Electrolytic process for preparing uranium metal
Granted 4 Dec 1990 · no office action yet
Assignee: United States Department of Energy
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Paul A. Haas · Examiner: Brooks H. Hunt · AU 224 · TC 2200
Life of the patent
2 dated eventsAbstract
An electrolytic process for making uranium from uranium oxide using Cl.sub.2 anode product from an electrolytic cell to react with UO.sub.2 to form uranium chlorides. The chlorides are used in low concentrations in a melt comprising fluorides and chlorides of potassium, sodium and barium in the electrolytic cell. The electrolysis produces Cl.sub.2 at the anode that reacts with UO.sub.2 in the feed reactor to form soluble UCl.sub.4, available for a continuous process in the electrolytic cell, rather than having insoluble UO.sub.2 fouling the cell.
Description
4 parts›This invention was developed pursuant to a contract…
This invention was developed pursuant to a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy.
This invention relates to a process for preparing uranium and more particularly an electrolytic process for preparing uranium using fluoride and chloride salt mixtures.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A standard method for making uranium metal is the reduction of UF 4 with magnesium as a reducing agent. The high cost of such a process has directed efforts at alternatives. One alternative is the use of electrochemical methods similar to the Hall-Heroult process used in making aluminum. These approaches presented major difficulties.
First, the high density and low solubility of uranium oxides resulted in fouled cells that prevented metal coalescence. Also, less than 50% of recovered metal is from uranium oxides, the rest being from UF 4 which not only must first undergo conversion from the UO 2 form before electrolytic reduction, but also produces an undesirable CF 4 waste gas emission. The efficiencies are low, rarely exceeding 30% and usually lower than 20% for production from UO 2 . Cell capabilities are low due to low current efficiencies and because the maximum current is limited by the "critical current density" that gives an "anode effect" when CF 4 is produced. Finally, in order to maintain continuous operation at 1200° C., consumed carbon anodes must be repeatedly replaced, a difficult and dangerous job.
Therefore there is a continuing need to develop new, safe and efficient process for making uranium metal.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the above needs, it is an object of this invention to provide a process for making uranium that eliminates oxide fouling of the cell.
It is another object of this invention to provide a process for making uranium that has a high uranium yield and is thus more efficient than present processes.
An additional object of this invention is to provide an electrolytic process for making uranium wherein current capacities are maximized.
A further object of this invention is to provide a process for making uranium that is safe, having no hazardous by products.
Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
To achieve the foregoing and other objects and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the process of this invention may comprise: in an electrolytic cell having an anode and cathode electrodes, contacting in the molten state uranium chloride and a mixture of salts comprising chloride salts of metals selected from the group consisting of K, Na and Ba, the fluoride salts of metals selected from the group consisting of K, Na and Ba in sufficient amounts to minimize volatility of uranium chlorides; and introducing an electric current across the electrodes thus resulting in the production of uranium metal. This process is safer and more efficient than prior electrolytic processes.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The theory of this invention is to produce at one electrode a byproduct that can be recycled to a feed reactor containing UO 2 feed material to produce a uranium compound that can be electrolytically reduced, thus eliminating the problem of having UO 2 in the reaction vessel and also recycling a byproduct. The composition of the reactants is formulated so that Cl 2 forms at the anode. This reacts with UO 2 in a the feed reactor to form uranium chlorides as the uranium compounds to be reduced.
The anode reaction is
4Cl.sup.- →2Cl.sub.2 +4e
The reaction at the cathode is
U.sup.+4 +4e→U°
The net overall cell reaction is
UCl.sub.4 →2Cl.sub.2 +U°
The reactions listed using uranium chlorides are known and were used in batch-type processes to prepare dendritic uranium metal solids at 750° to 900° C. The process was inefficient and uneconomical because of the large amount of waste solids and the steps for recovery of the uranium metal powder. Operations to prepare molten uranium were not practical because of the excessive volatility of uranium chlorides.
To get around that problem, the cell charge is a mixture of chloride and fluoride salts with one or more of the fluoride salts selected to give a high degree of conversion of uranium chlorides to uranium fluorides. The preferred fluoride is KF and some conversion reactions are
4KF+UCl.sub.4 →4KCl+UF.sub.4
3KF+UCl.sub.3 →3KCl+UF.sub.3
Thermodynamic data shows a value of -255 Kj/mol UCl 4 = f G°=-RT InK f at 1500° C. for the first reaction. This value indicates a very high equilibrium conversion to KCl and UF 4 and results in a very fast conversion in the molten cell charge. Other possible fluoride salts for exchange with uranium chlorides are NaF and BaF 2 , however, NaCl is more volatile than KCl, and the exchange reaction with BaF 2 is less favorable thermodynamically.
Another reason to use the salt mixture is that it will have a lower melting point resulting in easier more convenient operation. The composition is selected so that UCl 4 concentration in the melt is low to enable the cell to be operated above the boiling point of UCl 4 without the production of excessive amounts of UCl 4 vapor. Because the chlorine is in the melt, as KCl, the anode product is Cl 2 in spite of the low UCl 4 concentration.
The electrode reaction depend on the ions present at the electrode and not on the melt constituents that do not ionize. The KCl and UF 4 and UF 3 all ionize. The anode reaction to form Cl 2 occurs first and the undesirable reaction of F - to form CF 4 requires a higher voltage and does not occur until the chloride at the anode is depleted to a low concentration. At the cathode, U metal is formed in preference to K metal. The net reactions in the cell when the uranium is mostly UF 4 are
UF.sub.4 +4KCl→2Cl.sub.2 +U°+4KF
UF.sub.3 +3KCl→3/2Cl.sub.2 +U°+3KF
In combination with the exchange reactions for KF with uranium chloride feed, the net reactions starting with uranium chloride feed are
UCl.sub.4 →2Cl.sub.2 +U°
UCl.sub.3 →3/2Cl.sub.2 +U°
One reaction for chloride recycle in a chlorinator is
UO.sub.2 +2Cl.sub.2 +2CO→UCl.sub.4 +2CO.sub.2
Then the overall net process reaction is
UO.sub.2 +2CO→2CO.sub.2 +U°
This process provides many benefits over prior art processes. Uranium fluoride and chlorides are molten and soluble in the cell melt at 1200° C.; therefore, there are no interfering solids to foul the cell. The cell can be operated without UF 4 feed material or having to deal with CF 4 waste. The current efficiencies are higher since low efficiencies can be attributed to parasitic U(III)←→U(IV) cycle and large amounts of UF 4 needed to give useful solubilities UO 2 . Lower UF 4 concentrations and resulting higher current efficiencies are possible when the anode product is Cl 2 . Higher anode current densities and higher cell capacities are possible with Cl 2 as the anode product since Cl 2 does not give the critical anode effect that occurs when CF 4 is a product. In addition, the carbon anode is not consumed as it is when CO and CF 4 are the anode product. This allows for a continuous process for uranium manufacture since the anode does not need to be periodically replaced.
Claims
1 · 1 independent · depth 1Classifications
9 codes- C25C3/34
- G21C19/48
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
Chain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockValidity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock