USPatentGranted
A

Method and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over

Granted 31 Oct 2000 · no office action yet

Application
142615
filed 10 Oct 1996
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 6,141,604
granted 31 Oct 2000

Life of the patent

4 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom19961998200020022004200620082010201220142016ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In order to allow a vehicle rollover to be detected in timely fashion and with high reliability, acceleration sensors are provided which measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the direction of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis. In addition, at least one rotation rate sensor is provided which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle with respect to its roll axis and optionally also with respect to its pitch axis.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

If a vehicle rollover occurs, all the occupant protection mechanisms installed in the vehicle must be activated in timely fashion; these include, for example, rollover bars, belt tensioners, front and side airbags, fold-down seat locks in a commercial vehicle, etc. In order for all these safety devices to be activated in timely fashion, it is necessary to detect, as early as possible, whether vehicle accelerations in the direction of its vertical axis (yaw axis), longitudinal axis (roll axis), and transverse axis (pitch axis) will lead to a rollover. To ensure also that the occupant protection mechanisms are in fact activated only in the event of a rollover, incorrect detections of rollovers should be excluded to the greatest extent possible.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

German Patent No. 36 04 216 describes discloses a rollover sensor consisting of a fluid-filled space in which a body, suspended in the manner of a pendulum, is located as a seismic mass. By means of an electrical analysis circuit, changes in the position of the pendulum, which can deflect in any direction, yield information as to whether or not the vehicle is rolling over. This rollover sensor based on the pendulum principle has the disadvantage that it reacts too slowly to vehicle movements, so that a rollover might possibly be signaled too late to activate the occupant protection mechanisms.

European Patent No. 430 813 describes a safety system for a vehicle which extends a rollover bar in the event of a vehicle rollover. In order to be able to sense a rollover event, the system possesses acceleration sensors to measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis, and it has at least one rotation rate sensor which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle (FZ) with respect to its roll axis.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an arrangement for detecting a vehicle rollover, with which a rollover can be detected in timely fashion and with high reliability.

An arrangement for detecting a vehicle rollover comprises multiple acceleration sensors which measure the accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its yaw axis; and at least one rotation rate sensor which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle with respect to its roll axis and optionally also with respect to its pitch axis.

Also provided are means which calculate an acceleration vector from the three measured acceleration values and, if the angular offset of the acceleration vector from the acceleration vector of gravity when the vehicle is in the rest position exceeds a definable limit value, signal a rollover, such that the means define a limit value which is lower, the greater the angular velocity measured by the rotation rate sensor.

The following process steps are performed in order to detect a vehicle rollover: The accelerations of the vehicle in the directions of its yaw axis, its roll axis, and its pitch axis are measured with the acceleration sensors. An acceleration vector is then calculated from the three measured acceleration values. If the angular offset of the acceleration vector from the acceleration vector when the vehicle is in the rest position exceeds a definable limit value, a rollover is signaled. The limit value defined for the angular offset of the acceleration sensor is lower, the greater the angular velocity, with respect to the roll axis and optionally also with respect to the pitch axis, measured by at least one rotation rate sensor.

If no readings from the acceleration sensors are available, the angular velocity measured by the rotation rate sensor can be used as the sole criterion for detecting a rollover.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 1 of 2

FIG. 1 shows a schematic depiction of a vehicle, with its three axes and acceleration sensors and rotation rate sensors.

FIG. 2 shows a projection cone for the acceleration vector.

FIG. 3 shows a flow chart for a method according to the present invention.

FIG. 1 schematically depicts a vehicle FZ and an orthogonal axis system pertaining thereto, having a yaw axis z, a roll axis x, and a pitch axis y. Three acceleration sensors are installed in vehicle FZ. First acceleration sensor Bz measures the acceleration of the vehicle in the direction of yaw axis z, second acceleration sensor Bx measures acceleration in the direction of roll axis x, and third acceleration sensor By measures acceleration in the direction of pitch axis y. In order to be able to measure all three acceleration components, it is not absolutely necessary to provide three separate acceleration sensors. If all three acceleration components can be measured by a suitable arrangement of fewer than three acceleration sensors, the use of other acceleration sensor systems is also possible. At least one rotation rate sensor DRSx, which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle about roll axis X, is also installed in the vehicle. In addition, a second rotation rate sensor DRSy, which measures the angular velocity of the vehicle about pitch axis y, can also be provided. Since vehicle rollovers generally take place about roll axis x, second rotation rate sensor DRSy can optionally be omitted.

FIG. 3 depicts a process sequence according to which, from the readings of acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By and the at least one rotation rate sensor DRSx, information is derived as to whether or not a vehicle rollover is occurring. In step 1, the acceleration of the vehicle in the x, y, and z directions is measured by means of acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By. From these acceleration components, in step 2 a resultant acceleration vector B1 is calculated which has a specific direction and specific length.

FIG. 2 depicts a three-axis (x, y, z) projection diagram in which the calculated resultant acceleration vector B1 is plotted. Acceleration vector B0 lying in the z axis is the acceleration of gravity that is measured with acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, and By when the vehicle itself is exhibiting no inertial accelerations, i.e. is at a standstill or is moving uniformly. If the vehicle then experiences an inertial acceleration, acceleration vector B0 is pivoted (e.g. B1) out of its rest position (B0). A cone with enveloping surface M drawn in FIG. 2, whose vertex lies at the center of the coordinate system and whose rotation axis is the z axis, delimits the region for deflection of the acceleration vector in which the vehicle is in a stable position. A vehicle rollover may be expected only if acceleration vector B1, as sketched in FIG. 2, pivots beyond enveloping surface M of the cone.

In addition to the acceleration components, the angular velocity W of the vehicle about an axis (preferably roll axis x) is also measured by at least one rotation rate sensor (step 3). If it is found in step 4 that the magnitude of the resultant acceleration vector |B1|>G (G being in the range from 0 to, for example, 0.05 times the acceleration of gravity g), in the next step 5 an opening angle Δ for a projection cone plotted in FIG. 2 is derived from the measured angular acceleration W. The projection cone constitutes an auxiliary means for deriving rollover information. Its rotation axis is also the z axis, its vertex also lies at the center of the coordinate system, and its enveloping surface is oriented orthogonally with respect to enveloping surface M of the cone which delimits the stable range of the vehicle.

The greater the angular velocity W measured in step 3, the smaller the opening angle of the cone with enveloping surface M that delimits the stable range of the vehicle must be, and the greater the opening angle Δ of the projection cone must become. The reason is that at a high angular velocity W, a vehicle rollover may be expected even at a smaller deflection angle for acceleration vector B1. The correlation between angular velocity W and opening angle Δ of the projection cone must therefore be determined empirically.

In step 6, the projection of acceleration vector B1 onto the projection cone is calculated; specifically, the projections of acceleration vector B1 in several directions R1, R2, R3, R4 are calculated. In FIG. 2, only one projection B1' in direction R1 is depicted as an example. For calculating rollover information, only this projection B1', i.e. the component of acceleration vector B1 that is perpendicular to enveloping surface M of the cone delimiting the stable range of the vehicle, is authoritative. The component of acceleration vector B1 lying in enveloping surface M of the cone has no influence on vehicle rollover. In the remaining steps, only projection B1' of acceleration vector B1 will therefore be processed to yield the rollover information.

In step 7, projection B1 is delimited to a maximum value B1'max. This delimitation is performed because extremely high accelerations which exceed the value B1' max do not lead to a vehicle rollover. Such acceleration influences may occurs, for example, when driving over a curb or an abrupt discontinuity in the road surface. Without the aforesaid delimitation, the system would predict a rollover on the basis of the very high acceleration, even though a rollover is not in fact occurring.

In the next process step 8, the delimited projection B1' of acceleration vector B1 is integrated, yielding a velocity V1. In step 9, this velocity V1 is also delimited to a maximum value V1max, for the same reasons as with acceleration B1' in step 7. In step 10, velocity V1 is then integrated to yield a distance S1. In step 11, this distance S1, like velocity V1 and acceleration B1' previously, is also delimited to a maximum value S1max. In addition, distance Si is delimited to a minimum valve S1min (e.g. zero). If distance S1 exceeds an empirically determined length Sn1 (step 12), a rollover is signaled (step 13). If, however, distance S1 remains below length Sn1, the entire procedure described above is executed again.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 2 of 2

As already mentioned, the projections of acceleration vector B1 in multiple directions R1, R2, R3, R4 are considered, and a distance is derived from all of them. As soon as only one of said determined distances exceeds a limit value Sni (where i=1, 2, 3, . . . ), a rollover is signaled, resulting in activation of the safety mechanisms.

If the vehicle lifts off and loses contact with the ground, and if a rollover should thereby occur, acceleration sensors Bz, Bx, By would nevertheless measure only very small accelerations. In this case, following step 4, a query would be made in step 14 as to whether the measured angular velocity W is greater than a defined and empirically determined threshold WS. If such is actually the case, it is then assumed that a vehicle rollover is occurring. A rollover is thus signaled (step 13). If, on the other hand, the measured angular velocity W remains below threshold WS, the procedure begins afresh.

Claims

8 · 2 independent · depth 3
12345678
8 granted claims

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B60R21/00
  • B60R21/01
  • B60K28/14
  • B60R21/0132
  • B60R21/13
USPC · US Patent Classification
701/1701/36701/38

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
4.1 y
1,482 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Jacques H. Louis-Jacques
art unit 361 · TC 3600
Citations: 11 back · 82 forward

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200020022004200620082010201220142016Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Worldwide family

9 members · 6 offices
US1EP2JP1KR2WO1DE2
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
9
DOCDB simple family 7787725
Offices
6
US · EP · JP · KR · WO
Granted
4 of 9
grant date present
Non-English titles
7
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 7 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USthis patentUS-6141604-AA31 Oct 200010 Oct 1996grantedMethod and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over
EPEP-0883522-A1A116 Dec 199810 Oct 1996publishedMethod and arrangement for detecting a vehicle roll-over
EPEP-0883522-B1B119 Jan 200010 Oct 1996grantedVerfahren und anordnung zum erkennen eines fahrzeug-überschlagsde
JPJP-2000510407-AA15 Aug 200010 Oct 1996published車両の転倒を検出する方法および装置ja
KRKR-19990071703-AA27 Sep 199910 Oct 1996published자동차의 전복을 검출하기 위한 방법 및 장치ko
KRKR-100441816-B1B12 Oct 200410 Oct 1996granted자동차의 전복을 검출하기 위한 방법 및 장치ko
WOWO-9733774-A1A118 Sep 199710 Oct 1996publishedProcede et dispositif pour detecter le capotage d'un vehiculefr
›Other offices — 2 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
DEDE-19609176-A1A118 Sep 199711 Mar 1996publishedVerfahren und Anordnung zum Erkennen eines Fahrzeug-Überschlagsde
DEDE-59604260-D1D124 Feb 200010 Oct 1996grantedVerfahren und anordnung zum erkennen eines fahrzeug-überschlagsde

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock