LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
© LexDana · beta
LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
LexDanaLexDanabeta

Insights

Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.

AllCopyright & Trade Secrets59Federal Circuit877ITC / Section 33788Patent Litigation216Patent Prosecution126Pharma & ANDA62PTAB686Supreme Court61Trademark158USPTO Policy78Unsorted257

Tagged inventive concept · clear

Patent Prosecution

Exergen Corp v Kaz Usa Inc a Crack in the Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Claims

In Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc., Appeal No. 2016-2315, 2016-2341 (Fed. Cir., March 8, 2018) (Non-precedential). A panel of Moore, Bryson and Hughes (Hughes dissenting), upheld a district court decision, following trial, that claims to a method of…

March 14, 2018·Patent Prosecution·3 min read
Patent Prosecution

Ex Parte Patterson Assay Based on Two Natural Phenomena Does Not Equal One Inventive Concept

According to the “Mayo/Alice” rule, if a claim is directed to a “natural phenomena” such as the relationship between the a drug’s metabolite concentration following administration of an immunosuppressive drug and the…

December 11, 2017·Patent Prosecution·3 min read
LexDana
AskSearchRankingsInsightsPricingProfileContactTermsPrivacy
The LexDana Docket
Monthly — what shipped, who moved, what we published.
© 2026 LexDana, Inc.·Powered by Patexia data