USPatentGranted
A

Apparatus for singulating parts

Granted 27 Jul 1993 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. · originally Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Maureen Sugai · Examiner: Donald T. Hajec · AU 311 · TC 3100

Application
775391
filed 15 Oct 1991
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 5,230,432
granted 27 Jul 1993

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomOct 1991Jan 1992Apr 1992Jul 1992Oct 1992Jan 1993Apr 1993Jul 1993Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An apparatus (19) for singulating a series of packages (17). The apparatus (19) includes a vertical wheel (12), a retainer spring (10), a gravity feed track (14), a pass track (15), and a reject track (16). The vertical wheel (12) comprises a plurality of slots (22-29), and rotates in a clockwise direction to deliver the packages (17) to an electrical test fixture (18). Upon completion of testing, the vertical wheel (12) rotates in a clockwise direction and delivers the packages (17) to either the pass track (15) or the reject track (16). A motor driven eccentric (37) actuates the retainer spring (10) to unblock the appropriate slot (22-29), thereby releasing the packages (17) from the appropriate slot (22-29).

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates, in general, to an apparatus for singulating individual parts, and more particularly to an apparatus having a shutter assembly capable of singulating packaged integrated circuit parts.

In the semiconductor industry, packaged integrated circuits must pass a series of electrical tests, as well as visual inspections, in order to be released to the customer. Inherent in many test and inspection regimes is the separation of single units from a plurality of units, a step commonly referred to as singulation. Further, upon completion of the testing and inspection phases, units that have failed either phase must remain separated from those that pass. Those units that have failed are referred to as reject material and typically are discarded.

Semiconductor device manufacturers have employed several different types of equipment to accomplish the task of singulating units. Some of the more common means for singulating include a motor driven two wheel system, solenoid driven machinery, systems using reciprocating parts, and systems using gates and shutters. The two most important drawbacks for these types of systems are the increased cycle times introduced by these types of apparatus and the cost for maintaining these systems. In addition, machines requiring air cylinders or solenoids for singulating parts use up time without moving the parts. Sorting mechanisms using reciprocating parts that must move and return waste time on the return. Gates and shutters are slow because they must be activated by solenoids or other means.

A high-speed integrated circuit handler was disclosed by Frisbie et. al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,128,174 which addressed the issue of cycle time when testing and sorting integrated circuit parts. This U.S. patent is hereby incorporated herein by reference. In this patent a means for separating individual parts, having a sort wheel and a test wheel, was presented. This apparatus offered several advantages including the use of an electronic, rather than a mechanical, means for controlling the speed and positioning of both the sort and test wheels. Further, neither wheel has to return to a start position after completing an operation. Unfortunately, some drawbacks occur because of space limitations such that the sort wheel was rendered infeasible. Further, alignment between the sort and test wheels must be correct, and although the apparatus decreased cycle time significantly the alignment of sort wheel to test wheel does require time.

Accordingly, it would be beneficial to have an apparatus for separating and sorting individual parts in a fast and accurate manner while simultaneously minimizing the area required by the apparatus. Moreover, it would be beneficial to have an improved apparatus with less complex means for accomplishing the functions of separating and sorting. Finally, it would be advantageous for the system to be inexpensive to purchase as well as to maintain.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Briefly stated, the present invention is an apparatus for singulating a series of individual parts. The apparatus has a shutter assembly which cooperates with a gravity fed vertical wheel to release individual parts from slots disposed around a periphery of the vertical wheel. The shutter assembly has a retainer spring actuated by a motor driven eccentric wherein the retainer spring unblocks a slot in a first position, and when in a second position the retainer spring blocks the slot that was unblocked while in the first position. Further, the parts released by the shutter assembly are collected on a track.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side view of a singulating apparatus in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an isometric view of the vertical wheel, slots, retainer spring, and stop spring of the invention of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 is a top view of a pocket gating mechanism in accordance with the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 1 of 2

Typically, manufacturers test and inspect their product prior to release to customers. During this process good parts are sorted from those that fail the manufacturers test or inspection criteria. Parts that fail are considered reject, hence are not delivered to customers.

FIG. 1 shows a singulating apparatus 19 having a vertical wheel 12, a retainer spring 10, a gravity feed track 14, a pass track 15, and a reject track 16. Vertical wheel 12 is a low-mass test wheel 12 mounted on a drive shaft 13. Vertical wheel 12 has eight slots or pockets 22-29 located at 45° increments around a periphery. Slots 22-29 have been referred to as pockets 22-29. Vertical wheel 12 can be, for example, about 137.5 millimeters in diameter and 2.5 millimeters in thickness. It can be made of aluminum or other lightweight metal. Additionally, the mass of vertical wheel 12 can be further reduced by cutting away unnecessary material from the interior of vertical wheel 12. Slots 22-29 in vertical wheel 12 are lined with plastic inserts 32 to provide electrical isolation between vertical wheel 12 and articles 17 which ride in slots 22-29.

Articles or packages 17 are individual parts which are preferably integrated circuit packages, wherein these packages 17 can be any of the plastic or ceramic dual-in-line packages commonly used in the semiconductor industry. Further, packages 17 can have eight or more leads depending on the integrated circuit contained therein. Moreover, different circuits may require packages of different sizes, hence adjustable stops 33 are provided in slots 22-29 so that these slots 22-29 can be adjusted to have a depth just equal to the length of the packages. The adjustable stop 33 feature allows the same handling apparatus to accommodate different parts at different times.

Gravity feed track 14 is provided at an upper portion of vertical wheel 12 for delivering packages 17 to slots 22-29. An electrical test fixture 18 cooperates with vertical wheel 12 to test packages 17. A stop spring 11 cooperates with vertical wheel 12 to block slots 27, 28, and 29, thereby preventing packages 17B, 17C, and 17D from exiting vertical wheel 12 as wheel 12 rotates. In addition, stop spring 11 serves to align packages 17 for testing by electrical test fixture 18; and in particular the testing of part 17C shown in FIG. 1.

In FIG. 1 retainer spring 10 surrounds a portion of vertical wheel 12 spanning a circumference of vertical wheel 12 starting with slot 26 to an edge of slot 24. In a first position, retainer spring 10 blocks only slot 25; while in this first position retainer spring 10 leaves slot 26 unblocked. In a second position, retainer spring 10 blocks slots 25 and 26. Further, placing retainer spring 10 in the first position allows package 17E to exit slot 26 onto pass track 15. Placing retainer spring 10 in the second position allows packages 17 to exit onto reject track 16. Preferably retainer spring 10 is positioned in the first position as the typical position, since most packages 17 should pass both the visual and electrical criteria. In other words, slot 26 should be unblocked during most of the inspection or test period, with retainer spring 10 being moved to the second position when a package 17 must exit onto reject track 16.

An isometric drawing of vertical wheel 12 emphasizing retainer spring 10, stop spring 11, slots 22-29, and packages 17 is shown in FIG. 2. Retainer spring 10 overlaps stop spring 11, thereby allowing unimpeded movement of packages 17 as vertical wheel 12 rotates. Further, vertical wheel 12 rotates about a horizontal axis in a clockwise direction and in discrete partial revolutions to allow a series of packages 17 in continuous sequence to drop into slots 22-29. The horizontal axis is centered at drive shaft 13.

A notch 34 in retainer spring 10 serves to direct packages 17 to exit vertical wheel 12 at the location of slot 26 or at the location of slot 24 as shown in FIG. 2; wherein the package 17 exit location depends on the results of the inspection or tests. For example, if a package 17 passes both the visual inspection and the electrical test, retainer spring 10 is placed in a first position wherein notch 34 leaves slot 26 unblocked. If package 17 fails either the inspection or the test criteria, retainer spring 10 is moved in a direction of an arrow 40 shown in FIG. 2; thereby placing retainer spring 10 in the second position and blocking slot 26. Slot 25 remains covered whether retainer spring 10 is in either the first or the second positions. When retainer spring 10 is in the second position, package 17 exits slot 26 when slot 26 is at the position of slot 24 as shown in FIG. 2.

Preferably, retainer spring 10 and stop spring 11 are made from a resilient material such as blue spring-steel. The use of a resilient material for both retainer spring 10 and stop spring 11 decreases the probability of packages 17 becoming jammed in vertical wheel 12. Jamming occurs because of surface anomalies, such as burrs, on portions of packages 17 contacting either retainer spring 10 or stop spring 11.

FIG. 3 illustrates a top view of a preferred embodiment of a pocket gating mechanism 31. The embodiment of FIG. 3 shows an eccentric 37 driven by a motor (not shown). Eccentric 37 has a shaft 36 on its surface located between the center of the eccentric and a periphery of the eccentric. Further, motor driven eccentric 37 controls a bearing 38, mounted on shaft 36, which in turn modulates a slide 39. Bearing 38 has an aperture (not shown) which extends through a diameter of bearing 38, and through which shaft 36 is inserted. Moreover, bearing 38 fits inside an opening 35 in slide and pushes against the top or bottom of opening 35 thereby causing slide 39 to move up and down. It will be understood that bearing 38 fits inside opening 35 and that eccentric 37 is outside opening 35. Retainer spring 10, having notch 34, is connected to slide 39 by screws 41, hence motor driven eccentric 37 actuates retainer spring 10 via slide 39. Preferably, slide 39 is made of nylatron.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 2 of 2

Motor driven eccentric 37 may be microprocessor (not shown) controlled, wherein eccentric 37 is driven based on the information obtained by electrical test fixture 18 shown in FIG. 1. In other words, the results of tests performed by electrical test fixture 18 are processed by the microprocessor which then instructs eccentric 37 to actuate retainer spring 10 such that an appropriate slot 22-29 is uncovered. Thus packages 17 are delivered to either pass track 15 or reject track 16 as shown in FIG. 1.

In FIG. 1, package 17A is shown to have dropped into slot 22. Because of the length of package 17A, other packages 17 on track 14 are held out of slot 22. Leads of package 17A straddle edges of slot 22 and are electrically isolated from vertical wheel 12 by plastic inserts 32. In like manner, packages 17B 17C, and 17D which previously dropped from track 14 are held in slots 29, 28, and 27 respectively. Wheel 12 is rotated through 45° in a clockwise direction. A low inertia, high torque DC motor (not shown) used with a servo drive amplifier controls the speed and position of slotted wheel 12. As vertical wheel 12 rotates, its acceleration is sufficient to force packages 17A, 17B, 17C, and 17D outward against stop spring 11. This provides alignment of package 17B with electrical test fixture 18 which cooperates with slot 29 to test package 17B. After vertical wheel 12 has rotated through 45°, slot 23 is aligned with track 14 and another package 17 crops from track 14 into slot 23. Package 17B is now in contact with electrical test fixture 18; package 17A is in an intermediate position between electrical test fixture 18 and track 14; package 17C is in an intermediate position between electrical test fixture 18 and pass track 15; package 17D is aligned with pass track 15; and another package 17 has dropped into vertical wheel 12.

After the testing of package 17B is completed, vertical wheel 12 again rotates through 45° in the clockwise direction. Moreover the test results are processed by the microprocessor which ultimately controls the positioning of retainer spring 10. While vertical wheel 12 is rotating, some of the packages 17 are kept in their respective slots 22-29 by stop spring 11. The rotation of wheel 12 through 45° moves package 17B away from test fixture 18, moves package 17A into contact with test fixture 18 for test, moves the package 17 in slot 23 to an intermediate position and allows another untested package 17 to drop from track 14 into slot 24. While the testing of package 17A occurs, retainer spring 10 is positioned by motor driven eccentric 37 based on the test results for package 17B, and wheel 12 again rotates through 45°.

Moreover, a visual inspection of packages 17 may be performed by a visual inspection system (not shown) while packages 17 are on gravity feed track 14. Similar to electrical test fixture 18, the visual inspection system may send information to the microprocessor to control the positioning of retainer spring 10. Further, the visual inspection system may also control electrical test fixture 18. As an example, when packages 17 fails the visual inspection criteria, the information may be processed such that the electrical test is not performed on package 17 by electrical test fixture 18, since that package 17 is already defective.

If, after vertical wheel 12 rotates through 45°, retainer spring 10 is in the first position, thus not covering slot 29, package 17B may drop from slot 29 onto pass track, 15. If the retainer spring 10 is in a second position, thus covering slot 29, then package 17B is released onto reject track 16. The sequence continues in this manner with packages 17 being picked from gravity feed track 14, tested, and dropped on pass track 15 if the packages 17 pass the inspection and test criteria, or onto reject track 16, otherwise.

In this particular embodiment, integrated circuit packages 17 are classified into two categories by the test and inspection procedure. The actual number of categories is selected for the particular type of package 17 being tested. In other words, the number of slots 22-29 and the number of pass tracks 15 and reject tracks 16 may be different. In order to separate packages 17 into more than two categories, retainer spring 10 is modified to have a plurality of notches 34 (not shown) wherein the notches are positioned to permit packages 17 to exit the appropriate slot 22-29 onto the appropriate pass track 15 or reject track 16. It is the function of retainer spring 10 to release tested packages 17 at the appropriate pass track 15 or reject track 16 through which the part can be moved to a reservoir of similar tested and inspected parts.

It will be understood that the configuration shown in FIG. 1 represents a single position of vertical wheel 12. Wheel 12 rotates through a full three hundred and sixty degree range, hence each slot 22-29 will be positioned at each of the locations at which slots 24, 26, and 28 are shown in FIG. 1 at various times throughout the inspection or testing procedure. Thus each slot 22-29 will interact with electrical test fixture 18, and release packages onto either pass track 15 or reject track 16. Again, the number of slots 22-29, pass tracks 15, and reject tracks 16 are not limited to the number shown in FIG. 1.

By now it should be appreciated that there has been provided an improved method for sorting individual parts from a plurality of parts. In particular, the improvements are realized by a reduction in cycle time, cost, and space required by the sorting apparatus. In addition, this apparatus has the capability of sorting parts based on electrical or visual inspection criteria.

Claims

9 · 3 independent · depth 2
123456789
9 granted claims

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B07C5/344
USPC · US Patent Classification
209/552209/707198/368209/698209/919324/158.F209/573

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
1.8 y
651 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
Donald T. Hajec
art unit 311 · TC 3100
Citations: 12 back · 2 forward

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom19921994199619982000200220042006200820102012Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock