Image processing apparatus for suppressing high-frequency components of color difference data
Granted 6 Mar 2007 · 2 office actions
Current assignee: Sony Corporation · originally Sony Group Corporation
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Yoshinori Tomita · Examiner: Young Lee · AU 2621 · TC 2600
Life of the application
12 dated eventsAbstract
An image processing apparatus capable of reducing noise contained in input image data. By determining whether or not, among the absolute values of the AC components of luminance Y, there is at least one value greater than a threshold value A, it is determined whether the components are effective edge components of the image or noise components. When it is determined that the components are effective edge components of the image, a suppress_flag is set to “0†so that a suppression process is not performed. When it is determined that the components are noise components, the suppress_flag is set to “1†so that a suppression process is performed. The present invention can be applied to a video camera for capturing an image of a subject.
Description
8 parts›TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to an image processing apparatus and, more particularly, to an image processing apparatus which is suitably used to eliminate noise components contained in image data.
›BACKGROUND ART
As techniques for coding still images and moving images, the JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) technique, the MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group) technique, and so on are used. For example, in the JPEG technique, a coding process is performed in such a way that a captured still image is divided into a block of 8×8 portions, and DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) processing and quantization processing are performed on that block.
In the above-described coding process using DCT, there are cases in which, in order to reduce noise, a process for suppressing AC (Alternating Current) coefficients of luminance and color differences is performed. In a case where noise is reduced in such a manner, a problem arises in that block distortion sometimes occurs.
›DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances. An object of the present invention is to reduce noise by comparing noise components and edge components with a threshold value.
The image processing apparatus of the present invention comprises orthogonal conversion means for performing orthogonal conversion on input image data; comparison means for comparing at least one of AC components of luminance data and AC components of color-difference data of the image data on which orthogonal conversion has been performed by the orthogonal conversion means with a predetermined threshold value; and suppression means for suppressing high-frequency components of the color-difference data when it is determined by the comparison means that components which are greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components.
The comparison means may compare low-frequency components of the AC components of the luminance data with the threshold value.
The comparison means may compare low-frequency components of the AC components of the color-difference data with the threshold value.
The orthogonal conversion of the orthogonal conversion means may be DCT.
The image processing apparatus may comprise a video camera section including image-capturing means.
The image processing method of the present invention comprises an orthogonal conversion step of performing orthogonal conversion on input image data; a comparison step of comparing at least one of AC components of luminance data and AC components of color-difference data of the image data on which orthogonal conversion has been performed in the process of the orthogonal conversion step with a predetermined threshold value; and a suppression step of suppressing high-frequency components of the color-difference data when it is determined in the process of the comparison step that components which are greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components.
The program of the recording medium of the present invention comprises an orthogonal conversion step of performing orthogonal conversion on input image data; a comparison step of comparing at least one of AC components of luminance data and AC components of color-difference data of the image data on which orthogonal conversion has been performed in the process of the orthogonal conversion step with a predetermined threshold value; and a suppression step of suppressing high-frequency components of the color-difference data when it is determined in the process of the comparison step that components which are greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components.
The program of the present invention allows a computer to execute an orthogonal conversion step of performing orthogonal conversion on input image data; a comparison step of comparing at least one of AC components of luminance data and AC components of color-difference data of the image data on which orthogonal conversion has been performed in the process of the orthogonal conversion step with a predetermined threshold value; and a suppression step of suppressing high-frequency components of the color-difference data when it is determined in the process of the comparison step that components which are greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components.
In the image processing apparatus and method, and the program of the present invention, at least one of the AC components of the luminance data and the AC components of the color-difference data of the image data on which orthogonal conversion is performed are compared with a threshold value. When it is determined by the comparison result that components greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components, the high-frequency components of the color-difference data are suppressed.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the configuration of an embodiment of an image processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of an image compression section 8 .
FIG. 3 illustrates zigzag scanning.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating details of a noise reduction process performed in step S 4 of FIG. 2 .
›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION · 1 of 3
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows the configuration of an embodiment of an image processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied. The image processing apparatus 1 is an apparatus for handling, for example, still images and moving images for a digital still camera, a digital video camera, a camcorder, etc. Image data of an image captured by an image sensor 2 of the image processing apparatus 1 is output to a data processing section 3 . The image sensor 2 is driven by a driving section 4 .
The data processing section 3 generates luminance data and color-difference data from the input image data, and outputs the data to a storage section 6 via a data bus 5 . The storage section 6 temporarily stores the luminance data and the color-difference data. The luminance data and the color-difference data stored in the storage section 6 are output to a filter 7 . The filter 7 performs a process for conversion into a resolution of a desired image size on the input luminance data and color-difference data, and causes the data to be stored again in the storage section 6 .
The luminance data and the color-difference data whose resolutions are converted, stored in the storage section 6 , are output to an image compression section 8 , whereby a compression process is performed. The luminance data and the color-difference data on which a coding process has been performed are recorded on a recording medium (not shown) by a recording/playback processing section 9 . Such a recording process is performed when a shutter button 10 is operated, and a process corresponding to that operation is instructed from a microcomputer 11 .
A drive 12 is used when data is read from or written into a recording medium, such as a magnetic disk 21 , an optical disk 22 , a magneto-optical disk 23 , or a semiconductor memory 24 .
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating processes performed in the image compression section 8 . In step S 1 , luminance data and color-difference data serving as image data stored in the storage section 6 are input via the data bus 5 . In the following description, the image data is assumed to be data sampled at a 4:2:2 color space of luminance and color differences.
In step S 2 , DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) is performed. First, the image data is divided into a block of 8×8 pixels. DCT is performed on the divided block. In this case, since a 4:2:2 color space is used, DCT is performed in units of 2 blocks for the luminance and 1 block for each of the color differences Cb and Cr.
In step S 3 , zigzag scanning is performed on the image data of the block in units of 8×8 pixels. As shown in FIG. 3 , for the block in units of 8×8 pixels, by assuming the pixel in the upper left corner to be 0, numbers (coefficients) of 1 through 63 are assigned up to the lower right corner in the order zigzag scanning is performed. Coefficient 0 indicates DC components, and coefficients 1 through 63 indicate AC components. As a result of the zigzag scanning being performed on the AC components, the image data is converted into a set of zero run lengths and data.
In step S 4 , a noise reduction process is performed. The noise reduction process will be described later. In step S 5 , quantization is performed on the image data on which the noise reduction process has been performed. The quantization is performed in such a manner that image data on which DCT has been performed is divided by a predetermined coefficient. As a result of the quantization being performed, the entropy of the image data can be lowered. Then, in step S 6 , two-dimensional Huffman coding is performed.
In step S 7 , the image data which has been coded in this manner is output to the recording/playback processing section 9 , whereby the data is recorded in a recording medium (not shown).
Referring to the flowchart in FIG. 4 , a description will now be given of the noise reduction process performed in step S 4 of FIG. 2 . The noise reduction process with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. 4 is performed in units of macroblocks. In this embodiment, reduction of noise is performed by suppressing the high-frequency components of the chroma of the flat portion.
In step S 11 , initialization is performed by setting a suppress_flag to “1”. This suppress_flag is a flag indicating whether or not the high-frequency components of the chroma of the flat portion should be suppressed. When the suppress_flag has been set to “1”, this means that suppression is to be performed. When the suppress_flag has been set to “0”, this means that suppression is not to be performed.
In step S 12 , it is determined whether or not, among the absolute values of the AC coefficients of Y, there is at least one coefficient greater than the threshold value A. As described with reference to FIG. 3 , for the AC components of the luminance Y, coefficients 1 through 63 exist. In step S 12 , all the absolute values of the respective components of the coefficients 1 through 63 of the luminance Y may be compared with the threshold value A. However, it is assumed here that the absolute values of the respective components of the coefficients 1 through 27 of the luminance Y are compared with the threshold value A.
The reason for the above is that, even if the components are of a small amplitude, when edge components of a certain image are contained in the block after DCT processing, since the possibility that a large part of components appears in certain components of the AC coefficients 1 through 27 is high, it can be considered in step S 12 that, as the targets of comparison with the threshold value A, the components of the AC coefficients 1 through 27 are sufficient. Of course, the components of AC coefficients 1 through 63 may be used as the targets of comparison with the threshold value A.
As discussed above, by decreasing the number of targets of comparison with the threshold value A (by making the low-frequency components among the AC components to be targets), it becomes possible to shorten the processing time required for the noise reduction process. Also, by appropriately selecting the targets of comparison (in this case, the AC coefficients 1 through 27 are selected), it becomes possible to reliably perform a noise reduction process without causing a deterioration in the noise reduction process.
›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION · 2 of 3
When it is determined in step S 12 that, among the absolute values of the components of the AC coefficients 1 through 27 of the luminance Y, there is at least one value greater than the threshold value A, the process proceeds to step S 13 . When it is determined that there is no value greater than the threshold value A, the process of step S 13 is skipped, and the process proceeds to step S 14 . In step S 13 , the suppress_flag is set to “0”. That is, in the subsequent processes, the setting is performed so that a suppression process is performed as necessary. The suppression refers to components to be processed being set to 0 data.
When it is determined that, among the absolute values of the components of the AC coefficients 1 through 27 of the luminance Y, there is at least one value greater than the threshold value A and the suppress_flag is set to “0”, it can be determined that edge components of a certain image are contained in the image of the DCT block to be processed. However, even when effective edge components of the image are not contained, noise components of a small amplitude are output from, for example, the image-capturing device of the image sensor 2 ( FIG. 1 ), and the noise components may exert an influence on the components of the luminance Y.
By considering the above, the threshold value A is set to a value by which the components within the image of the DCT block can be identified as components formed by the effective edge components of the image or as components formed by the noise components. A threshold value C (to be described later) is also set similarly.
In step S 14 , a process for compressing the DCT block of the luminance Y is performed. Whether or not the process for compressing the DCT block of the luminance Y is terminated is determined in step S 15 .
When a macroblock of a 4:2:2 image is to be processed, there are two DCT blocks of the luminance Y, and therefore, processes of steps S 12 through S 15 are repeated two times. When it is determined in step S 15 that the process for compressing the DCT block of the luminance Y is terminated, the process proceeds to step S 16 . In step S 16 , it is determined whether or not, among the absolute values of the components of the AC components less than the threshold value B of the color difference Cb, there is at least one component of a value greater than the threshold value C.
The threshold value B is set as a value indicating the boundary between the low-frequency components and the high-frequency components of the color difference Cb (color difference Cr). When it is determined in step S 16 that, among the absolute values of the AC components of the color difference Cb less than the set threshold value B, there are components of the AC coefficient of a value greater than the threshold value C, the process proceeds to step S 17 . When it is determined that there are no such components, the process proceeds to step S 18 .
In step S 17 , the suppress_flag is set to “0”, that is, the suppress_flag is set so that suppression is not performed in the subsequent processes. In step S 18 , it is determined whether or not the suppress_flag is “1”. When it is determined that the suppress_flag is “1”, the process proceeds to step S 19 . Since the suppress_flag is determined to be “1”, in step S 19 , the components of the AC coefficient greater than the threshold value B of the color difference Cb are suppressed to “0”. Then, in step S 20 , a compression process is performed on the DCT block of the color difference Cb.
On the other hand, when it is determined in step S 18 that the suppress_flag is not “1”, that is, the suppress_flag is “0”, or when the suppress_flag is set to “0” in step S 17 , the process proceeds to step S 20 , where a compression process is performed on the DCT block of the color difference Cb.
When the compression process for the DCT block of the color difference Cb in step S 20 is terminated, the process proceeds to step S 21 . The processes of steps S 21 through S 25 are processes for the DCT block of the color difference Cr, and basically, these processes are the same as the processes performed on the DCT block of the color difference Cb in steps S 16 through S 20 . Accordingly, an explanation thereof is omitted.
For the threshold value B and the threshold value C, the same value may be used during the processes for the color difference Cb and the color difference Cr, and different values may also be used.
The above-described noise reduction process is performed in such a way that the AC components of the luminance Y, in particular, the AC components 1 through 27 positioned in the upper left of the DCT block, the low-frequency components of the color difference Cb (the components of the AC coefficient less than the threshold value B), and the low-frequency components of the color difference Cr (the components of the AC coefficient less than the threshold value B) are made to be detection targets (targets of comparison with the threshold value A or the threshold value C), and is performed in such a way that the high-frequency components of the color difference Cb and the high-frequency components of the color difference Cr are made to be targets of suppression. As a result, noise generated by the image sensor 2 , etc., is eliminated.
As a result of the above, it is possible to prevent effective edge components of the image from being determined to be noise and from being suppressed, conversely, it is possible to prevent noise from being determined to be effective edge components of the image and from being not suppressed. Thus, it is possible to reliably leave the edge components of the image and to eliminate unwanted noise.
In the above-described embodiment, the case of image data which is sampled at a 4:2:2 color space has been described as an example. Of course, the present invention can be applied to a 4:2:0 color space and a 4:1:1 color space.
Although the above-described series of processes can be performed by hardware, the processes can also be performed by software. In a case where the series of processes is performed by software, programs which form the software are installed from a recording medium into a computer incorporated into dedicated hardware or into, for example, a general-purpose personal computer capable of executing various types of functions by installing various programs.
›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION · 3 of 3
A recording medium may be formed of a packaged medium in which the program is recorded, which is distributed for providing the program to a user separately from a personal computer, as shown in FIG. 1 , such as the magnetic disk 21 (including a floppy (registered trade name) disk), the optical disk 22 (CD-ROM (Compact Disk-Read Only Memory) and a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk)), the magneto-optical disk 23 (including MD (Mini-Disc) (registered trade name)), or the semiconductor memory 24 . The recording medium may also be formed of a ROM or a hard disk in which the program is recorded, such recording medium being provided to the user while being incorporated in advance in the computer.
In this specification, the steps forming the program provided in the form of a recording medium may be executed chronologically according to the written orders. However, they do not have to be executed chronologically, and they may be executed concurrently or individually.
›INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
As has thus been described, according to the image processing apparatus and method, and the program of the present invention, at least one of the AC components of the luminance data and the AC components of the color-difference data of image data which has been subjected to orthogonal conversion are compared with a threshold value. When it is determined by the comparison result that components greater than the threshold value do not exist within the AC components, the high-frequency components of the color-difference data are suppressed. Therefore, it is possible to reduce noise components without causing block distortion to occur
Claims as granted
7 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
8 codes- G06T5/00
- H04N5/21
- H04N7/12
- H04N1/409
- H04N1/60
- H04N1/46
- H04N1/41
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock