USPatentGranted
B1

Prioritizing data clusters with customizable scoring strategies

Granted 29 Apr 2014 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: Wells Fargo · originally Palantir Technologies

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Michael Kross, Michael Harris, Adam Borochoff, Matthew Sprague +1 · Examiner: Lalita M Hamilton · AU 3691 · TC 3600

Application
13/968,213
filed 15 Aug 2013
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 8,712,906
granted 29 Apr 2014

Life of the patent

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Techniques are disclosed for prioritizing a plurality of clusters. Prioritizing clusters may generally include identifying a scoring strategy for prioritizing the plurality of clusters. Each cluster is generated from a seed and stores a collection of data retrieved using the seed. For each cluster, elements of the collection of data stored by the cluster are evaluated according to the scoring strategy and a score is assigned to the cluster based on the evaluation. The clusters may be ranked according to the respective scores assigned to the plurality of clusters. The collection of data stored by each cluster may include financial data evaluated by the scoring strategy for a risk of fraud. The score assigned to each cluster may correspond to an amount at risk.

Claims

21 · 3 independent · depth 3
123456789101112131415161718192021
21 granted claims

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06Q40/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
705/38705/35

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJulAugSepOctNovDec2014FebMarAprMayJunUSPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowanceRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
0.7 y
257 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
1 RCE
Examiner
Lalita M Hamilton
art unit 3691 · TC 3600
Citations: 25 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

1 priority documents
Priority
15 Mar 2013
earliest claimed
›Priority documents — 1
TypeDocumentDate
provisionalUS 6180088715 Mar 2013

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock