Rose scented geranium pelargonium graveolenes plant ‘Safal’
Granted 23 Dec 2003 · 2 office actions
Assignee: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Kakaraparthi Pandu Sastry, Gopal Rao Mallavarapu, Suchitra Banerjee, Ajit Kumar Shasany +5 · Examiner: Kent Bell · AU 1661 · TC 1600
Life of the patent
3 dated eventsAbstract
The invention relates to a new, distinct and unique plant of rose scented geranium Pelargonium graveolens Safal derived from a rare seed-set in cultivar Bipuli, apparently the result of hybridization between largely sterile populations of the cultivar accessions Bipuli and Hemanti, possessing the following combination of characteristics namely demonstrated vigour in the essential oil yield related traits in great measure and out yielded all the other accessions; the essential oil of the plant has 89% rhodinol content in which citronellol to geraniol ratio is approximately 1:1 and the contents of isomenthone, menthone, 10-epi--eudesmol, 6,9-guaiadiene, decanoic acid and isodecanoic acid were relatively lower than in the oils of accessions Bipuli and/or Hemanti, this plant can be propagated vegetatively through stem cuttings and suitable for commercial cultivation in large scale.
Description
29 parts›Latin name of the plant claimed: The plant…
Latin name of the plant claimed: The plant claimed is Pelargonium graveolens var. ‘Safal’.
›FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention is related to the development of a novel high essential oil producing plant obtained through a unique method of progeny screening from the seeds obtained from the plant cultivar ‘Bipuli’ (unpatented) of Pelargonium graveolens, from which a novel, unique and commercially viable plant of rose scented geranium Pelargonium graveolens with high quantity and quality of essential oil yield was screened out. Further, the invention relates to the development of a high essential oil yielding hybrid named as ‘Safal’ through a planned selection and analysis of the ‘Bipuli’ seedling progenies. The essential oil of the plant is rich in rhodinol (89%) which includes the constituents geraniol, citronellyl, geranyl acetate, citronellyl acetate, geranyl formate, citronellyl formate, phenyl ethyl alcohols, cis and trans rose oxides, linalool and likewise. The hybrid of the invention can be planted and maintained for commercial cultivation through vegetative propagation using the stem cuttings.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The members of the genus, Pelargonium commonly known as geraniums, are common ornamental plants. Some of the species such as P. graveolens are used as the source of rose scented geranium essential oil of considerable commercial importance. Geranium oil is one of the expensive essential oils used in perfumery, cosmetics and soap industries. On account of its antimicrobial and pesticidal activities, the use of geranium essential oil for technical applications is expanding. There is need to expand the geranium cultivation in diverse geographical areas with suitable agroclimates to meet the increasing industrial demand for the geranium essential oil. Traditionally, the geranium cultivation is confined to areas having semi-temperate to temperate climates where geranium is planted as perennial crop, maintained in the field for 4-5 years. The shoot portion of the perennial plantations of geranium is harvested 1 to 3 times each year to distill the oil. The spread of geranium cultivation has been narrow because the prevalent cultivars of Pelargonium graveolens are highly susceptible to water logging in soil, white ants and several bacterial and fungal diseases. Also there is paucity of genetic resources in Pelargonium species cultivated for essential oils. The available varieties suffer from high degree of male and female sterility. Breeding programmes based on cross hybridization have been scarce among essential oil yielding geraniums. So it is important to generate more genotypes with varied characters which can yield high quantity and quality of essential oil.
›OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
The main object of the present invention is to develop a new and distinct plant of Pelargonium graveolens ‘Safal’, through progeny screening from the seeds obtained from the plant cultivar ‘Bipuli’ of Pelargonium graveolens, said plant capable of producing higher quantity and quality of essential oil.
Another object of the present invention is to develop a new plant, which produces less of isomenthone, menthone and other sesqui-terpenes but rich in total rhodinol with a citroniol:geraniol ratio of 1:1.
›DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2
Accordingly, in the present invention we have developed a novel, distinct, unique, and high essential oil yielding plant of geranium ( Pelargonium graveolens ) ‘Safal’, through progeny screening from the seeds obtained from the plant cultivar ‘Bipuli’ of Pelargonlum graveolens, possessing the following combination of characters:
a. the plant is a hybrid between cultivar ‘Bipuli’ and cultivar ‘Hemanti’ (unpatented) as the pollen donor as indicated by the co-dominance RAPD pattern obtained by the random primer 5′AACGTACGCG3′ [SEQ ID NO:5]
b. possessing very large, hairy, soft, yellow-green (upper surface—144A; lower surface—147B) leaves, dark pink (78D) petals in the flowers,
c. possessing vigorous and rapid vegetative growth with higher plant height of up to 82±6 cm, higher canopy size of up to 1.42±0.4 m 2 , higher herb yield of up to 11.1±0.9 kg per plant, higher leaf area of up to 101±16 cm 2 , higher oil content up to 0.35 to 0.40% and higher oil yield of up to 41 g/plant,
d. producing an essential oil with the following composition; Citronellol 30.6±3.0, Geraniol 28.7±6.0, Isomenthone 8.4±0.5, Linalool 4.7±0.1, Cis rose oxide 0.4±0.1, trans rose oxide 0.2±0.1, Menthone 0.2±0.1, Citronellyl formate 6.6±0.5, Geranyl formate 2.9±0.2, 10-epi-γ-eudesmol 5.4±0.3, 6,9-guaiadiene 0.1±0.1, Decanoic acid 0.1±0.1, Phenyl ethyl tiglate 0.8±0.1, which may not be construed to be limited to these values,
e. with distinct molecular profile by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) using 10 random primers (AAATCGGAGC [SEQ ID NO:1], GTCCTACTCG [SEQ ID NO:2], TGCGCGATCG [SEQ ID NO:4], AACGTACGCG [SEQ ID NO:5], CGGGATCCGC [SEQ ID NO:9], GCGAATTCCG [SEQ ID NO:10], CCCTGCAGGC [SEQ ID NO:11], CCAAGCTTGC [SEQ ID NO:12], AAGATAGCGG [SEQ ID NO:15], GGATCTGAAC [SEQ ID NO:16]) distinguishing the plant from the other existing varieties known to us,
f. producing highest herbage, oil yield per plant as compared to any other existing varieties, and
g. possessing the following botanical details.
Stem shape: Rounded.
Stem habit: Ramified.
Number of nodes:
( i ) Primary nodes.— 4.
( ii ) Secondary nodes.— 25 to 30.
( iii ) Tertiary nodes.— 7.
Average length of primary internode: 3.0 cm.
Leaf apex shape: Mucronate (rounded), cuspidate.
Leaf shape: Palmately lobed, cordate.
Leaf lamina base shape: Hastate.
Petiole shape: Long, hairy.
Petiole color: Yellow-green 147B.
Color of upper leaf surface: Yellow green (144A).
Color of lower leaf surface: Yellow green (147B).
Leaf length: 10.0 cm.
Leaf width: 13 cm.
Number of trichomes: 3.5/mm 2 .
Trichome ratio (lower leaf/upper leaf): 2:1.
Peduncle:
Length.— 5.5.
Color.— Yellow green (147B).
Time for flowering: February end.
Lastingness of bloom: Starts from February lasts till April.
Flower shape: Tubular.
Pedicel length: 2.5 mm.
Pedicel color: Yellow green (147B).
Calyx diameter: 5 mm.
Calyx:
Color ( both surfaces ).—Yellow green (146A).
Sepal number.— 5.
Shape.— Triangular.
Apex.— Acute.
Base.— Concave.
Margin.— Entire, hairy.
Length.— 0.7 cm.
Corolla:
Petal number.— 5.
Shape.— Tubular bi-lipped free, zygomorphic.
Apex.— Slightly notched.
Base.— Slightly ligulate.
Margin.— Entire.
Length ( upper lip ).—1.0 cm.
Length ( lower lip ).—0.9 cm.
Corolla color (both surfaces): Purple group 78D.
Pubescence of corolla: Absent.
Reproductive organs:
Androecium.— 10 stamens, filament sub-equal, united at base, anthers 7, dithoecous, versatile.
Gynoceium.— Pentacarpellary syncarpous superior ovary.
Color of stigma: Magenta (red purple) (78B).
Umbel:
Inflorescence/plant.— 23.
Flowers/inflorescence.— 7.
Umbel shape.— Umbrella.
Mature plant:
Height.— 82 cm.
Width.— 140 cm.
Susceptibility to disease: Susceptible to stem and root rot by fungus Fusarium oxysporum, Rhyzoctonia solanii and Pythium spp. and to termite attack.
Age of plants when described: 2 years (Lucknow, India).
Conditions of culture: Subtropical climate, soil sandy loam, alkaline (pH 7.8), low in available nitrogen (N 155 kg/ha), medium in available phosphorus (P 2 O 5 30.4 kg/ha) and exchangeable potassium (K 2 O 120 kg/ha). Field was dressed with manure @ 1 ton/ha and chlorphyriphos 1%/ha before planting of cuttings.
Asexual reproduction: Stem cuttings of about 10-20 cm length, with 4-5 nodes and a terminal bud, were planted in nursery beds or pots containing course sand/sphagnum moss. These rooted within 60 days and were planted in the field beds, without disturbing the root system, at 60×60 cm spacing.
Fruit/seed: Fruit setting did not take place in subtropical climatic conditions of Lucknow.
Time to produce finished plant: One month from rooted cutting to flowering.
The plant ‘Safal’ can yield more essential oil with less of isomenthone, menthone and other sesqui-terpenes but rich in total rhodinol with a citroniol:geraniol ratio of 1:1, than the prevailing cultivars now grown in India.
While observing large populations of the ‘Bipuli’, ‘Hemanti’ and ‘Kunti’ (unpatented) cultivars of rose scented geranium P. graveolens growing at the Kodaikanal field station Tamil Nadu, India of this Institute, in the temperate climate of Southern hills, formation of fruits bearing seeds at low frequency was observed in the populations of the ‘Bipuli’ cultivar of P. graveolens. It was realized that the seeds obtained may be the product of rare self fertilization within ‘Bipuli’ cultivar or cross pollination of ‘Bipuli’ gynoecia by fertile pollen grains formed on ‘Hemanti’ or ‘Kunti’ cultivar. The present work was carried out to reveal new genetic variation if any present, among the plants that could be raised from the spontaneous seeds borne on the plants of the ‘Bipuli’ cultivar. Comparison of the plants produced from seeds, collected from ‘Bipuli’ cultivar plants growing amongst those of ‘Hemanti’ and ‘Kunti’ cultivar, has shown that the ‘Bipuli’ seed progeny plants indeed differed from the plants of the three cultivars of P. graveolens. Out of all progenies, one (BSP-4) named as ‘Safal’ was found to be high yielding with essential oil containing the oil constituents in desirable proportions, novel and was thus the plant of this invention. As used herein, the accession number “BSP-4” and variety name ‘Safal’ are used interchangeably.
›DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2
All the color grouping given in the description are made as per The International Royal Horticultural Society Colour chart.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows Co-dominance pattern of RAPD profile for the plant ‘Safal’ with Primer 5′AACGTACGCG3′ [SEQ ID NO:5].
FIG. 2 shows Unique RAPD profile of ‘Safal’.
FIG. 3 is a Photograph of plant ‘Safal’.
›BREEDING HISTORY · 1 of 2
The plants of ‘Bipuli’, ‘Kunti’ and ‘Hemanti’ varieties of P. graveolens were planted in beds of 20 m 2 size arranged randomly in a field at the experimental farm of Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (CIMAP), located at Kodaikanal at 101° N latitude, 78° E longitude and 1800 m above sea level in the state of Tamil Nadu, India, having temperate agroclimatic features. The distinguishing characteristics of the three accessions (varieties) are given in the Table 1. Table 2 gives the detailed botanical description of the newly developed plant ‘Safal’. The flowers of all the three varieties were generally sterile, however a small number of fruits bearing seed were found to have come up in the year 1997 on the plants of the ‘Bipuli’ cultivar. The seeds were separated from the fruits, soaked in 100 ppm GA 3 solution in water for 24 hours and sown in earthen trays containing 1:1 ratio of soil and farmyard manure in a glasshouse at Lucknow, India (26.5° N 80.5° E and of 120 m altitude, in subtropical north Indian plains), India. Altogether four seedlings were recovered from three separate sowings of 10 seeds each. The seedlings were transplanted individually into pots carrying soil and sand mixture and were continued to be maintained in the glasshouse under 16 hour light and 8 hour dark conditions. Cuttings from these were used to multiply the new accessions called BSP-1 (unpatented), BSP-2 (unpatented), BSP-3 (unpatented) and BSP-4 (‘Safal,’ the subject of the present application) (BSP=Bipuli seed progeny).
Field Experiments
Out of these 4 progenies obtained, preliminary analysis revealed encouraging results for BSP-4, (‘Safal’), as the plant showed high vigor in biomass production and higher oil yield. So the plant ‘Safal’ was taken to the field for further evaluation. To variously compare the ‘Safal’ accession with the cultivar accessions ‘Bipuli’, ‘Hemanti’ and ‘Kunti’, field plot experiments were carried out over two winter-summer cropping seasons (1998-1999) and (1999-2000) at the experimental farm of Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, at Lucknow India (26.5° N 80.5° E and of 120 m altitude, in subtropical north Indian plains). The soil in the field used was sandy loam in texture, alkaline in reaction (pH, 7.8), low in available N (155 kg/ha) and medium in available phosphorous (30.4 kg P 2 O 5 /ha) and exchangeable potassium (120 kg K 2 O/ha). In October 1998, six glasshouse-grown plants of each accession were transferred to the field trial. The cuttings drawn from each of the 4 accessions were planted in randomized blocks replicated three times, in January 1999. The field blocks used were given a uniform dose of 100 kg/ha P 2 O 5 and 60 kg/ha K 2 O. Nitrogen was applied in three splits while phosphorus and potassium were applied at the time of planting. A light irrigation was given just after the planting of cuttings and plots were manually weeded and irrigated at regular interval of two weeks throughout the cropping season. The crops were allowed to grow until June when observations on the morphology of the plants were recorded and crops harvested to estimate the yield of herbage as well as yield and quality of essential oil. About 300 g sample of herbage harvested from each plot was distilled to determine its oil content. The oil samples were analyzed by GC, GC-MS procedures. The 4 accessions were similarly grown and assessed in the 1999-2000 winter-summer cropping season at Lucknow. The parameters on which observations were recorded were averaged for the two seasons for presentation in Tables 3 and 4.
GC and GC-MS Analysis
GC analysis of the essential oils was performed on a Perkin-Elmer gas chromatograph 8500 equipped with FID, using two fused silica capillary columns BP-1 coated with dimethyl siloxane (30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm film thickness) and BP-20 coated with carbowax 20M (20 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm thickness), carrier gas nitrogen at 10 psi inlet pressure and temperature programmed to 60-220° C. at 5° C./min. For BP-20 column and split ratio of 1:80. GC-MS was performed on Schimadzu QP-2000 instrument using ULBON. HR-1 fused silica column (50 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm film thickness), temperature programmed to 100°-250° C. at 10° C./min, carrier gas helium at 2 ml/min, MS conditions of El mode 70 eV and ion source temperature of 250° C.
Identification of the Compounds
Compounds were identified by comparing the retention indices (relative to C8-C21 alkanes) with those reported in literature by peak enrichment on coinjection with standards wherever possible and by comparison of mass spectra of the peak with those of compounds reported in literature (Jennings, W. & T. Shibamoto, 1980. Qualitative analysis of flavour and fragrance volatile by capillary GC, Academic Press Inc., New York.; Adams, R. P., 1990. Identification of essential oils by ion trap mass spectroscopy. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.). Relative amounts of individual components were estimated based on peak areas on BP-1 column without FID response correction.
Molecular Analysis of Hybrids
DNA was isolated from young leaves (1 g) taken from mature plants following the reported protocol (Khanuja, S. P. S., Shasany, A. K., Darokar, M. P., and Kumar, S., 1999, Rapid isolation of PCR amplifible DNA from dry and fresh samples of plant producing large amounts of secondary metabolites and essential oil by modified CTAB procedure. Plant Molecular Biology, 17:74.) and was digested with EcoRI restriction endonucleases. A set of twenty decanucleotide primers (M/S Bangalore Genie, India) were used for PCR amplification. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in 25 μl reaction volume, containing 20-40 ng of plant genomic DNA, 125 μM Of MgCl 2 buffer, 100, μM of each dNTP, 5 p motes of primer and 0.2 units of Taq DNA polymerase. Amplification was carried out in DNA Engine PTC 200 (M J Research, USA) thermal cycler programmed for 45 cycles of 1 min at 94° C., 1 at 36° C. and 2 min at 72° C. The amplification cycle was concluded with final extension at 72° C. for 5 min. Amplification products were electrophoresed in 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel, visualized by ethidium bromide (0.5 μgml −1 ) staining. The pictures of the gel were scanned for the presence of polymorphic fragments which were scored for the presence (+) or absence (−) of bands. The data so generated was used for calculating the index of genetic similarity using Nei and Li's matching co-efficient method (Nei, M. and Li, W. H., 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,74 : 5267-5273.). The similarity indices were calculated by using the formula: Number of similar bands between the two accessions/total number of bands in the two accessions×2 and present in Table 5.
›BREEDING HISTORY · 2 of 2
The similarity indices arrived at using 20 decanucleotide primers (MAP01 to MAP20: AAATCGGAGC [SEQ ID NO:1], GTCCTACTCG [SEQ ID NO:2], GTCCTTAGCG [SEQ ID NO:3], TGCGCGATCG [SEQ ID NO:4], AACGTACGCG [SEQ ID NO:5], GCACGCCGGA [SEQ ID NO:6], CACCCTGCGC [SEQ ID NO:7], CTATCGCCGC [SEQ ID NO:8], CGGGATCCGC [SEQ ID NO:9], GCGAATTCCG [SEQ ID NO:10], CCCTGCAGGC [SEQ ID NO:11], CCAAGCTTGC [SEQ ID NO:12], GTGCAATGAG [SEQ ID NO:13], AGGATACGTG [SEQ ID NO:14], AAGATAGCGG [SEQ ID NO:15], GGATCTGAAC [SEQ ID NO:16], TTGTCTCAGG [SEQ ID NO:17], CATCCCGAAC [SEQ ID NO:19], GGACTCCACG [SEQ ID NO:19], AGC;CTGACGC [SEQ ID NO:20], respectively) in the RAPD analysis are given in the Table 4. Table 4 indicated that the accession ‘Safal’ was more similar to the parent varieties ‘Bipuli’ and ‘Hemanti’ (more than 75%) than ‘Kunti’ (67%). Further the RAPD profile of ‘Safal’ showed co-dominance inheritance from ‘Bipuli’ and ‘Hemanti’ (FIG. 1 ).
Distinctiveness of Safal
The accession ‘Safal’ expressed most of the characters at much higher levels than the corresponding measurements in the rest of the accessions. In ‘Safal’, the leaf/stem ratio and leaf area measurements fell within the ranges covered for these characters by the cultivar accessions. As compared to ‘Bipuli’, ‘Safal’ was 1.6 fold taller in height, had 1.7 fold larger canopy, yielded 3.5 fold more herbage, had 2 fold more branches, 3 fold more leaves, 3.5 fold longer leaf petiole, 1.4 fold more oil content in herbage and gave 5 fold more oil yield (Table 2). Apparently the accession ‘Safal’ demonstrated the kind of vigour associated with hybrids or transgressive segregants. The variation observed for the essential oil quality parameters among the seven accessions in terms of the 14 terpenoid components that could be identified are summarized in the Table 3. The oil of the accession ‘Safal’ had geraniol to citronellol proportion as 1:1 and had other parameters widely different from those observed for the oils of the other accessions. The cis and trans rose oxides and citronellyl fonnate contents in the oil of ‘Safal’ accession were lower than in the oils of the accessions ‘Bipuli’ and ‘Hemanti’. The essential oil of the accession ‘Safal’ had low concentrations of 6,9-guaiadiene, decanoic acid and, isodecanoic acid, like in the oils of the accessions ‘Bipuli’ and ‘Hemanti’. These observations described above have demonstrated that the accession ‘Safal’ of P. graveolens differed from the cultivar accessions ‘Bipuli’, ‘Kunti’ and ‘Hemanti’ not only in some of the morphological and essential oil characteristics but also in their DNA profiles.
The accession ‘Safal’ demonstrated the expression of essential oil yield related characters at much higher levels than by all the accessions studied. The terpenoid profile of the essential oil of the accession ‘Safal’ also appeared to be unique, in that it had equally high concentrations of citronellol and geraniol and very high concentration of total rhodinols. Considering all the essential oil yield related characters together with hierarchical relationships arrived at by DNA fingerprinting, it is possible to surmise that the accession ‘Safal’ may be a hybrid between the accession ‘Bipuli’ and ‘Hemanti’. The accession ‘Safal’ is novel, unique and has highly useful combination of yield, essential oil quality related characteristics, and this can be used for commercial cultivation to extract high value essential oil having utility for industrial and pharmaceutical purposes. Finally, the new plant was selected for its high quality essential oil and the genotype can be used in the future for plant improvement. The accession BSP-4 is the plant of this invention and was named as ‘Safal’.
Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis
The RAPD profiles of the plant ‘Safal’ were unambiguously able to establish its distinct identity as completely different from the parent plant ‘Bipuli’ as well as the known varieties ‘Kunti’ and ‘Hemanti’. The plant of the present invention was developed by screening the ‘Bipuli’ seed progenies and differentiated as distinct, unique and novel at DNA level. The plant is having desirable morphological and economical traits in a rare unmatchable combination and is available only with us in CIMAP. The primers with the sequence AAATCGGAGC [SEQ ID NO:1], GTCCTACTCG [SEQ ID NO:2], TGCGCGATCG [SEQ ID NO:4], AACGTACGCG [SEQ ID NO:5], CGGGATCCGC [SEQ ID NO:9], GCGAATTCCG [SEQ ID NO:10], CCCTGCAGGC [SEQ ID NO:11], CCAAGCTTGC [SEQ ID NO:12], AAGATAGCGG [SEQ ID NO:15], GGATCTGAAC [SEQ ID NO:16], were used to develop a unique and distinct RAPD profile of the Plant (FIG. 2 ). The whole plant ‘Safal’ has been shown in FIG. 3 wherein the canopy and the shape of the leaves are quite apparent.
20
1
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
1
aaatcggagc 10
2
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
2
gtcctactcg 10
3
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
3
gtccttagcg 10
4
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
4
tgcgcgatcg 10
5
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
5
aacgtacgcg 10
6
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
6
gcacgccgga 10
7
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
7
caccctgcgc 10
8
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
8
ctatcgccgc 10
9
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
9
cgggatccgc 10
10
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
10
gcgaattccg 10
11
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
11
ccctgcaggc 10
12
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
12
ccaagcttgc 10
13
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
13
gtgcaatgag 10
14
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
14
aggatacgtg 10
15
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
15
aagatagcgg 10
16
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
16
ggatctgaac 10
17
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
17
ttgtctcagg 10
18
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
18
catcccgaac 10
19
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
19
ggactccacg 10
20
10
›DNA
Artificial Sequence
Primer
20
agcctgacgc 10
›Tables in the description — 4
| 1. | Stem shape: | ROUNDED |
| 2. | Stem habit: | RAMIFIED |
| 3. | Number of nodes | |
| (i) Primary Nodes: | 4 | |
| (ii) Secondary Nodes: | 25 to 30 | |
| (iii) Tertiary Nodes: | 7 | |
| 4. | Average length of | 3.0 cm |
| primary internode: | ||
| 5. | Leaf apex shape: | MUCRONATE (rounded), |
| CUSPIDATE | ||
| 6. | Leaf shape: | PALMATELY LOBED, CORDATE |
| 7. | Leaf lamina base shape: | HASTATE |
| 8. | Petiole shape: | LONG, HAIRY |
| 9. | Petiole color: | YELLOW-GREEN 147B |
| Color of Upper leaf surface: | YELLOW GREEN (144A) | |
| 10. | Color of lower leaf surface: | YELLOW GREEN (147B) |
| 11. | Leaf length: | 10.0 cm |
| 12. | Leaf width: | 13 cm |
| 13. | Number of trichomes: | 3.5/mm 2 |
| 14. | Trichome ratio: | 2:1 |
| (lower leaf/upper leaf) | ||
| 15. | Peduncle | |
| length: | 5.5 | |
| color: | YELLOW GREEN (147B) | |
| 16. | Time for flowering: | FEBRUARY END |
| 17. | Lastingness of bloom: | Starts from February |
| lasts till April | ||
| 18. | Flower shape: | TUBULAR |
| 19. | Pedicel length: | 2.5 mm |
| 20. | Pedicel color: | YELLOW GREEN (147B) |
| 21. | Calyx diameter: | 5 mm |
| 22. | Calyx | |
| (i) color (both surfaces): | YELLOW GREEN (146A) | |
| (ii) sepal number: | 5 | |
| (iii) shape: | triangular | |
| (iv) apex: | acute | |
| (v) base: | concave | |
| (vi) margin: | entire, hairy. | |
| (vii) length: | 0.7 cm | |
| 23. | Corolla | |
| (i) petal number: | 5 | |
| (ii) shape: | tubular bi-lipped free, zygomorphic | |
| (iii) apex: | slightly notched | |
| (iv) base: | slightly ligulate | |
| (v) margin: | entire | |
| (vi) length (upper lip): | 1.0 cm | |
| (vii) length (lower lip): | 0.9 cm | |
| 24. | Corolla color (both surfaces): | Purple group 78D |
| 25. | Pubescence of corolla: | ABSENT |
| 26. | Reproductive organs | |
| (i) androecium: | 10 stamens, filament sub-equal, | |
| united at base, anthers 7, dithoecous, | ||
| versatile | ||
| (ii) gynoecium: | pentacarpellary | |
| syncarpous superior ovary | ||
| 27. | Color of stigma: | MAGENTA (RED PURPLE) (78B) |
| 28. | Umbel | |
| (i) inflorescence/plant: | 23 | |
| (ii) flowers/inflorescence: | 7 | |
| (iii) umbel shape: | umbrella | |
| 29. | Mature plant | |
| (i) height: | 82 cm | |
| (ii) width: | 140 cm | |
| 30. | Susceptibility to disease: | susceptable to stem and root rot by |
| fungus Fusarium oxysporum , | ||
| Rhyzoctonia solanii and Pythium spp. | ||
| and to termite attack |
| Acc. No. | Essential oil yield parameter | |||
| Plant | ||||
| height | Canopy | Herb Yield | Number of | |
| (cm) | Size (m 2 ) | (kg/plant) | branches/plant | |
| Bipuli | 50 ± 2 | 0.81 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 25 ± 2 |
| Hemanti | 55 ± 2 | 0.80 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 30 ± 4 |
| Kunti | 40 ± 4 | 0.58 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 22 ± 1 |
| BSP-4 (‘Safal’) | 82 ± 6 | 1.42 ± 0.4 | 11.1 ± 0.9 | 47 ± 4 |
| Mean ± (SEM) | 53 ± 5 | 0.73 ± 0.14 | 3.9 ± 1.3 | 27 ± 4 |
| CD at 5% | 5 | 0.30 | 0.6 | 4 |
| Number of | Leaf/stem | Leaf petiole | ||
| leaves/plant | ratio (cm) | lemgth (cm) | ||
| Bipuli | 1437 ± 100 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 9.7 ± 1.8 | |
| Hemanti | 1801 ± 167 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 11.1 ± 1.4 | |
| Kunti | 1363 ± 177 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 9.1 ± 1.1 | |
| BSP-4 (‘Safal’) | 4632 ± 201 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 24.6 ± 2.8 | |
| Mean ± (SEM) | 2445 ± 500 | 1.0 ± 0.07 | 11.7 ± 2.3 | |
| CD at 5% | 697 | 0.2 | 3.8 | |
| Leaf Area | Oil Yield/ | |||
| (cm 2 ) | Oil Content % | plant (g/plant) | ||
| Bipuli | 70 ± 7 | 0.25 ± 0.1 | 8.2 ± 0.1 | |
| Hemanti | 68 ± 2 | 0.20 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | |
| Kunti | 108 ± 5 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | |
| BSP-4 (‘Safal’) | 101 ± 16 | 0.37 ± 0.1 | 41.0 ± 0.9 | |
| Mean ± (SEM) | 83 ± 6 | 0.29 ± 0.2 | 19.3 ± 8.0 | |
| CD at 5% | 24 | 0.08 | 11.7 |
| Iso- | Cis | ||||
| Accession | Citronellol | Geraniol | menthone | Linalool | rose oxide |
| Bipuli | 34.5 ± 3.4 | 21.8 ± 3.3 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 4.3 ± 1.6 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
| Hemanti | 50.6 ± 1.4 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 12.4 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| Kunti | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 43.7 ± 1.4 | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| BSP-4 | 30.6 ± 3.0 | 28.7 ± 6.0 | 8.4 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
| (‘Safal’) | |||||
| Means ± | 26.2 ± 5.6 | 27.2 ± 6.2 | 9.5 ± 1.0 | 6.2 ± 1.3 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| SEM | |||||
| CD at 5% | 6.5 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 0.3 |
| Trans | Citronellyl | Geranyl | 10-epi-γ- | ||
| Accession | rose oxide | Menthone | formate | formate | eudesmol |
| Bipuli | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
| Hemanti | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 13.8 ± 0.8 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| Kunti | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.1 |
| BSP-4 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.3 |
| (‘Safal’) | |||||
| Means ± | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.8 |
| SEM | |||||
| CD at 5% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Decanoic | Phenyl ethyl | ||||
| Accession | 6,9-guaiadiene | acid | Isodecanoic | tiglate | |
| Bipuli | 0.1 ± 0.1 | ND a | ND | 0.8 ± 0.3 | |
| Hemanti | 0.4 ± 0.1 | ND | ND | 0.8 ± 0.2 | |
| Kunti | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | |
| BSP-4 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | ND | 0.8 ± 0.1 | |
| (‘Safal’) | |||||
| Means ± | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | |
| SEM | |||||
| CD at 5% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |
| a ND = not detected |
| Accession | Bipuli | Hemanti | Kunti | Safal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bipuli | 1.00 | |||
| Hemanti | 0.81 | 1.00 | ||
| Kunti | 0.83 | 0.78 | 1.00 | |
| Safal | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
Claims
1 · 1 independent · depth 1Classifications
2 codes- A01H5/02
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockPriority chain
1 priority documents›Priority documents — 1
| Type | Document | Date |
|---|---|---|
| related publication | US 20030014799 P1 | 16 Jan 2003 |
Validity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock