USPatentGranted
B2

Method of resolving display delay

Granted 26 May 2009 · 6 office actions

Life of the patent

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method of resolving display delay includes dividing a period of turning on scan lines of an image into at least two sections. At least one section of the period is for charging pixels while pixels are discharged during the other sections of the period for enabling the charging of scan lines (i.e., enabling pixel displaying). The discharging of scan lines (i.e., erasing pixel displaying) is performed a designated number of scan lines apart so as to achieve the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and exhibiting an image-sticking phenomena.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of resolving display delay, and more practically, to a method of providing continuous and uninterrupted images during digital image scan for increasing image quality.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The appearance and subsequent development of electronic products started only a few decades ago; however, the progressing speed of this industry has surpassed many others. This is especially so in the development of computer related periphery products and video-audio products. New products are ever emerging due to the needs of the working people and recreation needs of the general population. Much progress has been made in these areas; new products are ever emerging. Take the display product for instance; the conventionally used display is constituted of a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), which usually has the following drawbacks:

1. Since the conventional display is not equipped with flat screen, it is often suffering from a phenomenon of image twisting during watching. 2. The conventional cathode ray tube has comparatively larger power consumption, that is, the cathode ray tube will consume a conceivable more electricity that, as the consequence, the display of cathode ray tube suffers from the phenomena of high temperature and heat. 3. The size of the conventional display is bulky since it is restricted by the size of the cathode ray tube therein, so that a certain larger space is required for storing and operating the conventional display.

New generation of displays including liquid crystal display (LCD), and plasma display, etc, are developed by manufacturers in view of the aforementioned deficiencies of the conventional display. With the maturation of the LCD manufacturing technique, the price of the LCD is decreased to a degree almost equal to that of the conventional display of cathode ray tube. Since the LCD has the advantages of low radiation, low power consumption, small size, and larger visual angle, it is a favorite of mostly common users.

The LCD display nowadays is mostly being implemented as computer monitor, liquid crystal TV, and displaying device and other 3C electronic products, such as mobile phone, digital camera, etc. The LCD provides a widespread application. However, if LCD is applied to the liquid crystal TV in which the conversion of image signal is very fast and the image signal is continuous, a phenomenon of image sticking, as shown in FIG. 1 , is generated and seen by human eyes. The happening of image sticking is because that the response time of the liquid crystal display is slower than the TV image signal. It is not easy to significantly improve the response time since it is confined by the properties of the liquid crystal material. In addition, the scan method of the conventional monitor is first to scan a screen horizontally and successively in a single direction, for example, the scanning is performed successively from the topmost end of the screen to the bottommost end of the screen. Next, a step of entirely erasing the image (discharging every pixel of the screen) is performed to black the screen entirely. Following that a scanning of the next image is performed. These steps are performed repeatedly to complete the displaying of liquid crystal display. Nevertheless, the conventional scan method still suffers the image-sticking phenomenon. In view of the above description, the present invention discloses an improved scan method for LCD monitor capable of efficiently eliminating the image-sticking phenomenon.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art, the present invention discloses a method of resolving display delay. The primary object of the invention is to divide a period of turning on scan lines of an image into at least two sections while charging at least one section of the period and discharging the other section of the period, that is, the charging of scan lines (i.e. enabling pixel displaying) and the discharging of scan lines (i.e. erasing pixel displaying) are performed with a designated number of scan lines apart, such that the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and image-sticking phenomena can be achieved.

According to above principle, when an LCD is scanning, the charging and the discharging are performed at an interval of at least one-third through one-half of an image, so that the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and image-sticking phenomena can be achieved.

The following descriptions of drawings and preferred embodiment could be taken in conjunction with the accompanying auxiliary drawings to specifically explain the present invention and facilitate examiner to examine the present invention.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation showing the image-sticking phenomenon of the conventional liquid crystal display.

FIG. 2 is a waveform of hold-type displaying for LCDs according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration showing a mechanism of motion for LCDs according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows an intermittent displayed light method for LCDs according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 a schematic illustration showing a mechanism of motion for LCDs improved by the intermittent displayed light method with accordance to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a driving circuit of the present invention

FIG. 7A is a diagram showing a first movement of the scan lines for LCDs according to the present invention.

FIG. 7B is a diagram showing a second movement of the scan lines for LCDs according to the present invention.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

For your esteemed members of reviewing committee to further understand and recognize the fulfilled functions and structural characteristics of the invention, several preferable embodiments cooperating with detailed description are presented as the follows.

Referring to FIG. 2 , which is a waveform of hold-type displaying for LCDs according to the present invention. As seen in FIG. 2 , the profile is a period curve of a scan line without intermittent displayed light. Referring to FIG. 3 , which is a schematic illustration showing a mechanism of motion for LCDs according to the present invention. As seen in FIG. 3 , it is the image displayed corresponding to the screen line period of the FIG. 2 , wherein each field is composed of a plurality of single pixels 11 and the image is formed by a continue scanning that the image is formed by first scanning a screen horizontally and successively in a single direction, for example, the scanning is performed successively from the topmost end of the screen to the bottommost end of the screen, and then erasing the entire image (discharging every pixel of the screen) to black the screen entirely, and following that a scanning of the next image is performed. These steps are performed repeatedly to complete the displaying of liquid crystal display. Nevertheless, the conventional scan method still suffers the image-sticking phenomenon. Therefore, a method for resolving this deficiency is disclosed hereinafter.

Referring to FIG. 4 , an intermittent displayed light method for LCDs according to the present invention is shown. As seen in FIG. 4 , the method comprising the steps of: dividing a period of turning on scan lines of an image is into at least two sections, i.e. a first obstructing area A 1 and a first displaying area A 2 , or a second obstructing area B 1 and a second displaying area B 2 ; charging at least one section of the period, e.g. A 2 and B 2 , while discharging the other sections of the period, i.e. A 1 and B 1 , for enabling the charging of scan lines (i.e. enabling pixel displaying) and the discharging of scan lines (i.e. erasing pixel displaying) are performed with a designated number of scan lines apart, such that the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and image-sticking phenomena can be achieved. The result of adopting the method of FIG. 4 is shown in FIG. 5 , wherein a single pixel 12 of every field is divided into a displayed pixel 121 and an undisplayed pixel 122 so as to efficiently improve the image-sticking phenomenon.

Referring to FIG. 6 , a driving circuit of the present invention is shown. As seen in FIG. 6 , pixel capacitors 13 are applied for charging/discharging pixels. In this preferred embodiment, the left side and the right side of the plural pixel capacitors 13 are connected respectively to a first scan driver 14 and a second scan driver 15 , wherein these two scan drivers are applied to display pixel or erase pixel, and to maintain the pixel displaying of the screen or the pixel erasing of the screen to hold a difference of one-half or one-third of the screen, in addition, these two scan drivers are applied for controlling the signal output of horizontal scan lines. Moreover, a data driver 16 is mounted on the top of the plural pixel capacitors 13 so as to control the signal output of each pixel capacitor 13 . In this preferred embodiment, when an LCD is scanning, the charging and the discharging are performed at an interval of at least one-third through one-half of an image, or at any interval at will. As seen in FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B , the interval between black start 21 and charge start 22 is one-half the displaying screen. As a result, the image-sticking phenomenon is effectively improved.

According to the disclosure of FIG. 2 through FIG. 7B , it is understood that the present invention can divide a period of turning on scan lines of an image into at least two sections while charging at least one section of the period and discharging the other section of the period, that is, the charging of scan lines (i.e. enabling pixel displaying) and the discharging of scan lines (i.e. erasing pixel displaying) are performed with a designated number of scan lines apart, such that the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and image-sticking phenomena can be achieved. In addition, when an LCD is scanning, the charging and the discharging are performed at an interval of at least one-third through one-half of an image, so that the purpose of preventing the liquid crystal display from generating display delay and image-sticking phenomena can be achieved.

In summary that this invention has been disclosed and illustrated with reference to particular embodiments, the principles involved are susceptible for use in numerous other embodiments that will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Consequently, the present invention has been examined to be progressive and has great potential in commercial applications.

While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been set forth for the purpose of disclosure, modifications of the disclosed embodiment of the invention as well as other embodiments thereof may occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to cover all embodiments which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

2 · 2 independent · depth 1
12
2 granted claims

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G09G3/36
USPC · US Patent Classification
345/87345/204

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examinationResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.2 y
1,539 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Bipin Shalwala
art unit 2629 · TC 2600
Citations: 1 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

1 priority documents
›Priority documents — 1
TypeDocumentDate
related publicationUS 20060055688 A116 Mar 2006

Worldwide family

4 members · 2 offices
US2TW2
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
4
DOCDB simple family 36033391
Offices
2
US
Granted
2 of 4
grant date present
›IP5 & PCT — 2 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USUS-2006055688-A1A116 Mar 20069 Mar 2005publishedMethod of resolving display delay
USthis patentUS-7538751-B2B226 May 20099 Mar 2005grantedMethod of resolving display delay
›Other offices — 2 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
TWTW-200609901-AA16 Mar 200610 Sep 2004publishedMethod of resolving display delay
TWTW-I323449-BB11 Apr 201010 Sep 2004grantedno title held

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock