LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
© LexDana · beta
LexDanaLexDanabeta
New SessionSearchOfficial RankingsInsightsPricing
LexDanaLexDanabeta

Insights

Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.

AllCopyright & Trade Secrets59Federal Circuit877ITC / Section 33788Patent Litigation216Patent Prosecution126Pharma & ANDA62PTAB686Supreme Court61Trademark158USPTO Policy78Unsorted257

Tagged claim term · clear

Federal Circuit

Little Words That Can Make a Big Difference: i.e. Versus e.g.

The difference between "i.e." (id est, "that is") and "e.g." (exempli gratia, "for example") comes up in patent cases from time to time. While the difference is not always clear to some practitioners, it is clear to…

April 25, 2017·Federal Circuit·2 min read
PTAB

Construction of a Claim Term by the PTAB Does Not Negate Indefiniteness

The doctrine of definiteness requires a patent to clearly state what the inventor considers to be their invention. Of course, the PTAB interprets various claim terms when determining whether a prior art reference anticipates or renders obvious a particular…

January 18, 2017·PTAB·1 min read
LexDana
AskSearchRankingsInsightsPricingProfileContactTermsPrivacy
The LexDana Docket
Monthly — what shipped, who moved, what we published.
© 2026 LexDana, Inc.·Powered by Patexia data