Electronic stimulus device
Granted 28 Jul 2009 · no office action yet
Assignee: Ewing Donald P
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Donald P. Ewing, Felix Clarence Quintanar · Examiner: Robert A. Delehanty · AU 2914 · TC 2900
Life of the patent
2 dated eventsDescription
1 parts›FIG. 1 is perspective view of an embodiment…
FIG. 1 is perspective view of an embodiment of an electronic stimulus device constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a first side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a second side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a first end view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a second end view thereof.
The broken lines shown in the circular elements on the bottom of the electronic stimulus device shown in FIG. 3 are included for the purpose of illustrating a portion of the electronic stimulus device that forms no part of the claimed design.
Claims
1 · 1 independent · depth 1Classifications
2 codesClaim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockValidity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock