USPatentGranted
B1

Differential line driver

Granted 25 Jun 2002 · 6 office actions

Assignee: Ericsson

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Jacob Wikner, Johan Erlands, Tan Nianxiong · Examiner: Terry D. Cunningham · AU 2816 · TC 2800

Application
9259342
filed 1 Mar 1999
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 6,411,136
granted 25 Jun 2002

Life of the patent

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A fully differential line driver, especially for twisted copper pairs. It includes two current amplifiers made in standard CMOS technique, each having an input and an output, the latter being connected via terminal resistors to a voltage source, which may be set to a larger voltage than that used for driving the CMOS amplifiers. Accordingly, a low output impedance can be combined with a large swing. Further, feedback is not necessary, avoiding problems like potential instability. A very low-impedance input makes it appropriate for connecting to a DAC, thus reducing distortion of its output signal. The driver is suitable for very-high-speed-digital-subscriber-line modems.

Description

6 parts
›This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§…

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119 and/or 365 to 9800635-6 filed in Sweden on Mar. 2, 1998; the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

›BACKGROUND

The invention regards a CMOS differential line driver, in particular for driving a line comprising a twisted copper pair, and having a differential input with two input terminals and a differential analog output with two output terminals, which are each provided with a termination resistor. It is intended primarily for use with twisted copper pairs or the like as used for high speed applications, such as high speed internet access.

A traditional type of a fully differential line driver is shown schematically in FIG. 1 . The twisted copper pair 1 is fed with power via a transformer 2 . In order to obtain impedance matching, the transformed impedance of the twisted copper pair must be matched by termination resistors R t .

A full description of an embodiment of this prior art is given in the article by Khorramabadi, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 27 No. 4, (1992) p. 539, which is hereby included by reference into the present disclosure. General problems with line drivers are exposed in Johns and Essig, Integrated Circuits for Data Transmission Over Twisted-Pair Channels, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 32 No. 3 (1997) p. 398.

This known architecture has several drawbacks. The line driver must have a low output impedance and high common-mode rejection, since very high voltage in the copper wire may be coupled back as common-mode signals via parasitic capacitance. The input-dependent variation in the output impedance of the line driver must also be very small in order to have low distortion. Therefore, effective feedbacks are needed in the line driver. Improper compensation in the line driver may result in low signal bandwidth and/or instability.

To deliver a high power to the line driver, a high supply voltage is usually needed.

A line driver of the envisaged type would usually be handling signals from a high speed digital-to-analog converter (DAC) for high speed internet access. It is normal for such high speed DACs to be arranged as current-output devices, meaning that the driving DAC would have a high output impedance. In order to minimize the distortion in the DAC, the input impedance of the line driver must be low.

It is an object of the invention to obtain a fully differential line driver, which obviates the above-mentioned difficulties. Another object is to obtain such a driver which can be made with a standard 5-V CMOS process. This would even enable its integrating with a driving DAC on a single chip. A further object is to obtain very low distortion at high bandwidth without stability problems.

›SUMMARY

Said objects and other objects and advantages are obtained, according to the invention, with a line driver of the kind mentioned, and which is provided such

(i) that the said input is a current input,

(ii) that the driver comprises two current amplifiers (A p , A n ), each forming a said input terminal (I inp , I inn ) and a said output terminal (I op , I on ) respectively, and provided for feeding with a drive voltage (V cc )

(iii) that said termination resistors (R t ) are connected with first ends to said output terminals (I op , I on ) and have second ends connectible to a drive voltage (V ddh ).

Typical for the inventive solution is that amplifying circuits are used, which are current amplifying, enabling the obtaining of a low input impedance and a high output impedance. For obtaining high common-mode rejection and impedance matching, termination resistors are arranged.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention shall now be described with reference to the figures, which are to be considered as non-limiting.

FIG. 1, already mentioned, shows a prior-art line driver.

FIG. 2 shows schematically the inventive solution.

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary embodiment schematically drawn, and applied for the use of a standard 5-V CMOS manufacturing process.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The general concept of the invention may be understood from FIG. 2. A line driver is provided with a pair of current inputs I inp , I inn . The line driver (inside the dashed rectangle) has a pair of current outputs, which are provided with termination resistors R t , connected to drive voltages V ddh and connected to a transformer winding, with another winding connected to a twisted copper pair. As is apparent, there is inside the dashed rectangle a set of two current amplifiers A p and A n .

In order to easily interface with a driving DAC, the line driver itself will have a very low input impedance. Unlike the traditional approach shown in FIG. 1, the proposed line driver has a very high output impedance. Having a low input impedance and a high output impedance, this line driver thus is a current-mode line driver. The termination resistors at the outputs of the line drivers will give high common-mode rejection and impedance matching.

The effective impedance must be equal to the transformed line impedance Z t for impedance matching. If we assume that the output impedance of the line driver is very large, we have the value of the termination resistor R t given by

R t =2× Z T =2× Z I /n 2   (1)

where Z T is the transformed line impedance, Z I is the line impedance, and n is the turns ratio of the transformer.

Since the DAC usually uses offset binary codes, the outputs of the DAC, i.e. the input currents to the line driver, can be represented as

I inp =I os +i ac /2  (2)

I inn =I os −i ac /2  (3)

where I os is constant and i ac is the analog representation of the digital input signal of the DAC. Suppose that the line driver has a gain of A for both positive and negative branches, we have the output currents given by

I op =A× ( I os +i ac /2)  (4)

I on =A× ( I os −i ac /2)  (5)

Suppose the output impedance of the line driver is very large, then the ac current flowing into the transformer is given by

i T =K×A'i ac   (6)

where the constant K is determined by the transformed line impedance Z T and the termination resistance R t , given by

K=R t /(2 R t +Z T )  (7)

Notice that the constant current I os disappears in equation (6). As a matter of fact, any common-mode signals have no influence on the current flowing into the transformer and equation (7) holds independent of any common-mode signals.

In order to obtain unpedance matching, equation (1) must be satisfied. Therefore, we have

K=R t /(2 R t +Z T )=2 Z T /(4 Z T +Z T )=0.4  (8)

The power delivered to the line is equal to the power delivered to the transformer and is given by

P 1 =P t =i T 2 ×Z T =K 2 ×A 2 ×i ac 2 ×Z 1 /n 2 ==0.16 ×A 2 ×i ac 2 ×Z 1 /n 2   (9)

This makes it clear that the line driver can be realized by using current amplifiers terminated by resistors. Several advantages are won with such a solution.

Current amplifiers have inherently high bandwidth due to low internal impedance, and therefore this approach is suitable for high speed application. Further, no global feedback is necessary in the current amplifiers, and the line driver may thus be unconditionally stable in the global sense. Another great advantage with the It architecture shown in FIG. 2 is that the supply voltage for the termination resistors can be much higher than the supply voltage for the line driver, in order to accommodate voltage swing at the output. As long as the output voltage swing of the driver is not very large, such that all the transistors within the line driver do not break out, the line driver can be integrated with the DAC in a component made in a standard CMOS process.

It may be noted that the use of an extra supply voltage for the termination resistors is advantageous in that large common-mode signals are directed to this extra supply voltage without disturbing the supply voltages for the DAC and current amplifiers.

A disadvantage would be the power efficiency, since some power is wasted on the termination resistors due to the matching requirement.

In the above discussion, it has been assumed that the output impedance of the current amplifiers are infinite. If the output impedance of the current amplifiers changes dependent on the input current, distortion results. In order to ensure low distortion, a very high output impedance is desirable for the current amplifiers. This can be ensured by proper design.

In FIG. 3 is shown an example for a current amplifier, forming one of the amplifiers A p within the dashed rectangle in FIG. 2 . As the amplifier A n may be rigorously similar, only the first-mentioned current amplifier is shown in FIG. 2, with inputs and outputs shown.

In order to have high signal bandwidth, it is preferable to use only NMOS transistors in the signal path. For obtaining a large gain A, it is preferable to use several stages in cascade in order to maintain the high bandwidth.

The current amplifier consists of two stages, The first stage comprises transistors M 1 , M 2 and M 3 , and the gain of this stage is determined by the dimension ratio of M 2 and M 1 . The second stage comprises transistors M 4 , M 5 , M 6 and M 7 , and the gain of this stage is determined by the dimension ratio of M 5 and M 4 .

All the PMOS transistors M 8 -M 18 are used as bias current sources and provided with proper bias/source voltages. The parallel/serial configuration of PMOS transistors e.g. M 10 -M 18 is an effect of using a standard CMOS process with appropriate maskwork, which is also the feature of arranging the dimension ratios of M 2 -M 1 and M 5 -M 4 respectively, something which is immediately understood by the man of the art knowledgeable in CMOS construction.

Since the output impedance of MOS transistors decreases when the current is increased, double cascodes are used for enabling large currents, as shown in FIG. 3 . The input impedance is very low, determined by the transconductance of the input device M 1 . The output impedance is very high, determined approximately by the product of the output impedance of transistor M 5 and the gains of transistors M 6 and M 7 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

It is seen in FIG. 3 that the only transistor that might be broken is M 7 . As long as its drain voltage is not so large that the gate-drain voltage or drain-source voltage is smaller than its respective break-down voltage, transistor M 7 is safe. The whole line driver may therefore be integrated in a standard CMOS process like the 5V CMOS process, and higher supply voltages can be used for the termination resistors.

As a numerical example, the twisted copper pair may have an impedance Z 1 , of 100 Ω, with the terminal resistances R t , at 50 Ω and n=2.

1 of 6 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims

7 · 1 independent · depth 3
1234567
7 granted claims

Classifications

13 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04L25/02
  • H05K3/00
  • H03F3/45
  • H04B/
  • H03B1/00
  • H04B3/02
  • H03F1/56
  • H01L27/00
  • H04L/
USPC · US Patent Classification
327/108327/110326/30326/83

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.3 y
1,212 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
4
no RCE
Examiner
Terry D. Cunningham
art unit 2816 · TC 2800
Citations: 18 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Worldwide family

22 members · 13 offices
US1EP2JP1KR2CN2WO2AU1CA2DE2ES1HK2SE3TW1
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
22
DOCDB simple family 20410357
Offices
13
US · EP · JP · KR · CN · WO
Granted
9 of 22
grant date present
Non-English titles
12
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 10 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USthis patentUS-6411136-B1B125 Jun 20021 Mar 1999grantedDifferential line driver
EPEP-1060574-A2A220 Dec 20002 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
EPEP-1060574-B1B17 Jun 20062 Mar 1999grantedDifferentieller leitungstreiberde
JPJP-2002506315-AA26 Feb 20022 Mar 1999published差動ラインドライバja
KRKR-20010041500-AA25 May 20012 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
KRKR-100626548-B1B122 Sep 20062 Mar 1999granted차동 라인 구동기ko
CNCN-1304585-AA18 Jul 20012 Mar 1999publishedDifferential line driver
CNCN-1186885-CC26 Jan 20052 Mar 1999grantedDifferential line driver
WOWO-9945656-A2A210 Sep 19992 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
WOWO-9945656-A3A314 Oct 19992 Mar 1999publishedEtage d'attaque de ligne differentielfr
›Other offices — 12 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
AUAU-2756199-AA20 Sep 19992 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
CACA-2321571-A1A110 Sep 19992 Mar 1999publishedEtage d'attaque de ligne differentielfr
CACA-2321571-CC7 Oct 20082 Mar 1999grantedEtage d'attaque de ligne differentielfr
DEDE-69931760-D1D120 Jul 20062 Mar 1999grantedDifferentieller leitungstreiberde
DEDE-69931760-T2T214 Jun 20072 Mar 1999grantedDifferentieller leitungstreiberde
ESES-2263268-T3T31 Dec 20062 Mar 1999grantedUn excitador de linea diferencial.es
HKHK-1038655-A1A122 Mar 20022 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
HKHK-1038655-BB16 Sep 20052 Mar 1999publishedA differential line driver
SESE-9800635-D0D02 Mar 19982 Mar 1998publishedA differential line driversv
SESE-9800635-LL3 Sep 19992 Mar 1998publishedDifferentiell linjedrivenhetsv
SESE-511827-C2C26 Dec 19992 Mar 1998publishedDifferentiell linjedrivenhetsv
TWTW-494566-BB11 Jul 200210 Mar 1998grantedA differential line driver

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock