Analysis of patent litigation, PTAB practice, prosecution and pharma IP, written on the data behind LexDana.
Tagged federal circuit · clear
Written by : Brianne M. Kingery and Daniel P. Hughes LYNK LABS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Before Lourie, Prost , and Stark Summary: In an IPR, a patent application is considered a “printed publication” as of the application’s…
Written by : Raymond S. Lu and Douglas B. Wentzel NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION v. TORRENT PHARMA INC. Before Lourie , Prost, and Reyna. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary : A patent was not invalid for lack of…
Written by : Nefi R. Oliva and Justin J. Gillett BearBox, LLC, Austin Storms, v. Lancium LLC, Michael T. McNamara, Raymond E. Cline, Jr. Before Chen, Bryson, and Stoll . Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary :…
Written by : Ariadad Fattahyani and Nathan D. Reeves MIRROR WORLDS TECHS., LLC v. META PLATFORMS, INC. Before Prost, Taranto , and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Summary : Expert testimony that is…
Written by : Sashank Krothapally and Nathan D. Reeves CYTIVA BIOPROCESS R&D AB V. JSR CORP. Before Prost , Taranto, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary : A claim limitation merely reciting an inherent property or result of an…
CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. BELVAC PRODUCTION MACHINERY, INC. Before Dyk , Hughes, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Summary : An offer for sale described as a…
Written by : Ashley C. Morales and Brandon G. Smith PS PRODUCTS INC. V. PANTHER TRADING CO. INC. Before Moore , Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Eastern District of Arkansas. Summary : Section 285 does not prohibit an award of deterrence sanctions…
Written by : Brian C. Barnes and Brandon G. Smith DDR HOLDINGS, LLC V. PRICELINE.COM LLC, BOOKING.COM B.V. Before Chen , Mayer, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Delaware. Summary : Deleting a…
Written by : Brandon G. Smith & Zachary B. Grinovich TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC. Before Lourie, Prost, and Reyna. Appeal from the Eastern District of North Carolina. Summary: The threshold requirement for anti-suit…
Written by : Douglas B. Wentzel & H enry P. FitzGerald UTTO INC. v. METROTECH CORP. Before Prost, Taranto , and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: The district court erred in construing…
Written by : Nickolas Taylor & Daniel Kiang ALEXSAM, INC. v. ATENA, INC. Before Stark , Lourie, and Bryson. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Summary : A narrowly defined patent license may result in some…
Written by : Nathan D. Reeves & Ryan B. Freedman CROCS, INC. v. EFFERVESCENT, INC. Before Reyna, Cunningham and Albright. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Summary: A claim that an unpatented product feature is…
