USPatent applicationPatented

Iron catalyzed cross coupling reactions of aromatic compounds

Granted 11 Apr 2006 · 3 office actions

Assignee: STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE MBH

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: María Méndez, Andreas Leitner, Alois Fürstner · Examiner: James O. Wilson · AU 1624 · TC 1600

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A process for the production of compounds Ar—R 1 by means of a cross-coupling reaction of an organometallic reagent R 1 -M with an aromatic or heteroaromatic substrate Ar—X catalyzed by one or several iron salts or iron complexes as catalysts or pre-catalysts, present homogeneously or heterogeneously in the reaction mixture. This new invention exhibits substantial advantages over established cross coupling methodology using palladium- or nickel complexes as the catalysts. Most notable aspects are the fact that (i) expensive and/or toxic nobel metal catalysts are replaced by cheap, stable, commercially available and toxicologically benign iron salts or iron complexes as the catalysts or pre-catalysts, (ii) commercially attractive aryl chlorides as well as various aryl sulfonates can be used as starting materials, (iii) the reaction can be performed under “ligand-free†conditons, and (iv) the reaction times are usually very short.

Description

30 parts
›The present invention describes a method for the…

The present invention describes a method for the cross coupling of aromatic compounds with organometallic reagents in the presence of iron salts or iron complexes as the catalysts or pre-catalysts.

Classical cross coupling processes are of utmost importance for modern organic synthesis and have found applications in industrial practice for the production of fine chemicals and biologically active compounds (Review: Metal - catalyzed Cross - coupling Reactions (Eds: F. Diederich, P. J. Stang), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998). In most cases, cross coupling reactions are catalyzed by palladium- or nickel complexes. Despite their versatility and broad scope, however, the need for palladium- and nickel complexes constitutes a significant drawback. Most notable disadvantages are (i) the high cost of the required palladium catalysts, (ii) the potential toxicity of nickel complexes and of possible nickel residues derived thereof in the products formed, (iii) the need for special ligands to render the palladium- or nickel centers sufficiently reactive, and (iv) extended reaction times in many cases. To minimize the costs of production and/or the risk of contamination of the products with potentially toxic residues, considerable efforts have to be made to recover the metal catalysts from the reaction mixtures.

The best substrates for palladium- and nickel catalyzed cross coupling reactions are aryl iodides and aryl bromides. Only recently have special ligands been designed that allow to extend the scope of these methods to aryl chlorides which are usually more attractive substrates due to their lower price; some of these ligands, however, are expensive and sensitive towards oxygen and moisture (C. Dai et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 2001, 123, 2719–2724; D. W. Old et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1998, 120, 9722–9723; J. Huang et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1999, 121, 9889–9890; A. Fürstner et al. Synlett 2001, 290–292; A. Zapf et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed . 2000, 39, 4153–4155; V. P. W. Böhm et al. J. Organomet. Chem . 2000, 595, 186–190; X. Bei et al. J. Org. Chem . 1999, 64, 6797–6803; J. P. Wolfe et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1999, 121, 9550–9561; A. F. Littke et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 2000, 122, 4020–4028; R. Stürmer Angew. Chem. Int. Ed . 1999, 38, 3307–3308). Aryl triflates represent yet another class of suitable starting materials for palladium- or nickel catalyzed cross coupling reactions, whereas less expensive aryl sulfonates, in particular methanesulfonates or p-toluenesulfonates have hardly been used so far for their lack of activity in most cases (V. Percec et al. J. Org. Chem . 1995, 60, 1060–1065; Y. Kobayashi et al Tetrahedron Lett . 1996, 37, 8531–8534; D. Zim et al. Org. Lett . 2001, 3, 3049–3051).

Iron salts have been proposed as catalysts for cross coupling reactions by Kochi et al. as early as 1971 but found little attention in the following decades (M. Tamura et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1971, 93, 1487–1489; S. M. Neumann et al. J. Org. Chem . 1975, 40, 599–606; R. S. Smith et al. J. Org. Chem . 1976, 41, 502–509; J. K. Kochi, Acc. Chem. Res . 1974, 7, 351–360). This is partly due to the fact that iron salts in the presence of aryl halides lead to the homo-coupling of Grignard reagents with formation of symmetrical dimers (e.g. phenylmagnesium bromide to biphenyl) rather than to the desired cross coupled products (M. S. Kharasch et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1941, 63, 2316–2320). Therefore the scope of iron-catalyzed cross coupling reactions remained limited to reactions of Grignard reagents with alkenyl halides (G. Cahiez et al. Synthesis 1998, 1199–1205; G. A. Molander et al. Tetrahedron Lett . 1983, 5449–5452; A. Fürstner et al. Tetrahedron Lett . 1996, 37, 7009–7012; M. A. Fakhakh et al. J. Organomet. Chem . 2001, 624, 131–135; W. Dohle et al., Synlett 2001, 1901–1904), alkenyl sulfones (J. L. Fabre et al. Tetrahedron Lett . 1982, 23, 2469–2472), carboxylic acid chlorides (V. Fiandanese et al. Tetrahedron Lett . 1984, 25, 4805–4808; M. M. Dell'Anna et al., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical 2000, 161, 239–243) or allylic phosphates (A. Yanagisawa et al. Synlett 1991, 513–514; A. Yanagisawa et al., Tetrahedron 1991, 50, 6017–6028). Successful iron-catalyzed cross coupling reactions of aromatic compounds such as aryl halides, aryl sulfonates, or aryl phosphates have not been reported.

Surprisingly, however, we have found that the cross-coupling of various types of aromatic substrates with different types of organometallic reagents can be efficiently catalyzed by iron salts or iron complexes under certain conditions specified below (for a preliminary publication during the grace period see: A. Fürstner et al. Angew. Chem. Int Ed . 2002, 41, 609–612). This new invention exhibits substantial advantages over established cross coupling methodology. Most notable aspects are the fact that (i) expensive and/or toxic nobel metal catalysts are replaced by cheap, stable, commercially available and toxicologically benign iron salts or iron complexes as the catalysts or pre-catalysts, (ii) commercially attractive aryl chlorides as well as various aryl sulfonates can be used as starting materials, (iii) the reaction can be performed under “ligand-free” conditons, and (iv) the reaction times are usually very short.

The active iron catalyst is formed in situ under reaction conditions from suitable iron precatalysts. All iron compounds of the oxidation states −2, −1, 0, +1, +2, +3 can be used as such precatalysts, including metallic iron or intermetallic iron compounds if used in suitably dispersed form. This includes, but is not restricted to, FeF 2 , FeF 2 .4H 2 O, FeF 3 , FeF 3 .3 H 2 O, FeCl 2 , FeCl 2 .4 H 2 O, FeCl 3 , FeCl 3 .6H 2 O, FeCl 3 (PPh 3 ), Fe(OEt) 2 , Fe(OEt) 3 , FeCl 2 .(PPh 3 ) 2 , FeCl 2 .(dppe) [dppe=1,2-bis-(diphenylphosphino)-ethane], Fe(acac) 2 (acac=acetylacetonate), Fe(acac) 3 , tris-(trifluoroacetylacetonato)iron (III), tris-(hexafluoroacetylacetonato)iron (III), tris-(dibenzoylmethido)iron (III), tris-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-diheptanedionato)iron (III), FeBr 2 , FeBr 3 , Fel 2 , Fe(II)acetate, Fe(II)oxalate, Fe(II)stearate, Fe(III)citrate.Hydrate, Fe(III)pivalate, Fe(II)-D-gluconate.2 H 2 O, Fe(OSO 2 C 6 H 4 Me) 3 , Fe(OSO 2 C 6 H 4 Me) 3 .Hydrate, FePO 4 , Fe(NO 3 ) 3 , Fe(NO 3 ) 3 .9 H 2 O Fe(ClO 4 ) 2 .Hydrate, FeSO 4 , FeSO 4 .Hydrate, Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 .Hydrate, K 3 Fe(CN) 6 , ferrocene, bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)iron, bis(indenyl)iron, Fe(II)phthalocyanin, Fe(III)phthalocyanin chloride, Fe(III)-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedioate, Fe(CO) 5 , Fe(salen)X [salen=N,N-ethylenebis(salicylidenamidato), X=Cl, Br, I], 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-21H,23H-porphin-iron(III) halide, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)-21H,23H-porphin-iron(III) halide, activated Fe (A. V. Kavaliunas et al. Organometallics 1983, 2, 377–383; A. Fürstner Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl . 1993, 32, 164–189), iron-magnesium intermetallic compounds (L. E. Aleandri et al. Chem. Mat . 1995, 7, 1153–1170; B. Bogdanovic et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed . 2000, 39, 4610–4612). The precatalysts can be used in anhydrous or in hydrated form. Preferred catalysts are those that are soluble or partly soluble in the reaction medium. The catalyst loading can be varied in a wide range, preferably between 0.01 mol % and 20 mol % with regard to the substrates used.

›The present invention using said iron precatalyts pertains…

The present invention using said iron precatalyts pertains to the following process:

wherein

Ar is any C6–C30 aromatic or heteroaromatic group, with aromatic or heteroaromatic being defined as given in Smith, M. B., March, J. March's Advanced Organic Chemistry , 5 th Ed., Wiley, N.Y., 2001 X can be selected from halide, sulfonate, phosphonate R 1 is any C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said alkyl or aryl groups may be substituted by any substituent which is kinetically inert towards the metal in the reagent R 1 -M as defined below M is MgZ, CaZ, ZnZ, MnZ Z is any anionic ligand

In a preferred embodiment

Ar is phenyl, unsubstituted or substituted with 1–5 identical or different substituents chosen from the following list: C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 linear or branched perfluoroalkyl, C2–C10 alkenyl, C2–C10 alkynyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl, —COOR 2 , —OR 3 , —CN, —SR 4 , —SOR 5 , —SO 2 R 6 , —SO 2 (OR 7 ), —SO 2 (NR 8 R 9 ), —COR 10 , —NR 11 R 12 , —CONR 13 R 14 , —F, —Cl, —SiR 15 R 16 R 17 , —PR 18 R 19 , —P(O)R 20 R 21 , —P(O)(OR 22 )(OR 23 ), —P(O)(NR 24 R 25 )(NR 26 R 27 ), —NCO, —NCS, —OC(O)OR 28 , —OC(S)OR 29 , —OC(O)NR 30 R 31 , —NR 32 C(O)OR 33 , —NR 34 C(O)NR 35 R 36 , —C(OR 37 ) 2 , —C(OR 38 )(OR 39 ), —OC(O)R 40 , —NR 41 C(O)R 42 , —SC(O)R 43 , —N═R 44 , —OSO 2 R 45 , —NR 46 SO 2 R 47 , —C(NR 48 )(OR 49 ), —N═NR 50 R 51 , —NO 2 , —C(OR 52 ) 3 , —C(SR 53 ) 2 , —OSiR 54 R 55 R 56 with R 2 –R 56 independently chosen from: H, C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 linear or branched perfluoroalkyl, C2–C10 alkenyl, C2–C10 alkynyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said phenyl ring may be annellated or non-annellated to one or more other rings of any ring size, said other rings being aromatic, heteroaromatic or non-aromatic X is fluoride, chloride, —OSO 2 R 57 , —OP(O)(OR 58 )(OR 59 ) with R 57 –R 59 being independently chosen from: C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C1–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 perfluoroalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or heteroaryl groups can be substituted with 1–5 identical or different substituents chosen from C1–C6 branched or linear alkyl, C1–C6 perfluoroalkyl, C6–C20 aryl, —F, —CN, R 1 is C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or heteroaryl group may be substituted or unsubstituted by any substitutent which is kinetically inert towards Mg M is MgZ Z is any anionic ligand

In another preferred embodiment

Ar is a heteroaromatic five-membered or six-membered ring with 1–4 heteroatoms for the five-membered ring or 1–5 heteroatoms for the six-membered ring, respectively, which may be identical or not identical and chosen amongst N, S, O, P; said heteroaromatic five- or six-membered ring may be annellated or not-annelated to one or more other rings of any ring size, said other rings being aromatic, heteroaromatic, or non-aromatic, and can be substituted with 1–5 identical or different substituents chosen from the following list: C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 linear or branched perfluoroalkyl, C2–C10 alkenyl, C2–C10 alkynyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl, —COOR 2 , —OR 3 , —CN, —SR 4 , —SOR 5 , —SO 2 R 6 , —SO 2 (OR 7 ), —SO 2 (NR 8 R 9 ), —COR 10 , —NR 11 R 12 , —CONR 13 R 14 , —F, —Cl, —SiR 15 R 16 R 17 , —PR 18 R 19 , —P(O)R 20 R 21 , —P(O)(OR 22 )(OR 23 ), —P(O)(NR 24 R 25 )(NR 26 R 27 ), —NCO, —NCS, —OC(O)OR 28 , —OC(S)OR 29 , —OC(O)NR 30 R 31 , —NR 32 C(O)OR 33 , —NR 34 C(O)NR 35 R 36 , —C(OR 37 ) 2 , —C(OR 38 )(OR 39 ), —OC(O)R 40 , —NR 41 C(O)R 42 , —SC(O)R 43 , —N═R 44 , —OSO 2 R 45 , —NR 46 SO 2 R 47 , —C(NR 48 )(OR 49 ), —N═NR 50 R 51 , —NO 2 , —C(OR 52 ) 3 , —C(SR 53 ) 2 , —OSiR 54 R 55 R 56 with R 2 –R 56 being independently chosen amongst H, C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 linear or branched perfluoroalkyl, C2–C10 alkenyl, C2–C10 alkynyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; X is fluoride, chloride, —OSO 2 R 57 , OP(O)(OR 58 )(OR 59 ) with R 57 –R 59 being indepentently chosen amongst C1–C10 linear or branched alkyl, C1–C10 cycloalkyl, C1–C10 perfluoroalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or heteroaryl groups can be substituted with 1–5 identical or different substituents chosen from C1–C6 branched or linear alkyl, C1–C6 perfluoroalkyl, C6–C20 aryl, —F, —CN, R 1 is C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl; said alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or heteroaryl group may be substituted or unsubstituted by any substitutent which is kinetically inert towards the metal Mg M is MgZ Z is any anionic ligand

In a most preferred embodiment

X is chloride, methanesulfonate, benzenesulfonate, toluenesulfonate, dimethylbenzenesulfonate, trimethylbenzenesulfonate, triisopropylbenzenesulfonate, fluorobenzenesulfonate, difluorobenzenesulfoante, trifluorobenzenesulfonate, hexafluorobenzenesulfonate, methoxybenzenesulfonate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, or nonafluorobutanesulfonate (nonaflate) R 1 is C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl which may be substituted or unsubstituted by any substitutent which is kinetically inert towards the metal Mg and M is MgZ, wherein Z is fluoride, chloride, bromide, iodide, C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C20 cycloalkyl or M is (ZnR 60 R 61 )MgZ wherein R 60 , R 61 is any C1–C20 linear or branched alkyl, C3–C10 cycloalkyl, C6–C20 aryl or heteroaryl, which may be unsubstituted or substituted by any substitutent which is kinetically inert towards Mg, wherein Z is fluoride, chloride, bromide, iodide

The aromatic substrates as defined above may contain more than one group X which may be identical or non-identical and chosen from the lists defined above. If the aromatic substrate contains more than one such group X, the present invention also pertains to:

reactions in which only one of said groups X is selectively replaced during the cross coupling reaction in the presence of iron catalysts or iron precatalysts by an organic residue R 1 , while the other groups X are preserved in the product formed; reactions in which all said groups X are replaced during the cross coupling reaction in the presence of iron catalysts or iron precatalysts by the same organic residue R 1 ; reactions in which said groups X are consecutively replaced during the cross coupling process in the presence of iron catalysts or iron precatalysts with organic residues R 1 that are non-identical. This consecutive cross coupling is achieved by consecutive addition of the organometallic reagents R 1 -M having non-identical residues R 1 to the reaction mixture containing said substrate and the iron catalysts or iron precatalysts.

›A representative example for an iron-catalyzed cross coupling…

A representative example for an iron-catalyzed cross coupling which simultaneously introduces more than one identical substituent R 1 is given in Scheme 1. A representative example for an iron-catalyzed cross coupling which introduces more than one non-identical substituent R 1 is given in Schemes 2 and 3. This procedure allows the formation of the musk-odored macrocycle muscopyridine and analogues (H. Schinz et al., Helv. Chim. Acta 1946, 29, 1524) by a consecutive iron-catalyzed cross coupling followed by ring closing metathesis (RCM) (A. Fürstner, Angew, Chem. Int. Ed . 2000, 39, 3012) and subsequent hydrogenation as shown in Scheme 3.

The reaction can be performed in any solvent that is inert to the chosen organometallic reagents R 1 -M as defined above. Prefered solvents are ethereal solvents, hydrocarbon solvents or aprotic dipolar solvents. Possible solvents include, but are not restricted to, diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran, methyl-tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, tert-butyl methyl ether, dibutyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, dimethoxyethane, dimethoxymethane, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, isooctane, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, xylene, cymene, petrol ether, decaline, dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP), tetramethylurea, sulfolane, diethyl carbonate, 1,3-dimethyltetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone (DMPU), hexamethylphosphoric acid triamide (HMPA), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA).

In a preferred embodiment, the reaction medium consists of a mixture of two or more solvents, which comprise one or more ethereal or hydrocarbon solvent chosen from: diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran, methyl-tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, tert-butyl methyl ether, dibutyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, dimethoxyethane, dimethoxymethane, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, isooctane, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, xylene, cymene, petrol ether, decaline, and one or more aprotic dipolar solvent chosen from: dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP), tetramethylurea, sulfolane, diethyl carbonate, 1,3-dimethyltetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone (DMPU), hexamethylphosphoric acid triamide (HMPA), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA).

The reaction temperature can be varied in a wide range between −78° C. and +120° C. In a preferred embodiment, the reaction is started at temperatures ranging from −10° C. to +30° C. Eventually, heat may evolve during the iron-catalyzed cross coupling, particularly when carried out at larger scale, and appropriate measures must be taken to control the reaction temperature to avoid any risks associated with such formation of heat. One possibility consists in the slow addition of the organometallic reagent R 1 -M to the reaction mixture which may additionally be cooled.

The scope of the iron catalyzed cross coupling is illustrated by—but by no means restricted to—the examples compiled in Tables 1–3 and in the Experimental Section. Products accessible by said iron catalyzed cross coupling process can be used as, or may serve as precursors for detergents, agrochemicals, pharmaceutically active compounds for use in human or veterinary medicine, dyes, pheromones, lubricants, perfume ingredients, aroma ingredients.

The examples specified hereafter describe prototypical cross coupling reactions using iron salts or iron complexes as pre-catalysts under preferred conditions. However, said examples should by no means limit the scope, the scope of application, or the advantages of the present invention.

›Examples27
›EXAMPLE 1

A flame-dried two-necked flask is charged under argon with 4-chlorobenzoic acid methyl ester (1.00 g, 5.86 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (103 mg, 0.29 mmol), THF (35 mL) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP, 3.3 mL). A solution of n-hexylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 3.5 mL, 7.00 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown and finally to violet. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, the reaction is diluted with Et 2 O and is carefully quenched upon addition of aq. HCl (1M, ca. 10 mL). Standard extractive work-up followed by flash chromatography of the crude product (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 30/1) provides the cross coupling product as a colorless syrup (1.24 g, 91%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =7.90 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.59 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 1.57 (m, 2H), 1.21–1.29 (m, 6H), 0.84 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ =167.1, 148.4, 129.2, 128.7, 51.8, 35.9, 31.2, 31.0, 28.9, 22.5, 13.9; IR: ν=1724 cm −1 ; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 220 (50, [M + ]), 189 (39), 150 (100), 91 (54), 43 (17).

›EXAMPLE 2

Use of FeCl 2 as the Precatalyst

A flame-dried two-necked flask is charged under argon with 4-chlorobenzoic acid methyl ester (0.5 g, 2.93 mmol), FeCl 2 (19 mg, 0.15 mmol), THF (7 mL) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP, 1 mL). A solution of n-hexylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 1.9 mL, 3.8 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown and finally to violet. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5 min. Work-up as described above provides 4-hexylbenzoic acid methyl ester as a colorless syrup (90%). The spectroscopic and analytical data are identical to those compiled above.

›EXAMPLE 3

Cross Coupling of an Aryl Tosylate as the Substrate

A flame-dried two-necked flask is charged under argon with 4-(4-methylbenzenesulfonyloxy)benzoic acid methyl ester (0.50 g, 1.63 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (29 mg, 0.08 mmol), THF (10 mL) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP, 0.95 mL). A solution of n-hexylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 1 mL, 2 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown and finally to violet. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5 min, the reaction is diluted with Et 2 O and is carefully quenched upon addition of aq. HCl (1M, ca. 10 mL). Work-up followed by flash chromatography of the crude product as described above provides 4-hexylbenzoic acid methyl ester as a colorless syrup (298 mg, 83%). The spectroscopic and analytical data are identical to those compiled above.

›EXAMPLE 4

Cross Coupling of an Aryl Triflate as the Substrate

A flame-dried two-necked flask is charged under argon with 4-(trifluoromethylsulfonyloxy)benzoic acid methyl ester (760 mg, 2.66 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (47 mg, 0.13 mmol), THF (30 mL) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP, 1.7 mL). A solution of n-hexylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 1.7 mL, 3.4 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown and finally to violet. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5 min, the reaction is diluted with Et 2 O and is carefully quenched upon addition of aq. HCl (1M, ca. 10 mL). Work-up followed by flash chromatography of the crude product as described above provides 4-hexylbenzoic acid methyl ester as a colorless syrup (540 mg, 93%). The spectroscopic and analytical data are identical to those compiled above.

›EXAMPLE 5

Cross Coupling at Low Temperature

To a solution of methyl 4-chlorobenzoate (300 mg, 1.76 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (71 mg, 0.2 mmol) in THF (7 mL) and NMP (1.1 mL) at −60° C. is added a solution of C 14 H 29 MgCl (1M in THF, 2.3 mL). The mixture immediately turns black and becomes viscous after 3 min. Work-up as described above provides methyl 4-(tetradecyl)benzoate as a low-melting solid (92%). Mp=28–29° C. 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 7.92 (dd, 2H, J=6.5, 1.8 Hz), 7.21 (dd, 2H, J=6.4, 1.7 Hz), 3.87 (s, 3H), 2.63 (t, 2H, J=7.7 Hz), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.06 (m, 24H), 0.86 (t, 3H, J=6.7 Hz). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 167.6, 148.9, 130.0, 128.8, 128.0, 52.3, 36.4, 32.3, 31.5, 30.09, 30.07, 30.05, 30.00. 29.95, 29.9, 29.8, 29.7, 23.1, 14.5. IR: 3091, 3061, 3031, 2925, 2854, 1726, 1611, 1574, 1510, 1466, 1435, 1415, 1377, 1309, 1277, 1191, 1178, 1109, 1021, 970, 854, 763, 722, 704 cm −1 . MS m/z (rel. intensity) 332 (100, [M + ]), 301 (1), 163 (34), 150 (60), 149 (29).

›EXAMPLE 6

Simultaneous Substitution of Two Different Leaving Groups

A solution of n-hexylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 3.3 mL) is added to a solution of 6-chloro-2-(trifluoromethanesulfonyloxy)pyridine (435 mg, 1.66 mmol) in THF (7 mL) and NMP (0.5 mL) at 0° C. The reaction mixture turns black and GC inspection indicates quantitative conversion of the substrate after 5 min reacion time. For work-up, the mixture is diluted with Et 2 O (20 mL) and quenched with brine (20 mL), the aqueous phase is repeatedly extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic layers are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 15/1) to afford 2,6-di(hexyl)pyridine as a colorless liquid (301 mg, 73%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 7.47 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.70 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 4H), 1.68 (m, 4H), 1.32 (m, 12H), 0.88 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 6H). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 161.9, 136.2, 119.5, 38.5, 31.8, 30.0, 29.1, 22.7, 13.9. IR: 3060, 2955, 2926, 2871, 2856, 1590, 1577, 1456, 1378, 750 cm −1 . MS m/z (rel. intensity) 247 (5, [M + ]), 218 (7), 204 (22), 190 (23), 177 (100), 134 (12), 120 (44), 107 (15). HR-MS (C 17 H 29 N) calcd. 247.229999; found 247.229778.

›EXAMPLE 7

Consecutive Cross Coupling with Two Different Grignard Reagents

To a solution of 6-chloro-2-(trifluoromethanesulfonyloxy)pyridine (508 mg, 1.94 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (34 mg, 0.096 mmol) in THF (8 mL) and NMP (2.3 mL) at 0° C. is slowly added a solution of isobutylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 1.1 mL, 2.2 mmol) causing a color change to yellow-brown. After stirring for 3 min at that temperature, a solution of C 14 H 29 MgCl (1M in THF, 2.3 mL, 2.3 mmol) is introduced via syringe causing an immediate color change to black-violet. After stirring for 5 min, an additional portion of Fe(acac) 3 (20 mg, 0.057 mmol) and C 14 H 29 MgCl (1M in THF, 0.5 mL, 0.5 mmol) are added consecutively and the resulting mixture is stirred for another 15 min. Quenching of the reaction with brine followed by a standard extractive work up and flash chromatography (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 20/1) affords 2-(isobutyl)-6-(tetradecyl)pyridine as a colorless liquid (449 mg, 71%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 7.47 (t, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.07 (m, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.68 (m, 2H), 1.20–1.35 (m, 22H), 0.87–0.92 (m, 9H). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): 161.9, 160.9, 136.0, 120.4, 119.6, 47.6, 38.5, 32.0, 30.1, 29.80, 29.78, 29.75, 29.71, 29.6, 29.48, 29.47, 29.2, 22.8, 22.3, 13.9. MS m/z (rel. intensity) 331 (11, [M + ], 316 (9), 289 (31), 176 (11), 162 (16), 149 (100), 120 (24), 107 (23).

›EXAMPLE 8

Cross Coupling with a Zincate as the Nucleophile

A solution of EtMgBr (3 M in Et 2 O, 0.9 mL) is added to a solution of Et 2 Zn (3 M in toluene, 1 mL) at −78° C. After stirring for 15 min, the resulting cold solution of the zincate is added dropwise to a solution of methyl 4-chlorobenzoate (354 mg, 2.10 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (36 mg, 0.1 mmol) in THF (6 mL) and NMP (0.5 mL) at 0° C. causing a spontaneous color change from yellow to brown-black. Standard extractive work up followed by flash chromatography affords 4-ethylbenzoic acid methyl ester (93%) the analytical and spectroscopic data of which are identical to those of a commercial sample.

›EXAMPLE 9

Iron-Salen Catalyzed Cross Coupling of a Secondary Grignard Reagent

A flame-dried two-necked flask is charged under argon with 2-chloro-6-methoxypyridine (420 mg, 2.93 mmol), the shown Fe(salen)Cl complex (93 mg, 0.147 mmol), THF (10 mL) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP, 1.8 mL). A solution of isopropylmagnesium bromide (2M in Et 2 O, 1.9 mL, 3.8 mmol) is added at ambient temperature via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown and finally to violet. The resulting mixture is stirred for 10 min, the reaction is diluted with Et 2 O and is carefully quenched upon addition of brine. A standard extractive work-up followed by flash chromatography (hexanes) of the crude product provides the cross coupling product as a colorless liquid (246 mg, 56%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 7.48 (dd, J=8.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 2.93 (hept., 1H), 1.27 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 165.3, 163.1, 138.8, 112.9, 107.4, 52.9, 35.9, 22.2. IR: 3066, 2965, 2907, 2871, 1595, 1580, 1464, 1414, 1288, 1255, 1031, 801 cm −1 . MS m/z (rel. intensity) 151 (41, [M + ]), 150 (67), 136 (100), 121 (19), 104 (21), 93 (11).

›EXAMPLE 10

Cross Coupling of an Aryl Grignard Reagent

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 2-chloroquinoxaline (300 mg, 1.82 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (32 mg, 0.09 mmol) and THF (10 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −30° C. A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.2 mL, 4.2 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown/black. The resulting mixture is stirred for 30 min time while the temperature was allowed to reach −5° C., it was then diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 13:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (263 mg, 70%): mp=73–75° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 9.32 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.10 (m, 4H), 7.79–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.49 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 151.79 (C), 143.26 (CH), 142.27 (C), 141.54 (C), 136.75 (C), 130.20 (CH), 130.12 (CH), 129.59 (CH), 129.47 (CH), 129.09 (CH), 127.51 (CH). IR: υ (cm −1 , KBr) 3061, 1545, 1488, 1486, 1313, 769, 750, 687. MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 206 (100, [M + ]), 179 (36), 152 (5), 103 (12), 76 (19), 50 (9).

›EXAMPLE 11

Cross Coupling of an Aryl Grignard Reagent Using an Iron-Salen Precatalyst

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 2-chloroquinoxaline (300 mg, 1.82 mmol), the shown Fe(salen)Cl (29 mg, 0.09 mmol) and THF (10 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −30° C. A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF; 4.2 mL, 4.2 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown/black. The resulting mixture is stirred for 10 min, is then diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 13:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (275 mg, 73%). The analytical and spectroscopic data are identical to those compiled above.

›EXAMPLE 12

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with the shown aryl chloride (300 mg, 1.81 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (32 mg, 0.09 mmol), THF (8 mL) and NMP (1.13 mL, 11.76 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 2.3 mL, 2.3 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with EtOAc and carefully quenched with saturated NH 4 Cl. The aqueous layer was then reextracted with CHCl 3 . Standard extractive work-up, followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 1:1 containing 5% CHCl 3 ) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (403 mg, 67%). mp=64–66° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.41 (s, 1H), 6.81 (s, 1H), 3.14 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.68 (s, 3H), 1.86 (m, 2H), 1.47–1.26 (m, 22H), 0.88 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 164.68 (C), 155.19 (CH), 155.11 (C), 150.54 (C), 109.23 (CH), 31.75 (CH 2 ), 30.29 (CH 2 ), 29.51 (CH 2 ), 29.48 (CH 2 ), 29.46 (CH 2 ), 29.41 (CH 2 ), 29.27 (CH 2 ), 29.18 (CH 2 ), 29.09 (CH 2 ), 29.06 (CH 2 ), 25.95 (CH 2 ), 24.90 (CH 3 ), 22.51 (CH 2 ), 13.93 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3109, 2955, 2924, 2852, 1617, 1543, 1460, 1293; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 330 (21, [M + ]), 301 (4), 161 (41), 148 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C 20 H 34 N 4 : C, 72.68; H, 10.38. Found: C, 72.49; H, 10.31.

›EXAMPLE 13

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 2-chloroquinoxaline (500 mg, 3.06 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (54 mg, 0.15 mmol), THF (15 mL) and NMP (1.9 mL, 19.8 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.0 mL, 4.0 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (950 mg, 95%): mp=25–27° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.08–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.67 (m, 2H), 3.00 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.44–1.22 (m, 22H), 0.87 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 157.68 (C), 145.80 (CH), 142.20 (C), 141.21 (C), 129.83 (CH), 129.15 (CH), 128.85 (CH), 128.82 (CH), 36.51 (CH 2 ), 31.89 (CH 2 ), 29.65 (CH 2 ), 29.63 (CH 2 ), 29.61 (CH 2 ), 29.58 (CH 2 ), 29.48 (CH 2 ), 29.42 (CH 2 ), 29.40 (CH 2 ), 29.31 (CH 2 ), 22.65 (CH 2 ), 14.06 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3087, 2916, 2848, 1563, 1492, 1464, 765; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 326 (16, [M + ]), 157 (11), 144 (100), 117 (2), 43 (4). Anal. Calcd. for C 22 H 34 N 2 : C, 80.93; H, 10.50. Found: C, 80.86; H, 10.54.

›EXAMPLE 14

To a solution of Fe(acac) 3 (23 mg, 0.065 mmol) and NMP (0.8 mL, 8.4 mmol) in 3 mL of THF under Ar, n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 0.4 mL, 0.4 mmol) is added causing the reaction color to change from red to dark brown. Then a solution 1,3-dimethyl-6-chlorouracil (200 mg, 1.29 mmol) in THF (3 mL) is added via cannula followed by the rest of the n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 1.3 mL, 1.3 mmol). The temperature of the resulting mixture rises as a consequence of the addition of the Grignard. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min in which the color of the reaction fades to yellow. Dilution with Et 2 O, quenching of the reaction with brine followed by a standard extractive work-up and flash chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 6:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (259 mg, 60%). mp=59–60° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 5.52 (s, 1H), 3.34 (bs, 3H), 3.27 (bs, 3H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.11–1.20 (m, 22H), 0.82 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 162.49 (C), 155.05 (C), 152.60 (C), 99.91 (CH), 32.50 (CH 2 ), 31.77 (CH 2 ), 31.17 (CH 3 ), 29.50 (CH 2 ), 29.42 (CH 2 ), 29.30 (CH 2 ), 29.21 (CH 2 ), 29.12 (CH 2 ), 28.94 (CH 2 ), 27.75 (CH 3 ), 26.97 (CH 2 ), 22.54 (CH 2 ), 13.96 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 2924, 2847, 1706, 1665, 1467; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 336 (15, [M + ]), 167 (31), 154 (100), 127 (4), 97 (8). Anal Calcd. for C 20 H 36 N 2 O 2 : C, 71.38; H, 10.78. Found: C, 71.24; H, 10.64.

›EXAMPLE 15

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 4-chloro-2-phenylquinazoline (500 mg, 2.08 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (37 mg, 0.10 mmol), THF (15 mL) and NMP (1.3 mL, 13.5 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 2.7 mL, 2.7 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (701 mg, 84%). mp=54–56° C. 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.70 (m, 2H), 8.1 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (m, 1H), 7.59–7.47 (m, 4H), 3.32 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.00 (m, 2H), 1.59–1.22 (m, 22H), 0.92 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 171.38 (C), 160.01 (C), 150.66 (C), 138.47 (CH), 133.17 (CH), 130.25 (CH), 129.35 (CH), 128.55 (CH), 128.42 (CH), 126.59 (CH), 124.50 (CH), 122.48 (CH), 34.51 (CH 2 ), 31.91 (CH 2 ), 29.67 (CH 2 ), 29.58 (CH 2 ), 29.51 (CH 2 ), 29.35 (CH 2 ), 28.48 (CH 2 ), 22.67 (CH 2 ), 14.10 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3067, 2913, 2850,1616, 1549, 1345, 761, 703.

›EXAMPLE 16

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 4-chloro-2-phenylquinazoline (500 mg, 2.08 mmol), the shown Fe(salen)Cl complex (32 mg, 0.10 mmol) and THF (10 mL), and the mixture was cooled to −30° C. A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.8 mL, 4.8 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution, causing an immediate color change to dark brown/black. The resulting mixture is stirred for 10 min at this temperature, is then diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by flash chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (386 mg, 66%). mp=118–120° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.72 (m, 2H), 8.16 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (dt, J=8.3, 0.4 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (m, 3H), 7.64–7.49 (m, 7H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 168.31 (C), 160.25 (C), 152.01 (C), 138.24 (C), 137.73 (C), 133.48 (CH), 130.47 (CH), 130.17 (CH), 129.88 (CH), 129.19 (CH), 128.68 (CH), 128.51 (2×CH), 126.99 (CH), 126.96 (CH), 121.70 (C). IR: υ (cm −1 , KBr) 3053, 1613, 1564, 1540, 1486, 1342, 774, 702. MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 282 (80, [M + ]), 281 (100), 205 (7), 178 (8), 141 (6), 102 (4), 77 (8). HR-MS calcd. for C 20 H 14 N 2 282.1157; found 282.1157.

›EXAMPLE 17

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 6-chloro-2,5-dimethylpyrazine (500 mg, 3.51 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (60 mg, 0.17 mmol), THF (15 mL) and NMP (2.2 mL, 22.8 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.6 mL, 4.6 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with brine. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (1010 mg, 94%). mp=35–36° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.14 (s, 1H), 2.76 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.52 (s, 3H), 2.48 (s, 3H), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.41–1.28 (m, 22H), 0.87 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 154.99 (C), 150.04 (C), 148.45 (C), 140.52 (CH), 35.16 (CH 2 ), 31.92 (CH 2 ), 29.08 (CH 2 ), 29.65 (CH 2 ), 29.63 (CH 2 ), 29.55 (CH 2 ), 29.48 (CH 2 ), 29.35 (CH 2 ), 28.67 (CH 2 ), 22.68 (CH 2 ), 21.10 (CH 3 ), 21.02 (CH 3 ), 14.09 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 2954, 2914, 2850, 1473, 1453, 1377, 1370; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 304 (5, [M + ]), 289 (3), 135 (9), 122 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C 20 H 36 N 2 : C, 78.88; H, 11.92. Found: C, 78.77; H, 11.86.

›EXAMPLE 18

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 6-chloro-3-phenylpyridazine (500 mg, 2.62 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (46 mg, 0.13 mmol), THF (15 mL) and NMP (1.3 mL, 17.0 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 3.4 mL, 3.4 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with brine. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1, then 5:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (634 mg, 68%). mp=87–88° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.09–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.77 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.37 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (t, J=6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.44–1.20 (m, 22H), 0.88 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 162.31 (C), 157.32 (C), 136.34 (C), 129.82 (CH), 128.96 (CH), 126.72 (CH), 124.16 (CH), 35.79 (CH 2 ), 31.91 (CH 2 ), 29.65 (CH 2 ), 29.63 (CH 2 ), 29.53 (CH 2 ), 29.51 (CH 2 ), 29.44 (CH 2 ), 29.34 (CH 2 ), 29.26 (CH 2 ), 22.67 (CH 2 ), 14.09 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3060, 2916, 2848, 1590, 1469, 1450, 747, 693; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 352 (11, [M + ]), 183 (20), 170 (100), 141 (2), 102 (3). Anal. Calcd. for C 24 H 36 N 2 : C, 81.76; H, 10.29. Found: C, 81.65; H, 10.21. HRMS Calcd. for C 24 H 36 N 2 : 352.2879. Found: 352.2879.

›EXAMPLE 19

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 1-chloroisoquinoline (500 mg, 3.06 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (58 mg, 0.16 mmol), THF (15 mL) and NMP (1.9 mL, 19.8 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.0 mL, 4.0 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with brine. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 10:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (946 mg, 95%). mp=34–36° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.43 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (bt, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (bt, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 1H) (m, 2H), 3.30 (t, J=7.9 Hz, 2H), 1.86 (m, 2H), 1.49–1.22 (m, 22H), 0.87 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 162.45 (C), 141.71 (CH), 136.31 (C), 129.79 (CH), 127.37 (CH), 126.93 (CH), 125.39 (CH), 119.13 (CH), 35.49 (CH 2 ), 31.91 (CH 2 ), 29.91 (CH 2 ), 29.82 (CH 2 ), 29.66 (CH 2 ), 29.63 (CH 2 ), 29.57 (CH 2 ), 29.53 (CH 2 ), 29.34 (CH 2 ), 22.67 (CH 2 ), 14.08 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3051 br, 3049, 2916, 2848, 1563, 1502, 1468, 1386, 824, 749; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 325 (8, [M + ]), 198 (3), 156 (17), 143 (100), 115 (3), 43 (4). Anal. Calcd. for C 23 H 35 N: C, 84.86; H, 10.84. Found: C, 84.82; H, 10.97.

›EXAMPLE 20

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 2-chloro-4,6-dimethoxytriazine (500 mg, 2.85 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (50 mg, 0.14 mmol), THF (10 mL) and NMP (1.8 mL, 18.5 mmol). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 3.7 mL, 3.7 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with brine. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 5:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a white solid (754 mg, 84%). mp=51–52° C. 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 3.96 (bs, 6H), 2.65 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.71 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.12 (m, 22H), 0.88 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 183.53 (C), 172.36 (C), 54.82 (CH 3 ), 38.56 (CH 2 ), 31.80 (CH 2 ), 29.55 (CH 2 ), 29.51 (CH 2 ), 29.37 (CH 2 ), 29.23 (CH 2 ), 29.17 (CH 2 ), 27.23 (CH 2 ), 22.55 (CH 2 ), 13.94 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3003, 2955, 2915, 2851, 1588, 1553, 1502, 1472, 1355, 1072, 817, 716; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 377 (4, [M + ]), 322 (2), 168 (31), 155 (100), 125 (2), 43 (11). Anal. Calcd. for C 19 H 35 N 3 O 2 : C, 67.62; H, 10.45. Found: C, 67.54; H, 10.40.

›EXAMPLE 21

A flame-dried two necked round bottom flask is charged under Ar with 4-chloro-2-(methylthio)pyrimidine (500 mg, 3.11 mmol), Fe(acac) 3 (55 mg, 0.16 mmol), THF (10 mL) and NMP (2 mL). A solution of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 3.7 mL, 3.7 mmol) is added via syringe to the resulting red solution causing an immediate color change to dark brown. The resulting mixture is stirred for 5–10 min, diluted with Et 2 O and carefully quenched with saturated NaCl. Standard extractive work-up followed by column chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc 5:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a colorless syrup (896 mg, 89%). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.37 (d, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.56 (bs, 3H), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.22 (m, 22H), 0.88 (m, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 172.20 (C), 171.37 (C), 156.63 (CH), 115.31 (CH), 37.78 (CH 2 ), 31.96 (CH 2 ), 29.72 (CH 2 ), 29.54 (CH 2 ), 29.42 (CH 2 ), 29.39 (CH 2 ), 29.31 (CH 2 ), 28.61 (CH 2 ), 22.72 (CH 2 ), 14.13 (CH 3 ), 14.07 (CH 3 ); IR: υ (cm −1 ) 3032, 2924, 2853, 1568, 1542, 1466, 1423, 1335, 1205; MS (EI): m/z (rel. intensity): 322 (7, [M + ]), 209 (2), 153 (16), 140 (100), 94 (3), 43 (4). Anal. Calcd. for C 19 H 34 N 2 S: C, 70.75; H, 10.62. Found: C, 70.65; H, 10.54. HRMS Calcd. for C 19 H 34 N 2 S: 322.2443. Found: 322.2442.

›EXAMPLE 22

A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 3.9 mL, 3.9 mmol) is added to a solution of 2-chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine (300 mg, 1.70 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (30 mg, 0.085 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at −30° C. After stirring for 30 min at that temperature, the reaction is quenched with brine, the aqueous layer is extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic phases are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 10:1). After eluting a first fraction containing biphenyl (103 mg), one obtains 2-phenyl-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine as a colorless solid (231 mg, 63%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 8.47 (d, 2H), 7.47–7.56 (m, 3H), 4.08 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 175.0, 173.3, 135.6, 133.0, 129.2, 128.8, 55.4.

›EXAMPLE 23

A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 5.6 mL, 5.6 mmol) is added to a solution of 3-chloro-2,5-dimethylpyrazine (346 mg, 2.42 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (43 mg, 0.12 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at −30° C. After stirring for 30 min at that temperature, the reaction is quenched with brine, the aqueous layer is extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic phases are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 10:1). After eluting a first fraction containing biphenyl (212 mg), one obtains 2,5-dimethyl-3-phenylpyrazine as a pale yellow syrup (287 mg, 64%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.51 (m, 3H), 2.55 (s, 3H), 2.54 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 152.7, 150.6, 148.4, 142.1, 139.5, 129.3, 128.7, 128.6, 22.7, 21.2.

›EXAMPLE 24

A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.2 mL, 4.2 mmol) is added to a solution of 4-chloro-2-methylthio-pyrimidine (296 mg, 1.84 mmol) and Fe(acac) 3 (32 mg, 0.09 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at −30° C. After stirring for 50 min at that temperature, the reaction is quenched with brine, the aqueous layer is extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic phases are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 10:1). After eluting a first fraction containing biphenyl (90 mg), one obtains 2-methylthio-4-phenyl-pyrimidine as a pale yellow solid (197 mg, 53%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 8.53 (d, 1H), 8.09–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.39 (d, 2H), 2.63 (s, 3H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 173.0, 164.0, 158.0, 136.7, 131.1, 131.0, 129.2, 127.5, 127.4, 112.2, 14.3.

›EXAMPLE 25

A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 3.6 mL, 3.6 mmol) is added to a solution of 2-chloro-isoquinoline (258 mg, 1.57 mmol)) and Fe(acac) 3 (28 mg, 0.078 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at −30° C. After stirring for 50 min at that temperature, the reaction is quenched with brine, the aqueous layer is extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic phases are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 10:1). After eluting a first fraction containing biphenyl (60 mg), one obtains 2-phenyl-isoquinoline as a colorless solid (184 mg, 57%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 8.60 (d, 1H), 8.11 (d, 1H), 7.91 (d, 1H), 7.66–7.72 (m, 4H), 7.48–7.57 (m, 4H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 160.9, 142.6, 140.1, 137.2, 130.3, 130.2, 128.8, 128.5, 127.7, 127.5, 127.3, 127.0, 120.1.

›EXAMPLE 26

A solution of phenylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 4.2 mL, 4.2 mmol) is added to a solution of 2-chloro-quinoline (300 mg, 1.83 mmol)) and Fe(acac) 3 (32 mg, 0.09 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at −30° C. After stirring for 50 min at that temperature, the reaction is quenched with brine, the aqueous layer is extracted with Et 2 O, the combined organic phases are dried over Na 2 SO 4 and evaporated, and the residue is purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 15:1). After eluting a first fraction containing biphenyl (44 mg), one obtains 2-phenyl-quinoline as a colorless solid (265 mg, 71%). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ8.22–8.25 (m, 3H), 8.16 (d, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H), 7.86 (d, 1H), 7.75 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.57 (m, 4H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CD 2 Cl 2 ) δ 157.3, 148.7, 139.9, 137.0, 130.0, 129.7, 129.1, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 127.3, 126.8, 119.1.

›EXAMPLE 27

To a solution of Fe(acac) 3 (14 mg, 0.04 mmol) and NMP (0.34 mL, 3.5 mmol) in THF (2 mL) under Ar at room temperature is added n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 0.3 mL, 0.3 mmol) causing the reaction color to change from red to dark brown. A solution of 2′,3′,5′-tri-O-acetyl-6-chloro-9-β-D-ribofuranosyl-purine (220 mg, 0.53 mmol) in THF (5 mL) is then added via cannula, followed by addition of a second dose of n-tetradecylmagnesium bromide (1M in THF, 1.0 mL, 1.0 mmol). The resulting mixture is stirred for 10 min at that temperature prior to careful quenching with sat. NaCl and extraction with CH 2 Cl 2 . Flash chromatography (hexanes:EtOAc, 1:1) provides the cross-coupling product as a yellow oil (170 mg, 56%). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 8.87 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 6.21 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (t, J=5.4 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (t, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (m, 2H), 4.36 (dd, J=18.2, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.87 (m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.22 (m, 22H), 0.86 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 3H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ) (DEPT) δ 170.24 (C), 169.50 (C), 163.79 (C), 152.68 (CH), 150.24 (C), 141.91 (CH), 133.26 (C), 86.45 (CH), 80.31 (CH), 73.07 (CH), 70.59 (CH), 62.99 (CH 2 ), 33.34 (CH 2 ), 31.87 (CH 2 ), 29.64 (CH 2 ), 29.60 (CH 2 ), 29.48 (CH 2 ), 29.40 (CH 2 ), 29.30 (CH 2 ), 28.52 (CH 2 ), 22.64 (CH 2 ), 20.68 (CH 3 ), 20.47 (CH 3 ), 20.34 (CH 3 ), 14.06 (CH 3 ).

›Tables in the description — 1
TABLE 1 — Screening of different substrates in the iron catalyzed cross coupling reaction depicted below: Yield (GC, %)
NrX23
1I2746
2Br3850
3Cl>95—
4OSO 2 CF 3>95—
5OSO 2 C 6 H 4 Me>95—
3 of 30 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

20 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

42 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07D251/00
  • C07C303/00
  • C07D237/08
  • C07D487/00
  • C07D251/20
  • C07D213/16
  • C07D213/06
  • C07D215/00
  • C07D215/04
  • C07C69/76
  • C07D215/12
  • C07D241/12
  • C07D241/42
  • C07D213/64
  • C07D215/06
  • C07D217/02
  • C07D239/02
  • C07D239/38
  • C07D239/74
  • C07D237/00
  • C07C1/32
  • C07D487/04
  • C07D237/02
USPC · US Patent Classification
544/216558/56546/173558/357546/152549/460585/454549/86544/264548/152546/139544/224544/410560/103546/350544/353546/349564/90544/315

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.9 y
1,432 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
4
no RCE
Examiner
James O. Wilson
art unit 1624 · TC 1600
Citations: 13 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock