USPatent applicationPatented

Method for preventing the formation of biological films

Granted 14 Feb 2006 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Ecolab USA Inc. · originally Henkel AG & Co. KGaA

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Alfred Laufenberg, Ralf Krack, Bernhard Meyer · Examiner: Peter A. Hruskoci · AU 1724 · TC 1700

Application· this page
10/049,087
filed 27 Jul 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,998,049
granted 14 Feb 2006

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom200020022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

3 parts
›This invention relates to the use of formulations…

This invention relates to the use of formulations which, after addition to aqueous media passing through filtration units, improve the performance of the filtration units with time in relation to the performance with time of filtration units for the filtration of aqueous media to which these formulations have not been added.

It is basically known that aqueous media can be cleaned by filtration through filtration units. For example, the filtration units in question can be membrane units for the conditioning of water. The function of filtration units such as these is substantially to remove mineral, organic or microbiological impurities from the aqueous media to be filtered according to requirements. The filtration units are normally in operation for several days, weeks or even months before they are cleaned or overhauled. Depending on the type of filtration unit and the nature of the aqueous medium to be filtered, the performance of the filtration units deteriorates with time. This can be reflected, for example, in the fact that the differential pressure between the inflow and outflow side of the filtration unit is increased with the effect that the materials used in the filtration unit are subjected to greater mechanical stressing and hence to accelerated wear. As operation of the filtration unit continues, blockages can occur to the point where the filtration unit is brought to a standstill. The reduction in the performance of the filtration units is generally attributable to the fact that a layer of extracellular material is gradually formed over the filter materials used. For example, in the water conditioning field, experts often speak of the formation of biofilms in membrane units—so-called biofouling. The effect of the buildup of extracellular layers is that frequent stoppages for cleaning and disinfection are necessary. The result of this is that the filtration unit is not available for conditioning water during such stoppages which involves costs for interrupting the filtration process and for cleaning. If the necessary cleaning and disinfection intervals are not observed, the risk of failure of the water supply through blockage and the risk of microbiological impurities in the permeate increase because the extracellular layers can form a matrix for the growth of microorganisms under protected conditions. On the other hand, over-frequent cleaning and disinfection lead to increased wear, particularly where oxidative formulations are used, and hence to a reduced life of the filtration materials used.

The problem addressed by the present invention was to make it possible, by the addition of selected formulations to the aqueous media to be filtered, to increase the performance of the filtration units with time in relation to the performance with time of filtration units for the filtration of aqueous media to which these formulations have not been added.

The present invention relates to the use of formulations which

a) contain at least one compound selected from the groups of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, at least one ammonium compound preferably being present as the nitrogen compound, more particularly in quantities of 0.1 to 8 mg per liter of aqueous medium, and—in another preferred embodiment—the phosphorus compound being at least one phosphate compound which is preferably added in a quantity of 0.3 to 20 mg per liter of aqueous medium and b) are added to aqueous media passed through filtration units, the filtration units preferably containing at least one membrane filter element with pore sizes of 0.0001 to 1 μm and, more particularly, a membrane filter element with pore sizes of 0.0001 to 0.005 μm and—in a particularly preferred embodiment—achieving retention levels of 90 to 99.9% for sodium chloride

in order to increase the performance of the filtration units with time in relation to the performance with time of filtration units for the filtration of aqueous media to which the formulations have not been added. The expert generally characterizes the various membrane filter elements as microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Characterizing the membrane filter elements on the basis of pore size over the entire range from microfiltration to reverse osmosis is only meant to be taken as a basic characterization. For example, where the formulations according to the invention are used to increase the performance of the particularly preferred reverse osmosis membranes with time, the corresponding membrane filter will not be characterized by its pore size but instead by its sodium chloride retention levels.

Where membrane filter elements are used in the filtration units, they preferably contain at least one material component selected from the groups of ceramic materials and/or organic polymers. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the membrane filter element contains at least one polyamide and/or polypiperazine amide.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the performance of the filtration unit as a function of time is determined by measuring the differential pressure and/or the permeate flow. Where the formulations to be used in accordance with the invention are added to the aqueous media to be filtered, the differential pressure does not increase as much with time and the permeate flow does not decrease as much as is the case in the filtration of aqueous media to which the formulations to be used in accordance with the invention have not been added.

In another preferred embodiment of the use according to the invention, the formulations additionally contain at least one enzyme which is preferably selected from the group of hydrolases and more particularly from the group of proteases.

In the use according to the invention, the buildup of extracellular layers on the filtration units can take place more slowly or extracellular layers already present can even be removed. Since microorganisms can hide in such layers and are able to proliferate undisturbed, another particularly preferred embodiment of the formulation used in accordance with the invention is characterized by the additional presence of at least one biocide component selected from the groups of alcohols, aldehydes, antimicrobial acids, carboxylic acid esters, acid amides, phenols, phenol derivatives, diphenyls, diphenyl alkanals, urea derivatives, oxygen and nitrogen acetals and formals, benzamidines, isothazolines, phthalimide derivatives, pyridine derivatives, antimicrobial surface-active compounds, guanidines, antimicrobial amphoteric compounds, quinolines, 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane, iodo-2-propynyl butyl carbamate, iodine, iodophores, peroxides. In a most particularly preferred embodiment, the formulation contains as antimicrobial components one or more compounds selected from ethanol, n-propanol, i-propanol, butane-1,3-diol, phenoxyethanol, 1,2-propylene glycol, glycerol, undecylenic acid, citric acid, 2-benzyl-4-chlorophenol, 2,2′-methylene-bis-(6-bromo-4-chlorophenol), 2,4,4′-trichloro-2′-hydroxydiphenylether, N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-urea, N,N′-(1,10-decanediyldi-1-pyridinyl-4-ylidene)-bis-(1-octanoamine)-dihydro-chloride, N,N′-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)-3,12-diimino-2,4,11,13-tetra-azatetra-decane diimidoamide, quaternary ammonium compounds or alkylamines, guanidines, amphoteric compounds.

›In a preferred use, the formulations are added…

In a preferred use, the formulations are added proportionally to the water stream of the aqueous medium. In another preferred use, the quantity of formulation added to the aqueous medium is measured via conductivity. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the quantities added to the aqueous medium are measured and controlled via conductivity. In the use according to the invention, a mixing unit is preferably disposed between the point of addition and the filtration unit.

In another preferred embodiment of the use according to the invention, the formulations are made up in a form selected from aqueous solutions, gels, emulsions, pastes, dispersions, powders, granules, flakes, beads, tablets, blocks, extrudates. In a particularly preferred variant, the formulations used consist of a nonaqueous component and a water-soluble capsule preferably based on polyvinyl alcohol. In a most particularly preferred variant, the water-soluble capsule contains part of the formulation ingredients.

As already mentioned, formulations containing ammonium compounds may be employed in the use according to the invention. Where ammonium compounds are used, they are preferably selected from ammonium acetate, ammonium alum, ammonium carbonate, ammonium chloride, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, ammonium magnesium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate and ammonium sulfate saltpetre. In a preferred embodiment, the formulations used in accordance with the invention contain phosphate compounds preferably selected from at least one of the groups of primary orthophosphates with the general formula M′H 2 PO 4 or M″(H 2 PO 4 ) 2 , where M′ for example represents an alkali metal and M″ represents an alkaline earth metal, and secondary orthophosphates with the general formula M′ 2 HPO 4 or M″HPO 4 or tertiary orthophosphates with the general formula M′ 3 PO 4 or M″ 3 (PO 4 ) 2 and condensed phosphates derived therefrom—so-called metaphosphates and polyphosphates. In a most particularly preferred embodiment, the formulations used in accordance with the invention additionally contain at least one component selected from organic carbon compounds, preferably carbohydrates, lipids, proteins or hydrocarbons, and from the groups of fatty acids, amino acids, alcohols and other carboxylic acids. In very special cases, the formulations used in accordance with the invention additionally contain at least one trace element selected from the group of sulfur compounds and minerals, for example iron, calcium, potassium, magnesium, manganese, zinc compounds, and the trace elements, for example nickel, cobalt, tin, copper, aluminium, iodide, bromide, borate, molybdate compounds.

›EXAMPLES

Procedure:

In an industrial trial, water of defined quality was delivered to two parallel 2.5 inch reverse osmosis membranes at a constant pressure of 9 bar. The analysis of the water used is shown in Table 1.

Water of the quality detailed in Table 1 was continuously fed into the first membrane with no additives over a period of 30 days under a constant pressure of 9 bar. A formulation was added to the water just before the second membrane, being designed to release 3 mg/L ammonium chloride and 6 mg/L potassium hydrogen phosphate hourly into the water. During continuous operation for 30 days, the differential pressure was determined as the difference between the entry pressure and the exit pressure for both membranes. At the same time, the quantity of permeate obtained was recorded in liters per hour. The results of this long-term investigation are set out in Table 2 and show that, where the formulations used in accordance with the invention are added, the performance of the reverse osmosis membranes is improved. This is all the clearer, the longer the filtration units are operated without interruption, i.e. without cleaning and disinfection. In the Comparison Example, i.e. without the addition of a formulation to be used in accordance with the invention, operation had to be stopped after 30 days through blockage of the membranes. By this time, the pressure difference was 2 bar and the permeate flow was only 35 liters per hour. In the case of the Example according to the invention, the pressure difference at the same stage was 1.20 bar and the permeate flow 48 liters per hour.

›Tables in the description — 2
TABLE 1 — Water quality of the aqueous medium used in the Examples
ParameterUnitAverage value
m value*mmol/L3.00
pH value7.9
Hardness° dH25.9
Ca contentmg/L136
Mg contentmg/L30.4
Cl contentmg/L186
SO 4 2− contentmg/L255
SiO 2 content (ortho)mg/L7.2
P 2 O 3 contentmg/L0.37
NH 4 + contentmg/L0.08
Fe total contentmg/L0.17
NO 2 contentmg/L0.09
NO 3 contentmg/L28.1
TOC valuemg/L3.9
TurbidityTE/F5.7
Conductivity (at 25° C.)μS/cm1390
Solidsmg/L4.0
*The m value is defined as the quantity of hydrochloric acid which is required to acidify water and characterizes the buffer capacity of the water
TABLE 2 — Performance of a reverse osmosis membrane in the filtration of aqueous solutions expressed as the differential pressure and the permeate flow as a function of time and the addition of an auxiliary formulation
Comparison ExampleExample acc. to invention
DifferentialPermeate inDifferentialPermeate in
Dayspressure [bar]L/hpressure [bar]L/h
00.68520.6757
10.72510.6756
70.59470.5554
100.64460.7453
150.79420.7652
201.07430.7053
251.38361.0850
302.00 Stoppage351.2048
2 of 3 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N59/26
  • A01N59/00
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B01D65/08
  • B01D61/04
  • B01D61/16
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C02F1/50
USPC · US Patent Classification
210/632210/636

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom200120022003200420052006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
5.6 y
2,028 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Peter A. Hruskoci
art unit 1724 · TC 1700
Citations: 32 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock