USPatent applicationPatented

Use of urodilatin for treating chronic kidney failure with residual kidney functions

Granted 14 Dec 2004 · 1 office action

Current assignee: CARDIOPEP PHARMA GMBH · originally PHARIS BIOTEC GMBH

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Wolf-Georg Forssmann, Kristin Forssmann, Markus Meyer, Wolfgang Greb · Examiner: Christopher R. Tate · AU 1654 · TC 1600

Application· this page
10/088,498
filed 18 Jul 2002
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,831,064
granted 14 Dec 2004

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Use of urodilatin for treating chronic renal insufficiency by stimulating the residual renal function.

Description

1 parts
›This is a 371 of PCT/EP00/10462, filed Oct…

This is a 371 of PCT/EP00/10462, filed Oct. 24, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

The present invention relates to the use of urodilatin for treating chronic renal insufficiency with residual renal function.

Urodilatin is a peptide which is the subject matter of European Patent EP-A-0 349 545. This Patent Specification also mentions indications of urodilatin in which urodilatin is to be employed in renal insufficiency.

Patients suffering from chronic renal insufficiency go through different stages of treatment as the disease progresses:

a) promotion of residual renal function;

b) hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis; and, if possible

c) kidney transplantation.

In step a), hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is not yet necessary. Thus, it is sought to maintain this stage as long as possible even with a negative prognosis in order to save a patient with renal insufficiency from dialysis as long as possible. Surprisingly, urodilatin can be employed for prolonging phase a). Urodilatin, being an endogenous product, has an activity profile with a synergistic effect of particular importance: In the kidney, diuresis and natriuresis lead to the mobilization of fluids and thus to the clearance of urinary waste substances through an increase of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and inhibition of sodium reabsorption. Due to the simultaneous intrarenal vascular dilatation, urodilatin has a kidney-protecting effect as has now been found.

Thus, the present invention relates to the use of urodilatin for treating chronic renal insufficiency with residual renal function.

According to the invention, an improvement of residual renal function can be used in patients with chronic renal insufficiency before obligatory dialysis, and/or for prolonging the dialysis-free intervals in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. In particular, the latter alternative is also of great importance to the afflicted patients, because the frequency of dialysis can be reduced thereby.

In EP-A-0 349 545, various clinical indications were mentioned in which urodilatin is employed as an intravenous infusion. These include acute renal insufficiency, inter alia.

The amount of urodilatin to be used according to the invention is from 5 ng/kg of body weight to 10 μg/kg of body weight. The skilled person known that these ranges serve as clues for establishing an optimum dosage. Of course, the minimum possible amount to be administered is that which is just above the threshold value of a detectable effect, whereas the upper limit is determined by toxic phenomena occurring. Typically, the dosages are within the stated range.

Especially the applications of urodilatin as an intravenous infusion in a dosage of, for example, 20 mg/kg of body weight/min, especially over a period of from 6 to 24 hours, in patients with chronic preterminal renal insufficiency which is not yet subject to obligatory dialysis result in an increased clearance of fluid and urinary waste substances.

In addition, also as an intravenous infusion between the dialysis intervals, urodilatin results in a stimulation of residual renal function and thus in an increased clearance of fluid and urinary waste substances. Thus, urodilatin is particularly suitable for improving the residual renal function in a stage before obligatory dialysis and causes obligatory dialysis to be delayed. In addition, urodilatin is suitable as a medicament for use between dialyses to prolong the dialysis-free intervals.

The use of urodilatin according to the invention for improving the clearance of fluid and urinary waste substances into the abdominal cavity in patients with chronic renal insufficiency is performed by adding the urodilatin to the peritoneal dialysate of patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The therapy of chronic terminal renal insufficiency consists in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. In peritoneal dialysis, the clearance of fluid and urinary waste substances is controlled by the peritoneal dialysate administered into the abdominal cavity, which consists of sugars and electrolytes.

Surprisingly, the administration of urodilatin according to the invention virtually as an additive to the peritoneal dialysate causes an enhanced clearance of fluid and urinary waste substances into the abdominal cavity. Thus, urodilatin may also be used as a medicament in patients with chronic terminal renal insufficiency.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims as granted

2 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K38/22
  • A61P13/00
  • A61K38/00
  • A61P13/12
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07K14/575
USPC · US Patent Classification
514/12

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.1 y
1,512 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Christopher R. Tate
art unit 1654 · TC 1600
Citations: 7 back · 5 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock