USPatentGranted
B2

System and method for using cluster level quorum to prevent split brain scenario in a data grid cluster

Granted 17 Mar 2015 · 4 office actions

Current assignee: Oracle International · originally Oracle Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Robert H. Lee, Mark Falco, Gene Gleyzer, Cameron Purdy · Examiner: Ilya Traktovenko

Life of the patent

14 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20122014201620182020202220242026202820302032ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A system and method is described for use with a data grid cluster, which uses cluster quorum to prevent split brain scenario. The data grid cluster includes a plurality of cluster nodes, each of which runs a cluster service. Each cluster service collects and maintains statistics regarding communication flow between its cluster node and the other cluster nodes in the data grid cluster. The statistics are used to determine a status associated with other cluster nodes in the data grid cluster whenever a disconnect event happens. The data grid cluster is associated with a quorum policy, which is defined in a cache configuration file, and which specifies a time period that a cluster node will wait before making a decision on whether or not to evict one or more cluster nodes from the data grid cluster.

Claims

20 · 3 independent · depth 5
1234567891011121314151617181920
20 granted claims

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06F11/14
  • G06F9/50
USPC · US Patent Classification
706/10

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.2 y
1,155 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
2 RCE
Examiner
Ilya Traktovenko
art unit —
Citations: 54 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

2 priority documents
Priority
28 Jan 2011
earliest claimed
›Priority documents — 2
TypeDocumentDate
provisionalUS 6143754628 Jan 2011
related publicationUS 20120197822 A12 Aug 2012

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock