LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
© LexDana · beta
LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
LexDanaLexDanabeta

Insights

Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.

AllCopyright & Trade Secrets59Federal Circuit877ITC / Section 33788Patent Litigation216Patent Prosecution126Pharma & ANDA62PTAB686Supreme Court61Trademark158USPTO Policy78Unsorted257

Tagged network communications · clear

Federal Circuit

Arguments During Prosecution Can Limit the Scope of a Coined Term with No Ordinary and Customary Meaning

IRIDESCENT NETWORKS, INC. v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC Before Prost, Reyna and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Iridescent sued AT&T and Ericsson for infringement of a patent relating to network communication that…

August 12, 2019·Federal Circuit·1 min read
LexDana
AskSearchRankingsInsightsPricingProfileContactTermsPrivacy
The LexDana Docket
Monthly — what shipped, who moved, what we published.
© 2026 LexDana, Inc.·Powered by Patexia data