USPatentGranted
E1

Method of decoding a current image

Granted 19 Oct 2010 · 10 office actions

Current assignee: Lg Electronics, Inc. · originally LG Electronics

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Min-Cheol Hong · Examiner: Negussie Worku · AU 2625 · TC 2600

Application
11/892,178
filed 20 Aug 2007
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US RE41835
granted 19 Oct 2010

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomJul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The present invention relates to an image processing technique, and in particular to a method for restoring a compressed image by using a hybrid motion compensation discrete cosine transform (hybrid MC/DCT) mechanism, including: a step of defining a smoothing functional having a smoothing degree of an image and reliability for an original image by pixels having an identical property in image block units; and a step of computing a restored image by performing a gradient operation on the smoothing functional in regard to the original image, thereby preventing the blocking artifacts and the ringing effects in regard to the pixels having an identical property in image blocks. In one embodiment, the method includes obtaining a pixel value in a current block and at least one adjacent pixel value, obtaining a difference value between the pixel value in the current block and the adjacent pixel value, and obtaining a smoothing value of the current image based on the difference value. A pixel value around a boundary of the current block is smoothed based on the smoothing value and quantization information for the current block.

Description

8 parts
›DIVISIONAL REISSUE APPLICATIONS

Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6 , 611 , 361 . The other reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 11 / 212 , 137 , 11 / 808 , 423 , 11 / 892 , 177 , 11 / 892 , 179 , and 11 / 892 , 176 .

›DOMESTIC PRIORITY INFORMATION

This is a direct divisional of application Ser. No. 11 / 212 , 137 , filed Aug. 26 , 2005 ; the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an image process technique, and in particular to a method for restoring a compressed image by using a hybrid motion compensation discrete cosine transform (hybrid MC/DCT) mechanism, and an apparatus therefor.

2. Description of the Background Art

In general, image compression techniques, such as MPEG1 and MPEG2 employ a hybrid motion compensation discrete cosine transform (hereinafter, referred to as “hybrid MC/DCT”) mechanism in order to improve compression efficiency. The hybrid MC/DCT mechanism is roughly divided into an encoding process and a decoding process. In the encoding process, an original image is divided into a plurality of blocks in order to compress information in a spatial section, a second-dimensional discrete cosine transform is performed on each block, and redundancy information in the image or between the images is reduced by using the correlation on a time axis among the images in order to decrease information in a temporal section. In the decoding process, the steps of the encoding process are performed in a reverse order. An encoder and a decoder are necessary to carry out the hybrid MC/DCT mechanism.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an image encoder according to a related art. As shown therein, an input image signal is subtracted from an image signal moved from and compensated by an image memory 9 , passed through a first switching unit 2 , and inputted to a DCT unit 3 . The DCT unit 3 performs a discrete cosine transform on the inputted image signal. A quantization unit 4 quantizes the image signal, and outputs a DCT coefficient (q). An inverse quantization unit 6 inversely quantizes the DCT coefficient (q), and an inverse DCT unit 7 carries out an inverse discrete cosine transform thereon, thereby restoring the original image signal. The restored image signal is added to an image signal restored in a previous stage by an adder 8 , and inputted to an image memory 9 . A controller 5 controls switching of the first and second switching units 2 , 10 , and transmits INTRA/INTER information (p=mtype; flag for INTRA/INTER), transmission information (t; flag for transmitted or not), and quantization information (qz=Qp; quantizer indication) to a decoder (not shown in FIG. 1 ). The image memory 9 outputs a motion vector information (v=MV; motion vector) to the decoder. The DCT unit 3 outputs the DCT coefficient (q) to the decoder.

However, information of the original image signal is lost during the process of coding the image signal described above, especially during the quantization process, thereby causing blocking artifacts and ringing effects to the image which is reconstructed in the decoder. The blocking artifacts imply irregularity between the blocks generated due to information loss resulting from the quantization of the low-frequency DCT coefficients, and the ringing effects result from quantization errors of the high-frequency DCT coefficients.

That is, in accordance with a coding technique using the DCT in a coding system of a static image or dynamic image, an image is divided into a plurality of blocks, and the DCT is performed on each block. On the other hand, when the DCT is carried out on the original image, its important information is mainly included in low-frequency elements, and becomes lesser in high-frequency elements. Furthermore, the low-frequency elements include a lot of information relating to adjacent blocks. The DCT does not consider the correlation between the blocks, and quantizes the low-frequency elements by blocks, thereby destroying continuity of the adjacent blocks. It is called the blocking artifacts.

In addition, when the coefficients obtained by performing the DCT are quantized, as a quantization interval is increased, the elements to be coded are decreased, and thus the number of the bits to be processed is reduced. As a result, the information of the high-frequency element included in the original image is reduced, thereby generating distortion of the reconstructed image. It is called the ringing effects. The ringing effects generated by increasing the quantization interval are serious especially in a contour of an object in the reconstructed image.

As techniques for removing the blocking artifacts and the ringing effects, employed are a low pass filtering method and a regularized image restoration method.

According to the low pass filtering method, a plurality of pixels around a predetermined pixel are selected, and an average value thereof is computed. Here, a filter tap or filter coefficients are set by experience. For example, referring to FIG. 2 , there is provided a block of N*N size. Reference numerals A to F depict pixels. Pixels C, D are adjacent to a boundary of the block. In order to reduce irregular variations between the pixels C, D, a k-tap (here, 7-tap) filtering is performed, and a threshold value replacing a D pixel value is computed according to local statistics. There is an advantage in that a computation amount is reduced by utilizing a predetermined threshold value according to the comparison with the local statistics. However, an adaptive processing power in accordance with a quantization parameter is deficient, and thus a screen quality of the restored image is excessively smoothed according to the kind of the images and compression ratio.

The regularized image restoration method adaptively deals with the blocking artifacts in accordance with statistical properties of the image. That is, irregular information around the boundary of the block or in the block is all computed. However, the computed values form a matrix shape, and thus a real time processing is difficult due to the great computation amount. In addition, an average value obtained by a computation result of the irregular information is equally applied to the pixels, regardless of a degree of irregularity. Accordingly, when a block has a high degree of irregularity, it can be reduced. However, in case of a block having a low degree of irregularity, it may be increased. Thus, the system is not adaptive. Also, the information in the temporal section is not processed, and thus irregularity between the images cannot be adaptively processed.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for restoring a compressed image of an image processing system and an apparatus therefor which can reduce the blocking artifacts and ringing effects generated in a restored image signal.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for restoring a compressed image of an image processing system and an apparatus therefor which consider a smoothing degree of an image and reliability for an original image by pixels having an identical property in image block units, during a decoding process.

In order to achieve the above-described objects of the present invention, there is provided a method for restoring a compressed image of an image processing system including: a step of defining a smoothing functional having a degree of smoothing an image and reliability for an original image by pixels having an identical property in image block units; and a step of computing a restored image by performing a gradient operation on the smoothing functional in regard to the original image.

These and other objects of the present application will become more readily apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

The present invention relates to a method of decoding a current image.

In one embodiment, the method includes obtaining a pixel value in a current block and at least one adjacent pixel value, obtaining a difference value between the pixel value in the current block and the adjacent pixel value, and obtaining a smoothing value of the current image based on the difference value. A pixel value around a boundary of the current block is smoothed based on the smoothing value and quantization information for the current block. For example, in one embodiment, the quantization information includes a quantization parameter.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become better understood with reference to the accompanying drawings which are given only by way of illustration and thus are not limitative of the present invention, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an image encoder according to a related art;

FIG. 2 illustrates pixels in order to explain a low pass filtering method carried out in the image encoder of FIG. 1 ;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for restoring a compressed image of an image processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a configuration of original pixels in a block of an original image in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates directions of the irregular smoothing degree of the pixels in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 6 illustrates an image moved and compensated in regard to a temporal section in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 7 illustrates a flowchart of the apparatus for restoring the compressed image of the image processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 3

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for restoring a compressed image of an image processing system in accordance with the present invention. As shown therein, a decoder 210 receives INTRA/INTER information (p=mtype), transmission information (t), quantization information (qz=Qp), a discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficient (q) and motion vector information (v=MV; motion vector) from an encoder (as depicted in FIG. 1 ), and performs decoding. The encoder and the decoder 210 are connected by a communication channel or network. A post processing unit 220 receives image signals Y, U, V, a quantization variable (qz=Qp), a macro block type (mtype) and a motion vector (v=MV) from the decoder 210 , and carries out an operation of restoring the compressed image in accordance with the present invention.

According to the present invention, a smoothing functional is defined in regard to pixels having an identical property by blocks, a regularization parameter is computed based on the smoothing functional, and available values are applied to the regularization parameter, thereby obtaining an image to be restored. Thereafter, an iterative technique, a discrete cosine transform (DCT), a projection and an inverse DCT are sequentially performed on the obtained image, thereby restoring a similar image to the original image. The whole processes will now be described in detail.

Definition of Smoothing Functional

When an original image (f) is compressed and transmitted, an image (g) reconstructed in the decoder 210 is represented by the following equation.

g=f+n  (1)

Here, “g” and “f” indicate row vectors re-arranged in a stack-order, namely a scanning order, and “n” indicates a quantization error. When it is presumed that a size of the image is M×M, the original image (f), the reconstructed image (g) and (n) are column vectors having a size of M×1.

An original pixel for the original image (f) is represented by f(i,j). Here, “i” and “j” indicate a position of the pixel in the image.

FIG. 4 illustrates configuration of the original pixels f(i,j) in the block of the original image (f) in order to explain the present invention. Reference numerals in FIG. 4 depict information of the respective pixels. 8×8 pixels are shown in a single block.

The 8×8 pixels in the block are classified into the pixels having an identical property. That is, the pixels are divided in accordance with their position, vertical direction, horizontal direction and smoothing variation in the temporal section. Accordingly, it is defined that a set of the pixels positioned at a boundary of the block in a vertical direction is C VB , a set of the pixels positioned inside the block in the vertical direction is C VW , a set of the pixels positioned at a boundary of a block in a horizontal direction is C HB , a set of the pixels positioned inside the block in the horizontal direction is C HW , and a set of the pixels moved and compensated in the temporal section is C T . The sets C VB , C VW , C HB , C HW , C T are represented by the following expressions.

C VB ={f(i,j): i mod 8=0,1, and j=0,1, . . . , M−1}

C VW ={f(i,j): i mod 8=0,1, and j=0,1, . . . , M−1}  (2)

C HB ={f(i,j): j mod 8=0,1, and i=0,1, . . . M−1}

C HW ={f(i,j): j mod 8=0,1, and i=0,1, . . . , M−1}

C T ={f(i,j): f(i,j)εMB inter or f(i,j)εMB not coded }

Here, the set C T is a set of the pixels having a macro block type of “inter” or “not coded” in order to remove temporal redundancy information.

The smoothing functional M(f) for using the regularization restoration method from the above-defined sets C VB , C VW , C HB , C HW , C T is defined as follows.

M(f)=M VB (f)+M HB (f)+M VW (f)+M HW (f)+M T (f)  (3)

Here, M VB (f) is a smoothing functional for the set C VB , M HB (f) is a smoothing functional for C HB , M VW (f) is a smoothing functional for the set C VW , M HW (f) is a smoothing functional for the set and C HW , and M T (f) is a smoothing functional for the set C T . The smoothing fuctionals are respectively defined as follows.

M VB (f)=∥Q VB f∥ 2 +α VB ∥g−f∥ 2 W1

M HB (f)=∥Q HB f∥ 2 +α HB ∥g−f∥ 2 W2

M VW (f)=∥Q VW f∥ 2 +α VW ∥g−f∥ 2 W3

M HW (f)=∥Q HW f∥ 2 +α HW ∥g−f∥ 2 W4

M T (f)=∥Q T f∥ 2 +α T ∥g−f∥ 2 W5

Here, first terms in each expression indicate a smoothing degree for the original pixel (reference pixel) and adjacent pixel, and second terms indicate reliability for the original pixel and the restored pixel. “|.|” indicates the Euclidean norm. Q VB , Q VW , Q HB , Q HW , Q T indicate high pass filters for smoothing the pixels in the sets C VB , C VW , C HB , C HW , C T .

The first term at the right side is represented by the following expression.

 Q VB ⁢ f  2 = ∑ n = 0 M - 1 ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ ( f ⁡ ( m , n ) - f ⁡ ( m - 1 , n ) ) 2 , m = 0 , 8 , 16 , … ⁢

⁢  Q HB ⁢ f  2 = ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m = 0 M - 1 ⁢   ⁢ ( f ⁡ ( m , n ) - f ⁡ ( m , n - 1 ) ) 2 , n = 0 , 8 , 16 , … ⁢

⁢  Q VW ⁢ f  2 = ∑ n = 0 M - 1 ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ ( f ⁡ ( m , n ) - f ⁡ ( m - 1 , n ) ) 2 , m ≠ 0 , 8 , 16 , … ⁢

⁢  Q HW ⁢ f  2 = ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m = 0 M - 1 ⁢   ⁢ ( f ⁡ ( m , n ) - f ⁡ ( m , n - 1 ) ) 2 , n ≠ 0 , 8 , 16 , … ⁢

⁢  Q T ⁢ f  2 = ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ ( f MC ⁡ ( m , n ) - f ⁡ ( m , n ) ) 2 ( 5 )

The smoothing functionals represented by Expression (4) are quadratic equations, respectively. Thus, local minimizers of each smoothing functional become global minimizers.

FIG. 5 illustrates directions of the irregular smoothing degree of the pixels. There are a single pixel at the center and eight pixels therearound. There are also shown horizontal and vertical arrows starting from the pixel at the center. The arrows respectively depict the directions of the irregular smoothing degree in regard to the four adjacent pixels. That is to say, the irregular smoothing degree is considered in four directions in respect of a single pixel.

FIG. 6 illustrates an image moved and compensated in regard to the temporal section in accordance with the present invention. Arrows depict the correlation of a currently-restored image with a previously-restored image and a succeedingly reconstructed image, respectively.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 3

α VB , α HB , α VW , α HW , α T included in the second terms of Expression (4) are regularization parameters in regard to each set, indicate a ratio of the smoothing degree and reliability, and imply an error element. W 1 , W 2 , W 3 , W 4 , W 5 indicate diagonal matrixes having a size of M×M in order to determine whether each set has an element, and have a value of “1”, or “0” according to whether each pixel is included in a corresponding set. That is, if the respective pixels are included in the corresponding sets, the value of the diagonal elements is “0”. If not, the value of the diagonal elements is

Thereafter, the regularization parameters, α VB , α HB , α VW , α HW , α T are approximated as follows.

Approximation of Regularization Parameters

Approximation of the regularization parameters is a major element determining performance of the smoothing functional. In order to reduce the computation amount, presumptions are made as follows.

(1) A maximum value of the quantization error generated in the quantization process of the DCT region is Qp, and thus it is presumed that the quantization variables Qp are regular in each macro block. For this, the maximum quantization error of the DCT coefficients of each macro block is regularly set to be Qp. (2) It is also presumed that the DCT quantization errors have the Gaussain distribution property in the spatial section.

Under the above presumptions, in case a set theoretic is applied, each regularization parameter is approximated as follows.

α VB =  Q VB ⁢ f  2  g - f  W ⁢ 1 2 =  Q VB ⁢ g  2  g - f  W ⁢ 1 2 =  Q VB ⁢ g  2 ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ w 1 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢ Qp 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢

⁢ α HB =  Q HB ⁢ f  2  g - f  W ⁢ 2 2 ⁢   =  Q HB ⁢ g  2  g - f  W ⁢ 2 2 =  Q HB ⁢ g  2 ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ w 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢ Qp 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢

⁢ α VW =  Q VW ⁢ f  2  g - f  W ⁢ 3 2 ⁢   =  Q VW ⁢ g  2  g - f  W ⁢ 3 2 =  Q VW ⁢ g  2 ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ w 3 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢ Qp 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢

⁢ α HW =  Q HW ⁢ f  2  g - f  W ⁢ 4 2 ⁢   =  Q HW ⁢ g  2  g - f  W ⁢ 4 2 =  Q HW ⁢ g  2 ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ w 4 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢ Qp 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢

⁢ α T =  Q T ⁢ f  2  g - f  W ⁢ 5 2 ⁢   =  Q T ⁢ g  2  g - f  W ⁢ 5 2 =  Q T ⁢ g  2 ∑ n ⁢   ⁢ ∑ m ⁢   ⁢ w 5 ⁡ ( m , n ) ⁢ Qp 2 ⁡ ( m , n ) ( 6 )

Here, Q 2 P (m,n) is a quantization variable of a macro block including a (m,n)th pixel of a two-dimensional image.

In Expression (6), denominator terms of the respective regularization parameters are a sum of the energy for the quantization noise of the elements included in each group. As described above, the values of the regularization parameters may be easily computed by applying the set theoretic under the two presumptions.

Computing Pixels to be Restored From Smoothing Functional

Only the original image needs to be computed. However, the smoothing functional includes a square term of the original image. Accordingly, in order to compute the original image, a gradient operation is carried out on the smoothing functional in regard to the original image. A result value thereof is “0”, and represented by the following expression.

∇ f M(f)=2Q T VB Q VB +2Q T HB Q HB +

2Q T VW

Q VW +2Q T HW Q HW +2Q T

TQ T −2α VB W T 1 W 1 (

g−f)−2α HB W T 2 W 2 (

g−f)−2α VW W T 3 W 3 (

g−f)−2α HW W T 4 W 4 (

g−f)−2α T (g−f)=0  (7)

Here, a superscript “T” indicates a transposition of the matrix.

A restored image similar to the original image (f) can be obtained by Expression (7). However, operation of an inverse matrix must be performed, and thus the computation amount is increased. Thus, in accordance with the present invention, the restored image is computed by an iterative technique which will now be explained.

Iterative Technique

When Expression (7) is iterated k times, an iterative solution f k+1 is represented by the following expression.

f k+1 =f k +β[Ag−Bf k ],

A=α VB W 1 +α HB W 2 +α VW W 3 +α HW W 4 +α T W 5   (8)

B=(Q T VB Q VB +Q T HB Q HB +Q T VW Q VW +Q T HW Q HW +Q T T Q T )+A

In Expression (8), “β” is a relaxation parameter having a convergence property. Expression (8) can be represented by the following expression by computing consecutive iterative solutions.

(f k+1 −f K )=(I−B)(f k −f k−1 )  (9)

Here, “I” is an identity matrix, and the matrix B has a positive definite property. Therefore, when the following condition is satisfied, the iterative solutions are converged.

∥I−B∥<1  (10)

Expression (10) can be summarized as follows.

0 < β < 2 1 + max i ⁢ λ i ⁡ ( A ) ( 11 )

In Expression (11), “λ(A)” depicts an eigen value of the matrix A. A considerable amount of computation is required to compute the eigen value λ(A). However, the high pass filters have a certain shape determined according to the positions of the respective pixels, regardless of the image. Accordingly, before computing Expression (8), the eigen value λ(A) can be replaced by a fixed value. The value may be computed by a power method which has been generally used in interpretation of numerical values.

For example, a computation process of an eigen value of an iterative solution will now be explained.

x k+1 =Kx k

Here, “x k ” is a vector of M×1, and “K” is a positive-definite symmetric M×M matrix. The eigen value λ′ of the matrix K is approximated as follows.

λ ′ = ( x k + 1 ) T ⁢ x k ( x k T ) ⁢ x k

In the above expression, if “k” is to infinity, the eigen value λ′ is approximated to a real value.

Thus, the iterative solution represented by Expression (8) is computed. The next thing to be considered is a time of finishing the iterative technique, in order to determine the number of iteration. Here, two standards are set as follows.

Firstly, a predetermined threshold value is set before starting iteration, an image obtained after iteration, namely a partially-restored image is compared with the previously-set threshold value, and it is determined whether the iteration technique is continuously performed according to a comparison result.

Secondly, the iteration technique is performed as many as a predetermined number, and then finished.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 3 of 3

According to the first standard, a predetermined threshold value is set in performing iteration, and thus a wanted value is obtained. However, although the iteration number is increased, it may happen that the predetermined threshold value is not reached. On the other hand, the second standard is performed by experience, but can reduce a computation amount. Therefore, the two standards may be selectively used according to the design specification.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of the apparatus for restoring the compressed image of the image processing system in accordance with the present invention. As shown therein, in the step S 1 , the quantization variable Qp and the image signals Y, U, V are inputted, and the regularization parameter is approximated as described above. In the step S 2 , the gradient operation is performed on the smoothing functional in regard to the original image. In the step S 3 , an iterative solution, namely a wanted restored image is obtained by the iteration technique. In this step, employed are the image signals Y, U, V and the motion vector MV which is moved and compensated.

In the step S 4 , the DCT is performed on the restored image corresponding to the iterative solution f k+1 obtained in the step S 3 . An (u,v)th DCT coefficient of the two-dimensional restored image is expressed as F k+1 (u,v), and must exist in the following section in accordance with a property of the quantization process.

G(u,v)−Qp≦F k+1 (u,v)≦G(u,v)+Qp  (12)

Here, “Qp” is a maximum quantization error as explained above, and “G(u,v)” is a two-dimensional DCT coefficient obtained by performing the DCT on the reconstructed image (g). The DCT coefficients F k+1 (u,v) and G(u,v) are represented as follows. In Expression (13), “B” indicates a block DCT.

F k+1 (u,v)=(Bf k+1 )(u,v), and G(u,v)=(Bg)(u,v)  (13)

In the step S 6 , a section of the DCT coefficient of the restored image is set as in Expression (12). Accordingly, in case the DCT coefficient F k+1 (u,v) of the restored image is not in the predetermined section, it must be projected as follows. A projection process is carried out in the step S 7 , and represented by Expression (14).

P(F k+1 (u,v))=G(u,v)−Qp, if F k+1 (u,v)<G(u,v)−Qp

P(F k+1 (u,v))=G(u,v)+Qp, if F k+1 (u,v)>G(u,v)−Qp  14

P(F k+1 (u,v))=F k+1 (u,v), otherwise.

Expression (14) will now be described.

When F k+1 (u,v) is smaller than G(u,v)−Qp, the projected restored image P(F k+1 (u,v)) is mapped to G(u,v)−Qp. In case F k+1 (u,v) is greater than G(u,v)+Qp, the projected restored image P(F k+1 (u,v)) is mapped to G(u,v)+Qp. Otherwise, the projected restored image P(F k+1 (u,v)) is mapped as it is.

In the step S 8 , the inverse DCT is performed on the mapped image P(F k+1 (u,v)) in the spatial section. The finally restored image is represented by Expression (14).

f k+1 =B T PBf k+1   (15)

Here, “B” indicates the DCT, “P” indicates mapping, and “B T ” indicates the inverse DCT.

The restored image is stored in a frame memory in the post processing unit 220 (Step S 9 ). The post processing unit 220 performs motion compensation based on the motion vector MV (Step S 10 ). The motion and compensation image is employed for generation of the regularization parameter for a succeeding image and the iteration technique.

The post processing unit 220 outputs the restored motion and compensation image as a video signal to a display (not shown) (Step S 11 ).

As discussed earlier, the present invention can restrict a section of the restored image for the respective pixels by using the various regularization parameters. In addition, the present invention prevents flickering which may occur in the dynamic image compression technique.

Consequently, the present invention adaptively prevents the blocking artifacts and the ringing effects for the pixels having an identical property in image block units, and thus can be widely used for the products of the hybrid MC-DCT mechanism.

As the present invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof, it should also be understood that the above-described embodiment is not limited by any of the details of the foregoing description, unless otherwise specified, but rather should be construed broadly within its spirit and scope as defined in the appended claims, and therefore all changes and modifications that fall within the meets and bounds of the claims, or equivalences of such meets and bounds are therefore intended to be embraced by the appended claims.

Claims

31 · 5 independent · depth 4
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
31 granted claims

Classifications

22 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06T9/00
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N19/423
  • H04N19/80
  • H04N19/86
  • H04N19/51
  • H04N19/625
  • H04N19/44
  • H03M7/30
  • H04N7/24
  • H04N19/00
  • H04N1/04
USPC · US Patent Classification
358/474382/233375/240.16358/539382/254375/240.22358/261.3358/426.7382/232348/475348/700

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
3.2 y
1,156 days filing → grant
Office actions
5
non-final + final
Responses
6
no RCE
Examiner
Negussie Worku
art unit 2625 · TC 2600
Citations: 34 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Worldwide family

12 members · 3 offices
US6JP4KR2
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
12
DOCDB simple family 19558268
Offices
3
US · JP · KR
Granted
8 of 12
grant date present
Non-English titles
3
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 12 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USUS-6611361-B1B126 Aug 200324 Jun 1999grantedMethod for restoring compressed image of image processing system and apparatus therefor
USUS-RE41089-EE126 Jan 201020 Aug 2007grantedMethod of decoding a current image
USUS-RE41400-EE129 Jun 201020 Aug 2007grantedMethod of decoding a current image
USUS-RE41526-EE117 Aug 201026 Aug 2005grantedMethod and apparatus for restoring compressed image processing system and method of decoding a current image
USthis patentUS-RE41835-EE119 Oct 201020 Aug 2007grantedMethod of decoding a current image
USUS-RE41907-EE12 Nov 201020 Aug 2007grantedMethod of decoding a current image
JPJP-2000152229-AA30 May 200022 Sep 1999publishedMethod and device for restoring compressed image of image processing system
JPJP-3697120-B2B221 Sep 200522 Sep 1999granted画像処理システムの圧縮画像の復元方法及びその装置ja
JPJP-2005312079-AA4 Nov 200531 May 2005publishedMethod for restoring compressed image
JPJP-2009153226-AA9 Jul 20098 Apr 2009published復号化方法ja
KRKR-20000032333-AA15 Jun 200013 Nov 1998publishedMethod for restoring compressed image
KRKR-100282147-B1B115 Feb 200113 Nov 1998granted압축 영상 복원 방법ko

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock