USPatentGranted
B2

Architecture for delivery of video content responsive to remote interaction

Granted 5 Mar 2013 · 6 office actions

Current assignee: TIR TECHNOLOGY LP · originally SKYFIRE LABS, INC.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Erik R. Swenson, Michael Guzewicz, Nitin Bhandari, Nirmal Nair · Examiner: Timothy Newlin

Life of the patent

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom200620082010201220142016201820202022202420262028ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Systems and methods pertaining to a client-server architecture for communicating video frames across a network are disclosed. In one embodiment, a system includes a first engine residing on a first device, with the first engine adapted to encode a succession of video frames of a user interface of a program for transmission across the network. The encoding of the video frames is based on one or more feedback parameters and includes video compression techniques. In the same embodiment, the system includes a first command process engine operatively coupled to the program. In the same embodiment, the system includes a second engine residing on a second device, the second engine adapted to decode the succession of video frames after transmission across the network. In the same embodiment, the system includes a second command process engine operatively coupled to the first command process engine and adapted to communicate user input of the second device to the program via the first command process engine.

Claims

23 · 5 independent · depth 3
1234567891011121314151617181920212223
23 granted claims

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N5/445
USPC · US Patent Classification
725/54725/117348/441348/384.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionRequest for continued examinationNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
5.3 y
1,953 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Timothy Newlin
art unit —
Citations: 85 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

2 priority documents
Priority
1 Nov 2006
earliest claimed
›Priority documents — 2
TypeDocumentDate
provisionalUS 608638881 Nov 2006
related publicationUS 20080104652 A11 May 2008

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock