Block ciphering system, using permutations to hide the core ciphering function of each encryption round
Granted 25 Jan 2011 · 4 office actions
Assignee: Irdeto
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Willem Charles Mallon, Joachim Artur Trescher, Menno Anne Treffers, Paulus Mathias Hubertus Mechtildus Antonius Gorissen +1 · Examiner: Kambiz Zand · AU 2434 · TC 2400
Life of the patent
13 dated eventsAbstract
In a system, a server provides a digital signal processing function ƒ to an executing device in an obfuscated form. The function ƒ includes a function cascade of signal processing functions ƒ i , 1≦i≦N (e.g., FC 1 (x)≡ƒ N ∘ . . . ∘ƒ 1 (x)). The server includes a processor for selecting a set of 2N invertible permutations p i , 1≦i≦2N; calculating a set of N functions g i , where g i is functionally equivalent to p 2i −1 ∘ƒ i ∘p 2i−1 , for 1≦i≦N; and calculating a set of N−1 functions h i , where h i is functionally equivalent to p 2i−1 −1 ∘p 2i−2 , for 2≦i≦N. The server equips the executing device with an execution device function cascade that includes y N ∘h N ∘y N−1 ∘h N−1 ∘ . . . ∘y 1 , where y 1 , . . . , y N are function parameters (e.g., ED 1 (y 1 , . . . , y N )≡y N ∘h N ∘y N−1 ∘h N−1 ∘ . . . ∘y 1 ), and provides the functions g 1 , . . . g N to the executing device. The executing device obtains the functions g 1 , . . . , g N and a processor for loading the execution device function cascade and applying the loaded execution device function cascade to the functions g 1 , . . . , g N (e.g., ED 1 (g 1 , . . . , g N )).
Claims
21 · 6 independent · depth 3Classifications
4 codes- H04N1/44
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockPriority chain
1 priority documents›Priority documents — 1
| Type | Document | Date |
|---|---|---|
| related publication | US 20080285744 A1 | 20 Nov 2008 |
Validity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock