USPatentGranted
E

Methods of adding reactive metals to form a remelting electrode

Granted 16 Nov 1976 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Bank of America Corporation · originally Cabot Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Howard Joseph Klein, Robert B. Herchenroeder · Examiner: Francis S. Husar · AU 322 · TC 3200

Application
636196
filed 28 Nov 1975
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US RE29035
granted 16 Nov 1976

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomOct 1975Jan 1976Apr 1976Jul 1976Oct 1976Jan 1977Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method is provided for adding reactive metals to a molten metal bath by forming said reactive metal into an elongated member, suspending said member generally lengthwise vertically of a mold and pouring metal to be treated into said mold, to make said formed member an integral part of the molten metal as it rises in the mold and is cooled.

Description

1 parts
›This invention relates to methods of adding reactive…

This invention relates to methods of adding reactive metals to molten baths and particularly to a method of adding reactive metals to a molten metal ingot or casting such as an electrode for electroslag remelting (ESR), vacuum arc remelting, plasma arc remelting, electron beam remelting or similar remelting techniques.

The problems which are common to present day methods of adding reactive metals to molten baths are well known and long recognized. It is well known that large proportions of added reactive metals are lost in normal practice by contact with refractory linings, with slag and with air. It is also known that there is frequently a marked difference from one ingot to another in a series of ingots cast from melts to which a reactive metal has been added and that this is particularly true from first to last ingot.

We have found a method of adding reactive metals, such as lanthanum, which eliminates these problems.

Preferably, we provide an elongated member containing the reactive metal extending vertically generally from top to bottom of a mold and proportioned to feed the metal uniformly into the mold as the mold is filled with molten metal to be treated. Preferably, we suspend a tube filled with the reactive metal or an alloy thereof axial of the mold so that as the metal rises in the mold, the tube melts off in the molten metal releasing the reactive metal into the molten mass.

In some instances it may be desirable to encapsulate the reactive metal in the cast electrode as an integral but distinct core so that it is released during subsequent remelting of the electrode rather than during casting of the electrode as just described. In such event, we provide a tube or member e.g. of thick walled construction, such that the member is not distributed into the molten metal but is encapsulated as the metal cools as an elongated core and is then subsequently melted during the remelting operation. Prior to filling the mold with molten alloy we have found it to be good practice to purge the mold with an inert gas such as argon.

In the foregoing general description, we have outlined certain objects, purposes and advantages of this invention. Other objects, purposes and advantages will be apparent from a consideration of the following description and the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a vertical section through an apparatus for practicing this invention; and

FIG. 2 is a section on the line II--II of FIG. 1.

Referring to the drawings, we have illustrated an ESR electrode mold 10 on a stool 11, both of conventional form. A tube 12 filled with LaSi 13 (or other reactive metal or alloy) is suspended by a chain 14 from the bottom of a tundish 15 into which molten metal is poured and delivered through nozzle 16 into mold 10. The mold 10 is purged with inert gas. As the molten metal 17 rises in mold 10, the tube 12 is melted off and the reactive metal is dissolved into the metal.

It is, of course, obvious that the axial member need not be a tube filled with reactive metal but may be an elongated formed member of the reactive metal in a compatible matrix.

The tube 12 may be restricted along its length so as to compartment the reactive metal and prevent its flowing out of the end when the end is melted off as pouring beings. This restriction may be accomplished by pinching, crimping or otherwise constricting or compartmenting the tube at spaced intervals along its length. This restriction will also provide, in effect, successive metered charges of reactive metal as the molten metal to be treated rises in the mold.

Inherent in this invention are a number of advantages not available in present methods. These are: (A) the lanthanum or other reactive metal addition is distributed uniformly from top to bottom of the cast electrode, (B) there is no loss of the reactive metal by reaction with refractories such as those found in ladles, furnaces or tundishes because the molds are not lined with ceramic and solidification at the mold metal interface is almost instantaneous, (C) because slag is not present, with the reactive metal, there is no loss of the addition via slag-addition interaction, (D) reaction of the reactive metal with air is minimal because the addition melts after it is submerged in molten alloy and because the mold represents a near closed system from which air can be purged by argon or other inert gas, (E) because losses due to reactions with air and refractory is minimal the amount of undesirable oxide inclusions in the electrode are minimal, (F) because reactive metal recovery is high, less of it need be added and therefore costs are reduced especially when the more expensive elements such as yttrium or lanthanum are added, (G) because less of the reactive metal need be added, less of the alloying agents such as Fe, Ni, Cr, Si, Al, etc. often commonly associated with reactive elements are added to the system resulting in easier control of these elements.

In the foregoing specification, I have described certain preferred practices of our invention, however, it will be understood that this invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the following claims.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims

9 · 9 independent · depth 1
123456789
9 granted claims

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B22D27/20
  • B22D7/12
  • B22D19/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
164/59164/112

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
1.0 y
354 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Francis S. Husar
art unit 322 · TC 3200
Citations: 5 back · 0 forward

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom198819891990199119921993199419951996Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienhover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock