USPatentGranted
A

Rubber compositions containing zinc hexasulfide complexes

Granted 5 Sep 2000 · no office action yet

Application
134978
filed 17 Aug 1998
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 6,114,469
granted 5 Sep 2000

Life of the patent

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom19982000200220042006200820102012201420162018ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Rubber compositions which contain a complex of zinc hexasulfide with an amine, together with a vulcanization accelerator exhibit favorable vulcanization behavior, and their vulcanizates show improved properties.

Description

9 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to vulcanizable rubber compositions which combine vulcanizable rubber with effective amounts of a complex of zinc hexasulfide and an amine and of co-agent which comprises one or more vulcanization accelerators.

2. Related Art

Complexes of zinc hexasulfide with an amine are described in a publication, "Direct Approaches to Zinc Polychalcogenide Chemistry: ZnS 6 (N-MeIm) 2 and ZnSe 4 (N-MeIm) 2 " by Dev, Ramli, Rauchfuss and Stern, JACS 112, 6385 (1990). The article describes the preparation and properties of the complexes, and suggests that they are "relevant to the action of zinc catalysts for the addition of polysulfur radicals to polyolefins in the vulcanization process."

Experiments in which these complexes were used as accelerators in standard rubber formulations were unsuccessful; instead, the effect of the complexes was to produce extremely slow cure (vulcanization) times, and the complexes produced the same effect as if elemental sulfur had been added. Thus, the expected "zinc catalyst" effect was not achieved and the vulcanizates required impractically long cure times.

Further experiments showed, surprisingly, that the inclusion of a co-agent, in effective amounts, gave compositions which vulcanized much faster, more quickly even than conventional formulations. Specifically, the additional presence of a vulcanization accelerator in an amount of from 0.1 to 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of vulcanizable rubber, proved to be effective in producing vulcanizates with fast cure rates and superior physical properties.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to vulcanizable rubber compositions, which compositions comprise 100 parts by weight of vulcanizable rubber, from 0.01 to 10 parts, preferably 0.1 to 5.0, by weight of a complex of zinc hexasulfide and an amine of from 3 to 24 carbon atoms, and as a co-agent, from 0.1 to 10, preferably 0.5 to 5, parts by weight of an accelerator of rubber vulcanization.

Rubber accelerators that can be used as co-agents include 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) and benzothiazolyl disulfide (MBTS); sulfenamide accelerators, such as N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide (CBS), N-t-butyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide (TBBS), 2-(4-morpholinothio)benzothiazole and N,N-dicyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide; sulfenimides, such as N-t-butyl-N,N-di-(2-benzothiazolyl)sulfenimide, and guanidines, such as diphenylguanidine (DPG) and di-o-tolylguanidine (DOTG). Preferred are the sulfenamides. When MBT or MBTS are used, it is preferred to include an amine compound as well, such as, for instance a guanidine, urea or an amine antidegradant. These conventional rubber accelerators are present in the amount of from 0.1 to 10 parts by weight, preferably 1.0 to 5.0 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of vulcanizable rubber. Other, less conventional accelerators can be used, as well, such as those in which the benzothiazyl radical is replaced with other heterocycles, including triazinyl, pyridyl, pyrimidyl, pyrazyl, pyridazyl, quinolyl, lepidyl and the like. They are used in the same amounts as the conventional accelerators.

Complexes of zinc hexasulfide and an amine that are effective in the compositions of the invention include zinc hexasulfide which has been complexed with an amine of from 3 to 24 carbon atoms. Preferred amines include tertiary amines and di-tertiary amines. Among these preferred amines are N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine, 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine, 1-butylimidazole, 1,2-dipiperidinoethane, 1,2-dimorpholinoethane, 1,2-di-(N-methylpiperazino)ethane, N-methylimidazole, 1-benzyl-2-methylimidazole, 1,2-dimethylimidazole, N-butylimidazole, N-3-aminopropylimidazole, N-vinylimidazole, N-cyclohexyl-N',N',N",N"-tetramethylguanidine, and 4-dimethylaminopyridine.

Vulcanizable rubbers that can be used in the compositions of the invention include natural rubber, synthetic polyisoprene, polybutadiene, copolymers of butadiene with styrene (SBR) or acrylonitrile (NBR), butyl rubber, halobutyl rubber, halogenated copolymers of isobutylene with p-methyl styrene, ethylene-propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM), polychloroprene, and blends of two or more of them.

Other conventional rubber compounding materials can be included as well, such as zinc oxide, stearic acid, antidegradants, fillers, reinforcers (such as carbon black and silica), softeners, retarders, oils, pre-vulcanization inhibitors, post-vulcanization stabilizers and the like, all of which are well known to those skilled in the art. The various ingredients are mixed with conventional rubber mixing equipment such as rubber mills and internal mixers such as Banbury mixers and mixing extruders.

The compositions of the invention can be formed into articles and vulcanized, usually in a mold under pressure, to produce tires, hose, belts and the like.

The rubber portion of the compositions of the invention may also be in the form of a latex, in which case, the other ingredients are added in the form of dispersions or emulsions. These compositions can be processed to produce film, thread or foam, and vulcanized with steam, hot water or hot air.

Evaluation of the compositions of the invention is performed on samples which have been vulcanized for sufficient time at vulcanizing temperatures, using test methods well known in the art.

The zinc hexasulfide amine complexes of the invention can be made (as shown in JACS 112, 6385) by reacting zinc powder, sulfur and a molar excess of the appropriate amine at an elevated temperature; then cooling the reaction product to room temperature and diluting with ethanol. The product appears, on cooling, as a yellow powder which is recovered by filtration. While the zinc hexasulfide amine complexes can be made by this general process, it is often easier to produce one complex from another by amine substitution, whereby the desired amine is reacted with a completed complex, displacing the amine from the complex and substituting the desired amine thereon.

The vulcanizable rubbers and the conventional vulcanization accelerators are all commercially available. Preparation of sulfenimides based on other heterocycles can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,079,305. Sulfenamides based on these heterocycles are described, along with their preparation, in European publications 643,702; 643,703 and 644,881.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To demonstrate the use of the compositions of the invention, a number of rubber compositions were prepared and tested. The behavior of the compositions during vulcanization were observed, and the properties of their vulcanizates were measured in accordance with standard ASTM procedures for rubber.

Parameters which characterize vulcanization were taken from ODR (oscillating disc rheometer) cure curves ("rheographs"), which were obtained for vulcanization at 150° C. and/or 160° C. The parameters Rmin and Rmax are the minimum rheometer torque (before the onset of vulcanization) and the maximum rheometer torque (due to vulcanization), respectively. The parameter t2 is the time required for an increase (over Rmin) in rheometer torque of 2.2 dNm joule (2.0 in-lb); t25 is the time required for the occurrence of 25 percent of the increase in torque due to vulcanization (time at which torque equals (Rmax-Rmin) 0.25+Rmin); t90 is the time required for the occurrence of 90% of the increase in torque due to vulcanization (time at which torque equals (Rmax-Rmin) 0.9+Rmin).

The invention will be better understood by reference to the following examples in which all parts are parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of rubber (phr) and all temperatures are in degrees Celsius, unless otherwise specified.

›Examples6
›EXAMPLE 1

In order to demonstrate the advantage of the instant invention as it applies to compositions of natural rubber, the zinc hexasulfide complexes and co-agents were incorporated into a formulation intended for use as a "skim stock" to be calendered onto steel cord for use in tires.

A master batch was first prepared by mixing the following ingredients in a Banbury mixer:

______________________________________

Ingredient Parts by Weight

______________________________________

Natural rubber, SMR-L

90.0

Polyisoprene, NATSYN ® 2200 10.0

Carbon black, N-326 68.0

Oil, Sundex 8125 4.0

Resin, Piccopale ® 100 SF 3.0

Zinc oxide 8.0

Stearic acid 1.5

Antiozonant 6PPD 1.5

Resin, Resimene ® S-72 2.0

CTP, SANTOGARD ® PVI 0.25

Total 188.25

______________________________________

As shown in Table 1, various other ingredients were added (on a mixing mill) and the resulting compositions were tested for scorch safety (Mooney Viscometer) and cure behaviour (Oscillating Disc Rheometer "ODR"). The vulcanizates were tested for a variety of physical properties, using standard ASTM test procedures. Results are set forth in Table II.

MOR is 2-(4-morpholinothio)benzothiazole. TBSI is N-t-butyl-N,N-di-(2-benzothiazolyl)sulfenimide. DCBS is N,N'-dicyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide. Complex A is zinc hexasulfide complexed with tetramethylethylenediamine. TMTD is tetramethylthiuram disulfide.

Stress-strain data were obtained on samples which were vulcanized, in each instance, for t90+5 minutes at 150° C. Die C tear tests were run according to ASTM D624-91, at 24° C. and at 100° C.

__________________________________________________________________________

Composition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

__________________________________________________________________________

Masterbatch 188.25--------------------------------------------------------

--------------->

MOR 0.8

0.8

0.8

-- -- -- -- -- --

TBSI -- -- -- 0.8 0.8 0.8 -- -- --

DCBS -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.8 0.8 0.8

INSOLUBLE SULFUR 4.5 4.1 4.1 4.5 4.1 4.1 4.5 4.1 4.1

COMPLEX A -- 0.3 -- -- 0.3 -- -- 0.3 --

TMTD -- -- 0.3 -- -- 0.3 -- -- 0.3

Mooney Scorch @ 121° C.

Min. Viscosity, Mμ 45.1 49.4 49.4 48.8 49.4 49.5 47.8 49.2 49.4

t5, Minutes 52.8 28.4 23.2 50.8

29.2 19.7 58.9 32.5 20.2

t35, Minutes 66.6 35.7 27.4 62.1 35.5 21.6 70.1 41.9 21.9

ODR @ 150° C.

Max. Torque, dNm 52.4 56.1 60.7 55.4 57.0 60.7 53.4 55.2 56.5

Min. Torque, dNm 7.3 7.9 7.7 7.8 8.0 7.8 8.0 8.0 7.8

t2, Minutes 5.6 4.1 3.0 5.0 4.1 2.9 6.3 4.3 2.9

t25 Minutes 10.9 7.0 4.0 10.0 6.9 3.7 11.6 8.5 3.7

t25-t2, Min. 5.3 2.9 1.0 5.0 2.8 0.8 5.3 4.2 0.8

t90, Minutes 25.4 20.3 5.5 21.3 17.7 5.3 31.2 30.4 5.6

t90-t2, Min. 19.8 16.2 2.5 16.3 13.6 2.4 24.9 26.1 2.7

% Reversion 0.0 0.0 is.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 13.4

__________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

Composition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

__________________________________________________________________________

Stress-Strain Data

Tensile, Mpa 27.1 26.6 24.4 27.6 26.8 25.0 27.2 26.6 24.8

100% Modulus, MPa 3.6 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 3.3 3.7 4.6

300% Modulus, MPa 16.0 17.2 19.9 17.3 17.0 19.8 15.6 16.2 18.2

% Elongation 497 460 376 473 474 390 501 491 407

Shore "A" Hardness 71 71 74 69 72 73 68 71 73

Die C Tear @ 24° C.

Peak Stress, N/mm 128.0 77.8 73.9 93.6 93.8 57.3 107.8 104.9 66.7

Die C Tear @ 100° C.

Peak Stress, N/mm 84.4 58.6 32.2

67.4 55.6 32.8 84.4 66.7 32.7

Harp Adhesion (Unaged)

Peak Stress, N 406 402 51 467 506 56 407 402 48

Harp Adhesion (Aged) -

95% Humidity, 10 days @ 85° C.

Peak Stress, N 216 368 42 361 382 38 478 487 110

Harp Adhesion (Aged) -

Salt (5% Nacl) 10 days @ 23° C.

Peak Stress, N 60 107 32 162 275 39 92 122 22

__________________________________________________________________________

The Mooney Viscometer data show that when used with each of the sulfenamide accelerators the zinc hexasulfide complex shortens scorch times, but not as much as does TMTD. The rheometer data show that both the zinc hexasulfide complex and TMTD were very effective in producing fast early cures, as measured by t25-t2. The TMTD compositions showed significant reversion, a loss of properties on further heating after maximum cure was attained.

The Die C tear data indicate that TMTD produced significantly lower tear-resistance, compared with the zinc hexasulfide complex, and this effect was more pronounced when the test was performed at an elevated temperature. Similarly, harp adhesion results showed very superior unaged and aged performance in the compositions containing the zinc hexasulfide complex, as compared with compositions containing TMTD.

In summary, the data indicate that the zinc hexasulfide complexes were able to provide substantial increases in the cure-rate of all three sulfenamide-accelerated compositions, while mitigating the negative effects seen with the TMTD compositions. This is in addition to eliminating the hazard of using secondary amine compounds, a potential source of nitrosamines.

›EXAMPLE 2

To evaluate the use of the compositions of the invention as sulfur-donors in EPDM rubber, a series of compositions was prepared, using the following masterbatch formulation:

______________________________________

Ingredient Parts by Weight

______________________________________

EPDM - Vistalon ® 5600

100

Carbon Black - N-550 100

Carbon Black - N-774 100

Oil-Sunpar ® 2280 110

Antioxidant- FLECTOL ® TMQ 2

Zinc oxide 5

Stearic Acid 2

Accelerator - MBTS 1.5

Total 420.5

______________________________________

The above materials were mixed in a Banbury mixer to produce a masterbatch, with the MBTS being added on a mill to complete the masterbatch. Various curatives were added to the masterbatch, and the curing behaviour of the resulting compositions was observed, as set forth in Table III.

__________________________________________________________________________

Composition

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

__________________________________________________________________________

EPDM Master

420.5------------------------------------------------------------

------------------>

Accelerator-CBS 1.5----------------------------------------------------

-------------------------->

DTDM -- 3.0

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Rhenocure S/G -- -- 4.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Complex B -- -- -- 2.1 -- -- -- -- -- --

Complex C -- -- -- -- 2.2 -- -- -- -- --

Complex D -- -- -- -- -- 3.0 -- -- -- --

Complex E -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.5 -- -- --

Complex F -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.5 -- --

Complex G -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 --

Complex H -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.4

Sulfur 0.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

ODR @ 160° C.

Max. Torque, dNm 26.0 27.8 24.6 33.3 26.8 25.8 28.3 27.6 21.3 20.9

Min. Torque, dNm 4.9 4.8 4.9 5.2

5.2 5.2 5.4 5.1 5.0 5.1

t2, Min. 5.0 8.5 6.6 2.5 2.1 2.5 1.8 2.6 3.1 2.3

t90, Min. 18.3 16.0 15.9 14.8 11.4 10.4 8.7 15.4 8.9 11.0

t90-t2, Min. 13.3 7.5 9.3 12.3 9.3 7.9 6.9 12.8 5.8 8.7

__________________________________________________________________________

Seven different complexes of zinc hexasulfide with an amine were tested, as follows:

______________________________________

Complex Amine

______________________________________

B N-Methylimidazole

C 1,2-Dimethylimidazole

D 1-Benzyl-2-methylimidazole

E N-Butylimidazole

F N-3-Aminopropylimidazole

G N-Vinylimidazole

H N-Allylimidazole

______________________________________

As controls, dithiodimorpholine (DTDM) and caprolactam disulfide, 80% on a polymeric carrier (Rhenocure® S/G), were compared as sulfur donors.

Physical test results are set forth in Table IV.

__________________________________________________________________________

Composition 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

__________________________________________________________________________

Stress-strain Data

Cured(t90 + 5 min) @ 160° C. 10.04 10.9 10.2 12.0 10.3 9.9 10.7

10.3 9.0 8.4

100% Modulus, MPa 3.9 4.0 3.6 4.9 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.8 3.2 2.9

300% Modulus, MPa 9.5 9.8 9.0 11.5 9.5 9.2 10.0 9.6 8.0 7.5

% Elongation 408 406 427 312 399 395 396 372 410 407

Shore "A" Hardness 73 74 71 75 72 73 72 73 70 71

Aged Stress-Strain

Hot Air, 70 hrs.@ 121° C.

Tensile, MPa 12.5 13.0 12.1 13.0 12.4 11.8 12.7 12.3 10.2 9.6

100% Modulus, MPa 5.9 6.2 5.8 7.8 5.8 5.7 6.2 6.0 4.7 4.2

200% Modulus, MPa 10.2 10.6 10.0 12.9 10.1 9.7 10.5 10.3 8.4 7.6

% Elongation 303 284 287 202

300 290 289 275 322 342

Shore "A" Hardness 75 75 75

74 77 72 76 76 73 74

Compression Set-22 hrs. @ 121° C.

Cured 2 × (t90 + 5 min.) @ 160° C.

% Set 52 58 56 54 56 57 67 52 58 63

__________________________________________________________________________

›EXAMPLE 3

In a similar manner, a master batch was prepared from butyl rubber, according to the following recipe:

______________________________________

Ingredient Parts by Weight

______________________________________

Butyl Rubber (268)

100

Carbon Black, N-660 60

Oil, Sundex ® 790 10

Zinc Oxide 5

Stearic Acid 1

Total 176

______________________________________

To this masterbatch were added 1.0 phr MBTS accelerator and 0.5 phr sulfur. Compositions were prepared containing 1.25 phr each of tellurium diethydithiocarbamate (TDEC), CBS, tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TETD), tetrabenzylthiuram disulfide (TB z TD) and Complex A. Rheometer (ODR) data showed that the composition containing Complex A exhibited the highest state of cure (as shown by maximum torque data) and the lowest percent reversion.

›EXAMPLE 4

The compositions of the invention were evaluated in a basic natural rubber formulation, compared with known accelerators in the presence of sulfur, and combined with these accelerators in the absence of sulfur, with the zinc hexasulfide/amine complexes functioning as sulfur donors.

The natural rubber formulation ("NR master") was mixed from the following ingredients:

______________________________________

Ingredient Parts by Weight

______________________________________

Natural Rubber - SMR-CV60

100.0

Carbon Black - N330 50.0

Oil - Flexon 580 5.0

Zinc Oxide 5.0

Stearic Acid 2.0

Total 162.0

______________________________________

Accelerators (CBS, MBS and TBSI) were compared, as well as Complex A, with and without sulfur, with proportions and test data as set forth in Table V.

Compositions 20, 21 and 22 are comparative examples, showing the use of sulfur and conventional accelerators. Compositions 23 and 27 are outside the scope of the invention because they contain the zinc hexasulfide-amine complex without a co-agent. Compositions 24, 25 and 26 are within the scope of the invention showing the use of the zinc hexasulfide-amine complex together with an accelerator co-agent, in the absence of sulfur.

The test data show that compositions 23 and 27 (outside the scope of the invention) vulcanize at a significantly slower rate and show significantly poorer stress-strain properties, compared with comparative compositions 20, 21 and 22 or the compositions the invention, 24, 25 and 26.

______________________________________

Composition

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

______________________________________

NR Master

162.0 →

→

→

→

→

→

→

Sulfur 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 -- -- -- --

CBS 1.5 -- -- -- 1.5 -- -- --

MOR -- 1.5 -- -- -- 1.5 -- --

TBSI -- -- 1.5 -- -- -- 1.5 --

Complex A -- -- -- 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Mooney Scorch

@ 121° C.

Min. Visc. 20.8 23.1 23.8 25.6 29.6 26.5 26.0 25.8

t5, Min. 42.2 69.2 64.7 10.4 3.7 4.9 6.1 10.2

t35, Min. 44.8 78.4 88.9 27.9 6.3 8.5 11.2 30.8

Rheometer @

150° C.

Max. Torque, 29.4 30.8 31.4 23.8 33.9 33.3 32.6 17.4

dNm

Min. Torque, 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.7

dNm

t2, Min. 7.0 9.8 8.9 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.5 3.4

t90, Min. 10.0 15.7 20.2 24.5 4.7 6.3 9.2 19.8

t90-t2, Min. 3.0 5.9 11.3 21.4 2.4 4.0 6.7 16.4

% Reversion 4.5 3.7 3.2 14.3 7.5 7.1 4.3 21.5

Stress-Strain

Cured (t90 +

5 min.) @

150° C.

Tensile, MPa 25.7 26.1 25.2 18.3 25.6 26.7 24.4 14.5

100% 2.2 2.4 2.3 1.8 2.6 2.6 2.3 1.2

Modulus, MPa

300% 11.3 12.4 11.8 9.0 12.8 12.4 11.6 6.4

Modulus, MPa

% Elongation 577 550 531 495 517 550 518 520

Shore A 57 57 56 52 58 58 57 46

Hardness

______________________________________

›EXAMPLE 5

To evaluate other amines as complexing agents for zinc hexasulfide, a series of compositions was prepared and tested. The following complexes were incorporated into the test compositions: ##STR1##

All of the compositions showed favorable vulcanization behavior.

›EXAMPLE 6

To demonstrate the effectiveness of the compositions of the invention when the rubber is in latex form, a complex of zinc hexasulfide and TMEDA was compared with DTDM in natural latex formulations without sulfur. Both compositions contained zinc oxide, an antioxidant, 0.5 phr of ZDBC and 1.5 phr of ZMBT. The zinc hexasulfide/TMEDA complex and the DTDM were each used at 2 phr.

After mixing, casting of a film and drying, the compositions were tested for vulcanization characteristics using a Moving Die Rheometer (Alpha Technologies) operating at 0.5° arc at temperatures of 100° and 140° C. In both instances, the compositions containing the zinc hexasulfide/TMEDA complex outperformed those containing DTDM, both in rate of cure and in state of cure (as measured by maximum rheometer torque).

Claims

14 · 1 independent · depth 4
1234567891011121314
14 granted claims

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C08K5/00
  • C08K3/30
USPC · US Patent Classification
525/343524/495524/492525/348524/571

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
2.1 y
750 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Tae Yoon
art unit 174 · TC 1700
Citations: 4 back · 11 forward

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom19982000200220042006200820102012201420162018Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Worldwide family

4 members · 4 offices
US1EP1WO1AU1
this patentIP5 & PCTother officessolid = grantedhover for detail · click to open
Members
4
DOCDB simple family 22465920
Offices
4
US · EP · WO
Granted
1 of 4
grant date present
Non-English titles
1
shown as filed, never translated
›IP5 & PCT — 3 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
USthis patentUS-6114469-AA5 Sep 200017 Aug 1998grantedRubber compositions containing zinc hexasulfide complexes
EPEP-1112309-A1A14 Jul 20019 Aug 1999publishedKautschukzusammensetzungen die zinkhexasulfid-komplexe enthaltende
WOWO-0009601-A1A124 Feb 20009 Aug 1999publishedRubber compositions containing zinc hexasulfide complexes
›Other offices — 1 members
OfficePublicationKindPublishedFiledStatusTitle
AUAU-5344099-AA6 Mar 20009 Aug 1999publishedRubber compositions containing zinc hexasulfide complexes

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock