Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged federal circuit · clear
Written by : Melis Tirhi & Brandon G. Smith CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC v. GOPRO, INC. Before Reyna , Prost, and Schall. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Claims are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C.…
Written by : S ophia Zahn & Douglas B. Wentzel OSSEO IMAGING, LLC v. PLANMECA USA INC. Before Dyk, Clevenger, and Stoll . Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : An expert witness can testify from the…
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery & Michael L. Fuller On August 13, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., No. 24-1061, [1] which limits the scope of obviousness-type double patenting for patents…
Written by : Harper L. Beasley and Daniel Kiang WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION v. APPLE INC Before Prost , Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Summary : Literal infringement and…
Written by : Brandon G. Smith & Juliana H. Kirby CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. ITC Before Reyna, Mayer, and Cunningham. Appeal from the International Trade Commission. Summary: Process patent claims are invalid under the on-sale bar (35 U.S.C.…
Written by : Daniel P. Hughes & Jordan A. DeOrio MOBILE ACUITY LTD. v. BLIPPAR LTD . Before Lourie, Bryson, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: Patent claims that merely recite…
Written by : Daniel P. Hughes & Savannah J. Torborg BUREAU NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU COGNAC v. COLOGNE & COGNAC ENTERTAINMENT Before Lourie, Clevenger and Hughes. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Fame and likelihood of…
Written by : Kelsey S. Weinman & Justin J. Gillett KOSS CORPORATION v. BOSE CORPORATION Before Hughes , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : Filing an amended complaint…
Written by : Kelsey S. Weinman & Justin J. Gillett KOSS CORPORATION v. BOSE CORPORATION Before Hughes , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : Filing an amended complaint…
Written by: Andrew R. Huntsinger & Jeremy Anapol MILLER MENDEL, INC. V. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS Before Moore, Stoll, and Cunningham . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Summary : No live controversy existed over…
Written by : Charles J. Sirek & Nathan D. Reeves ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS Before Dyk , Prost, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : Because the PTAB’s MTA Pilot Program’s core…
Written by : Jae Jin Lee & Daniel Kiang SOFTVIEW LLC v. APPLE INC. Before Bryson , Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). Summary : Estoppel…
