USPatent applicationPatented

Fungicidal active compound combinations

Granted 17 Aug 2004 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: Bayer Aktiengesellschaft · originally Bayer Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Bernd-Wieland Krger, Stefan Dutzmann, Heinz-Wilhelm Dehne, Karl-Heinz Kuck +1 · Examiner: Alton N. Pryor · AU 1616 · TC 1600

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

There are described new active compound combinations of a compound of the formula (I) with known fungicidal active compounds, and their use for the control of phytopathogenic fungi.

Description

9 parts
›This application is a division of Ser. No…

This application is a division of Ser. No. 09/736,917, filed on Dec. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,365,195 allowed, which is a division of Ser. No. 09/541,950, filed on Apr. 3, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,744, which is a division of Ser. No. 09/249,690, filed on Feb. 12, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,940, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,940, which is a division of Ser. No. 08/846,872, filed on May 1, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,922,762, which is a division of Ser. No. 08/629,245, filed on Apr. 8, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,619, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 08/462,408, filed on Jun. 5, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,532,262, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/232,923, filed on Apr. 25, 1994, now abandoned.

The present application relates to novel active compound combinations which consist of a compound of the formula I

on the one hand and other known fungicidal active compounds on the other hand and are very highly suitable for the control of phytopathogenic fungi.

It is already known that the compounds of the formula (I) has fungicidal properties (cf. EP-A 339,418). The activity of this substance is good; however, in some cases it leaves something to be desired at low application rates.

It is also already known that numerous azole derivatives, aromatic carboxylic acid derivatives, morpholine compounds and other heterocycles can be employed for the control of fungi (cf. K. H. Büchel “Pflanzenschutz und Schädlingsbekämpfung” [Plant protection and pest control] pages 87, 136, 140, 141 and 146 to 153, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1977).

The action of the substances concerned, however, is not always satisfactory at low application rates.

It has now been found that the new active compound combinations of a compound of the formula I

and

(A) dichlofluanid of the formula

and/or

(B) tolylfluanid of the formula

and/or

(C) tetrachloro-isophthalo-dinitrile of the formula

and/or

(D) propineb of the formula

and/or

(E) tetramethyl-thiuram disulphide of the formula

and/or

(F) mancozeb of the formula

and/or

(G) anilazine of the formula

and/or

(H) copper oxychloride

and/or

(I) captan of the formula

and/or

(K) a morpholine derivative of the formula

and/or

(L) dithianone of the formula

and/or

(M) phaltan of the formula

and/or

(N) cymoxanil of the formula

and/or

(O) methyl benzimidazole-2-carbamate of the formula

and/or

(P) fosetyl of the formula

or its aluminium adduct

and/or

(Q) metalaxyl of the formula

and/or

(R) oxadixyl of the formula

and/or

(S) fluazinam of the formula

and/or

(T) 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-3-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl-ethyl)-pentan-3-ol of the formula

and/or

(U) an azole derivative of the formula

and/or

(V) an azole derivative from the group consisting of

a) difenconazole

b) penconazole

c) flusilazole

d) hexaconazole

e) myclobutanil

f) prochloraz

g) fluquinconazole

h) epoxiconazole

i) fenpropidin

j) perifenox

k) 8-t-butyl-2-(N-ethyl-N-n-propylamino)-methyl-1,4-dioxaspiro[4,5]decane

and/or

(W) metiram

and/or

(X) pyrimethanil

and/or

(Y) diethofencarb

and/or

(Z) mepanipyrim and/or cyprodinyl

and/or

(α) phenylpyrrole

and/or

(β) iprodione

and/or

(Γ) vinclozolin

and/or

(δ) procymidone

and/or

(ε) benomyl

and/or

(θ) thiphanate and/or thiophanate-methyl

and/or

(II) sulphur

and/or

(n) compounds of the formula

have very good fungicidal properties.

The active compound of the formula (I) is known (EP-A-339,418). The components additionally present in the combinations according to the invention are also known.

In addition to the active compound of the formula (I), the active compound combinations according to the invention contain at least one active compound from the compounds of the groups (A) to (II). They may also moreover contain further fungicidally active admixed components.

If the active compounds are present in the active compound combinations according to the invention in certain weight ratios, the synergistic effect is seen particularly distinct. However, the weight ratios of the active compounds in the active compound combinations can be varied with a relatively wide range. In general, the following are proportioned to 1 part by weight of active compound of the formula (I)

The active compound combinations according to the invention have very good fungicidal properties and can be employed in particular for the control of phytopathogenic fungi, such as Plasmodiophoromycetes, Oomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, Zygomycetes, Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, Deuteromycetes etc.

The active compound combinations according to the invention are very particularly suitable for the control of cereal diseases, such as Erysiphe, Cochliobolus, Pyrenophora and Leptosphaeria, and against fungal attack on vegetables, grapes and fruit, for example against Venturia on apples, Botrytis on beans and Phytophthora on tomatoes.

The good plant tolerability of the active compound combinations in the concentrations necessary for the control of plant diseases enables a treatment of above-ground parts of plants, of plants and seeds, and of the soil.

The active compound combinations according to the invention can be converted into the customary formulations, such as solutions, emulsions, suspensions, powders, foams, pastes, granules, aerosols, very fine capsules in polymeric substances and in coating compositions for seeds, as well as ULV formulations.

These formulations are produced in a known manner, for example by mixing the active compounds or the active compound combinations with extenders, that is, liquid solvents, liquefied gases under pressure, and/or solid carriers, optionally with the use of surface-active agents, that is, emulsifying agents and/or dispersing agents, and/or foam-forming agents. In the case of the use of water as an extender, organic solvents can, for example, also be used as auxiliary solvents. As liquid solvents, there are suitable in the main: aromatics, such as xylene, toluene or alkylnaphthalenes, chlorinated aromatics or chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylenes or methylene chloride, aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example mineral oil fractions, alcohols, such as butanol or glycol as well as their ethers and esters, ketones, such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone, strongly polar solvents, such as dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulphoxide, as well as water. By liquefied gaseous extenders or carriers are meant liquids which are gaseous at ambient temperature and under atmospheric pressure, for example aerosol propellants, such as halogenated hydrocarbons as well as butane, propane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. As solid carriers there are suitable: for example ground natural minerals, such as kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite or diatomaceous earth, and ground synthetic minerals, such as highly-disperse silica, alumina and silicates. As solid carriers for granules there are suitable: for example crushed and fractionated natural minerals such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite and dolomite, as well as synthetic granules of inorganic and organic meals, and granules of organic material such as sawdust, coconut shells, maize cobs and tobacco stalks. As emulsifying and/or foam-forming agents there are suitable: for example non-ionic and anionic emulsifiers, such as polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, for example alkylaryl polyglycol ethers, alkylsulphonates, alkyl sulphates, arylsulphonates as well as albumen hydrolysis products. As dispersing agents there are suitable: for example lignin-sulphite waste liquors and methylcellulose.

›Adhesives such as carboxymethylcellulose and natural and synthetic…

Adhesives such as carboxymethylcellulose and natural and synthetic polymers in the form of powders, granules or latices, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl acetate, as well as natural phospholipids, such as cephalins and lecithins, and synthetic phospholipids, can be used in the formulations. Other additives can be mineral and vegetable oils.

It is possible to use colorants such as inorganic pigments, for example iron oxide, titanium oxide and Prussian Blue, and organic dyestuffs, such as alizarin dyestuffs, azo dyestuffs and metal phthalocyanine dyestuffs, and trace nutrients such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.

The formulations in general contain between 0.1 and 95 per cent by weight of active compound, preferably between 0.5 and 90%.

The active compound combinations according to the invention can be present in the formulations as a mixture with other known active compounds, such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides and herbicides, as well as in mixtures with fertilizers or plant growth regulators.

The active compound combinations can be used as such or in the form of their formulations or the use forms prepared therefrom, such as ready-to-use solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, emulsions, suspensions, wettable powders, soluble powders and granules.

They are used in the customary manner, for example by watering, spraying, atomizing, scattering, dusting, brushing on, as a powder for dry seed treatment, as a solution for seed treatment, as a water-soluble powder for seed treatment, as a water-dispersible powder for slurry treatment, or seed-coating.

In the treatment of parts of plants, the active compound concentrations in the use forms can be varied within a substantial range. They are, in general, between 1 and 0.0001% by weight, preferably between 0.5 and 0.001%.

In the treatment of seed, amounts of active compound of 0.001 to 50 g per kilogram of seed, preferably 0.01 to 10 g, are generally required.

For the treatment of soil, active compound concentrations of 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight, preferably 0.0001 to 0.02% by weight, are required at the site of action.

The good fungicidal action of the active compound combinations according to the invention can be seen from the following Examples. While the individual active compounds have weaknesses in their fungicidal action, the combinations exhibit an action which extends beyond a simple additive action.

A synergistic effect is always present with fungicides if the fungicidal action of the active compound combinations is greater than the sum of the actions of the individually applied active compounds.

The action to be expected for a given combination of two active compounds can be calculated (cf. Colby, S. R., “Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations”, Weeds 15, pages 20-22, 1967) as follows:

If

X denotes the degree of efficacy, expressed in % of the untreated control, on use of the active compound A at a concentration of m ppm,

Y denotes the degree of efficacy, expressed in % of the untreated control, on use of the active compound B at a concentration of m ppm,

E denotes the expected degree of efficacy, expressed in % of the untreated control, on use of the active compound A and B at a concentrations of m and n ppm,

then E = X + Y - X - Y 100 .

If the actual fungicidal action is larger than calculated, the combination is superadditive in its action, i.e. a synergistic effect is present. In this case, the actually observed degree of efficacy must be greater than the value for the expected degree of efficacy (E) calculated from the abovementioned formula:

›Examples7
›EXAMPLE 1

Botrytis Test (Bean)/Protective

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, commercially available active compound formulations (individual active compounds or active compound combinations) are diluted with water to the desired concentration in each case.

To test for protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dripping wet. After the spray coating has dried on, 2 small pieces of agar covered with Botrytis cinerea are placed on each leaf. The inoculated plants are placed in a darkened humid chamber at 20° C.

3 days after the inoculation, the size of the infected spots on the leaves is evaluated.

In order to demonstrate synergism between the active compounds used in this test, the results were assessed by the method described by Colby (see above).

Active compounds, active compound concentrations and test results can be seen from the following tables.

›EXAMPLE 2

Leptosphaeria nodorum Test (Wheat/Protective

Solvent: 100 parts by weight of dimethyl-formamide

Emulsifier: 0.25 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1-part by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew-moist. After the spray coating has dried on, the is plants are sprayed with a spore suspension of Leptosphaeria nodorum. The plants remain for 48 hours in an incubation cabin at 20° C. and 100% relative atmospheric humidity.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of 15° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of about 80%.

Evaluation is effected 10 days after the inoculation.

In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following Preparation Examples:

›EXAMPLE 3

Erysiphe Test (Barley)/Protective

Solvent: 10 parts by weight N-methyl-pyrrolidon

Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight alkylarylpolyglycolether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew-moist. After the spray coating has dried on, the plants are dusted with spores of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of about 20° C. and a relative atmospheric humidty of about 80%, in order to promote the development of powdery mildew pustules.

Evaluation is carried out 7 days after the inoculation.

In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following preparation examples:

›EXAMPLE 4

Erysiphe Test (Wheat) Protective

Solvent: 10 parts by weight N-methyl-pyrrolidone

Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight alkylarylpolyglycolether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1-part by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for protective activity, young plants are dusted with spores of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. 48 hours after the inoculation, the plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew-moist.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of about 20° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of about 80%, in order to promote the development of powdery mildew pustules.

Evaluation is carried out 7 days after the inoculation.

In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following preparation examples:

›EXAMPLE 5

Erysiphe-test (Wheat)/Curative

Solvent: 10 parts by weight of N-methyl-pyrrolidone

Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylarylpolyglycolether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1-part by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for curative activity, young plants are dusted with spores of Erysiphe graminis f.sp.hordei. 48 hours after the inoculation, the plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew-moist.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of about 20° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of about 80%, in order to promote the development of powdery mildew pustules.

Evaluation is carried out 7 days after the inoculation.

In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following preparation examples:

›EXAMPLE 6

Leptosphaeria nodorum Test (Wheat)/Curative

Solvent: 10 parts by weight of dimethylformamide

Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1-parts by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for curative activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew-moist. After the spray coating has dried on, the plants are sprayed with a spore suspension of Leptosphaeria nodorum. The plants remain for 48 hours in an incubation cabin at 20° C. and 100% relative atmospheric humidity.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of 15° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of about 80%.

Evaluation is effected 10 days after the inoculation. In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following Preparation Examples:

›EXAMPLE 7

Pyrenophora teres Test (Barley)/Protective

Solvent: 10 parts by weight N-methyl-pyrrolidon

Emulsifier: 0. 6 parts by weight alkylarylpolyglycolether

To produce a suitable preparation of active compound, 1-part by weight of active compound is mixed with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier, and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration.

To test for protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active compound until dew moist. After the spray coating has dried off, the plants are sprayed with a conidia suspension of Pyrenophora teres. The plants then remain in an incubation cabin at 20° C. and 100% relative atmospheric humidity for 48 hours.

The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of about 20° C. and a relative atmospheric humidity of about 80°.

Evaluation is carried out 7 days after inoculation.

In this test, a clearly superior activity compared with the prior art is shown, for example, by the compounds according to the following preparation examples:

›Tables in the description — 7
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound propineb (D)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound mancozeb (F)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound TMTD (E)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound metiram (W)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to20 parts by weight of active compound dichlofluanid (A)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to20 parts by weight of active compound tolylfluanid (B)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to20 parts by weight of active compound phaltan (M)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to20 parts by weight of active compound captan (I)
1to50 parts by weight, preferably
1to20 parts by weight of active compound Cu oxychloride (H)
1to50 parts by weight, preferably
1to20 parts by weight of active compound sulphur (II)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound anilazine (G)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound chlorothalonil (C)
0.5to50 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound dithianon (L)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to5 parts by weight of active compound fluazinam (S)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to5 parts by weight of active compound pyrimetanil (X)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to5 parts by weight of active compound diethofencarb (Y)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to5 parts by weight of active compound mepanipyrin (Z)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to5 parts by weight of active compound phenylpyrrole
(Saphire) (α)
0.1to20 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound iprodione (β)
0.1to20 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound vinclozolin (γ)
0.1to20 parts by weight, preferably
0.5to10 parts by weight of active compound procymidone (δ)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound benomyl (ε)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound carbendazim (ο)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound thiopanate-methyl (ω)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound cymoxanil (N)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound metalaxyl (Q)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.25to5 parts by weight of active compound oxadixyl (R)
0.1to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.2to5 parts by weight of active compound dimethomorph (K)
0.1to20 parts by weight, preferably
0.2to10 parts by weight of active compound Al fosethyl (P)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound tebuconazole (T)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound triadimefon (U XIXc)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound triadimenol (U XIXa)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound bitertanol (U XIXb)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound difenconazole (Va)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound penconazole (Vb)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound flusilazole (Vc)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound hexaconazole (Vd)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound myclobutanil (Ve)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound prochloraz (Vf)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound of formula (ηa)
0.01to10 parts by weight, preferably
0.025to5 parts by weight of active compound of formula (ηb)
TABLE 2 — Leptosphaeria nodorum test (wheat)/protective
Active compoundDegree of
concentrationeffectiveness
of the sprayin % of the
Active compoundliquor in ppmuntreated control
Tebuconazole2575
(I)O
Tebuconazole + (I)12.5100
(1:1)+12.5
TABLE 3 — Erysiphe-Test (barley)/protective Degree of
Active compoundeffectiveness
concentrationin % of the
Active compoundin g/hauntreated control
(I)500
(ηa)5015
(ηb)5085
mixtures according to the invention:
25100
(I) + (ηb)+25
(1.0:1)
(I) + (ηa)2558
(1.0:1)+25
TABLE 4 — Erysiphe Test (wheat) protective Degree of
Active compoundeffectiveness
concentrationin % of the
Active compoundin g/hauntreated control
known:
(I)200 2585 30
(ηa)20079
(ηb)2585
mixture according to the invention:
12.5100
(I) + (ηb)+12.5
(1.0:1)
(I) + (ηa)10094
(1.0:1)+100
TABLE 5 — Erysiphe-test (wheat)/curative Degree of
Active compoundeffectiveness
concentrationin % of the
Active compoundin g/hauntreated control
(I)20030
(ηa)20075
mixture according to the invention:
10096
(I) + (ηa)+100
(1.0:1)
TABLE 6 — Leptosphaeria nodorum -Test (Wheat)/curative Degree of
Active compoundactivity
concentrationin % of the
Active compoundin g/hauntreated control
known:
(I)40025
(ηb)40049
mixture according to the invention:
20081
(I) + (ηb)+200
(1.0:1)
TABLE 7 — Pyrenophora teres -test (barley)/protective
Degree ofDegree of
active compoundactivity
concentrationin the
Active compoundin g/hauntreated control
(I)2533
(ηb)2533
mixture according to the invention:
12.575
(I) + (ηb)+12.5
(1.0:1)
2 of 9 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

2 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

22 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N37/24
  • A01N47/14
  • A01N43/42
  • A01N43/54
  • A01N59/20
  • A01N47/18
  • A01N43/40
  • A01N37/22
  • A01N37/34
  • A01N47/04
  • A01N43/653
  • A01N47/16
  • A01N37/50
  • A01N57/12
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07D239/52
  • C07D339/08
  • C07D213/74
  • C07D209/48
  • C07D251/44
  • C07D471/18
USPC · US Patent Classification
424/269514/600

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003Jan 2004Apr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.7 y
978 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
after a restriction
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Alton N. Pryor
art unit 1616 · TC 1600
Citations: 16 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

No assignments have been recorded for this application yet.