USPatentGranted
S1

Double function eyelash groomer head

Granted 22 Nov 2011 · 4 office actions

Assignee: Yong Hoon Cho

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Yong Hoon Cho · Examiner: Zenia Bennett · AU 2913 · TC 2900

Application
29/370,361
filed 6 Jul 2010
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US D649287
granted 22 Nov 2011

Life of the patent

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

1 parts
›FIG. 1 is a rear perspective view of…

FIG. 1 is a rear perspective view of the double function eyelash groomer head with a cap and handle showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view of the double function eyelash groomer head without a cap;

FIG. 3 is a top end view of the double function eyelash groomer head thereof;

FIG. 4 is a front view of the double function eyelash groomer head thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side view of the double function eyelash groomer head thereof;

FIG. 6 is a rear view of the double function eyelash groomer head thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is a right side view of the double function eyelash groomer head.

The broken lines are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims

1 · 1 independent · depth 1
1 granted claims

Classifications

2 codes
USPC · US Patent Classification
D28/30D28/36

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2010Oct 2010Jan 2011Apr 2011Jul 2011Oct 2011Jan 2012USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.4 y
504 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Zenia Bennett
art unit 2913 · TC 2900
Citations: 12 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock