USPatentGranted

Modular telephone enclosure

Granted 16 Dec 1997 · no office action yet

Assignee: Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc.

Inventors: James Edwin Raynor, William Byron Wiggins, Eddie Lanier Holland, Lionel D. Gillespie · Examiner: Carmen H. Vales-Lado · AU 293 · TC 2900

Application

Not granted yet

filed 8 Jan 1997

Publication

Not published

not published

Patent· this page

US D387579

granted 16 Dec 1997

term adjustment not held

none

Litigation

checked

1 recorded conveyances

Life of the patent

4 dated events

⤢ drag to zoom

ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

1 parts

›FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a…

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a modular telephone enclosure showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view as seen when in use; and,

FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view as seen when in use.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims

1 · 1 independent · depth 1

1 granted claims

›1.independentThe ornamental design for a modular telephone enclosure, as shown and described.

Classifications

1 codes

USPC · US Patent Classification

D06/421

Claim changes

Soon

Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency

0.9 y

342 days filing → grant

Office actions

on the grant's record

Examiner

Carmen H. Vales-Lado

art unit 293 · TC 2900

Law firm

Law firm · Log in to unlock

Citations: 2 back · 0 forward

Chain of title

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.