USPatentGranted
A

Pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound

Granted 29 Dec 1992 · no office action yet

Assignee: Nitta Industries Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Katsumi Higuchi, Mitsuo Takaya, Kiyotaka Inoue · Examiner: James J. Seidleck · AU 152 · TC 1500

Application
799863
filed 27 Nov 1991
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent· this page
US 5,175,214
granted 29 Dec 1992

Life of the patent

2 dated events
⤢ drag to zoomOct 1991Jan 1992Apr 1992Jul 1992Oct 1992Jan 1993Prosecution
Prosecutionhover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention relates to a pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound which exhibits high resistance (insulating performance) when it is in non-pressed condition and the resistance of which, as the compound is pressed, varies according to the magnitude of the pressure. The compound comprises a matrix material having insulating and elastomeric properties and baked and carbonized conductive spherical particles of a macromolecular material incorporated and dispersed into the matrix material. The conductivity of the conductive particles varies according to the degree of their carbonization.

Description

8 parts
›This is a continuation of application Ser. No…

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 519,320, filed May 4, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 220,389, filed Jul. 18, 1988, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 906,759, filed Sep. 11, 1986, now abandoned.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compounds and, more specifically, to a pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound of the type which exhibits high resistance (insulating performance) when it is in non-pressed condition, and of which the resistance, as the compound is pressed, will vary according to the magnitude of the pressure.

Hitherto, pressure-conductive materials have been known which are in the form of a conductive compound comprising a resilient material, such as rubber or the like, and a conductive filler mixed therewith. For such filler, metallic particles, such as nickel, conductive carbon black, graphite particles and the like are normally used. Such conductive compound, molded into a rod or sheet form, is widely used today as a switching element, or as a pressure-sensitive element for sensors such as pressure sensor and tactile sensor.

Conductive compounds of such conventional type have the following difficulties. Those incorporating metallic particles as a conductive filler are liable to change of properties with time due to oxidation of the particles; therefore, they lack stability and are often subject to chattering and noise generation. Those incorporating powdery masses of a conductive carbon black as a conductive filler provide only insignificant change in resistance when they are under pressure, because the particle diameter of the carbon black is extremely small, i.e., 20˜30 mμ; as such, they are of no practical use. If a granulated material formed of a conductive carbon black is used as such a filler, it is possible to provide greater variations in resistance, but a conductive compound incorporating such material is liable to particle breakage when it is under pressure; naturally, therefore, such compound lacks both durability and stability.

Where graphite particles are used as a conductive filler, no characteristic stability can be provided if they are of non-uniform shape as those of natural graphite. Therefore, it is known to use artificial graphite particles which have been rounded and freed of sharpness by pulverization, milling or otherwise to provide good characteristic stability.

Conductive compounds incorporating artificial graphite particles of such type are advantageous in that they are characteristically stable, durable, and less liable to noise generation, but on the other hand they have drawbacks in that preparation of graphite particles to the desired configuration requires a complicated and troublesome procedure and in that the attainable yield thereof is rather small.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention, made in view of aforesaid difficulties with the prior-art compounds, has as its primary object the provision of a pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound having highly stable conductive characteristics under pressure and which is easy to manufacture.

Another object of the invention is to provide a pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound whose conductive characteristics under pressure may be varied without changing the mechanical properties of the compound.

In order to accomplish the above and other objects, the compound according to the invention comprises a matrix material having insulating and elastomeric properties, and conductive particles of a macromolecular material having a spherical particle configuration and baked and carbonized, the conductive particles being incorporated and dispersed into the matrix material.

Materials available for use as aforesaid matrix material having insulating and elastomeric properties include natural rubber, synthetic rubbers, such as chloroprene rubber, SBR, NBR, and silicone rubber, thermoplastic elastomers, such as polyurethane, polyester, and EVA, and liquid rubbers, such as polyurethane and silicone. Particularly preferable among them is silicone rubber, a material having high heat resistance, excellent electrical properties, and good resistance to chemicals.

Macromolecular materials having a spherical particle configuration useful for the purpose of the invention include styrene, vinyl-chloride, vinylidene-chloride, methyl methacrylate, and furfuryl alcohol, all in spherical particle form prepared by suspension polymerization, and resol resins chemically pulverized in spherical particle form. The term "suspension polymerization" referred to herein means a process such that a polymerization catalyst is added to monomers, the mixture being stirred in water added with a dispersant to allow the monomers to disperse in oil-drop form, being then polymerized. The term "chemically pulverized" herein means that a resin dissolved in a solvent is cooled or added with a precipitant so that the resin is separated out in fine powder form.

The particle diameter of said conductive particles is 30˜120 μm, preferably 50˜100 μm, and the proportion of the particles to the compound as a whole is 20˜60% by volume. If the particle diameter is less than 30 μm, the possible variation in resistance of the compound is unreasonably small, while if it is greater than 120 μm, the particles cannot satisfactorily be dispersed in the matrix material. The proportion of the particles may be suitably determined according to the desired characteristics and sensitivity, and also to the type of the matrix material.

However, if it is less than 20% by volume, the compound may not exhibit any sufficient conductivity, and if it is more than 60% by volume, the variation in conductivity (resistance) when the compound is under pressure, from the conductivity level when the compound is not under pressure, is insignificant, the compound being thus of no practical use. Therefore, the proportion of the particles should be within the range of 20 vol. % to 60 vol. %.

According to the invention, spherical particles of a macromolecular material have conductivity given to them by being baked and wholy or partially carbonized. This facilitates the selection of particle size for the conductive particles. Therefore, it is possible to use particles having a uniform particle size, and thus to allow the compound to have highly stable pressure-sensitive conductive properties. Furthermore, the compound is easy to manufacture.

The degree of carbonization of the particles (thickness of the carbonized portion of each particle's spherical shell) can be varied by changing the degree of baking of the particles, and thus various conductivity grades of particles can be easily produced. Therefore, it is possible to provide varied pressure-sensitive conductive characteristics without changing the mechanical properties of the compound.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1a to 1c, inclusive, are sectional illustrations showing various degrees of carbonization of spherical particles of a macromolecular material. In FIG. 1a, only the surface area of a particle is carbonized. In FIG. 1b, nearly the entire portion of a particle is carbonized. In FIG. 1c, a particle is entirely carbonized.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing the pressing force-resistance relationships in Example 1.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the pressing force-resistance relationships in Examples 2 and 3, in which graph the character (a) represents such relationships in Example 2 and (b) represents those in Example 3.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The compound according to the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIGS. 1a through 1c are schematic views showing a few examples of spherical carbonized particles used for the purpose of the invention. Various conductivity grades of particles are shown as they are formed of non-conductive spherical particles of a macromolecular material. Experiments have revealed that the electric conductivity of the particles varies according to the heating and baking conditions. This is considered to be attributable to the following facts. If, as in FIG. 1a, only a region in the vicinity of the outer periphery of a particle 1 is carbonized thicknesswise (t) in a spherical shell pattern, the conductivity of the particle 1 is small because the carbonized portion 2, i.e., the portion having electric conductivity, is of a small volume. If carbonization progresses further to the extent that a larger part of the particle 1 is carbonized, as FIG. 1b shows, the conductivity of the particle 1 becomes considerably greater. Finally, if carbonization progresses still further until the particle is completely carbonized, the conductivity of the particle is maximized. Thus, even if particles 1 of same diameter are used, the carbonization degree of the particles varies according to the baking conditions applied. These facts are considered to be responsible for the variations in conductivity. Shown by 3 is a non-carbonized portion.

The degree of carbonization of particle 1 is adjustable by changes in baking conditions, such as heating temperature and time. Therefore, by baking and carbonizing preselected particles 1 having a specified diameter under preset baking conditions it is possible to easily obtain particles 1 having the required conductivity.

Particular examples are given hereinbelow to further illustrate the invention.

›Examples3
›EXAMPLE 1

Spherical fine particles of a polystyrene resin material cross-linked with divinylbenzene and having a particle diameter of about 70˜130 μm were heated to 300° C. in an air current, then heated and baked to 1000° C. in an inert gas. The particle diameter measurements of the carbonized particles thus obtained showed that more than 90 wt. % of the particles prior to baking were within the range of 53˜105 μm. One hundred parts by weight of the carbonized particles within this range were mixed with 100 parts by weight of a silicone rubber (TSE 270 - 4 U, produced by Toshiba Silicone Co.), the mixture being kneaded, and one form of the pressure-sensitive conductive elastomer compound according to the invention was thus produced.

The compound was molded by press-molding into a sheet form having a thickness of 0.5 mm. Pressure was applied to the sheet surface by a rod-like pressing electrode having a 5 mm diameter, and the relationships between the pressing force and the resistance were measured. The measurements, as shown in FIG. 2, revealed satisfactory resistance variation characteristics, with only a small degree of hysterisis.

In this example, the spherical fine particles of polystyrene resin were produced in the following way. Benzoyl peroxide or lauroyl peroxide was dissolved in a mixed monomer liquid of styrene and divinylbenzene, and the resulting liquid was vigorously agitated in water added with a dispersant such as completely-saponified polyvinylalcohol, non-completely-saponified polyvinylalcohol or the like, being then suspension-polymerized at 80° C. for 6˜8 hours.

›EXAMPLE 2

A phenolic resin having a spheric particle configuration and a particle diameter of 60˜100 μm was heated and baked at 800° C. in an inert gas. The particle diameters of the carbonized spherical particles in glass-like (amorphous) form thus obtained were such that more than 90 wt. % of the particles prior to baking were within the range of 44˜74 μm. One hundred parts by weight of the carbonized particles within this range were mixed with 100 parts by weight of same silicone rubber as in Example 1, the mixture being kneaded together, then molded by press molding into a sheet having a thickness of 0.5 mm.

Pressing force-resistance characteristics were measured in same way as in Example 1. The measurements, as shown in FIG. 3 graph (a), revealed that the sheet had good characteristics, with a small degree of hysterisis.

In this example, the spherical phenolic resin particles were produced in the following way: a resol resin was dissolved in acetone, and a precipitant was added to the mixture under stirring, so that spherical fine resin particles were separated out; the particles were then subjected to filtration and drying and subsequently heated and hardened.

In this conjunction, spherical phenolic resin particles were also produced in the following way: phenol was added into a large amount of an aqueous mixture solution of hydrochloric acid and formaldehyde under stirring, whereby a solid matter having a spherical configuration was produced; the solid matter was separated out, then neutralized in an alkaline solution, and subsequently washed in water and dried. Use of the phenolic resin particles thus obtained also witnessed satisfactory results as in aforesaid case.

›EXAMPLE 3

Spherical phenolic resin particles identical with those used in Example 2 were heated and baked at 600 ° C. The particle diameters of the glass-like spherical carbonized particles were such that more than 90 wt. % of the particles prior to baking were within the diameter range of 44˜74 μm. One hundred and twenty parts by weight of the carbonized particles within this range were mixed with 100 parts by weight of same silicone rubber as in Example 1, the mixture being kneaded together, and a 0.5 mm thick sheet was produced by press-molding.

Measurements were made in same way as in Example 1. The results are shown in FIG. 3 graph (b). In this instance, the variations in resistance shown are of a similar pattern to those in Example 2 except that the range of variations is different. This means that the conductivity of the spherical phenolic resin particles varies according to the baking temperature for the particles. Presumably, this may be due to the fact that the degree of carbonization varies according to the baking temperature and that as the baking temperature becomes higher, the carbonized portion will become greater. In other words, it is considered that the thickness t of the carbonized spherical shell portion in FIG. 1a becomes greater and thus the conductivity of the particle is increased.

1 of 8 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims

9 · 2 independent · depth 2
123456789
9 granted claims

Classifications

15 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C08L61/10
Section H — Electricity
  • H01B1/24
  • H01C10/10
USPC · US Patent Classification
525/104525/227525/106525/130525/129528/481525/183525/233252/511525/480252/500525/474

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

Pendency
1.1 y
398 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
on the grant's record
Examiner
James J. Seidleck
art unit 152 · TC 1500
Citations: 11 back · 19 forward

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock