USPatentGranted
H

Electrolyte for use in an all inorganic rechargeable cell and lithium inorganic cell containing the improved electrolyte

Granted 5 Jul 1988 · no office action yet

Assignee: The United States of America - Secretary of the Army

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Robert J. Mammone, Michael Binder · Examiner: John F. Terapane · AU 223 · TC 2200

Application
Not granted yet
filed 10 Aug 1987
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US H496
granted 5 Jul 1988

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomJul 1987Oct 1987Jan 1988Apr 1988Jul 1988Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An improved electrolyte is provided in a lithium/sulfur dioxide rechargea cell, the electrolyte comprising a solution of a stable, highly conductive liquid electrolyte complex LiAlCl.sub.4 --3SO.sub.2 and up to about 50 percent by weight of sulfuryl chloride as a cosolvent.

Description

7 parts
›The invention described herein may be manufactured, used…

The invention described herein may be manufactured, used, and licensed by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment to us of any royalty thereon.

This invention relates in general to an improved electrolyte for use in all inorganic rechargeable cell and to an all inorganic rechargeable cell including the improved electrolyte and in particular to an improved electrolyte for use in a lithium/SO 2 rechargeable cell and to a lithium/SO 2 rechargeable cell including the improved electrolyte.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An all inorganic Li/SO 2 rechargeable cell generally includes a lithium anode, a porous carbon cathode and a stable highly conductive liquid electrolyte complex LiAlCl 4 --xSO 2 . This complex is rapidly formed when the commonly used LiAlCl 4 electrolyte salt reacts with SO 2 gas or SO 2 liquid. Although the initially formed liquid complex has the formula LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 , additional lowered LiAlCl 4 salt concentration can be achieved at will by diluting the above electrolyte with additional SO 2 . Thus, electrolyte with formulas LiAlCl--xSO 2 where x is at least 3 can be prepared. The starting electrolyte LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 has a very high specific conductivity of 0.1 S/cm. The fact that this is the highest known conductivity for any ambient temperature non aqueous electrolyte makes this general class of electrolytes extremely valuable.

One difficulty with the use of this electrolyte is however, that during cell discharge, the insoluble reduction product is deposited in the porous carbon cathode. Simultaneously, some of the LiAlCl 4 electrolyte salt is also precipitated in the porous carbon cathode. The coprecipitation of electrolyte salt is partially responsible for the severely reduced capacity currently plaguing this system.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The general object of this invention is to provide an improved lithium inorganic rechargeable cell system. A more particular object is to minimize or even eliminate LiAlCl 4 coprecipitation and thus improve cell capacity.

It has been found that the aforementioned objects can be attained by adding a suitable cosolvent to the electrolyte to allow excess LiAlCl 4 that would normally precipitate to dissolve. The requirements of an effective cosolvent are:

(A) The cosolvent should be capable of rapidly dissolving the LiAlCl 4 salt and, in order to minimize IR losses, must in the process form a reasonably conducting electrolyte solution.

(B) The cosolvent should be extremely miscible with liquid SO 2 .

(C) The cosolvent must not become easily oxidized during cell charging which typically takes place at 4.0 volts relative to lithium.

(D) The cosolvent should not become chemically degraded in the presence of AlCl 3 or chlorine, both of which are formed during cell charging.

A particularly effective cosolvent has been found to be sulfuryl chloride, SO 2 Cl 2 . One would not expect that the addition of SO 2 Cl 2 as a cosolvent would be able to improve cell capacity in Li/SO 2 rechargeable cells since the specific conductivity of pure SO 2 Cl 2 is very poor. That is, pure SO 2 Cl 2 is one million times less conductive than is the LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 electrolyte.

Experimental results were obtained in small laboratory cells. The cells include a lithium anode, a porous carbon cathode made from high surface area carbon black and a LiAlCl 4 electrolyte salt.

The following electrolytes were tested: (1) LiAlCl--3SO 2 ; (2) LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 +10% SO 2 Cl 2 ; (3) LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 +20% SO 2 Cl 2 ; and (4) LiAlCl 4 --SO 2 Cl 2

The results of these experiments are shown in the following Table:

______________________________________

FIRST
CYCLE TENTH CYCLE
CAPACITY CAPACITY
›ELECTROLYTE mAH mAH

______________________________________

LiAlCl.sub.4 --3SO.sub.2

9 14

LiAlCl.sub.4 --3SO.sub.2 + 10% SO.sub.2 Cl.sub.2

32 20

LiAlCl.sub.4 --3SO.sub.2 + 20% SO.sub.2 Cl.sub.2

52 18

LiAlCl.sub.4 --SO.sub.2 Cl.sub.2

20 0

______________________________________

The results clearly show that Li/LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 cells constructed with 10% and 20% added SO 2 Cl 2 had longer capacities than either Li/LiAlCl 4 --3SO 2 cells or even Li/LiAlCl 4 --SO 2 Cl 2 cells. It is clear that on the TENTH CYCLE, the advantage of the addition of low percentages of SO 2 Cl 2 is evident. Cells containing more than 50% added SO 2 Cl 2 could not be cycled ten times.

We wish it to be understood that we do not desire to be limited to the exact details as described for obvious modifications will occur to a person skilled in the art.

1 of 7 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims

10 · 3 independent · depth 3
12345678910
10 granted claims

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H01M10/36
USPC · US Patent Classification
429/101429/196429/197252/62.2

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
0.9 y
330 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
John F. Terapane
art unit 223 · TC 2200
Citations: 4 back · 0 forward

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom1990199219941996199820002002200420062008Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock