LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
© LexDana · beta
LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
LexDanaLexDanabeta

Insights

Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.

AllCopyright & Trade Secrets59Federal Circuit877ITC / Section 33788Patent Litigation216Patent Prosecution126Pharma & ANDA62PTAB686Supreme Court61Trademark158USPTO Policy78Unsorted257

Tagged non-obviousness · clear

Federal Circuit

A Known Technique for Showing a Motivation to Combine References

Written by : Justin J. Gillett & Eric Wittgrove INTEL CORP. V. PACT XPP SCHWEIZ AG Before Newman, Prost , and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Under the “known-techniques” rationale, a motivation to combine two…

March 20, 2023·Federal Circuit·1 min read
Patent Prosecution

Simplicity is not a bar to patentability!

There is a cloud of complexity around the term ‘patents’. Patents, as is known, are granted over inventions. But a very common misunderstanding about patents is that they are granted for those inventions which are highly technical or complex in…

July 6, 2011·Patent Prosecution·2 min read
LexDana
AskSearchRankingsInsightsPricingProfileContactTermsPrivacy
The LexDana Docket
Monthly — what shipped, who moved, what we published.
© 2026 LexDana, Inc.·Powered by Patexia data