USPatentGranted
E

Composite seal for rotary cone rock bits

Granted 21 Dec 1999 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Smith International, Inc. · originally SLB

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Gary Portwood, Jerry Pyka, Robert G. Upton, Michael E. Hooper +2 · Examiner: Anthony Knight · AU 366 · TC 3600

Application
649954
filed 8 Jul 1996
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US RE36452
granted 21 Dec 1999

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomJul 1996Jan 1997Jul 1997Jan 1998Jul 1998Jan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An elastomeric o-ring rock bit seal is disclosed with two or more integrally bonded elastomers or phenolic type materials joined together to form the seal. The dynamic sealing face adjacent the journal bearing is fabricated from an elastomer/phenolic engineered specifically for wear resistance The bulk of the seal adjacent the static seal retention cavity typically formed in the rotary cone is molded from an elastomer engineered specifically for precise control of the seal contact force adjacent the dynamic seal face when the seal is compressed against the dynamic face by the seal retention cavity in the cone.

Description

22 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a rotary cone seal with two or more elastomeric materials joined together to form the seal.

More particularly, this invention is a composite seal with two or more elastomeric materials bonded together with further means affixed to the seal to minimize damage to the seal from detritus invading the seal cavity surrounding the seal.

II. Description of the Prior Art

There are a number of prior art patents that teach sea for sealed bearing rotary cone rock bits

For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,765,495 describes an earth boring drill employing roller cone cutters with a seal to inhibit ingress of detritus into the cutter bearing area and egress of lubricant therefrom The seal cavity and adjacent journal is designed to place the seal in hoop compression. The shape of the seal is such that its cross-section is not overly compressed or displaced when in operating position. The seal has a greater radial cross-sectional extent than axial extent by a ratio of at least one-and-one-half to one to conserve bearing space and to provide flexibility to accommodate the various movements of the cutter cone relative to its bearing journal which it is rotatively mounted.

Since the seal is fabricated from a homogeneous resilient material, the portion of the seal adjacent to the journal bearing is exposed to debris and thus, vulnerable to wear that will eventually compromise the seal. The seal, of necessity, has to be flexible enough to maintain the seal in hoop compression as heretofore mentioned. If the seal material is too bard in an attempt to resist abrasion it will not be resilient enough to maintain proper hoop compression.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,788,654 teaches a multiple hardness o-ring seal A molded ring of partially activated nitrile rubber materials subsequently forms a hardened skin by the process of surface curing the Activated materials in a solution of a curing agent. The nitrile rubber curing agent provides a secondary curing period which increases the exterior hardness of the seat. The compression set characteristics of the o-ring however are somewhat sacrificed as a result Furthermore, the hardened skin does not necessarily provide lower friction and/or greater wear resistance.

The harsh environment sealed bearing rock bits are subjected to, demand that the bearing seals adapt to these condition. For example, hard rock earthen formations subject the roller cone cutters to uneven loads that eventually cause the cones to eccentrically wobble on their respective journal bearings especially after extended run times. In addition, heat buildup caused from depth of bit penetration, weight on bit and relatively high bit rotational speeds challenge the seals to perform despite these deterring factor. Moreover, modern day drilling techniques have resulted in higher bit rotational speeds deeper borehole penetration depths and a greater weight on the bit that further challenges the performance of the rotary cone seals.

The prior art seals, while they exhibited adequate performance under ordinary drilling conditions, lack the necessary composition to withstand the higher performance demanded by drilling operators competing in the petroleum industry.

The present invention teaches the fabrication of a composite seal designed to resist abrasion from bore hole detritus and heat from high rotary speeds. In addition, the seal is pliable enough to maintain a seal despite cone wobble and excessive bit weight.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of this invention to provide a composite seal for a sealed bearing rotary cone rock bit that protects the cutter cone journal bearings despite increased rock bit operating performance parameters.

A predominantly elastomeric O-ring rock bit seal is fabricated with two or more integrally bonded elastomers or phenolic type materials. The dynamic sealing face typically adjacent the journal bearing is made from an elastomer/phenolic engineered specifically for wear resistance due to sliding wear on the dynamic wear surface and from abrasive wear due to the abrasive slurry being sealed. The bulk of the seal is molded from an elastomer engineered specifically for precise control of the seal contact force adjacent the dynamic seal face when the seal is squeezed.

Moreover, the seal face may be further divided into more specialized functions. For example, one material can be formulated for resisting abrasive wear from the sealed slurry as heretofore mentioned. This material may be a phenolic material and the sliding wear face can be formulated from an elastomer designed for a sliding wear only.

A composite O-ring seal for a sealed bearing rotary cone rock bit is disclosed. The seal is confined within a seal cavity formed between a rotary cutter cone and a bearing journal.

A first elastomer is integrally bonded to at least a second elastomer. The first elastomer that is in contact with a dynamic surface, is wear resistant. The second elastomer has properties that is adapted for precise control of seal contact force while resisting compression set when the seal is squeezed within the seal cavity.

A means is provided for applying contact pressure to the composite seal.

The invention further teaches a barrier material such as a screen mesh that is bonded to the first elastomer in contact with the dynamic surface. The mesh is positioned adjacent to an exterior area that is exposed to detritus material generated during operation of the rock bit in an earthen formation.

The invention is further characterized by a means for applying contact pressure to the composite seal. The seal cavity is preferably formed in the cutter cone. The maximum diameter of the seal cavity is smaller in diameter than the outside diameter of the composite O-ring seal. This dimensioning assures that the seal is subjected to hoop compression forces that maintains constant contact of the first wear resistant elastomer against the dynamic surface formed on the journal bearing.

An advantage then of the present invention over the prior art is the composite O-ring seal with the capability to withstand high frictional wear loads while remaining flexible enough to resist compressibility during rock bit drilling operations.

Yet another advantage of the present invention over the prior art is the addition of a screen mesh bonded to the dynamic portion of the composite seal adjacent the exposed side of the seal to further protect the seal from the harsh elements present during drilling operations.

It is obvious that the dynamic sealing surface may be on the outer diameter of the seal, with the elastomer engineering for control of the seal contact force on the inner diameter. Moreover, the seal may be constructed to have dynamic sealing surfaces on both its outer and inner diameters with the energizing elastomer sandwiched inbetween.

The above noted objects and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood upon a study of the following description in conjunction with the detailed drawings.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a partially cutaway perspective view of a sealed bearing rotary cone rock bit;

FIG. 2 is a cross-section of a cone mounted to a journal bearing illustrating a seal retained within a seal gland formed within the mouth of the cone, the dynamic surface of the preferred embodiment of the seal is adjacent the base of the journal bearing.

FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the seal illustrating the various design features, and

FIG. 4 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the O-ring seal.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS AND BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Referring now to the partially sectioned perspective view of FIG. 1, a sealed bearing rotary cone rock bit, generally designated as 10, consists of rock bit body 12 forming an upper pin end 14 and a cutter end of rotary cones 16 that are supported by legs 13 extending from body 12. The threaded pin end 14 is adapted to be connected to a drill swing (not shown).

Contained within bit body 12 is a grease reservoir system generally designated as 18. Lubricant passages 21 and 42 are provided from the reservoir to rotary cone bearing surfaces formed between a journal bearing 24 and each of the cones 16.

Each of the legs 13 terminate in a shirttail portion 22. Each of the roller cones 16 typically have a multiplicity of tungsten carbide inserts 17 interference fitted within insert sockets formed in the cones.

Drilling fluid is directed within the hollow pin end 14 of the bit 10 to an interior plenum chamber 11 formed by the bit body 12. The fluid is then directed out of the bit through one or more nozzle openings 20. The fluid accelerated through the nozzles serves to cool the rock bit and to clean the debris from the bottom of the borehole as the bit works in a borehole (not shown).

With reference now to both FIGS. 1 and 2, the partially broken away cross-section of leg 13 of the bit illustrates the grease reservoir system in detail. Lubricant contained within chamber 19 of the reservoir is directed through lube passage 21 formed within leg 13. The passage 21 terminates adjacent ball plug hole 42. The ball plug bole 42 serves to admit a multiplicity of cone retention balls 28 to cone retention ball races 29 and 32 formed between journal 24 and cone 16. The balls 28 are passed through the ball plug hole 42, entering a track 29 formed in journal 24. The ball race 29 is indexed with ball race 32 formed in the cone. The ball track is filled with balls 28 and a ball plug 44 is subsequently inserted within the ball plug hole 42 to retain the balls within the ball races 29 and 32. The end of the plug 44 is welded within shirt 22 of leg 13. Journal 24 extends from leg 13 and forms bearing surface 25. The cone forms bearing surface 26. A floating bearing 45 is disposed between the cone and the journal. A smaller concentric spindle or pilot bearing 31 extends from end 33 of the journal bearing 24 and is retained within a complimentary bearing formed within the cone. A seal generally designated as 50 is positioned within a seal gland formed between the journal 24 and the cone 16.

Referring specifically now to FIGS. 2 and 3, the preferred embodiment of seal 50 consists of an O-ring having a generally oval cross-section. The dynamic sealing face, for example, is made from a material formulated specifically for low friction and wear resistance. The body of the seal is made from a material formulated specifically to maintain its stiffness properties throughout the temperature and chemical environments that the seal encounters, thus a consistent preload on the sliding surface. Therefore, the material for the wear function must emphasize properties of low friction in a sliding motion, low wear in a sliding motion and good resistance to particle abrasion.

Seal 50 is designed to be retained within a U-shaped seal gland groove 46 preferably formed in the cone 16. The outside diameter of the seal 50 is larger in diameter than the diameter of the seal retention groove 46. FIG. 3 illustrates the seal in the unconfined state represented by the phantom line at outer portion 56 of the seal. The seal therefore is placed under hoop compression (the forces being directed radially inwardly) when it is installed within the confines of the bottom 49 of the annular groove 46. The static portion of the seal therefore is adjacent the outer surface 52 of the seal 50 where it contacts the bottom 49 of the groove 46. .Iadd.As seen in FIG. 3, the bottom of the groove 46 is rounded and the static sealing surface of the seal has a radius of curvature in a transverse cross section similar to that of the bottom of the groove. .Iaddend.

The inner dynamic seal face or surface 54 of the seal 50 is adjacent seal bearing surfaces 48 formed on journal bearing 24. .Iadd.The dynamic seal face includes a radius of curvature in a transverse cross section different from the radius of curvature of the static face. .Iaddend.

The seal preferably consists of a formulation of different elastomers that are co-joined and designed to function under unusually harsh rock bit drilling conditions.

For example, with specific reference to FIGS. 2 and 3, the radially outwardly extended elastomer portion 56 of the seal 50 adjacent the bottom 49 of the groove 46, consists of a low compression set material having a constant compression modulus with good dynamic response characteristics that maintain seal compression.

The inner seal portion 58 adjacent dynamic surface 48 (nearest the lubricated bearings) is an elastomeric formulation having the following characteristics; low friction and wear in a sliding motion.

The outer seal portion 60 adjacent the outer environment consists of an elastomer having the following characteristics; low friction and wear with good resistance to particle abrasion.

The same family of elastomers may be used for both materials but with different additives to enhance their specific function.

The chart below gives the preferred seal formulations for elastomer segments 56, 58 and 60:

______________________________________

PARTS BY WEIGHT
WEAR WEAR
BODY FACE FACE
›MTL MTL MTL

ADDITIVE FUNCTION (56) (58) (60)

______________________________________

2207S HSN POLYMER 100.0 100.0 100.0

NAUGARD ANTIOXIDANT 1.1 1.1 1.1

445

ZMTI ANTIOXIDANT 0.4 0.4 0.4

STEARIC ACTIVATOR 0.5 0.5 0.5

›ACID

ZINC ACTIVATOR 5.0 5.0 5.0

›OXIDE

VULCAN REINFORCE- 0.0 40.0 40.0

6-LM MENT CARBON-

›BLACK

N-990 REINFORCE- 30.0 0.0 0.0

MENT CARBON-
›BLACK

VUL-CUP CURATIVE 10.0 10.0 10.0

40KE

RICON 153D

CO-AGENT 4.0 4.0 4.0

›CURATIVE

GRAPHITE FRICTION 0.0 15.0 15.0

A99 REDUCER

PHENOLIC TEAR RESIS- 0.0 5.0 5.0

›RESIN TANCE

KEVLAR TEAR & ADRA- 0.0 0.0 5.0

FIBER* SION RESIS-
›TANCE

______________________________________

The additives listed above may be obtained from the following suppliers:

______________________________________

HSN Miles, Polysar, Silver Lake, Ohio

NAUGARD 445 Uniroyal Chemical, Middlebury, Connecticut

ZMTI R. T. Vanderbilt, Norwalk, Connecticut

›STEARIC ACID

C. P. Hall Co., Memphis, Tennessee

ZINC OXIDE R. T. Vanderbilt, Norwalk, Connecticut

VULCAN 6-LM CABOT, Atlanta, Georgia

N-990 J. M. Huber, Akron, Ohio

VUL-CUP 40KE

Hercules, Wilmington, Delaware

RICON 153D Colorado Chemical, Golden, Colorado

GRAPHITE A99

Superior Graphite, Chicago, Illinois

PHENOLIC Occidental Chemical, North Tonawanda, N.Y.

›RESIN

KEVLAR E. I. DuPont, Wilmington, Delaware

FIBER 6F568

______________________________________

.Iadd.Kevlar fiber is a non-elastomeric polymeric aromatic polyamide fiber. .Iaddend.

The percent by weight of rubber hydrocarbons (R.H.C.) formulating the wear face material 60 is as follows:

______________________________________

HSN POLYMER 53.763

NAUGARD 445 .591

ZMTI .215

STEARIC ACID .269

ZINC OXIDE 2.688

VULCAN 6-LM 21.505

VUL-CUP 40KE 5.376

RICON 153D 2.151

GRAPHITE A99 8.065

PHENOLIC RESIN 2.688

KEVLAR FIBER 2.688

EQUALS 100.00

______________________________________

The percent by weight of R.C.H. formulating the wear face material 58 is as follows:

______________________________________

HSN POLYMER 55.249

NAUGARD 445 .608

ZMTI .222

STERAIC ACID .276

ZINC OXIDE 2.762

VULCAN 6-LM 22.099

VUL-CUP 40KE 5.525

RICON 153D 2.210

GRAPHITE A99 8.287

PHENOLIC RESIN 2.762

EQUALS 100.00

______________________________________

The percent by weight of R.C.H. formulating the body material 56 is as follows:

______________________________________

›HSN POLYMER

66.225

NAUGARD 445

.728

ZMTI .265

›STEARLC ACID

.331

›ZINC OXIDE

3.311

N-990 19.868

VUL-CUP 40KE

6.623

RICON 153D

2.649

EQUALS 100.00

______________________________________

The novel elastomer material combinations are molded to the desired o-ring seal cross-section using well known, state of the art molding techniques.

The durometer hardness of the elastomeric wear materials 58 and 60 is between 80 and 100. The durometer hardness of materials 58 and 60 is preferably 85 to 90.

The durometer hardness of elastomeric material 56 is between 60 and 80. The durometer hardness of material 56 is preferably between 65 and 70.

Referring now to FIG. 4, the alternative seal includes a seal protection feature consisting of a metal wire mesh 162 that is bonded to, or encapsulated within the seal segment 160 of composite seal generally designated as 150. Elastomeric segments 156, 158 and 160 are comparable to those material combinations set forth for seal 50 of FIGS. 1 through 3.

The protection element 162 may be, for example, selected from steel, brass, or bronze. Moreover, the protection element may be a thermo-plastic such as polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE). Graphite is another material that could be utilized.

It will of course be realized that various modifications can be made in the design and operation of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof thus, while the principal preferred construction and mode of operation of the invention have been explained in what is now considered to represent its best embodiments, which have been illustrated and described, it should be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described.

Claims

12 · 1 independent · depth 4
123456789101112
12 granted claims

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section E — Fixed constructions
  • E21B10/25
  • E21B10/22
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F16C33/74
USPC · US Patent Classification
277/336277/589277/936277/938277/944

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
3.5 y
1,261 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Anthony Knight
art unit 366 · TC 3600
Citations: 31 back · 0 forward

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock