USPatent applicationPatented

System for controlling flue gas exit temperature for optimal SCR operations

Granted 26 Aug 2003 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

27 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20052010201520202025ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A system for maintaining an optimal flue gas inlet to a boiler mounted SCR assembly in the flue of the boiler is accomplished by mixing the normal inlet feedwater to an economizer of the boiler with near saturation water from downcomers of the boiler to thereby raise the temperature of the flue gas passing across the economizer and raising the SCR inlet to the desired optimal SCR operation temperature.

Description

4 parts
›FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally drawn to broilers using SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) systems at the flue exhaust to clean the exhaust gas thereby and more particularly to the optimized temperature operation of the same.

In operating a boiler with a Selective Catalytic Reduction system, or SCR, at the flue gas exhaust, the reactiveness of the catalyst is dependent upon the flue gas temperature entering the catalyst reactor. A given catalyst will have maximum performance when it is operated at the temperature of peak performance (TPP). As an example, in a typical SCR for NO x removal, the temperature of peak performance (typically 650° F.) at the reaction of ammonia with NO x present in the flue gas is optimized and the amount of the ammonia needed for the catalytic reaction is minimized. Therefore, for economic reasons the desired gas temperature entering the catalyst reactor should be maintained at the TPP at all loads. Also, maintaining the desired flue gas temperature reduces the formation of ammonia and/or sulfate salts within the ammonia injection grid (AIG) and the catalyst.

However, as boiler load decreases, the boiler exit gas temperature will drop below the TPP. To increase the gas temperature to TPP, current practice has been to use an economizer gas bypass. The economizer gas bypass is used to bypass the hotter gases upstream of the economizer to the cooler gas that leaves the economizer and mixes with the flue gas. By controlling the amount of gas that passes through the bypass system, a boiler exit flue gas temperature of approaching the TPP can be maintained at the lower boiler loads which normally results in the flue gas temperature below TPP.

Also, systems for mixing economizer feedwater with hot water at the inlet of the economizer are known. These systems were known as the Off Line Circulation System and were developed in the mid 1980s. However, this system was not designed for increasing the flue gas temperature from the economizer. This system's main purpose was to reduce the economizer inlet headers thermal shock that occurs during boiler start up and shut down and to eliminate the stratification/subcooling temperature effects that occur in the furnace walls of the boiler when the boiler is off line and put into hot standby.

Thus, what was needed was a simpler system that required less physical space to obtain the desired flue gas temperature to the SCR at various boiler loads. With the known flue gas bypass systems currently used for SCR application, static mixing devices, pressure reducing vanes/plates and thermal mixing devices were required to make the different temperature flue gases mix before the gas mixture reaches the inlet of the catalyst reactor. In most applications, obtaining the strict mixing requirements for flow, temperature and the mixing of the reagent (if received) before the catalyst reactor was often difficult.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention solves the problems associated with prior art devices as well as others by providing a boiler water recirculation system where the variation in the gas flow and temperature at the economizer outlet is less severe than with a flue gas bypass system, making it easier to meet the gas mixing requirement for the catalyst reactor at the optimal inlet temperature.

To accomplish this, the invention uses the economizer to increase the outlet temperature of the flue gases to the desired temperature at the lower boiler loads by using a boiler recirculation system to provide higher temperature water from the circulation system that is used to cool the furnace walls. The recirculation system supplies near saturation water from the downcomers of drum circulation boiler applications, or for once-through boiler applications, the fluid is obtained from a fluid mix location in the upper region of the lower furnace. In either a drum or once through boiler application, the higher temperature water is transferred to the economizer inlet and mixed with the boiler's economizer normal feedwater inlet flow. The mixture of the two fluid streams results in a higher temperature fluid in the economizer that can be used to increase the flue gas temperature leaving the economizer. With proper adjustment of the different fluid streams to the economizer, the desired flue gas temperature can be obtained for any boiler load. The amount of near saturation water (or higher temperature furnace wall water for a once-through boiler) from the boiler recirculation system is controlled throughout the load range. Calculations have shown that no catastrophic effects (critical heat flux or tube failures) on the cooling of the boiler's furnace walls will occur in the use of this system.

In view of the foregoing it is seen that one aspect of the present invention is to provide stable flue gas temperature control system based on economizer water inlet temperature.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is to provide an increased temperature economizer gas outlet responsive to increased economizer water inlet temperature.

These and other aspects of the present invention will be more fully understood upon a review of the following description of the preferred embodiment when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a boiler water/steam recirculation system utilizing the increased temperature economizer water inlet of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic of the control system used to increase flue gas temperature in response to increased economizer water inlet temperature.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2 of the drawings, the present invention uses a different approach to obtaining a TPP boiler exit flue gas temperature. In a normal boiler application, the water side of the economizer is used to cool the flue gas that flows over the surface that is installed in the boiler. Here, the boiler recirculation system ( 10 ) is modified to have higher temperature water near saturation from downcomers ( 12 ) connected by a bypass line ( 14 ) to an inlet ( 16 ) of an economizer ( 18 ). The inlet ( 16 ) is a tee inlet with the other inlet of the tee providing normal feedwater flow from line ( 20 ). The flow through line ( 14 ) is provided by a pump ( 22 ) which has monitoring, flow T and pressure P sensors mounted on both sides of the pump ( 22 ). An economizer ( 18 ) bypass line ( 24 ) is provided as shown in dotted lines on FIG. 1, to recirculate the downcomers ( 12 ) saturated water back thereto from drum ( 26 ) when no increased water temperature is needed for mixing with the normal economizer ( 18 ) feedwater from line ( 20 ).

With particular reference to FIG. 2, it will be seen that the operation of this invention is as follows. An SCR ( 28 ) located on an outlet ( 30 ) of a boiler flue ( 32 ) needs the optimum flue gas temperature supplied to the inlet thereof for optimal operation as was described earlier. To accomplish this end, a temperature sensor ( 34 ) is mounted in a flue ( 32 ) near the entrance to the SCR ( 28 ) to monitor the flue gas temperature. A signal indicative of the actual flue gas is transmitted along line ( 36 ) to comparator station ( 38 ) having a set point signal of the optimum temperature inputting thereto along line ( 40 ). Any difference in these two signals develops an error signal e along line ( 42 ) to a controller ( 44 ) which controls the opening of a gate valve ( 46 ) to control the quantity of satuation temperature water sent along line ( 14 ) to the tee ( 16 ) to be mixed with the normal temperature feedwater from line ( 20 ) and supplied to the economizer ( 18 ).

The bypass line ( 24 ) is closed by normally closed valve ( 48 ) being maintained closed by the error signal e being transmitted along line ( 50 ) to a NAND gate ( 52 ). As long as there is a positive signal from comparator ( 38 ) to the NAND gate ( 52 ), there will be no control signal passed therefrom along line ( 54 ) to the valve ( 48 ) and it will remain shut. When the error e signal becomes O indicating a flue gas temperature is at the optimum, a O signal will enter NAND gate ( 52 ) along line ( 50 ) an O signal will enter the NAND gate ( 52 ) along line ( 56 )from the controller ( 44 ). This will cause an output control signal to be transmitted along line ( 54 ) to normally closed valve ( 48 ) to open and a control signal along line ( 58 ) to the normally open valve ( 46 ) to close. This establishes flow back to the downcomers ( 12 ) bypassing the economizer ( 18 ) until the flue ( 32 ) temperature falls below 650° F. and saturated water will again be mixed with normal feedwater to the economizer ( 18 ) inlet.

Clearly as more saturated water is inputted to the inlet of the economizer ( 18 ) the flue temperature across the economizer ( 18 ) will rise and, when mixed with normal flue gas, will raise the temperature to the temperature of peak performance at the SCR ( 28 ) inlet.

Certain modifications and construction details have been deleted herein since they are obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art area and for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claim.

Claims as granted

9 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F22B37/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
122/479.2122/166.2

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.5 y
545 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Gregory Wilson
art unit 3749 · TC 3700
Citations: 7 back · 14 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1Owner 2Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock