LexDanaLexDanabeta
USPatentGranted
S1

Portion of a miter saw

Granted 27 Nov 2007 · 6 office actions

Current assignee: Milwaukee Electric Tool · originally Techtronic Industries

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: David Hlavac, Troy C. Thorson, Eric Fernandes, Michael L. Welliver +10 · Examiner: Antoine D. Davis · AU 2915 · TC 2900

Application
29/227,851
filed 15 Apr 2005
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US D556224
granted 27 Nov 2007
1
Claims
1 independent
53
File wrapper
transactions
2025
20-year term
term adjustment not held
none
Litigation
checked
1
Classifications
111
Citations
111 cites · 0 cited by

Life of the patent

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

1 parts
›FIG. 1 is a front perspective exploded view…

FIG. 1 is a front perspective exploded view of a portion of a saw.

FIG. 2 is a side view of the portion of a saw of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is another side view of the portion of a saw of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 4 is a top view of the portion of a saw of FIG. 1 ; and,

FIG. 5 is a front view of the portion of a saw of FIG. 1 .

The present application is directed to the shape and contour of the design illustrated in the drawings. Other features of the drawings, specifically, portion of the table portion of the miter saw, are not considered part of the design sought to be patented, and have accordingly been shown in broken lines.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims

1 · 1 independent · depth 1
1 granted claims

Classifications

1 codes
USPC · US Patent Classification
D15/133

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2005Jul 2005Oct 2005Jan 2006Apr 2006Jul 2006Oct 2006Jan 2007Apr 2007Jul 2007Oct 2007Jan 2008USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.6 y
956 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Antoine D. Davis
art unit 2915 · TC 2900
Law firm
Law firm · Log in to unlock
Citations: 111 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock