USPatent applicationPatented

Apparatus and method of correcting for dark current in a solid state image sensor

Granted 20 Jun 2006 · 1 office action

Current assignee: OmniVision Technologies, Inc. · originally Kodak Limited

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Stephen M. Coppola, Wayne E. Prentice · Examiner: Thai Tran · AU 2612 · TC 2600

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Apparatus and method of correcting for dark current in a solid state image sensor, include capturing an image with the image sensor to produce a digital image having pixel values; correcting the pixel values with a dark level correction value; employing a control system to adjust the dark level correction value to drive the number of pixels having values lower than a predetermined value chosen to represent dark scene content to a predetermined range.

Description

7 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to solid state image sensors, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for correcting for dark current in a solid state image sensors.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The photo-sites in solid state image sensors generate current in the absence of light due the thermal action of electrons in the devices. This thermally generated current is called dark current, and adds to the photo-current generated by the photo-sites when exposed to light. One approach to reducing dark current is to cool the image sensor, for example using liquid nitrogen. This approach is not considered practical for consumer applications. Accordingly, it is generally necessary to correct digital images by removing the component of the image signal due to dark current. To remove the dark current from the image signal, the level of dark current produced by the sensor must be known. If the dark current is under-estimated, the dark current corrected image will appear to have flare and when it is over-estimated shadows will turn black thereby causing shadow detail to be lost. In either case, after white balancing, it is impossible to maintain a neural gray without hue throughout the gray scale when the dark current is improperly determined. White balancing is an adjustment to the color balance of an image to take into account the color of the illuminant under which the image was acquired.

One technique for determining the dark current is to measure a sample of image sensors in the factory to determine the average dark current produced by the sensors, and to employ this value for correction. This will not provide a satisfactory solution in cases where the dark current is temperature dependent or where it changes over time. Another technique for determining the dark current in an image sensor is to mask some of the photo-sites in the image sensor, sense the signal produced by the masked photo-sites and subtract the sensed signal from the signals produced by the unmasked photo-sites in the image sensor. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,276 issued Apr. 14, 1992 to Schrock.

One problem encountered with this latter approach is that anomalies caused by the device physics may prevent a light shielded pixel from accurately estimating the dark current. Further, other device properties may change the dark current dependent upon the scene brightness or the length of the exposure. For example, in some CMOS image sensors the nonlinear signal response of the photo-sensor at low signal levels makes it difficult to estimate the dark current signal level from the signals produced by shielded pixels.

It is also known to determine correction values for individual images by using the histograms of the images. In these applications, it is assumed a small predetermined percentage of the pixels are black. The next step is to form a histogram of the pixel values and determine the code value that is associated with the predetermined percentage. For example, suppose it is assumed that 2% of all pixels are black and the image being corrected contains 1 Megapixels. This means that 20 k pixels in the image are assumed black. Next, all of the pixels in the histogram are added up starting from code value 0 to n to find the last bin for which the sum is less than 20 k. The correction offset is then set to n. The Kodak Palm Pix camera uses this method to determine a dark level correction for a still image prior to any dark correction.

This approach is not applicable to correct for dark current in a video stream because it would not be stable over time because the value of the offset is determined by an estimate that includes a range of variability. Furthermore, if previously corrected signals are used to determine the offset, the approach would not converge on a reasonable correction because each new application of correction would add to the last, driving the correction to an extreme. This is important since the design of available image sensors often include a dark level correction that is applied on the image sensor chip before the signal becomes available for the further processing that is required for determining the offset using the histogram method.

There is a need therefore for an improved technique for correcting for dark current in a solid state image sensor that avoids the problems noted above.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The need is met according to the present invention by providing an apparatus and method of correcting for dark current in a solid state image sensor, that includes capturing an image with the image sensor to produce a digital image having pixel values; correcting the pixel values with a dark level correction value; employing a control system to adjust the dark level correction value to drive the number of pixels having values lower than a predetermined value chosen to represent dark scene content to a predetermined range.

›ADVANTAGES

The present invention has the advantage of providing dark level correction without the need for a separate dark current sensor. It also is capable of tracking dark level changes that may not be detectable by the use of a separate dark current sensor. An additional advantage of the invention is that it is also effective to reduce the effects of veiling glare on an image sensor, thereby improving the image quality. The method of the present invention does not use light shielded pixels (dark pixels) or any other external reference signal, and therefore avoids the problems associated with the unreliability of such reference signals.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a solid state image sensor and dark correction apparatus according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a histogram useful in describing the operation of the present invention, illustrating pixel values with the dark current correction level too low;

FIG. 3 is a histogram useful in describing the operation of the present invention, illustrating pixel values with the dark current correction level too high; and

FIG. 4 is a histogram useful in describing the operation of the present invention, illustrating pixel values after dark current correction according to the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is based on the assumption that a small predetermined percentage of pixels in any scene have no light incident upon them (i.e. these pixels are dark). The pixel value associated with these pixels can then be assumed to be the dark level offset. The dark level correction value is adjusted in a feedback control loop to maintain the number of pixels that have a pixel value less than a predetermined value to a predetermined range.

The assumption that a predetermined percentage of pixels will have no light incident on them may be invalid for some scenes, for example for a properly exposed low contrast scene, where there will be fewer dark pixels than the predetermined percentage, the method will overcorrect the dark current correction value. Alternatively, for a scene containing a large black object there will be more dark pixels, the method will under-correct. These situations are addressed by imposing limits on the dark current correction value as will be described below.

Referring to FIG. 1 , an image sensor 10 (CCD or Active CMOS Imager) includes an array of photo-sites 12 that generate voltage signals that are proportional to the incident light on the photo-sites and that include a dark current component. The voltage signals are converted to digital values by analog to digital (A/D) converter 14 to produce a digital image signal. The digital signal from a photo-site is called a pixel, and the digital signal value is called a pixel value. Dark current contributes to the pixel values.

To improve the appearance of the image, the digital image signal is corrected for dark current by subtracting 16 a dark level correction value from each pixel value. The same dark level correction value is subtracted from every pixel. According to the present invention, a control system 18 is used to adjust the dark level correction value to drive the number of pixels having values lower than a predetermined value chosen to represent dark scene content to a predetermined range. The control system 18 samples 20 a dark corrected image frame from the dark level corrected image signal and counts 22 the number of pixel values in the sampled image frame that are less than a predetermined value X to produce a Count.

Next, a dark level correction value adjustment is calculated 24 . The dark level correction value adjustment is calculated based on the count as follows. If the Count is less than a number representing a first predetermined percentage (e.g. 0.03%) of the pixels in the image, the dark level correction value adjustment is positive (e.g. +1). If the Count is greater than a second predetermined percentage (e.g. 1.0%), the dark level correction value adjustment is negative (e.g. −1). If the Count is between the first and second predetermined percentages, the dark level correction value adjustment is zero.

The dark level correction adjustment is then applied 26 to the previous dark level correction value to produce a new dark level correction value. An initial dark level correction value can be provided. The initial correction value can be determined for example from a factory calibration, or assumed from experience. An initial value of 10 for example has been found to work reasonably well for a 10 bit digital image signal. Alternatively, the control system 18 may simply be allowed to stabilize over time, without initialization, which will occur in a relatively short time at reasonable sampling rates (e.g. 3 times per second) since the dark level correction value can normally range between 5 and 40 for a 10 bit digital image signal.

To account for the cases noted above when the assumption about the percentage of dark pixels in an image fails, upper and lower limits are then applied 28 to the dark current correction value. The limits can be set around the factory calibration value for the dark level correction, typical values being 5 and 40 for the lower and upper limits respectively for a 10 bit digital image signal, with the factory calibration value being 10. Finally, the new dark level correction value is applied 16 to the succeeding digital image signal.

The method of the present invention can be implemented in a video camera as part of an auto exposure/auto-white balance control loop to periodically adjust the dark level correction value at the same rate that the exposure and white-balance is adjusted. Auto exposure is generally performed on a sample of the digital image frames. The sampled frames are further sub-sampled to reduce the data rate. For example, the auto exposure control loop may be operated at 3 times per second (every 10 th frame in a 30 frame per second video stream), and the frames further sub-sampled to one eighth of the original size of the frame.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the step 22 of determining the number of pixels having a value less than X is performed by forming a histogram of the pixel values in the sub-sampled frame, and summing the bins in the histogram from zero to the predetermined value X.

FIG. 2 shows the histogram of an image having an under-corrected dark level. The image contains no pixels with a value of less than 5. FIG. 3 shows the histogram of an image having a properly corrected dark level. It contains an expected percentage of pixels with a value of less than 5. FIG. 4 shows the histogram of an image having an over-corrected dark level. It contains a larger than desired percentage of pixels with a value less than 5.

The present invention can be implemented as software in a micro processor, as firmware in a programmed logic chip, or as hardware in a digital image processing circuit. Appendix A includes example C code for computing a simple histogram from a digital image, and appendix B includes example C code for computing the dark level correction value according to one embodiment of the present invention.

The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.

›PARTS LIST

10 image sensor

12 photo-sites

14 A/D converter

16 subtraction block

18 control system

20 sample step

22 count step

24 calculation step

26 apply adjustment step

28 apply limits step

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N25/63
USPC · US Patent Classification
348/243348/241348/246348/257348/251

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.4 y
1,594 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Thai Tran
art unit 2612 · TC 2600
Citations: 37 back · 8 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock