USPatent applicationPatented

Methods and apparatus for testing and burn-in of semiconductor devices

Granted 15 Feb 2005 · 1 office action

Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Siu Waf Low, Yong Kian Tan, Soon Huat Goh, Yong Poo Chia +2 · Examiner: Minh N. Tang · AU 2829 · TC 2800

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A testing scheme for ball-grid array devices of different sizes where the same ball-grid pattern may be tested using the same set of test adapters. A testing scheme includes providing a plurality of devices having a predetermined pattern of solder balls attached, providing a plurality of adapters secured to a test board, each of the adapters including a plurality of test contacts arranged in a pattern corresponding to the predetermined pattern of solder balls, removably attaching the plurality of devices to a device holding apparatus such that the predetermined pattern of solder balls on the devices corresponds to the predetermined pattern of test contacts on the plurality of adapters, then positioning the device holding apparatus to bring the plurality of solder balls in contact with the plurality of test contacts.

Description

6 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from Singapore Application No. 200204962-5, filed Aug. 16, 2002.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates, generally, to testing and burn-in of semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to an improved test and burn-in fixture for use with bare die and high-density packages such as ball grid arrays.

2. Background Information

Modern semiconductor fabrication techniques have dramatically increased the density and speed of semiconductor devices, leading to a parallel effort in the field of semiconductor packaging, where increased device density gives rise to many challenges related to electrical connectivity, heat-transfer, manufacturability, and the like. One such challenge relates to the burn-in and testing of ball-grid array (BGA) packages, chip-scale packages (CSP), bumped die, and other such devices using an array of solder balls as contacts.

With such devices, edge-of-package to solder ball location is a critical dimension, and is easily influenced by substrate tolerance issues, processing machinery, test machinery, and other factors. The BGA ball pad location tolerance might be approximately +/−25 microns, while the singulation tolerance of the edges of finished devices may vary by +/−50 microns. Any such errors in alignment may result in erroneous rejection due to poor contacts during electrical tests—errors which will only become more significant as ball pitch becomes smaller and effects such as thermal expansion and the like become more and more dominant.

Furthermore, while ball-grid array patterns may be standardized, the dimensions of the packages or die themselves often vary greatly. Referring to FIG. 1 , for example, while the two BGA devices 102 and 106 exhibit the same pattern of solder balls 104 , their external package or die dimensions are different, and would therefore require different test adapters for burn-in or functional testing. Specifically, the distance x′ from corner 116 to ball 114 on device 106 is significantly larger than dimension x from corner 112 to ball 110 on device 102 . Similarly, the dimension y′ of device 106 is greater than dimension y of device 102 . Traditional BGA test systems would rely on registration of the external package of the devices to corners within a rectangular fixture. As a result, any fixture designed for use with device 102 could not be used with device 106 .

Similarly, any wafer-level testing would require refixturing of the test board to accommodate different die geometries. As it is desirable to achieve 100% utilization of burn-in boards, current test systems are inadequate in that rejects during wafer-level testing can not easily be removed after each stage.

Methods are therefore needed in order to overcome these and other limitations of the prior art.

›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides systems and methods which overcome the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a testing scheme wherein ball-grid array devices of different sizes but the same ball-grid pattern may be efficiently and cost-effectively tested using the same set of test adapters.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a testing scheme includes the following steps: providing a plurality of devices having a predetermined pattern of terminals (for example, solder balls) attached thereto; providing a plurality of adapters secured to a test board, each of said adapters including a plurality of test contacts arranged in a pattern corresponding to said predetermined pattern of terminals; removeably attaching said plurality of devices to a device holding apparatus such that said predetermined pattern of terminals on said devices corresponds to said predetermined pattern of test contacts on said plurality of adapters; and positioning said device holding apparatus to bring said plurality of terminals in contact with said plurality of test contacts.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and:

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of typical packages or dice having an array of solder bonds arranged in a grid;

FIG. 2 is schematic cross-sectional view of a testing scheme in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the scheme shown in FIG. 2 wherein the ball grid is brought into contact with the test contact array;

FIG. 4 depicts an array of adapters in accordance with the present invention used to test devices of varying sizes;

FIGS. 5A and 5B show top and side views of an adapter in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 6 and 7 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of an adapter in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 8 shows a test assembly in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

Systems and methods in accordance with the present invention provide a testing scheme wherein ball-grid array devices of different sizes but the same ball-grid pattern may be efficiently and cost-effectively tested using the same set of test adapters.

More particularly, referring to FIG. 2 , a test apparatus in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention includes a series of adapters 204 connected to a test board 214 , wherein each of the adapters 204 includes a number of test contacts 208 which electrically communicate with test board 214 . The test contacts 208 are aligned with an array of terminals 206 attached to a corresponding series of devices 202 . That is, test contacts 208 are arranged in a grid which matches the terminal pattern (e.g., ball grid pattern) of devices 202 . Devices 202 are attached to an adhesive surface 211 of flexible tape 210 which, in the illustrated embodiment, is anchored by a frame or “carrier” 212 .

As shown in FIG. 3 , when carrier 212 and tape 210 are lowered, terminals 206 are brought into contact with corresponding test contacts 208 . Because the alignment of terminals 206 with contacts 208 is achieved by proper placement of devices 202 on flexible adhesive tape 210 , the dimensions of the device 202 are not critical to achieving good test contact. In the illustration, for example, devices 202 ( a ), 202 ( b ), and 202 ( c ) vary in width, but their respective arrays of terminals 206 properly contact adapters 204 .

This advantage can also be seen in FIG. 4 , which shows a top view of a series of adapters 204 configured in a rectilinear pattern. Without loss of generality, the terms “solder balls,” “ball grid array,” or “balls” are used to describe terminals 206 in the description that follows. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be used in connection with any form of terminal, including, for example, various balls, bumps, and the like.

A total of twelve devices 202 with ball grid arrays 206 are shown in FIG. 4 . Although the exterior dimensions of devices 202 are different (note, for example, devices 202 ( a ), 202 ( b ), and 202 ( c )) the ball grid array 206 for each device 202 is similarly situated with respect to adapters 204 (and their corresponding test contacts, not shown). In this illustration, the ball grid array for each device 202 is centered with respect to the rectangular outline of the device. Although this centered array position would typically be the case, the present invention may be used in connection with other configurations, i.e., configuration where the ball grid pattern is not necessarily centered with respect to the package. The pattern itself may be arbitrary, and need not be simply rectangular.

It should be appreciated that the term “device” as used herein is intended to encompass a wide range of package-level, die-level, and wafer-level applications where an array of solder balls or the like are used to provide electrical connectivity to any external boards or components.

In the event device 202 is a semiconductor package, it may comprise, for example, a chip-scale package (CSP) or a ball grid array (BGA) package, including conventional as well as high-lead pitch BGA packages, i.e., plastic ball grid arrays (PBGA), fine-pitch ball grid arrays (FBGA), and thin fine-pitch ball grid arrays (TFBGA).

In the event device 202 corresponds to an individual semiconductor die, either in wafer or sawn form, it may comprise any suitable semiconductor material upon which or within which electronic components may be formed. Suitable materials for devices 202 include, for example, group IV semiconductors (i.e., Si, Ge, and SiGe), group III-V semiconductors (i.e., GaAs, InAs, and AlGaAs), and other less-conventional materials, such as SiC, diamond, and sapphire. Devices 202 may comprise single crystal material, a silicon-on-insulator material (SOI), or one or more polycrystalline or amorphous epitaxial layers formed on a suitable base material. It will be appreciated that devices 202 will also include various electronic components incorporated into the semiconductor material as well as interconnect structures consisting of conductive paths and various dielectrics for isolating these conductive paths. Such electronic components and processing methods are well known and therefore will not be discussed in detail herein.

Solder balls 206 and, consequently, test contacts 208 , may be configured in a variety of grid patterns with a wide range of ball-pitch. In one embodiment, the ball grid has a pitch of about 0.5 to 2.0 mm. As is known in the art, solder balls 206 may comprise a variety of materials, e.g., various lead alloys (Sn63Pb37, Sn62Pb36Ag2, Sn10Pb90, etc.), lead-free alloys (Sn95Ag5, Sn65Ag25Sb10, Au80Sn20, Sn95.5Ag4Cu0.5, etc.), and various Cu-core and Ag-core balls.

More background information regarding BGA technology may be found, for example, in John H. Lau, BALL GRID ARRAY TECHNOLOGY (1994), and John H. Lau, FLIP CHIP TECHNOLOGIES (1995). Additional information regarding basic packaging techniques may be found in a number of standard texts, e.g., Seraphim, Lasky, and Li, PRINCIPLES OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING (1989); John H. Lau, et al., ELECTRONIC PACKAGING: DESIGN, MATERIALS, PROCESS, AND RELIABILITY (1998).

In the illustrated embodiment, flexible tape 210 is used to secure devices 202 through the use of an adhesive surface 211 which lightly bonds to surfaces 220 of the devices and which is attached to a carrier 212 . Flexible tape 210 may be any suitably material, e.g., any of the various tapes used to secure wafers and die for sawing, testing, and the like. For example, tape 210 may consist of a flexible polyvinylchloride material having an adhesive surface 211 comprising a synthetic acrylic adhesive. Such adhesives can be selected in accordance with whether a low-tack, medium tack, or high-tack adhesive is required.

In one embodiment, carrier 212 comprises a standard inner and outer hoop set, wherein the inner hoop and tape fit concentrically within the outer hoop. The geometry of carrier 212 may be selected in accordance with the size and number of devices being tested. For example, carrier 212 may comprise a conventional circular frame or hoop-set having a diameter of 5″-12″. The present invention may be used in conjunction with larger carriers, however.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

FIGS. 5A and 5B show one embodiment of adapter 204 . Specifically, FIG. 5A shows a top view of an adapter 204 , and FIG. 5B shows a cross-sectional view. In this embodiment, the array of test contacts 208 are fixed within the body of adapter 204 and each test contact 208 includes a corresponding pin 502 which can be used, for example, to fit into a corresponding socket, either soldered or fixed to the test board or connected to the test board pins' wires in the test board (i.e., test board 214 in FIG. 2 ). The top surface of contacts 208 may be flat, concave, or any other shape suitable for contacting a solder ball. The diameter of contacts 208 are preferably about the same diameter as the solder balls being contacted, but may be slightly larger or smaller.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show another embodiment of adapter 204 . In this embodiment the adapter 204 includes a number of holes 602 arranged in a pattern corresponding to the ball grid being contacted. A number of probe pins 604 are provided for contacting balls 206 of device 202 through holes 602 . Referring to FIG. 7 , device 202 is positioned such that balls 206 fit in a self-aligning matter within holes 602 . Next, during testing or burn-in, probe pins 604 are moved into contact with solder balls 206 . In this embodiment, a flexible tape and adhesive surface may be used as shown in FIG. 2 , or, alternatively, a non-adhesive surface may be brought down upon devices 202 to keep them in contact with adapters 204 after the devices 202 have been properly positioned.

The present invention also comprehends a number of additional embodiments for adapter 204 wherein the array of balls 206 are contacted by test contacts 208 of various designs. For example, contacts 208 may be configured as “tweezer” contacts, side contacts, “Y” contacts, spring and pin contacts, metal contacts formed on an elastomer adapter body, conductive epoxy bump contacts, and any other known or future method of contacting solder balls.

FIG. 8 shows an example test assembly in accordance with the present invention. Initially, a number of devices 202 are placed on the adhesive surface of tape 210 with solder balls 206 facing outward. These devices may be a subset of dice or package's selected from a previous test step, or may be dice as sawn in wafer form (wafer-level testing). Next, the carrier 212 and tape 210 are placed such that balls 206 on the various devices 202 make contact with respective adapters 204 on test board 802 . A clamp subassembly 806 rotateably attached to board 802 via a hinge 808 is closed onto the carrier 212 and suitably held in position. In this embodiment, the flexible tape 210 acts to provide a small amount of pressure to the back of devices 202 , ensuring contact with adapters 204 . A connector 804 is provided along one edge of test board 802 to allow the board to be plugged into an external test system through a back-plane or other similar socket in the burn-in oven, test chamber, or the like. Electrical wiring and/or metallic traces (not shown) are included on test board 802 to provide electrical connectivity from the various adapters to connector 804 .

Although the invention has been described herein in conjunction with the appended drawings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the scope of the invention is not so limited. Modifications in the selection, design, and arrangement of the various components and steps discussed herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims as granted

28 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01R31/28
USPC · US Patent Classification
324/755324/765

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003Jan 2004Apr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.4 y
862 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Minh N. Tang
art unit 2829 · TC 2800
Citations: 5 back · 6 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock