LexDanaLexDanabeta
USPatentGranted
S1

Rail for an architectural covering

Granted 3 Sep 2019 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: JPMorgan Chase Bank · originally Hunter Douglas

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Stephen T. Wisecup, Kwan Hon Anson Cheung, Fred Bould, Ronald Holt +1 · Examiner: Kevin K Rudzinski · AU 2919 · TC 2900

Application
29/581,048
filed 14 Oct 2016
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US D858139
granted 3 Sep 2019
1
Claims
1 independent
49
File wrapper
transactions
2036
20-year term
term adjustment not held
none
Litigation
checked
1
Classifications
56
Citations
56 cites · 0 cited by

Life of the patent

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20162018202020222024202620282030203220342036ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

1 parts
›FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a…

FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a rail for an architectural covering in accordance with the present design.

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof.

FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof.

FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof.

FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof.

FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.

The break lines shown in FIGS. 1-3, 6 and 7 symbolize breaks in the length of the article in which the claimed design is embodied. The appearance of any portion of the rail for an architectural covering between the break lines forms no part of the claimed design.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims

1 · 1 independent · depth 1
1 granted claims

Classifications

1 codes
USPC · US Patent Classification
D06/580

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.9 y
1,054 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
after a restriction
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Kevin K Rudzinski
art unit 2919 · TC 2900
Law firm
Law firm · Log in to unlock
Citations: 56 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2018202020222024202620282030203220342036Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienhover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock