USPatentGranted
B2

Barrier layer to SiOC alkali metals

Granted 21 Apr 2015 · no office action yet

Life of the patent

3 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomOct 2012Jan 2013Apr 2013Jul 2013Oct 2013Jan 2014Apr 2014Jul 2014Oct 2014Jan 2015Apr 2015Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention relates to a glazing comprising a transparent glass substrate containing ions of at least one alkali metal and a transparent layer made of silicon oxycarbide (SiO x C y ) having a total thickness E with (a) a carbon-rich deep zone, extending from a depth P 3 to a depth P 4 , where the C/Si atomic ratio is greater than or equal to 0.5, and (b) a carbon-poor surface zone, extending from a depth P 1 to a depth P 2 , where the C/Si atomic ratio is less than or equal to 0.4, with P 1 <P 2 <P 3 <P 4 and (P 2 −P 1 )+(P 4 −P 3 )<E the distance between P 1 and P 2 representing from 10% to 70% of the total thickness E of the silicon oxycarbide layer and the distance between P 3 and P 4 representing from 10% to 70% of the total thickness E of the silicon oxycarbide layer.

Description

4 parts
›The present invention relates to a thin silicon-oxycarbide-based…

The present invention relates to a thin silicon-oxycarbide-based transparent layer that forms a barrier to the diffusion of alkali-metal ions. The invention also relates to a process for manufacturing such a layer on a mineral glass substrate.

It is known that the diffusion of alkali-metal ions, in particular of sodium ions, from substrates made of glass (borosilsicate glass, soda-lime glass) toward and into thin functional layers such as TiO 2 -based photocatalytic layers, transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layers or hydrophobic organic layers deteriorates the advantageous properties inherent in these functional layers.

It is also known to interpose, between the substrate made of mineral glass rich in alkali-metal ions and said functional layer to be protected, a thin layer of a mineral oxide as a barrier against the diffusion of alkali-metal ions. Mention may be made, as examples of such oxides, of silica, alumina, zirconia, zinc/tin oxide, titanium oxide and silicon oxycarbide (SiOC). The barrier properties to alkali-metal ions of silicon oxycarbide layers are mentioned, for example, in applications EP 1 708 812, EP 1 686 595 and US 2003/612033.

To the Applicant's knowledge, no study exists at the current time regarding the influence of the carbon content of SiOC layers on the ability to block or capture alkali-metal ions. In the context of its studies that aim to optimize silicon oxycarbide sublayers with a view to their subsequent functionalization by hydrophobic agents, the Applicant observed that the silicon oxycarbide layers richest in carbon had the best barrier properties to alkali-metal ions and were also excellent tie layers for the hydrophobic functional agents.

Increasing the carbon content of the thin silicon oxycarbide layers resulted, however, in the undesirable appearance of a yellow coloration of the glazings. Such a coloration is problematic from an esthetic viewpoint, in particular in the field of motor vehicle glazings and glazings for dwellings. It is an even greater problem in the field of photovoltaic cells, where it significantly reduces energy efficiency by filtering out the blue and green components of visible light.

The present invention is based on the discovery that it was possible to significantly reduce the yellow color of thin carbon-rich sodium oxycarbide layers by depositing directly onto these layers either a thin layer of silica (SiO 2 ) essentially free of carbon or a sodium oxycarbide layer significantly poorer in carbon than the underlying layer.

The present invention therefore relates to a glass substrate containing alkali-metal ions and provided with a first transparent thin carbon-rich silicon oxycarbide layer and with a second transparent thin layer, deposited directly onto the first layer and which is significantly less rich in carbon than the first layer or even essentially free of carbon.

As it is, however, often impossible to determine, in the final product, the boundary between the carbon-rich SiOC layer and the carbon-poor or carbon-free layer, these two layers are defined in the present application as a single layer with a carbon-rich deep zone (corresponding to the first layer mentioned above) and a carbon-poor or carbon-free surface zone (corresponding to the second layer mentioned above).

One subject of the present invention is consequently a glazing comprising a transparent glass substrate containing ions of at least one alkali metal and a transparent layer made of silicon oxycarbide (SiO x C y ) having a total thickness E with

a carbon-rich deep zone, extending from a depth P 3 to a depth P 4 , where the C/Si atomic ratio is greater than or equal to 0.5, and a carbon-poor surface zone, extending from a depth P 1 to a depth P 2 , where the C/Si atomic ratio is less than or equal to 0.4,

with P 1 <P 2 <P 3 <P 4 and (P 2 −P 1 )+(P 4 −P 3 )<E the distance between P 1 and P 2 representing from 10% to 70%, preferably from 15% to 50% and in particular from 25% to 40%, of the total thickness E of the silicon oxycarbide layer (0.1≦(P 2 −P 1 )/E≦0.7) and the distance between P 3 and P 4 representing from 10% to 70%, preferably from 25% to 60%, in particular from 35% to 50%, of the total thickness E of the silicon oxycarbide layer (0.1≦(P 4 −P 3 )/E≦0.7).

The sum of the distance between P 1 and P 2 and the distance between P 3 and P 4 is of course always less than the overall thickness E of the silicon oxycarbide layer since there exists, between P 2 and P 3 , a zone where the C/Si ratio is intermediate between 0.4 and 0.5, and, beyond P 4 , a zone where the C/Si ratio is less than 0.5. Furthermore, the zone nearest the surface, located at a depth of less than P 1 , generally has an extremely high C/Si ratio due to the presence of CO 2 originating from the atmosphere or from organic pollutants absorbed at the surface.

The silicon oxycarbide layer of the glazing of the present invention is a dense non-porous layer having a refractive index between 1.45 and 1.9.

Its total thickness E is preferably between 10 and 200 nm, more preferably between 20 and 100 nm, and in particular between 40 and 70 nm.

The absolute methods that make it possible to determine the value of the total thickness of the silicon oxycarbide layer are X-ray reflectometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

In the appended figures, this total thickness of the SiO x C y layer is systematically indicated by an arrow. In these figures, and in particular with a view to determining the ratios (P 2 −P 1 )/E and (P 4 −P 3 )/E, it is determined not by one of the absolute methods mentioned above, but by secondary ionization mass spectroscopy (SIMS), which makes it possible to obtain the variation in the silica (SiO 2 ) content as a function of the analysis time and therefore of the depth of the sample analyzed.

In the present invention, the interface between the substrate and the silicon oxycarbide layer is defined as being the depth where the concentration of silica is exactly intermediate between that of the glass substrate and that at the local minimum in the vicinity of the interface. The determination of this depth, corresponding to the total thickness E of the layer, is illustrated in FIG. 2 , which shows the variation in the silica (SiO 2 ) content of the sample from FIG. 1 . The silica content of the mineral glass substrate is equal to SiO 2S and that corresponding to the local minimum in the vicinity of the interface is equal to SiO 2M . The interface between the glass substrate and the layer deposited by CVD is defined as being located at the depth where the silica content (SiO 2intermediate ) is equidistant between SiO 2S and SiO 2M .

›This depth E corresponding to SiO 2intermediate has…

This depth E corresponding to SiO 2intermediate has been reported on FIG. 1 .

The carbon content of the silicon oxycarbide layer is also determined by SIMS. It is expressed in the present application by means of the ratio of the number of carbon atoms to the number of silicon atoms (C/Si atomic ratio).

FIG. 1 shows, by way of example, the C/Si ratio as a function of the abrasion time (during the SIMS analysis) of a sample according to the invention. As is known, the abrasion time (indicated on the x axis) is proportional to the depth analyzed, the proportionality factor depending on the experimental conditions and on the nature and properties of the sample. It is observed on this figure that the C/Si ratio is very high at the surface due to possible carbon-containing pollutants and/or adsorbed CO 2 originating from the atmosphere. In the layers near the surface, between P 1 and P 2 , it is relatively low (of the order of 0.2) and then increases with the depth to exceed the value of 0.4 at a depth P 2 , and the value of 0.5 starting from a depth P 3 . It remains above this value until a depth P 4 and then tends toward zero upon arriving at the glass substrate.

As already explained in the introduction, the present invention is based on the discovery that the yellow color of thin carbon-rich silicon oxycarbide layers may be attenuated, or even eliminated, by depositing a thin carbon-poor layer of silica or of silicon.

In the present application, this yellow color is quantified, as is known, using the CIE L*A*b* (hereinafter CIELab) colorimetric system from measurements made on the glazing, after deposition of the layers. The CIELab system defines a color space in the form of a sphere with an axis L* characterizing the lightness, a red/green axis a* and a blue/yellow axis b*. An a* value of greater than 0 corresponds to colors with a red component, a negative a* value to colors with a green component, a positive b* value to colors with a yellow component and a negative b* value to colors with a blue component.

Generally, gray-colored or colorless layers that have low a* and b* values, that is to say values close to zero, will be sought.

The glazings of the present invention preferably have a b* value (CIELab, illuminant D65) between −2 and +3, in particular between −1.5 and +2.0; and an a* value (CIEBab, illuminant D65) between −2 and +2, in particular between −1.5 and +1.5. These values apply to glazings with layers deposited on a transparent colorless substrate made of clear float glass sold by the company Saint-Gobain Glass France under the trade name SGG Planilux®.

Another subject of the present invention is a process for manufacturing the glazings described above.

This process essentially comprises the following two successive steps:

(a) a first step of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of a carbon-rich silicon oxycarbide layer onto at least one part of the surface of a mineral glass substrate, by bringing said surface into contact with a gas flow containing ethylene (C 2 H 4 ), silane (SiH 4 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and nitrogen (N 2 ), at a temperature between 600° C. and 680° C., the ethylene/silane (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 ) volume ratio during step (a) being less than or equal to 3.3, (b1) a second step of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of a carbon-poor silicon oxycarbide layer onto the carbon-rich layer obtained in step (a), with a gas flow containing ethylene (C 2 H 4 ), silane (SiH 4 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and nitrogen (N 2 ), at a temperature between 600° C. and 680° C., the ethylene/silane (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 ) volume ratio during step (b1) being less than or equal to 3.4, or (b2) a second step of depositing a layer of silica (SiO 2 ) by CVD, PECVD or magnetron sputtering onto the carbon-rich layer obtained in step (a).

The first step (step (a)) is preferably carried out on float glass inside the furnace on a tin bath or immediately after exit from the furnace. One particularly advantageous embodiment consists in carrying out the deposition by CVD inside the furnace, where it is relatively easy to create a confined atmosphere essential to a satisfactory control of the chemical composition of the reactive mixture and of the layer deposited.

The deposition temperatures indicated above are the temperatures of the tin bath measured in the immediate vicinity (less than 20 cm away) of the nozzle through which the reactive gases arrive.

When the two layers (steps (a) and (b1)) are deposited by CVD, two nozzles are placed parallel to one another, at a distance generally between 2 and 5 m, the one upstream in the direction of travel of the ribbon forming the deepest layer/zone and the one downstream forming the least deep layer/zone.

Each of the nozzles preferably covers the entire width of the glass ribbon.

It is important to note that, although the process comprises two steps of forming a silicon oxycarbide layer, these “layers” are impossible to distinguish from one another in the final product, where they correspond to carbon-rich and carbon-poor zones of the single silicon oxycarbide layer.

The deposition of thin silicon oxycarbide layers by CVD is known and a person skilled in the art will know how to adjust the flow rates of the reactive gases as a function of the speed of travel of the glass, the furnace temperatures, and the thickness of the layers that it is desired to obtain. In the present invention, the experimental conditions of step (a) and optionally (b1) are preferably adjusted such that the thickness of the SiO x C y layer deposited is, after step (b1), between 10 and 200 nm, in particular between 20 and 100 nm and particularly preferably between 40 and 70 nm. These total thickness ranges are also preferred when a layer of silica is deposited below the carbon-rich SiO x C y zone by a method other than CVD.

The ethylene/silane (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 ) volume ratio during step (a) is preferably between 1 and 3.3, in particular between 1.5 and 3.3. The ratio of oxidizing gas (CO 2 ) to silane (SiH 4 ) is generally between 1 and 50, preferably between 1.5 and 10 and in particular between 2 and 6.

›For the deposition of the carbon-poor silicon oxycarbide…

For the deposition of the carbon-poor silicon oxycarbide layer (step (b1)), the ethylene/silane (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 ) volume ratio is preferably between 3.5 and 6, in particular between 3.7 and 5.5.

The CVD of the silica layer (step (b2)) is conventionally carried out using tetraethoxysilane as precursor.

The process for manufacturing the glazings of the present invention preferably also comprises, after step (b1) or (b2), a third step (step (c)) of annealing and/or forming the substrate bearing the silicon oxycarbide layer. During this step (c), the substrate is brought to a temperature between 580° C. and 700° C., preferably between 600° C. and 680° C.

›EXAMPLES

A glazing according to the invention is prepared by CVD (C 2 H 2 , SiH 4 , CO 2 , N 2 ) with two parallel CVD nozzles having a width of 3.3 m each, onto a substrate made of clear float glass (Planilux®) respectively at a temperature of 648° C. and 638° C. (temperature of the tin bath in the immediate vicinity of the nozzle); the width of the ribbon is 3.6 m, its thickness is 2.5 mm and its speed of travel is 15 m/min. The two nozzles are inside the glass-making furnace, at a distance of 3 m from one another.

The first, upstream nozzle delivers the following mixture of reactive gases:

SiH 4 : 14 nL/min, CO 2 : 30 nL/min, C 2 H 4 : 39 nL/min (in diluent N 2 ) (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 volume ratio=2.79).

The second nozzle, downstream of the first, delivers the following mixture of reactive gases:

SiH 4 : 14 nL/min, CO 2 : 30 nL/min, C 2 H 4 : 52 nL/min (in diluent N 2 ) (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 volume ratio=3.71).

Comparative glazing is manufactured under the same experimental conditions. This comparative example differs from the example according to the invention simply by the fact that the second nozzle delivers a mixture of gases identical to that of the second nozzle, namely the following mixture:

SiH 4 : 14 nL/min, CO 2 : 30 nL/min, C 2 H 4 : 39 nL/min (in diluent N 2 ) (C 2 H 4 /SiH 4 volume ratio=2.79).

All of the glazings are subjected to an annealing step at a temperature of 640° C. for 8 minutes.

FIG. 1 shows the SIMS spectrum of the glazing according to the invention where the (P 2 −P 1 )/E ratio is equal to around 29% and the (P 4 −P 3 )/E ratio is equal to around 46%.

FIG. 3 shows the SIMS spectrum of the comparative example. The silicon oxycarbide layer of this sample has a high carbon content (C/Si>0.4) both in the surface zone and in the deeper zone. It is impossible to determine the values of P 1 , P 2 and P 3 .

Table 1 presents the values of the parameters a* and b* (CIELab) for the glazings obtained according to the example and the comparative example.

It may be observed that the sample of the comparative example lacking a carbon-free or carbon-poor surface layer has a quite significant yellow color (b*=3.52). This value is significantly reduced for the example according to the invention (b*=1.39) owing to the presence of the carbon-poor layer of the example according to the invention.

›Tables in the description — 1
TABLE 1 — Example according to
the inventionComparative example
Light transmission82.08%78.57%
a*−0.95−1.09
b*1.393.52
Total thickness60.8 nm54 nm
determined by TEM
3 of 4 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims

9 · 1 independent · depth 3
123456789
9 granted claims

Classifications

20 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B32B17/06
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C03C17/34
  • C23C16/22
  • C23C16/40
  • C23C16/32
USPC · US Patent Classification
428/428428/426428/688428/432427/255.29428/704427/585428/689428/699428/701427/590204/192.1427/255.28427/587428/702

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
2.4 y
888 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
David Sample
art unit 1784 · TC 1700
Citations: 15 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2014201620182020202220242026202820302032Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

1 priority documents
›Priority documents — 1
TypeDocumentDate
related publicationUS 20140349107 A127 Nov 2014

Worldwide family

28 members · 18 offices
US2EP2JP2KR2CN2WO1BR2CA2DK1EA2ES1FR2HU1IN1MX2PL1PT1TR1
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
28
DOCDB simple family 47291136
Offices
18
US · EP · JP · KR · CN · WO
Granted
9 of 28
grant date present
Non-English titles
14
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 11 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USUS-2014349107-A1A127 Nov 201414 Nov 2012publishedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals
USthis patentUS-9012024-B2B221 Apr 201514 Nov 2012grantedBarrier layer to SiOC alkali metals
EPEP-2780294-A1A124 Sep 201414 Nov 2012publishedCouche barriere aux metaux alcalins a base de siocfr
EPEP-2780294-B1B127 Mar 201914 Nov 2012grantedSioc barrier layer to alkali metals and process of making
JPJP-2015506890-AA5 Mar 201514 Nov 2012publishedアルカリ金属に対するSiOCバリア層ja
JPJP-6050370-B2B221 Dec 201614 Nov 2012grantedアルカリ金属に対するSiOCバリア層ja
KRKR-20140093235-AA25 Jul 201414 Nov 2012publishedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals
KRKR-102000803-B1B116 Jul 201914 Nov 2012grantedSiOC 알칼리 금속에 대한 배리어층ko
CNCN-103974918-AA6 Aug 201414 Nov 2012published基于碳SiOC的碱金属阻挡层zh
CNCN-103974918-BB14 Dec 201614 Nov 2012grantedAlkali metal barrier layers based on carbon SiOC
WOWO-2013072623-A1A123 May 201314 Nov 2012publishedCouche barriere aux metaux alcalins a base de siocfr
›Other offices — 17 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
BRBR-112014010220-A2A213 Jun 201714 Nov 2012publishedcamada barreira aos metais alcalinos à base de siocpt
BRBR-112014010220-A8A820 Jun 201714 Nov 2012publishedcamada barreira aos metais alcalinos à base de siocpt
CACA-2854052-A1A123 May 201314 Nov 2012publishedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals
CACA-2854052-CC7 Jan 202014 Nov 2012grantedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals
DKDK-2780294-T3T38 Jul 201914 Nov 2012grantedBarrierelag af sioc-holdige alkalimetallerda
EAEA-201490968-A1A129 Aug 201414 Nov 2012publishedБарьерный слой для щелочных металлов на основе siocru
EAEA-024976-B1B130 Nov 201614 Nov 2012publishedBARRIER LAYER TO SiOC ALKALI METALS
ESES-2736923-T3T39 Jan 202014 Nov 2012grantedCapa barrera para metales alcalinos a base de SiOC y procedimiento de fabricaciónes
FRFR-2982608-A1A117 May 201316 Nov 2011publishedCouche barriere aux metaux alcalins a base de siocfr
FRFR-2982608-B1B122 Nov 201316 Nov 2011grantedCouche barriere aux metaux alcalins a base de siocfr
HUHU-E045009-T2T230 Dec 201914 Nov 2012publishedSioc barrier layer to alkali metals and process of making
ININ-2014MN00825-AA17 Apr 201514 Nov 2012publishedno title held
MXMX-2014005735-AA9 Jul 201414 Nov 2012publishedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals.
MXMX-336859-BB4 Feb 201614 Nov 2012publishedBarrier layer to sioc alkali metals.
PLPL-2780294-T3T330 Sep 201914 Nov 2012publishedSioc barrier layer to alkali metals and process of making
PTPT-2780294-TT10 Jul 201914 Nov 2012publishedSioc barrier layer to alkali metals and process of making
TRTR-201909120-T4T422 Jul 201914 Nov 2012publishedSIOC esaslı alkali metal bariyer katmanı ve üretim yöntemi.tr

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock