 , rather than the fifth array of detectors d 5 . There may arise a problem of discrepancy if the projection data collected by the fifth array of detectors d 5 is used is used for the projection data at the view angle “view=0”, resulting in a so-called corn angle artifact.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 5
Therefore, a primary object of the present invention is to provide a three dimensional back projection method and an X-ray CT apparatus, which allow reconstruction to be achieved, in a so-called cone beam reconstruction, by using the projection data in correct correspondence with the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area.
In accordance with the first aspect, the present invention, provides a three dimensional back projection method, characterized in that the method comprises: projecting projection data D 0 gathered by an axial scan or a helical scan using a multidetector which has a plurality of detector arrays onto a projection plane which is planar to determine planar projection data D 1 ; then projecting the data D 1 onto each of pixels consisting a reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission to determine back projection pixel data D 2 ; and adding for each corresponding pixel the back projection pixel data D 2 of all views for use in the image reconstruction to determine back projection pixel data D 3 .
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above first aspect of the present invention, plane projection data D 1 projected from the projection data D 0 may be first determined, then the plane projection data D 1 will be projected onto the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission so as to determine back projection pixel data D 2 . The reconstruction will be thereby allowed to be performed faster by using the projection data correctly corresponding to the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area.
It should be noted that the reconstruction area P is in a plane while the multidetector is located in spatial position along a sector of arc. At this point, when directly projecting the data in position at an arcuate sector into the reconstruction area, namely the grid of a coordinate system, coordinate transform will become complex, requiring a certain amount of computation. In addition, the amount of computation will become huge if transforming every pixel in the reconstruction area. In other words, the processing will be complex and time-consuming if determining back projection pixel data D 2 directly from projection data D 0 .
In contrast, the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above first aspect of the present invention, instead of directly determining back projection pixel data D 2 from projection data D 0 , plane projection data D 1 will be derived from the projection data Projection Data D 0 , and the plane projection data D 1 is used to derive the back projection pixel data D 2 . At this point, when projecting data located in a plane onto a reconstruction area that is a grid coordinate, a 1st order transform (affine transform) is sufficient to achieve the process by sampling data at a constant sampling pitch. Therefore in view of overall performance, the process will be simplified and become faster.
Preferably, the plane projection data D 1 should be interpolated such that the interval between data be sufficiently smaller.
In accordance with the second aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises, when defining the direction perpendicular to the rotating plane of X-ray tube or the multidetector or the direction of linear displacement of the helical scan as z-axis, the direction of center axis of the X-ray beam at view=0° as y-axis, and the direction normal to both the z- and y-axis as x-axis, the projection plane being xz plane that passes through the center of rotation in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 135°≦view<225° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, and the projection plane being yz plane that passes through the center of rotation in a view angle range which may be delimited as 45°≦view<135° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 225°≦view<315° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof.
It should be understood that in this specification different definitions “view=−45°” and “view=315°” are used for the purpose of expression, however those two are equivalent and indicates the same view.
When projecting data onto a projection plane, the precision will become higher if the angle of the line of projecting direction with the projection plane reaches to 90° and become coarser if the angle reaches to 0°.
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above second aspect of the present invention, the angle of the line of projection direction with the projection plane, i.e., xz plane or yz plane may not become less than approximately 45° the degradation of precision may be suppressed within the tolerance.
In accordance with the third aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises determining one set of plane projection data D 1 by interpolation/extrapolation delivered from a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 .
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above third aspect of the present invention, since one set of plane projection data D 1 is derived by the interpolation from a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 , the density of plane projection data D 1 can be sufficiently higher when compared to the pixel density in the reconstruction area. The processing of determining back projection pixel data D 2 by projecting plane projection data D 1 onto the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission may be simply a sampling, allowing eliminating interpolation so as to simplify the processing and to accelerate. The interpolation may be used if desired.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 5
In accordance with the fourth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises making a table of addresses and interpolation/extrapolation indices of the plurality of sets of projection data D 0 in order to determine one set of plane projection data D 1 .
Addresses of a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 and indices for the interpolation/extrapolation for use in determining one set of plane projection data D 1 may be calculated each time one set of plane projection data D 1 is to be required, however the calculation time may be a considerable overhead.
In accordance with the above fourth aspect of the present invention, addresses of a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 and interpolation/extrapolation indices are preprocessed and are stored in a table to eliminate the overhead as have been described above. In other words, the processing will become faster by making a table.
In accordance with the fifth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises determining a set of plane projection data D 1 by interpolation of a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 ; making a table of addresses and interpolation/extrapolation indices for use with a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 in order to determine one set of plane projection data D 1 in either a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 135°≦view<225° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or a view angle range which may be delimited as 45°≦view<135° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 225°≦view<315° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, and using the table in other view angle ranges.
When the projection plane is xz plane, which intersects with the revolving center, if geometric relationship of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of 135°≦view<225° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof is rotated 180° around about the revolving center, the geometric relationship will be matched with that of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of −45°≦view<45° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof. Thus addresses of projection data D 0 and interpolation/extrapolation indices for determining one set of plane projection data D 1 may be shared among both range.
When the projection plane is yz plane, which intersects with the revolving center, if geometric relationship of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of 45°≦view<135° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof is rotated −90° around about the revolving center, the geometric relationship will be matched with that of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of −45°≦view<45° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof, in case in which the projection plane is xz plane, which intersects with the revolving center. Thus, addresses of projection data D 0 and interpolation/extrapolation indices for determining one set of plane projection data D 1 may be shared among both range.
In addition, when the projection plane is yz plane, which intersects with the revolving center, if geometric relationship of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of 225°≦view<315° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof is rotated 90° around about the revolving center, the geometric relationship will be matched with that of the X-ray tube, detectors, and projection axis in the view angle range of −45°≦view<45° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof, in case in which the projection plane is xz plane, which intersects with the revolving center. Thus, addresses of projection data D 0 and interpolation/extrapolation indices for determining one set of plane projection data D 1 may be shared among both range.
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above fifth aspect of the present invention, table used either one of the view angle range of −45°≦view<45° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof, the view angle range of 135°≦view<225° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof, 45°≦view<135° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof, or the view angle range 225°≦view<315° or range which primarily includes the same and also the periphery thereof may be shared in common with other view angle ranges, allowing the storage required for the table to be minimized.
In accordance with the sixth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises interpolation/extrapolation including the interpolation/extrapolation of 0th order or the interpolation/extrapolation of 1st order.
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above sixth aspect of the present invention, interpolation/extrapolation of 0th order (i.e., adoption of neighboring data), and interpolation/extrapolation of 1st order (i.e., interpolation/extrapolation may be included using two neighboring data items) so as to facilitate the interpolation/extrapolation.
In accordance with the seventh aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises determining one set of back projection pixel data D 2 by weighted addition of a plurality of sets of plane projection data D 1 .
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 5
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above seventh aspect of the present invention, weighted addition of a plurality of sets of data in the same view or in the opposing view in the vicinity of the reconstruction area may be applied.
In accordance with eighth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as above, characterized in that the method comprises the weight of the weighted addition being determined in accordance with the distance from the X-ray focal point to the plane projection data D 1 .
In general, data D 1 of which the distance from the X-ray focal point to the plane projected data D 1 is shorter may be considered to include more correctly information about each pixel, in comparison with the data D 1 having a larger distance.
Consequently, the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above eighth aspect of the present invention may allow determining back projection pixel data D 2 in a much more precise fashion.
In accordance with the ninth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises the weight of the weighted addition being determined in accordance with the distance from the X-ray focal point to each pixel in the reconstruction area.
Since the distance from the X-ray focal point to the detectors is constant, data D 1 of the case in which the distance from each pixel in the reconstruction area to the X-ray focal point is larger may be considered to include more correctly information about each pixel because in comparison with the data D 1 of the case in which the distance to the X-ray focal point is shorter the distance to the detectors is shorter.
Therefore the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above ninth aspect of the present invention may allow determining back projection pixel data D 2 in a much more precise fashion.
In accordance with the tenth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises the weight of the weighted addition being in common in pixels consisting the reconstruction area which lie on a straight line parallel to the projection plane.
The weight used in the weighted addition may be defined as the ratio of the distance from the X-ray focal point to the plane projection data D 1 , to the distance from the X-ray focal point to each pixel in the reconstruction area. In this scenario, those pixels which belong to the reconstruction area and reside on the straight line parallel to the projection plane may have the same value of the ratio.
Thus the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above tenth aspect of the present invention may allow simplifying the process by sharing the weight in common.
In accordance with the eleventh aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises sampling the plane projection data D 1 with the starting addresses, sampling pitch, and the number of samples being predefined, in order to select the plane projection data D 1 for the weighted addition of the pixels consisting the reconstruction area which reside on a straight line parallel to the projection plane.
For those pixels which belong to the reconstruction area and reside on the straight line parallel to the projection plane, plane projected data D 1 used for determining the back projection pixel data D 2 may be present on the straight line on the projection plane. By defining the starting address, sampling pitch, and the number of samples, selection will be simple.
Thus the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above eleventh aspect of the present invention, plane projection data D 1 for determining back projection pixel data D 2 may be selected with a simple operation.
In accordance with the twelfth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises making a table of the predefined weight of the weighted addition, starting addresses, sampling pitch and the number of samples.
In the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above twelfth aspect of the present invention the operation may be accelerated by making a table.
In accordance with the thirteenth aspect, the present invention provides a three dimensional back projection method of the configuration as have been described above, characterized in that the method comprises putting into the back projection pixel data D 2 of a view the result of adding the back projection pixel data D 2 of a view and the back projection pixel data D 2 of an opposing view with both sets of data multiplied by weighted indices ω a, ω b (where ω a+ω b=1) in correspondence with the angle between the straight line from each pixel of reconstructed area in both views to the X-ray focal point and the reconstructed area.
In general, it may be considered that data may contain more correct information about each pixel if the angle between the straight line connecting each pixel in the reconstruction area to the X-ray focal point and the reconstruction area is closer to 90°.
Thus the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above thirteenth aspect of the present invention may allow determining more correctly the back projection pixel data D 2 .
In accordance with the fourteenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus, which comprises: an X-ray tube; a multidetector having a plurality of detector arrays; a scanning means for collecting projection data D 0 either while revolving at least one of the X-ray tube and the multidetector around a subject to be imaged or while revolving and moving straight both the X-ray tube and multidetector relative to the subject to be imaged; a plane projection data calculating means for projecting the projection data D 0 onto a projection plane which is planar to determine plane projection data D 1 ; a back projection pixel data calculating means for projecting the data D 1 onto each of pixels consisting a reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission to determine back projection pixel data D 2 ; a back projection pixel data calculating means for adding for each corresponding pixel the back projection pixel data D 2 of all views for use in the image reconstruction to determine back projection pixel data D 3 .
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 4 of 5
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above fourteenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above first aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the fifteenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the planar projection data calculator means uses, when defining the direction perpendicular to the rotating plane of X-ray tube or the multidetector or the direction of linear displacement of the helical scan as z-axis, the direction of center axis of the X-ray beam at view=0° as y-axis, and the direction normal to both the z- and y-axis as x-axis, as the projection plane an xz plane that passes through the center of rotation in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 135°≦view<225° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof; and as the projection plane a yz plane that passes through the center of rotation in a view angle range which may be delimited as 45°≦view<135° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 225°≦view<315° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above fifteenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above second aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the sixteenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the planar projection data calculator means applies interpolation/extrapolation to a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 to determine one set of plane projection data D 1 .
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above sixteenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the above third aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the seventeenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the planar projection data calculator means makes use of a table having addresses and interpolation/extrapolation indices of a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 set for determining one set of plane projection data D 1 .
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above seventeenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above fourth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the eighteenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the planar projection data calculator means determines a set of plane projection data D 1 by interpolation of a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 ; and makes a table of addresses and interpolation/extrapolation indices for use with a plurality of sets of projection data D 0 in order to determine one set of plane projection data D 1 in either a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 135°≦view<225° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or a view angle range which may be delimited as 45°≦view<135° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 225°≦view<315° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, and also uses the table in other view angle ranges.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above eighteenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above fifth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the nineteenth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the interpolation/extrapolation includes the interpolation/extrapolation of 0th order or the interpolation/extrapolation of 1st order.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above nineteenth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above sixth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twentieth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which one set of back projection pixel data D 2 is determined by weighted addition of a plurality of sets of plane projection data D 1 .
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twentieth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above seventh aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty first aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the weight of the weighted addition is determined in accordance with the distance from the X-ray focal point to the plane projection data D 1 .
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty first aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above eighth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty second aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the weight of the weighted addition is determined in accordance with the distance from the X-ray focal point to each pixel in the reconstruction area.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 5 of 5
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty second aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above ninth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty third aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the weight of the weighted addition is in common in pixels consisting the reconstruction area which lie on a straight line parallel to the projection plane.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty third aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above tenth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty fourth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which the plane projection data D 1 is sampled with the predefined starting addresses, sampling pitch, and the number of samples, in order to select the plane projection data D 1 for the weighted addition of the pixels consisting the reconstruction area which lie on a straight line parallel to the projection plane.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty fourth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above eleventh aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty fifth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which a table having the weight of the weighted addition, starting addresses, sampling pitch and the number of samples predetermined is made in advance.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty fifth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above twelfth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the twenty sixth aspect, the present invention provides an X-ray CT apparatus of the configuration as have been described above, in which back projection pixel data D 2 of a view is derived from the result of adding the back projection pixel data D 2 of a view and the back projection pixel data D 2 of an opposing view after having both sets of data multiplied by respective weighted indice ω a, ω b (where ω a+ω b=1) in correspondence with the angle between the straight line from each pixel of reconstructed area in both views to the X-ray focal point and the reconstructed area.
The X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with the above twenty sixth aspect of the present invention may suitably implement the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the above thirteenth aspect of the present invention.
In accordance with the three dimensional back projection method and X-ray CT apparatus of the present invention, determined from projection data D 0 may be plane projection data D 1 , which plane projection data D 1 may be projected to a reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission to determine back projection pixel data D 2 , instead of directly determining back projection pixel data D 2 from projection data D 0 , so that reconstruction is allowed by using projection data correctly corresponding to the X-ray beam having passed through the reconstruction area. In addition, the operation will become totally simplified and faster.
Further objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of spatial position of projection data in reconstruction area;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating problems in accordance with the related art.
FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic flow diagram of the operation of an X-ray CT apparatus;
FIG. 5 is a schematic flow diagram of the three dimensional back projection method in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram indicating exemplary arrangements of X-ray tube and multidetector at view=0° and δ=0° as well as plane projected original data;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram indicating exemplary arrangements of X-ray tube and multidetector at view=0° and δ=360° as well as plane projected original data;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram indicating plane projected original data at view=0°;
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram indicating plane projected data at view=0°;
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram indicating plane projected original data at view=30°;
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram indicating plane projected data at view+30°;
FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram indicating exemplary arrangements of X-ray tube and multidetector at view=90° as well as plane projected original data;
FIG. 13 is an example of lookup table for plane projected data calculation;
FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram indicating iteration unit of interpolation/extrapolation in the direction qt;
FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram indicating an exemplary spatial position of the reconstruction area;
FIG. 16 is determination of back projection pixel data by projecting plane projection data to the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission at view=0°;
FIG. 17 is determination of back projection pixel data by projecting plane projection data to the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission at view=30°;
FIG. 18 is consecutive determination of back projection pixel data for pixels lying on a line parallel to the projection plane;
FIG. 19 is an example of lookup table for back plane projection;
FIG. 20 is determination of back projection pixel data by adding back projection pixel data of all views for each corresponding pixel.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 4
The present invention will be described in greater details with reference to some preferred embodiments depicted in the accompanying drawings.
Now referring to FIG. 3 , there is shown a schematic block diagram of an X-ray CT apparatus in accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The X-ray CT apparatus 100 may include an operation console 1 , an imaging table 10 , and a scanning gauntry 20 .
The operation console 1 may include an input device 2 for accepting input from the operator, a central processing unit 3 for executing three dimensional back projection in accordance with the present invention, a data collector buffer 5 for collecting the projection data obtained by the scanning gauntry 20 , a CRT 6 for displaying a CT image reconstructed from the projection data, and a storage device 7 for storing programs, data, and X-ray CT images.
The imaging table 10 may include a cradle 12 , which serves for carrying a subject to be imaged thereon to carry in and out to and from the bore (center void) of the scanning gauntry 20 . The cradle 12 will be driven by a motor equipped in the imaging table 10 .
The scanning gauntry 20 may include an X-ray tube 21 , an X-ray controller 22 , a collimator 23 , a multidetector 24 , a data acquisition system (DAS) 25 , a revolving controller 26 for revolving the X-ray tube 21 and others around the body axis of the subject, a control interface 29 for sending and receiving control signals and the like to and from the operation console 1 and imaging table 10 .
In the following description, it is assumed that a helical scan system is used. Although the axial scan system need not linear translation of the cradle 12 , the present invention may also be applied thereto equally as similar to the helical scan system.
Now referring to FIG. 4 , there is shown a flow diagram indicating the flow of the operation of X-ray CT apparatus 100 .
In step S 1 , the X-ray tube 21 and the multidetector 24 are revolved around the subject to be imaged by means of the scanning gauntry 20 , while moving linearly the cradle 12 to gather projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i), which data is represented by the view angle “view”, relative angular difference δ, the number of detector array j, and channel number i. The relative angular difference δ means a parameter indicating how many turn the X-ray tube 21 and the multidetector 24 has been elapsed in the same view, for example, for the first turn δ=360°.
In step S 2 , the projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i) will be preprocessed (including such operations as offset compensation, logarithm transform, X-ray radiation compensation, and sensitivity compensation).
In step S 3 , the preprocessed projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i) will be filtered. More specifically, the data will be Fourier transformed, filtered (performed with a reconstruction function), and invert Fourier transformed.
In step S 4 , the filtered projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i) will be processed by the three dimensional back projection in accordance with the present invention to determine back projection data D 3 (x, y). The three dimensional back projection process will be described in greater details below with reference to FIG. 5 .
In step S 5 , back projection data D 3 (x, y) will be postprocessed to obtain a CT image.
Now referring to FIG. 5 , there is shown a detailed flow diagram of the three dimensional back projection process (step S 4 )
In step R 1 , plane projection data D 1 (view, qt, pt) that was plane projected to the projection plane will be obtained from the projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i). This operation will be described in greater details below with reference to FIGS. 6 to 14 .
In step R 2 , back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y) will be obtained from the plane projection data D 1 (view, qt, pt) that was plane projected to the projection plane. This operation will be described in greater details below with reference to FIGS. 15 to 19 .
In step R 3 , either a view for 360° worth or a view of “180° worth with fan angle” will be added to the back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y) in correspondence with pixels to obtain back projection data D 3 (x, y). This operation will be described in greater details below with reference to FIG. 20 .
In FIGS. 6 ( a ) and ( b ) there are shown the arrangement examples of the X-ray tube 21 and the multidetector 24 at view=0°, δ=0° The projection plane pp at this time will be xz plane that passes through the revolving center IC. At the position in the projection plane pp to which each of channels of the multidetector 24 is plane projected in the direction of X-ray transmission, projection data D 0 (view=0, δ=0, j, i) obtained from that channel will be multiplied with the distance index and allocated thereto, then interpolated in the direction of the channel to increase sufficiently the data density so that the plane projection data D 1 ′ (view=0, δ=0, j, pt) will be obtained as shown in FIG. 6 ( c ). This will be referred to as “plane projecting projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i) to the projection plane pp in the direction of X-ray transmission” hereinbelow.
Here the distance index may be defined as (r 1 /r 0 ) 2 where the distance from the X-ray focal point of the X-ray tube 21 to the channel of the multidetector 24 is r 0 , the distance from the X-ray tube 21 to the projection position on the projection plane pp is r 1 .
Z 0 in FIG. 6 ( c ) is the origin of coordinate indicating the spatial location of the plane projection data D 1 ′ (view=0, δ=0, j=1, pt=0).
In FIGS. 7 ( a ) and ( b ) there are shown the arrangement examples of the X-ray tube 21 and the multidetector 24 at view=,0°, δ=360° (i.e., one turn after δ=0°). By plane projecting projection data D 0 (view=0, δ=360, j, i) obtained at this situation to the projection plane pp, plane projection data D 1 ′ (view=0, δ=360, j, pt) will be obtained, as shown in FIG. 7 ( c ).
In a similar way, as shown in FIG. 8 , plane projection data D 1 ′ (view=0, δ=720, j, pt) will also be obtained corresponding to view=0°, δ=720° (second turn).
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 4
Then, interpolation/extrapolation will be performed on the plane projection data D 1 ′ (0, 0, j, i), D 1 ′ (0, 360, j, i), D 1 ′ (0, 720, j, i) shown in FIG. 8 , and plane projection data D 1 (view=0, qt, pt) having sufficient density in the direction qt (direction perpendicular to the intersecting line of the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp) as well as direction pt (direction parallel to the intersecting line of the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp) will be calculated, as shown in FIG. 9 . The density of plane projection data D 1 (view=0, qt, pt) is preferably sufficiently higher than the pixel density in the reconstruction area, so as to be able to eliminate the interpolation when determining back projection pixel data D 2 from plane projection data D 1 .
FIG. 10 shows a schematic diagram of plane projection data D 1 ′ (view=30, δ=0, j, pt), D 1 ′ (view=30, δ=360, j, pt), D 1 ′ (view=30, δ=720, j, pt), corresponding to 0th turn, first turn, second turn at view=30°, respectively.
When compared to view=0°, first channel side of the multidetector 24 reaches to the projection plane pp, and the I-th channel side goes away from the projection plane pp, so that the plane projection data D 1 ′ (30, 0, j, pt), D 1 ′ (30, 360, j, pt), D 1 ′ (30, 720, j, pt), will be wider in the first channel side and narrower in the I-th channel side.
Here Z 30 indicates the origin of coordinate indicating the spatial location of the plane projection data D 1 ′ (30, 0, 1, 0).
FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of plane projection data D 1 ′ (30, qt, pt), which is calculated so as to have a sufficient density in both direction qt and direction pt after having performed interpolation/extrapolation on plane projection data D 1 ′ (30, 0, j, pt), D 1 ′ (30, 360, j, pt), D 1 ′ (30, 720, j, pt) as shown in FIG. 10 .
In FIGS. 12 ( a ) and ( b ) there are shown arrangement examples of the X-ray tube 21 and the multidetector 24 at view=90°. The projection plane pp at this point is yz plane that passes through the revolving center IC. When plane projecting thus obtained projection data D 0 (view=90, δ, j, i) onto the projection plane pp, plane projection data D 1 ′ (view 90, δ, j, pt) will be obtained, as shown in FIG. 12 ( c ).
As can be seen from the foregoing description, in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 135°≦view<225° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, xz plane that passes through the revolving center IC will be used for the projection plane pp, in a view angle range which may be delimited as 45°≦view<135° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, or in a view angle range which may be determined as 225°≦view<315° or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof, yz plane that passes through the revolving center IC will be used for the projection plane pp.
In order to determine plane projected data D 1 (view, δ, j, pt) from the projection data D 0 (view, δ, j, i), it is desirable to have a lookup table 31 for the plane projection stored in the storage device 7 as shown in FIG. 13 to make use of it.
The lookup table 31 as shown in FIG. 13 ( a ) is for determining plane projection data D 1 ′ (view, δ, j, pt) by two point interpolation/extrapolation, in which there are precalculated and predefined items including reference channel address i for retrieving projection data D 0 at a plurality of channel addresses i, and i+1 for determining plane projection data D 1 (view, δ, j, pt) at the coordinate (j, pt) by two point interpolation/extrapolation, and indices k 1 and k 2 for two point interpolation/extrapolation in the direction pt, for each view angle “view” in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof).
D 1 (view, δ, j, pt )= k 1 × D 0 (view, δ, j, i )+ k 2 × D 0 (view, δ, j, i+ 1)
Here, view is a step angle of the view angle (view angle difference between two adjacent views), for example 0.36° for a total of 1000 views.
A lookup table 31 ′ shown in FIG. 13 ( b ) is used for determining plane projection data D 1 ′ (view, qt, pt) by three point interpolation/extrapolation, in which there are precalculated and predefined items including reference channel address i for retrieving projection data D 0 at a plurality of channel addresses i, i+1, and i+2 for determining plane projection data D 1 (view, δ, j, pt) at the coordinate (j, pt) by three point interpolation/extrapolation, and indices k 1 , k 2 , and k 3 for three point interpolation/extrapolation in the direction pt, for each view angle “view” in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof).
In addition, for the helical scan system, the interpolation indices in the direction qt will be also set in a lookup table as similar to the above lookup table 31 , 31 ′ in order to perform interpolation/extrapolation in the direction qt in a similar way. The interpolation in the direction qt will be repeatedly iterated for each oblong area Ra as shown in FIG. 14 . Within such an oblong area Ra the operation will be symmetry in the direction qt about the center line.
For the axial scan system, interpolation/extrapolation will be done in only one single oblong area Ra as shown in FIG. 14 .
Due to the geometric similarity, the lookup table 31 , 31 ′ for use in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof) may be equally applied to any other view angle ranges than the view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof).
Now referring to FIG. 15 , there is shown an exemplary spatial position of the reconstruction area P.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 4
There is shown in this figure an exemplary reconstruction area P that resides at the position Zp=Za+(Zb−Za)/4, where Za is the z-axis coordinate of the X-ray tube 21 at view=0° and δ=0° and Zb is the z-axis coordinate of the X-ray tube 21 at view=0°, δ=360°.
Now referring to FIG. 16 , there is shown determination of back projection pixel data D 2 (0, x, y) by projecting plane projection data D 1 ( 0 , qt, pt) to the reconstruction area P in the direction of X-ray transmission.
As shown in FIG. 16 ( a ), coordinate X 0 may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 at view=0° to pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
As shown in FIG. 16 ( b ), coordinate Z 0 _a may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 at view=0° to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
As shown in FIGS. 16 ( c ) and ( d ), coordinate Z 0 _b may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 in the opposing view to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
In general,
β b=βa +180°−2 γ,
where γ is the angle of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 at view=β a to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with respect to the axis Bc of X-ray beam, and its opposing view is view 32 δ b.
Next, plane projection data D 1 ( 0 , qt_a, pt) will be determined corresponding to the coordinate (X 0 , Z 0 _a). In addition, plane projection data D 1 ( 0 , qt_b, pt) will also be determined corresponding to the coordinate (X 0 , Z 0 _b).
Then, back projection pixel data D 2 (0, x, y) will be delivered from the equation given by
D 2 (0 , x, y ) — a =( r 0 _ 0 a/r 0 _ 1 a ) 2 D 1 ( 0 , qt — a, pt )
where r 0 _ 0 a is the distance from the X-ray focal point of the X-ray tube 21 to the plane projection data D 1 ( 0 , qt a, pt) at view=0°, and r 0 _ 1 a is the distance from the X-ray focal point of the X-ray tube 21 to the pixels g (x, y).
Also, back projection pixel data D 2 (0, x, y)_b at view=0° in the opposing view will be given by
D 2 (0 , x, y ) — b =( r 0 _ 0 b/r 0 _ 1 b ) 2 D 1 ( 0 , qt — b, pt )
where r 0 _ 0 b is the distance from the X-ray tube 21 to the plane projection data D 1 ( 0 , qt_b, pt) in the opposing view, and r 0 _ 1 b is the distance from the X-ray tube 21 to the pixels g (x, y).
Then, back projection pixel data D 2 (0, x, y) will be given by adding back projection pixel data D 2 (0, x, y)_a to D 2 (0, x, y)_b after each having multiplied by cone beam reconstruction weight indices depending on the angle α a and α b shown in FIG. 16 , ω a and ω b respectively:
D 2 (0 ,x, y )=ω a D 2 (0 ,x, y ) — a+ω b D 2 (0 , x, y ) — b
The angle α a is the angle of the X-ray beam passing through the pixels g (x, y) at view=0° with the plane of reconstruction area P. Also, the angle α b is the angle of the X-ray beam passing through the pixels g (x, y) in the opposing view with the plane of reconstruction area P. In addition, ω a+ω b=1. The addition after multiplication with cone beam reconstruction weight indices ω a, ω b allow decreasing cone angle artifact.
For example, values for the cone beam reconstruction weight indices ω a, ω b maybe obtained from the following equation, where max [ ] is a function that selects larger one of values, and ½ of fan-beam angle is γ max:
g a =max [0, {(π/2+γmax)−|β a |}]|tan (α a )|
g b =max [0, {(π/2+γmax)−|β b |}]|tan (α b )|
x a =2 ×g a q /( g a q +g b q )
x b =2 ×g a q /( g a Q +g b q )
ω a=xa 2 (3−2 xa )
ω b=xb 2 (3−2 xb )
(for example, q=1)
Now referring to FIG. 17 , there is shown determination of back projection pixel data D 2 (30, x, y) by projecting plane projection data D 1 (30, qt, pt) into the reconstruction area P in the direction of X-ray transmission.
As shown in FIG. 17 ( a ), coordinate X 30 may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 at view=30° to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
Also as shown in FIG. 17 ( b ), coordinate Z 30 _a may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 at view=30° and δ=0° to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
Moreover, as shown in FIGS. 17 ( c ) and ( d ), coordinate Z 30 _b may be determined from the intersection of the line connecting the focal point of the X-ray tube 21 in the opposing view to the pixels g (x, y) on the reconstruction area P with the projection plane pp.
Then, back projection pixel data D 2 (30, x, y) will be given in a similar way to the foregoing description.
Similarly, back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y) for any views required for reconstruction will be determined.
Preferably, back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y)_a and D 2 (view, x, y)_b for the pixels g (x, y) present on the line parallel to the projection plane pp will be sequentially determined.
For example, as shown in FIG. 18 , when the reconstruction area P is a plane parallel to xy plane, and the projection plane pp is xz plane, back projection pixel data D 2 (view, str_x, y)_a to D 2 (view, str_x+n(y), y)_a for the pixels g (x, y) present on the line parallel to the x-axis are preferably determined consecutively.
In this case, weight R (y)_a for the pixels g (x, y) present on the line parallel to the x-axis may be (r 0 _ 1 a /r 0 _ 0 a ) 2 , which is shared in common. Therefore,
D 2 (view, x, y ) — a=R ( y ) — a×D 1 (view, str — qt +( x−str — x ) Δ qt, str — pt +( x−str — x )Δ pt ),
in which by varying from x=str_x to x=str_x+n (y), back projection pixel data D 2 (view, str_x, y) to D 2 (view, str_x+n (y), y) for pixels g (x, y) present on the line parallel to the x-axis can be consecutively determined.
Now referring to FIG. 19 , there is shown a schematic diagram of a lookup table 32 for back projection stored in the storage device 7 .
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 4 of 4
Back projection pixel data D 2 may be preferably determined from plane projection data D 1 (view, qt, pt) by making use of this lookup table 32 for back projection.
In the lookup table 32 , for each view angle “view” in the view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and als includes the periphery thereof), there are precalculated and predefined y coordinates “y” of back projection pixel data D 2 (y coordinates of the line), weights R (y)_a=(r 0 _ 0 a /r 0 _ 1 a ) 2 as a parameter of transform for determining one item of back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y)_a from one item of plane projection data D 1 (view, qt, pt), starting addresses str_x str_qt, sampling pitches Δqt, Δpt, the number of samples n (y).
Due to the geometric similarity, the lookup table 32 for use in a view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof) may be equally applied to any other view angle ranges than the view angle range which may be delimited as −45°≦view<45° (or which primarily includes the same and also includes the periphery thereof).
Now referring to FIG. 20 , there is shown determination of back projection data D 3 (x, y) by adding back projection pixel data D 2 (view, x, y) of all views for each corresponding pixel. Namely, D 3 (x, y)=viewsΣD 2 (view, x, y).
In accordance with the X-ray CT apparatus 100 as have been described above, by determining plane projection data D 1 from projection data D 0 , and determining back projection pixel data D 2 therefrom by projecting plane projection data D 1 to the reconstruction area in the direction of X-ray transmission, reconstruction will be performed by using projection data correctly corresponding to the X-ray beam passing through the reconstruction area. In addition, the operation will become totally simplified and faster.
In the foregoing description, 1st order interpolation/extrapolation has been envisioned. However, interpolation/extrapolation of 0th order or interpolation/extrapolation of 2nd order or more may be equally applied.
Also in the foregoing description, a helical interpolation using two sets of data D 2 originated from mutually opposing views has been envisioned. However a helical interpolation using two sets of data D 2 originated from the same view.
In addition, in the foregoing description, the view for the center axis Bc of X-ray beam to be parallel to the y-axis is termed as view=0°. However, any other given angle may be defined as view=0°.
Furthermore, in the foregoing preferred embodiment, an X-ray CT apparatus for medical use has been envisioned. However the present invention may be equally applied to the X-ray CT apparatus for industrial use.
Many widely different embodiments of the invention may be configured without departing from the spirit and the scope of the present invention. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described in the specification, except as defined in the appended claims.
Claims as granted
17 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
4 codes- A61B6/03
- G06T11/00
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock