Strawberry plant named ‘Walker’
Granted 8 Jul 2014 · 2 office actions
Assignee: Cornell University
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Courtney A. Weber · Examiner: Annette Para · AU 1661 · TC 1600
Life of the patent
3 dated eventsAbstract
This invention relates to a new and distinct June-bearing (short day responsive) strawberry plant named ‘Walker’ primarily adapted to the growing conditions of the west central New York and other regions of similar climate. The new plant is primarily characterized by longer than broad fruit, conical fruit shape, uniformity in shape between primary and secondary fruit, reflexed calyx, dark red-purple fruit color and glossy fruit skin.
Description
5 parts›Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa. Variety denomination: ‘Walker’
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘Walker’.
›BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2
I. Field & Utility Summary
The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry. The strawberry variety is primarily characterized by longer than broad fruit, conical fruit shape, uniformity in shape between primary and secondary fruit, reflexed calyx, dark red-purple fruit color and glossy fruit skin. Fruit of the new plant ripens after the plant ‘Honeoye’ (not patented), similar to the plant ‘L'Amour’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,480) and before ‘MNUS 210’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,191).
Test plantings in various locations at in New York, Illinois and Michigan have shown this plant to be widely adapted to differing soil and climactic conditions. It has shown cold hardiness typical to strawberries in a matted row system when covered with straw in the winter, which is standard procedure for this growing region.
The new plant is primarily adapted to the climate and growing conditions of west central NY, the upper mid-western U.S, the mid-Atlantic states and southeastern Canada. This region provides the necessary climate conditions required for it to produce a strong vigorous plant and to produce fruit in the summer harvest season from May to July, depending on location.
II. Cultivation Summary
‘Walker’ originated from hand-pollinated hybridization in 1997 in Geneva, N.Y.
III. Comparisons
NYUS299, the proprietary the female parent (unpatented), is June-bearing with smaller average fruit size (8.3 g) that is medium red, firm fleshed, and conic shaped that ripens in a similar season to ‘Walker’.
NY1674, the proprietary male parent (unpatented), is a very vigorous plant with smaller average fruit size (8.1 g) that is dark red, globose shaped, moderately soft fleshed and ripens in a similar season to ‘Walker’.
Other varieties which are believed to most closely resemble ‘Walker’ are ‘Honeoye’ (not patented), ‘L'Amour’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,480) and ‘Jewel’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,897).
In comparison to the similar plant ‘Honeoye’, ‘Walker’ differs by the following characteristics. The plant of ‘Walker’ is taller and more upright in growth habit with greater vigor. The fruit of ‘Walker’ is larger than that of ‘Honeoye’ with a more reflexed calyx. The fruit skin and flesh color of ‘Walker’ is darker red-purple than that of ‘Honeoye’. The yield of ‘Walker’ is larger than that of ‘Honeoye’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ is firmer with glossier skin than that of ‘Honeoye’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ has lower soluble solids (% Brix) and equal titratable acids compared to ‘Honeoye’ with similar juice pH. The fruit of ‘Walker’ has higher anthocyanin content compared to ‘Honeoye’. The harvest season of ‘Walker’ is later than that of ‘Honeoye’ and slightly less compact.
In comparison to the similar plant, ‘L'Amour’, ‘Walker’ differs by the following combination of characteristics. The plant of ‘Walker’ is shorter and smaller with more upright leaves. The leaflets are less wide and similar in length giving them a greater length to width ratio and an ovate shape. The stipules of ‘Walker’ are shorter and less wide than those of ‘L'Amour’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ is smaller in size, with darker red-purple flesh color than ‘L'Amour’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ has lower average soluble solids, higher titratable acids, lower juice pH and higher anthocyanin content than ‘L'Amour’.
The flowering trusses of ‘Walker’ are shorter than those of ‘L'Amour’. The flowers of ‘Walker’ are smaller in diameter than the flowers of ‘L'Amour’ with a greater petal length to width ratio than ‘L'Amour’. The harvest season for ‘Walker’ is more compact than that of ‘L'Amour’.
In comparison to the similar plant, ‘Jewel’, ‘Walker’ differs by the following combination of characteristics. The plant of ‘Walker’ is more vigorous but with shorter stature than ‘Jewel’. The foliage is smaller in size with less interveinal leaf blistering. A pair of petiole bracts are occasionally present in ‘Walker’ and absent in ‘Jewel’. The leaves are more sharply serrated in ‘Walker’ than ‘Jewel’. The stipules of ‘Walker’ are shorter and less broad than those of ‘Jewel’.
The fruit of ‘Walker’ is darker red-purple in color than ‘Jewel’ with more recessed seeds and a more reflexed calyx. The fruiting trusses of ‘Walker’ are shorter in overall length than ‘Jewel’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ has lower soluble solids and higher titratable acidity than that of ‘Jewel’. The fruit of ‘Walker’ has higher anthocyanin content than the fruit of ‘Jewel’.
Strawberry plant ‘Walker’ has these distinguishing characteristics;
1. Vigorous plants with an upright growth habit and moderate stolon production; 2. Trifoliate leaves with a flat appearance and gray green undersides and ovate leaflets with greater length than width; 3. Longer than broad fruit, conical fruit shape, dark red-purple fruit color, dark red-purple flesh color that is lighter towards the center, high fruit gloss and moderately soft flesh firmness; 4. Reflexed calyx generally equal or smaller in diameter than the fruit width; 5. Medium length pedicels and peduncles with few bracts; 6. Mid-season production with high yields; and 7. Compact harvest season.
IV. Breeding History
‘Walker’ originated from a hand-pollinated hybridization made in 1997 in Geneva, N.Y. between female parent NYUS299 (not patented)×male parent NY1674 (not patented). Both parents of ‘Walker’ are hybrids of the strawberry genus of the species Fragaria×ananassa . Thus ‘Walker’ is of the species Fragaria×ananassa Duchesne. The seeds resulting from this controlled hybridization were germinated in a greenhouse in Geneva, N.Y. during the winter of 1997-98. Resulting seedlings were planted in the spring of 1998 in Geneva, N.Y. The seedlings fruited in the summer of 1999 and one, designated NY99-15, was selected for its attractive, dark red-purple fruit and strong strawberry flavor.
V. Asexual Reproduction
During 1999, the original plant selection NY99-15 was propagated asexually by stolons (runners) at Geneva, N.Y. and a test planting of ten plants was established. Subsequently, larger test plantings were established with asexually multiplied plants at Geneva, N.Y. The new plant NY99-15 was re-designated ‘Walker’ and tested over the next several years in the fruiting fields at Geneva, N.Y. Further propagation was done using tissue culture in Geneva, N.Y. to produce disease free material for use in further testing. Tissue culture plants were used as mother plants for propagation from stolons.
›BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2
VI. Stability
Asexual propagation has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein as characterizing the strawberry plant ‘Walker’ are fixed and remain true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction. All propagules of ‘Walker’ have been observed to be true to type in that during all asexual multiplication, the vegetative and fruit characteristics of the original plant have been maintained. All plants planted from dormant crowns or rooted runner tips have fruited after one season of growth in the field.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new plant at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The depicted plant and plant parts were from the first harvest season, approximately 13 months after planting.
FIG. 1A-FIG . 1 B shows typical external fruit characteristics of ‘Walker’ (A) including calyx structure and fruit shape compared to ‘Jewel’ (B) on Jun. 6, 2012.
FIG. 2A-FIG . 2 B shows typical internal fruit characteristics of ‘Walker’ (A) compared to ‘Jewel’ (B) on Jun. 6, 2012.
FIG. 3A-FIG . 3 B shows typical external color of ‘Walker’ (A) compared to ‘Jewel’ (B).
FIG. 4A-FIG . 4 C shows leaf margin serrations for ‘Walker’ (A), ‘Jewel’ (B) and ‘L'Amour’ (C).
›DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The following description of ‘Walker’ unless otherwise noted, is based on observations taken during the 2012 growing season in Geneva, N.Y. These measurements and ratings were taken from plants planted in May 2011. The age of the planting is approximately 13 months and in its first harvest season. Yield observations and fruit quality characteristics are averaged from data collected during the 2003-04 and 2008-10 production seasons. The characteristics of the new plant may vary in detail, depending upon variations in environmental factors (temperature, rainfall, humidity and light intensity). ‘Walker’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology where noted follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London.
Comparative Fruit Characteristics
‘Walker’ fruit, fruit production and fruit quality characteristics. Fruit characteristics are taken from the first harvest season.
Plant Characteristics
‘Walker’ plant characteristics. Plant characteristics are taken from a fully mature mid-season plant.
Foliage Characteristics
‘Walker’ foliage characteristics. Foliage characteristics are taken from a fully mature tri-foliate leaf during mid season.
Flower and Inflorescence Characteristics
‘Walker’ inflorescence and flower characteristics. Inflorescence characteristics are taken from a fully mature plant during full bloom. Flower characteristics are taken from a secondary flower during mid season at full maturity:
Pest reactions: It is known to be moderately resistant to the two-spotted spider mite and susceptible to aphids and flower thrips. It is susceptible to leaf spot, scorch and blight. It is resistant to powdery mildew. The susceptibility of the new plant to any of the virus complexes of NY has not been determined.
›Tables in the description — 12
| (kg per ha) | 2003 | 2004 | 2008 | 2009 | Average |
| ‘Walker’ | 8,740 | 24,790 | 4,910 | 20,010 | 14,610 |
| ‘Honeoye’ | 11,730 | 17,160 | 3,990 | 7,970 | 6,360 |
| ‘L'Amour’ | 7,090 | 14,490 | — | — | 10,790 |
| ‘Jewel’ | 11,160 | 15,440 | 11,270 | 5,760 | 10,910 |
| (g per berry) | 2003 | 2004 | 2008 | 2009 | Average |
| ‘Walker’ | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 11.2 | 10.8 |
| ‘Honeoye’ | 13.2 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 10.5 |
| ‘L'Amour’ | 11.9 | 11.7 | — | — | 11.8 |
| ‘Jewel’ | 10.9 | 10.6 | — | 11.1 | 10.9 |
| Character | ‘Walker’ | ‘L'Amour’ | ‘Jewel’ | ‘Honeoye’ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHS Exterior | red-purple 59A | red 46B | red 44A | red 46A |
| Color Mature Fruit | ||||
| Fruit Length | 3.68 | 4.22 | 3.46 | 3.85 |
| mean (cm) | ||||
| Fruit Width | 3.49 | 3.62 | 3.61 | 3.55 |
| mean (cm) 1 | ||||
| Fruit Length/Width | 1.05 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.08 |
| Ratio | ||||
| No. Sepals/Berry | 10.0 | 11.0 | 12.4 | 12.7 |
| Character | ‘Walker’ | ‘L'Amour’ | ‘Jewel’ | ‘Honeoye’ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble solids 1,2 | 9.03 | 10.37 | 11.77 | 10.93 |
| Titratable acidity 2,3 | 9.29 | 9.64 | 10.93 | 10.89 |
| Juice pH 2 | 3.38 | 3.50 | 3.38 | 3.42 |
| Anthocyanin | 306 | 117 | 147 | 148 |
| content 2,4 | ||||
| 1 soluble solids is estimated from % Brix with % Brix being an indirect measurement of the sugar content in the fruit | ||||
| 2 Averaged from 3 samples on 3 dates during the harvest season. | ||||
| 3 g per L equivalents of citric acid | ||||
| 4 mg/100 g fresh weight |
| Characteristic | Description |
| Ratio of length/width | Longer than broad |
| Size | Medium to large |
| Predominant shape | Conical |
| Difference in shapes between | Little to none |
| primary and secondary fruit | |
| Band without achenes | Intermediate width |
| Color of mature fruit | Bright to dark red |
| Evenness of color | Very even |
| Glossiness | Strong |
| Insertion of achenes | Level to slightly recessed from surface |
| Attitude of the calyx segments | Somewhat reflexed up |
| Size of calyx in relation to | 2.3 cm to 4.0 cm |
| fruit diameter | |
| Adherence of calyx (when | Strong |
| fully ripe) | |
| Firmness of skin | Moderately firm |
| Color of flesh | Dark purple-red with lighter ring (red- |
| purple 59A to red 44A in center) | |
| Distribution of red color of | Throughout the flesh with the darkest flesh |
| the flesh | around internal margin and lighter towards |
| the center | |
| Hollow center | Moderately to strongly expressed |
| Seed color | Medium yellow-green to dark red-purple |
| (yellow-green 151D to red-purple 59A). | |
| Time of flowering (50% of | Medium to early |
| plants at first flower) | |
| Time of ripening (50% of | Medium to early |
| plants with first ripe fruit) | |
| Type of bearing | Fully short day responsive |
| Avg. number of achenes | 240 per fruit |
| Achene position | Indented in the flesh so that the upper |
| surface of the achene is even to slightly | |
| extruded above the flesh surface | |
| Presence of hollow core | Common, often with pithy flesh within the |
| space | |
| Hollow core length | 5 to 15 mm |
| Hollow core width | 5 to 7 mm |
| Character | ‘Walker’ | ‘L'Amour’ | ‘Jewel’ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Height mean (cm) | 26.0 | 31.9 | 27.3 |
| Vigor 1 | 8.0 | 8.3 | 5.0 |
| Canopy density 1 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.0 |
| Characteristic | Description |
| Size | Medium |
| Habit | Upright |
| Density | High |
| Vigor | Strong |
| Character | ‘Walker’ | ‘L'Amour’ | ‘Jewel’ |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHS Color | green 137A | green 137A | green 138A |
| (upper surface) | |||
| RHS Color | greyed-green 191A | green 139C | green 137D |
| (lower surface) | |||
| Terminal Leaflet Length | 7.4 | 8.4 | 7.5 |
| mean (cm) | |||
| Terminal Leaflet Width | 5.7 | 8.5 | 7.6 |
| mean (cm) | |||
| Terminal Leaflet ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| (L/W) | |||
| Petiole Length mean (cm) | 21.1 | 22.8 | 19.9 |
| Serrations/Leaf | 26.9 | 22.3 | 18.3 |
| Stipule Length mean (cm) | 1.6 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Stipule Width mean (cm) | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Characteristic | Description |
| Color of upper surface | Medium to dark green |
| Color of under side | Medium to light grey-green |
| Shape in cross section | Slightly concave |
| Interveinal blistering | Light to moderate |
| Glossiness | Low, flat coloring |
| Number of leaflets/leaf | Generally three |
| Terminal leaflet size | Small to medium |
| Terminal leaflet - length/width ratio | Longer than broad |
| Terminal leaflet - shape of base | Cuneate |
| Terminal leaflet - shape serrations | Acute |
| Petiole - pubescence density | High |
| Petiole - stipule color | Light to medium yellow-green |
| (yellow-green N144C) | |
| Petiole - anthocyanin coloration of stipule | Slight blush of Red 45D |
| Petiole - attitude of hairs | Strongly upward towards leaf |
| Petiole - size of bract leaflets | Small |
| Petiole - frequency of bract leaflets | Approximately 10% of the |
| petioles | |
| Avg. number of leaflets | 3 |
| Venation pattern of leaflets | reticulated |
| Character | ‘Walker’ | ‘L'Amour’ | ‘Jewel’ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fruiting Truss Length 1 mean (cm) | 21.6 | 32.3 | 20.9 |
| Corolla Diameter mean (mm) | 35 | 36 | 31 |
| Calyx Diameter mean (mm) | 33 | 33 | 34 |
| Petal Length mean (mm) | 14.8 | 15.4 | 14.0 |
| Petal Width mean (mm) | 13.3 | 13.6 | 13.3 |
| Petal L/W Ratio | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.09 |
| Petals/Flower (mean) | 5.8 | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| Sepals/Flower (mean) | 10.0 | 11.0 | 12.4 |
| Petal shape | obovate | ||
| Petal RHS color | white 155C | ||
| both surfaces | |||
| Shape of Apex | rounded | ||
| Shape of base | cuneate | ||
| Shape of margin | entire | ||
| (not serrated) |
| Characteristic | Description |
| Position relative to foliage | Even with canopy |
| Fruiting truss length | Medium |
| Characteristic | Description |
| Color | White (white 155C). |
| Size | Medium to large |
| Size of calyx relative to corolla | Equal to smaller |
| Relative position of petals | No overlap when fully open |
| Petal length/width ratio | Longer than broad |
| Petal shape | Obovate |
| Sepal RHS color | Green 137D |
| Avg. sepal length | 8.5 cm |
| Avg. sepal width at base | 3.4 mm |
Claims
1 · 1 independent · depth 1Classifications
2 codes- A01H5/08
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockPriority chain
1 priority documents›Priority documents — 1
| Type | Document | Date |
|---|---|---|
| related publication | US 20140068826 P1 | 6 Mar 2014 |
Validity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock