USPatentGranted
E

Two stage coding method

Granted 11 May 1993 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha · originally Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Ken Ohnishi, Kiyoshi Matsutani · Examiner: Charles E. Atkinson · AU 233 · TC 2300

Application
578178
filed 6 Sep 1990
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US RE34245
granted 11 May 1993

Life of the patent

3 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom19901992199419961998200020022004200620082010ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Errors which arise in recording and reproducing data in a recording material are corrected with the use of an error correction code such as an RS (Reed-Solomon) code, and a two stage C.sub.2 and C.sub.1 coding method is conducted at an interval of repetition of a combination of [k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ] and [k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]+1 on digital data having a two dimensional arrangement of k.sub.1 in the first direction and k.sub.2 in the second direction, whereby burst error correction ability is enhanced by the enhancement of error correction capacity.

Description

6 parts
›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a two stage coding method having a high burst error correction ability and also a random error correction ability equivalent to that of the prior art when an error correction code such as a Reed Solomon code (hereinafter referred to as "RS code") is used in order to correct data errors which arise in reproducing data recorded in a recording material such as a magnetic disk.

›BACKGROUND ART

Generally, in recording and reproducing data into and from a recording material such as a magnetic disk a data error may arise dependent on the state of the recording material. A data error may be a burst error caused by a signal drop out .[.on.]. .Iadd.or .Iaddend.a random error caused by a deterioration in SN ratio. In order to correct these errors a two stage coded error correction code is used. As an example, a two stage code using RS codes on a GF .[.(2 8 ).]. (.Iadd.2 q ) .Iaddend.where q=8 will be considered. A two stage encoder is shown in FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, reference numeral 1 designates an input terminal, reference numeral 2 designates a C 2 encoder, reference numeral 3 designates an interleaving circuit, reference numeral 4 designates a C 1 encoder, the reference numeral 5 designates an output terminal. First of all, C 2 encoding is performed on the original data, interleaving is executed thereto, and thereafter C 1 encoding is conducted, and the resulting code signal is output to the output terminal. A two stage decoder is shown in FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, reference numeral 6 designates an input terminal, reference numeral 7 designates a C 1 decoder, reference numeral 8 designates a deinterleaving circuit, reference numeral 9 designates a C 2 decoder, and reference numeral 10 designates an output terminal. In this decoder deinterleaving is executed after the C 1 decoding, and thereafter C 2 decoding is conducted. There is a prior art two stage coding method which, assuming that data obtained by arranging .[.k 1 ×9.]. .Iadd.k 1 ×q .Iaddend.digits in a first direction and k 2 digits (k 1 <k 2 ) in a second direction as shown in FIG. 5 is arranged into 8 .[.data.]. .Iadd.digit .Iaddend.words in the first direction, consists of adding a first check code of n 2 -k 1 digits, and thereafter adding a second check code of n 1 -n 2 digits as shown in FIG. 2, (n 2 , k 1 ) RS code is used as the C 2 code, and (n 1 , n 2 ) RS code is used as the C 1 code.

A specific coding example will be described with reference to FIGS. 5 and 2. When it is established that k 1 =32, k 2 =128, n 1 =40, n 2 =36, and h 1 =h 2 = . . . =h 35 =h=3, the data region comprising the data and the first check code becomes data of n 2 ×k 2 =4608 digits as shown in FIG. 5, and when a 1 is set to 1, a 2 to a 36 become as follows: ##EQU1## and C 2 encoding is conducted on the data corresponding to the a 1 -th, a 2 -th, . . . , a 32 -th data .Iadd.selected .Iaddend.with use of the following generation polynomial of C 2 code ##EQU2## where α is a root of a primary polynomial (for example, such as x 8 +x 4 +x 3 +x 2 +1 on GF (2 8 )). The generated check codes are arranged at the positions corresponding to the a 33 -th, a 34 -th, . . . , a 36 -th data. Next, a 1 is set as follows:

a.sub.1 =a.sub.1 +n.sub.2 =a.sub.1 +36,

and similarly check codes are added to the data successively. Herein, if the calculated result of a 2 to a 36 exceeds n 2 ×k 2 =4608, a number obtained by subtracting 4608 therefrom is made the result. The encoding is repeated k 2 times thereby to conclude the C 2 encoding.

Next, C 1 encoding is conducted on the data of n 2 digits in each column arranged in the first direction as shown in FIG. 2 with the use of the following generation polynomial of C 1 code ##EQU3## The generated check code is added to the end portion of the data and the encoding is repeated k 2 times. In the recording of the data onto the recording material data of n 1 =40 digits arranged in the first direction is sent out k 2 times successively. In the reproduction of the same the sent out data are arranged in a column in the first direction by 40 digits successively.

In the prior art two stage coding method with such a construction, the C 2 code is concerned with burst error correction ability, and the C 1 and C 2 codes are concerned with random error correction ability. In the stage of conducting C 2 encoding the h must be made large in order to enhance the burst error correction ability, and h is set as follows:

h=[k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]=[128/36]=3

.Iadd.where [A] denotes an integer which does not exceed A .Iaddend.The C 2 codes are gathered at the right end portion of the data region in FIG. 5, and the C 2 and the C 1 code are arranged adjacent to each other in the first direction subsequent to the data of k 1 =32 digits when the C 1 encoding is completed.

The prior art two stage coding method is constructed in such a manner, and the error correction ability by one code amounts to n 2 -k 1 digits when forfeiture correction is conducted by the C 2 decoding. Accordingly, the burst error correction ability becomes as follows for data of n 2 ×k 2 =4608 digits comprising all the data and the C 2 code

(n.sub.2 -k.sub.1)×n.sub.2 ×h=432,

but h becomes as follows:

h=[k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]=[128/36]=3<128/36,

and k 2 /n 2 does not equal an integer, thereby resulting in deterioration of error correction capability.

›DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to solve the problems pointed out above and an object is to provide a two stage coding method in which the above-described deterioration in a burst error correction ability is improved and a higher burst error correction ability than that of the prior art device is obtained.

According to the coding method of the present invention, assuming that data of k 1 ×8×k 2 digits are arranged in a matrix of k 1 ×8 digits in a first direction and k 2 digits(s) in a second direction and the data is divided into words of 8 digit(s) in the first direction, in conducting C 2 encoding by taking out n 2 data words from the data of .[.n 2 .]. .Iadd.n 2 -k 1 .Iaddend.words in the first direction and k 2 words in the second direction with no duplication of data in either of the first and second directions, a C 2 code of .[.code.]. length .[.n 2 .]. .Iadd.n 2 -k 1 .Iaddend.is produced by establishing a 1 at an arbitrary data number word, and establishing h 1 , h 2 , . . . , h n2-1 such that they become a repetition of a combination satisfying the condition that [k.sub. 2 /n 2 ] and [k 2 /n 2 ]+1 may be

[k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]×1.sub.1 +([k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]+1)×1.sub.2 ≦k.sub.2

(herein, l 1 +l 2 =n 2 (l 1 , 1 2 : integer) and a 2 to a n2 exceeding n 2 ×k 2 are obtained by subtracting n 2 ×k 2 therefrom) for a 2 to a n2 as in the following: ##EQU4## when numbering is conducted successively in the first direction on the data of n 2 words in the first direction and k 2 words in the second direction, and this is repeated k 2 words in the second direction, and thereafter C 1 encoding of each n 2 ×q digits in the first direction .[.into a.]..Iadd., forming an C 1 C 2 encoded data matrix having a total .Iaddend.code length n 1 is conducted.

In the two stage coding method of the present invention, C 2 codes are constructed to be effective for error correction at the portion of n 2 -k 1 in the first direction and at the portion of k 2 in the second direction against the data obtained by arranging k 1 digits in the first direction and k 2 digits in the second direction, as shown in FIG. 1. According to the present invention, the burst error correction ability against the data of n 2 ×k 2 =4608 digits comprising all the data, and the C 2 codes becomes

(n.sub.2 -k.sub.1)×n.sub.2 ×(h.sub.4 +h.sub.B)/2=504.

and this exceeds 432 which is the burst error correction ability of the prior art device against the same number of data and the same number of check codes.

In this way, it is possible to conduct a two stage coding having a higher burst error correction ability than that of the prior art, and having a random error correction ability equivalent to that of the prior art due to the C 1 and C 2 codes.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a data arrangement for conducting a C 2 encoding method as one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a data arrangement for conducting a prior art two stage coding method and a C 1 encoding method as an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a two stage encoding circuit;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a two stage decoding circuit; and

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a data arrangement for conducting the C 2 encoding method of the prior art two stage coding method.

›BEST MODES OF EMBODYING THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In FIGS. 1 and 2, the constants are established that q=8, k 1 =32, k 2 =128, n 1 =40, n 2 =36, and data are divided into words of 8 digits in the first direction. FIG. 1 shows a C 2 encoding method. Data of k 1 ×k 2 =4096 data words are arranged sequentially in the first direction and in a matrix of k 1 =32 words in the first direction and k 2 =128 words in the second direction, and when h 2i-1 and h 2i are set as follows

h.sub.2i-1 =h.sub.A =]k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]=3

h.sub.2i =h.sub.B =[k.sub.2 /n.sub.2 ]+1=4,

(i: integer, 1≦i≦(n 2 -1)/2)

and a 1 is set 1, a 2 to a 36 become ##EQU5## and, C 2 encoding is performed on the data corresponding to the a 1 -th, a 2 -th, . . . , and a 32 -th data with the use of the generation polynomial of the C 2 code ##EQU6## Herein, α is a root of a primary polynomial. The generated check codes are arranged at the positions corresponding to the a 33 -th, a 34 -th, . . . , a 36 -th data. Next, a 1 is set as follows

a.sub.1 =a.sub.1 +n.sub.2 =a.sub.1 +36

and similarly inspection codes are added to the data successively. a 2 to a 36 exceeding n 2 ×k 2 =4608 are made by subtracting 4608 therefrom. When this encoding operation is repeated k 2 times the C 2 encoding is completed.

Next, C 1 encoding is performed on the data of n 2 words in each column arranged in the first direction as shown in FIG. 2 with the use of the generation polynomial of C 1 code ##EQU7## The generated check codes are added to the data, and the encoding is repeated k 2 times. The recording of the data on a recording material is conducted by sending out data of n 1 =40 words arranged in the first direction successively k 2 times. The data format reproduction is conducted by arranging the sent out data by 40 words successively in a column in the first direction.

In the two stage coding method of the present invention, the C 2 code is concerned with burst error correction ability and both C 1 and C 2 codes are concerned with random error correction ability. In conducting the C 2 encoding, C 2 codes of n 2 -k 1 in the first direction and k 2 in the second direction can be used effectively for the error correction of the data arranged in a matrix of k 1 in the first direction and k 2 in the second direction.

In the above-illustrated embodiment a repetition pattern of (h A , h B ) is adopted for h 1 , h 2 , . . . , h n2-1 , but other combinations using h A and h B such as (h B , h A ) or (h A , h B , h B ) can be used if they comply with the following conditions

h.sub.A ×l.sub.1 +h.sub.B ×l.sub.2 ≦k.sub.2

l.sub.1 +l.sub.2 =n.sub.2

Furthermore, an RS code on GF (2 q ) is used as an error correction code, but another code such as a BCH code can be used as an error correction code. Furthermore, the number of data, the construction of information lengths in the first and second directions, and the C 2 and C 1 code lengths can be arbitrarily established. Furthermore, in the illustrated embodiment the region occupied by the check codes of the C 2 code and the C 1 code is shown in FIG. 2, but this occupied region can be arbitrarily established by establishing a 1 at an arbitrary number.

Furthermore, it is possible to add the additional information of k 3 ×q digits in the second direction k 2 times precedent to the C 1 encoding, and thereafter to conduct C 1 encoding on GF (2 q ) having the (n 1 +k 3 )×q digits in the first direction, and to conduct a coding k 2 times repeatedly in the second direction.

›APPLICABILITY TO THE INDUSTRY

The present invention is applicable not only to a magnetic disk apparatus but also to an optical recording and reproducing apparatus, and an optical magnetic recording and reproducing apparatus.

Claims

2 · 2 independent · depth 1
12
2 granted claims

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G11B20/18
Section H — Electricity
  • H03M13/27
  • H03M1/24
  • H03M13/29
USPC · US Patent Classification
371/38.1371/40.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
2.7 y
978 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Charles E. Atkinson
art unit 233 · TC 2300
Citations: 7 back · 0 forward

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Worldwide family

10 members · 5 offices
US2JP2WO1DE2GB3
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
10
DOCDB simple family 17621187
Offices
5
US · JP · WO
Granted
4 of 10
grant date present
Non-English titles
1
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 5 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USUS-4769819-AA6 Sep 198819 Dec 1985grantedTwo stage coding method
USthis patentUS-RE34245-EE11 May 19936 Sep 1990grantedTwo stage coding method
JPJP-S61154227-AA12 Jul 198626 Dec 1984publishedTwo-stage coding method
JPJP-H0152940-B2B210 Nov 198926 Dec 1984publishedno title held
WOWO-8603911-A1A13 Jul 198619 Dec 1985publishedProcede de codage en deux etapesfr
›Other offices — 5 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
DEDE-3590661-TT19 Feb 198719 Dec 1985publishedno title held
DEDE-3590661-C2C214 Sep 198919 Dec 1985grantedno title held
GBGB-8619805-D0D024 Sep 198619 Dec 1985publishedTwo-step encoding method
GBGB-2180966-AA8 Apr 198719 Dec 1985publishedTwo-step encoding method
GBGB-2180966-BB14 Sep 198819 Dec 1985grantedA two stage coding method

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock