Apparatus, method, and system for providing a decision mechanism for conditional commits in an atomic region
Granted 14 May 2013 · no office action yet
Assignee: Intel Corporation
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Shiliang Hu, Craig B. Zilles, Youfeng Wu, Mauricio Breternitz, Jr. +2 · Examiner: John Chavis · AU 2193 · TC 2100
Life of the patent
3 dated eventsAbstract
An apparatus and method is described herein for conditionally committing and/or speculative checkpointing transactions, which potentially results in dynamic resizing of transactions. During dynamic optimization of binary code, transactions are inserted to provide memory ordering safeguards, which enables a dynamic optimizer to more aggressively optimize code. And the conditional commit enables efficient execution of the dynamic optimization code, while attempting to prevent transactions from running out of hardware resources. While the speculative checkpoints enable quick and efficient recovery upon abort of a transaction. Processor hardware is adapted to support dynamic resizing of the transactions, such as including decoders that recognize a conditional commit instruction, a speculative checkpoint instruction, or both. And processor hardware is further adapted to perform operations to support conditional commit or speculative checkpointing in response to decoding such instructions.
Claims
23 · 5 independent · depth 3Classifications
2 codes- G06F9/45
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockPriority chain
1 priority documents›Priority documents — 1
| Type | Document | Date |
|---|---|---|
| related publication | US 20120079246 A1 | 29 Mar 2012 |
Validity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock