Method and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over
Granted 31 Oct 2000 · no office action yet
Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Bernhard Mattes, Michael Henne, Walter Seyfang · Examiner: Jacques H. Louis-Jacques · AU 361 · TC 3600
Life of the patent
4 dated eventsAbstract
In order to allow a vehicle rollover to be detected in timely fashion and with high reliability, acceleration sensors are provided which measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the direction of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis. In addition, at least one rotation rate sensor is provided which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle with respect to its roll axis and optionally also with respect to its pitch axis.
Description
5 parts›FIELD OF THE INVENTION
If a vehicle rollover occurs, all the occupant protection mechanisms installed in the vehicle must be activated in timely fashion; these include, for example, rollover bars, belt tensioners, front and side airbags, fold-down seat locks in a commercial vehicle, etc. In order for all these safety devices to be activated in timely fashion, it is necessary to detect, as early as possible, whether vehicle accelerations in the direction of its vertical axis (yaw axis), longitudinal axis (roll axis), and transverse axis (pitch axis) will lead to a rollover. To ensure also that the occupant protection mechanisms are in fact activated only in the event of a rollover, incorrect detections of rollovers should be excluded to the greatest extent possible.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
German Patent No. 36 04 216 describes discloses a rollover sensor consisting of a fluid-filled space in which a body, suspended in the manner of a pendulum, is located as a seismic mass. By means of an electrical analysis circuit, changes in the position of the pendulum, which can deflect in any direction, yield information as to whether or not the vehicle is rolling over. This rollover sensor based on the pendulum principle has the disadvantage that it reacts too slowly to vehicle movements, so that a rollover might possibly be signaled too late to activate the occupant protection mechanisms.
European Patent No. 430 813 describes a safety system for a vehicle which extends a rollover bar in the event of a vehicle rollover. In order to be able to sense a rollover event, the system possesses acceleration sensors to measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis, and it has at least one rotation rate sensor which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle (FZ) with respect to its roll axis.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an arrangement for detecting a vehicle rollover, with which a rollover can be detected in timely fashion and with high reliability.
An arrangement for detecting a vehicle rollover comprises multiple acceleration sensors which measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its yaw axis; and at least one rotation rate sensor which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle with respect to its roll axis and optionally also with respect to its pitch axis.
Also provided are means which calculate an acceleration vector from the three measured acceleration values and, if the angular offset of the acceleration vector from the acceleration vector of gravity when the vehicle is in the rest position exceeds a definable limit value, signal a rollover, such that the means define a limit value which is lower, the greater the angular velocity measured by the rotation rate sensor.
The following process steps are performed in order to detect a vehicle rollover: The accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis are measured with the acceleration sensors. An acceleration vector is then calculated from the three measured acceleration values. If the angular offset of the acceleration vector from the acceleration vector when the vehicle is in the rest position exceeds a definable limit value, a rollover is signaled. The limit value defined for the angular offset of the acceleration sensor is lower, the greater the angular velocity, with respect to the roll axis and optionally also with respect to the pitch axis, measured by at least one rotation rate sensor.
If no readings from the acceleration sensors are available, the angular velocity measured by the rotation rate sensor can be used as the sole criterion for detecting a rollover.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 1 of 2
FIG. 1 shows a schematic depiction of a vehicle, with its three axes and acceleration sensors and rotation rate sensors.
FIG. 2 shows a projection cone for the acceleration vector.
FIG. 3 shows a flow chart for a method according to the present invention.
FIG. 1 schematically depicts a vehicle FZ and an orthogonal axis system pertaining thereto, having a yaw axis z, a roll axis x, and a pitch axis y. Three acceleration sensors are installed in vehicle FZ. First acceleration sensor Bz measures the acceleration of the vehicle in the direction of yaw axis z, second acceleration sensor Bx measures acceleration in the direction of roll axis x, and third acceleration sensor By measures acceleration in the direction of pitch axis y. In order to be able to measure all three acceleration components, it is not absolutely necessary to provide three separate acceleration sensors. If all three acceleration components can be measured by a suitable arrangement of fewer than three acceleration sensors, the use of other acceleration sensor systems is also possible. At least one rotation rate sensor DRSx, which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle about roll axis X, is also installed in the vehicle. In addition, a second rotation rate sensor DRSy, which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle about pitch axis y, can also be provided. Since vehicle rollovers generally take place about roll axis x, second rotation rate sensor DRSy can optionally be omitted.
FIG. 3 depicts a process sequence according to which, from the readings of acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By and the at least one rotation rate sensor DRSx, information is derived as to whether or not a vehicle rollover is occurring. In step 1, the acceleration of the vehicle in the x, y, and z directions is measured by means of acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By. From these acceleration components, in step 2 a resultant acceleration vector B1 is calculated which has a specific direction and specific length.
FIG. 2 depicts a three-axis (x, y, z) projection diagram in which the calculated resultant acceleration vector B1 is plotted. Acceleration vector B0 lying in the z axis is the acceleration of gravity that is measured with acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, and By when the vehicle itself is exhibiting no inertial accelerations, i.e. is at a standstill or is moving uniformly. If the vehicle then experiences an inertial acceleration, acceleration vector B0 is pivoted (e.g. B1) out of its rest position (B0). A cone with enveloping surface M drawn in FIG. 2, whose vertex lies at the center of the coordinate system and whose rotation axis is the z axis, delimits the region for deflection of the acceleration vector in which the vehicle is in a stable position. A vehicle rollover may be expected only if acceleration vector B1, as sketched in FIG. 2, pivots beyond enveloping surface M of the cone.
In addition to the acceleration components, the angular velocity W of the vehicle about an axis (preferably roll axis x) is also measured by at least one rotation rate sensor (step 3). If it is found in step 4 that the magnitude of the resultant acceleration vector |B1|>G (G being in the range from 0 to, for example, 0.05 times the acceleration of gravity g), in the next step 5 an opening angle Δ for a projection cone plotted in FIG. 2 is derived from the measured angular acceleration W. The projection cone constitutes an auxiliary means for deriving rollover information. Its rotation axis is also the z axis, its vertex also lies at the center of the coordinate system, and its enveloping surface is oriented orthogonally with respect to enveloping surface M of the cone which delimits the stable range of the vehicle.
The greater the angular velocity W measured in step 3, the smaller the opening angle of the cone with enveloping surface M that delimits the stable range of the vehicle must be, and the greater the opening angle Δ of the projection cone must become. The reason is that at a high angular velocity W, a vehicle rollover may be expected even at a smaller deflection angle for acceleration vector B1. The correlation between angular velocity W and opening angle Δ of the projection cone must therefore be determined empirically.
In step 6, the projection of acceleration vector B1 onto the projection cone is calculated; specifically, the projections of acceleration vector B1 in several directions R1, R2, R3, R4 are calculated. In FIG. 2, only one projection B1' in direction R1 is depicted as an example. For calculating rollover information, only this projection B1', i.e. the component of acceleration vector B1 that is perpendicular to enveloping surface M of the cone delimiting the stable range of the vehicle, is authoritative. The component of acceleration vector B1 lying in enveloping surface M of the cone has no influence on vehicle rollover. In the remaining steps, only projection B1' of acceleration vector B1 will therefore be processed to yield the rollover information.
In step 7, projection B1 is delimited to a maximum value B1'max. This delimitation is performed because extremely high accelerations which exceed the value B1' max do not lead to a vehicle rollover. Such acceleration influences may occurs, for example, when driving over a curb or an abrupt discontinuity in the road surface. Without the aforesaid delimitation, the system would predict a rollover on the basis of the very high acceleration, even though a rollover is not in fact occurring.
In the next process step 8, the delimited projection B1' of acceleration vector B1 is integrated, yielding a velocity V1. In step 9, this velocity V1 is also delimited to a maximum value V1max, for the same reasons as with acceleration B1' in step 7. In step 10, velocity V1 is then integrated to yield a distance S1. In step 11, this distance S1, like velocity V1 and acceleration B1' previously, is also delimited to a maximum value S1max. In addition, distance Si is delimited to a minimum valve S1min (e.g. zero). If distance S1 exceeds an empirically determined length Sn1 (step 12), a rollover is signaled (step 13). If, however, distance S1 remains below length Sn1, the entire procedure described above is executed again.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 2 of 2
As already mentioned, the projections of acceleration vector B1 in multiple directions R1, R2, R3, R4 are considered, and a distance is derived from all of them. As soon as only one of said determined distances exceeds a limit value Sni (where i=1, 2, 3, . . . ), a rollover is signaled, resulting in activation of the safety mechanisms.
If the vehicle lifts off and loses contact with the ground, and if a rollover should thereby occur, acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By would nevertheless measure only very small accelerations. In this case, following step 4, a query would be made in step 14 as to whether the measured angular velocity W is greater than a defined and empirically determined threshold WS. If such is actually the case, it is then assumed that a vehicle rollover is occurring. A rollover is thus signaled (step 13). If, on the other hand, the measured angular velocity W remains below threshold WS, the procedure begins afresh.
Claims
8 · 2 independent · depth 3Classifications
8 codes- B60R21/00
- B60R21/01
- B60K28/14
- B60R21/0132
- B60R21/13
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
Chain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlockTerm & fees
See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.
Log in to unlockWorldwide family
9 members · 6 offices›IP5 & PCT — 7 members
| Office | Publication | Kind | Published | Filed | Status | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USthis patent | US-6141604-A | A | 31 Oct 2000 | 10 Oct 1996 | granted | Method and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over |
| EP | EP-0883522-A1 | A1 | 16 Dec 1998 | 10 Oct 1996 | published | Method and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over |
| EP | EP-0883522-B1 | B1 | 19 Jan 2000 | 10 Oct 1996 | granted | Verfahren und anordnung zum erkennen eines fahrzeug-überschlagsde |
| JP | JP-2000510407-A | A | 15 Aug 2000 | 10 Oct 1996 | published | 車両の転倒を検出する方法および装置ja |
| KR | KR-19990071703-A | A | 27 Sep 1999 | 10 Oct 1996 | published | 자동차의 전복을 검출하기 위한 방법 및 장치ko |
| KR | KR-100441816-B1 | B1 | 2 Oct 2004 | 10 Oct 1996 | granted | 자동차의 전복을 검출하기 위한 방법 및 장치ko |
| WO | WO-9733774-A1 | A1 | 18 Sep 1997 | 10 Oct 1996 | published | Procede et dispositif pour detecter le capotage d'un vehiculefr |
›Other offices — 2 members
| Office | Publication | Kind | Published | Filed | Status | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE | DE-19609176-A1 | A1 | 18 Sep 1997 | 11 Mar 1996 | published | Verfahren und Anordnung zum Erkennen eines Fahrzeug-Überschlagsde |
| DE | DE-59604260-D1 | D1 | 24 Feb 2000 | 10 Oct 1996 | granted | Verfahren und anordnung zum erkennen eines fahrzeug-überschlagsde |
Validity challenges
See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.
Log in to unlockCitations
See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.
Log in to unlock